A phase II trial of an alternative schedule of palbociclib and embedded serum TK1 analysis

Jairam Krishnamurthy, Jingqin Luo, Rama Suresh, Foluso Ademuyiwa, Caron Rigden, Timothy Rearden, Katherine Clifton, Katherine Weilbaecher, Ashley Frith, Anna Roshal, Pavan K Tandra, Mathew Cherian, Tracy Summa, Brittney Haas, Shana Thomas, Leonel Hernandez-Aya, Mattias Bergqvist, Lindsey Peterson, Cynthia X Ma, Jairam Krishnamurthy, Jingqin Luo, Rama Suresh, Foluso Ademuyiwa, Caron Rigden, Timothy Rearden, Katherine Clifton, Katherine Weilbaecher, Ashley Frith, Anna Roshal, Pavan K Tandra, Mathew Cherian, Tracy Summa, Brittney Haas, Shana Thomas, Leonel Hernandez-Aya, Mattias Bergqvist, Lindsey Peterson, Cynthia X Ma

Abstract

Palbociclib 3-weeks-on/1-week-off, combined with hormonal therapy, is approved for hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Neutropenia is the most frequent adverse event (AE). We aim to determine whether an alternative 5-days-on/2-days-off weekly schedule reduces grade 3 and above neutropenia (G3 + ANC) incidence. In this single-arm phase II trial, patients with HR+/HER2- MBC received palbociclib 125 mg, 5-days-on/2-days-off, plus letrozole or fulvestrant per physician, on a 28-day cycle (C), as their first- or second-line treatment. The primary endpoint was G3 + ANC in the first 29 days (C1). Secondary endpoints included AEs, efficacy, and serum thymidine kinase 1 (sTK1) activity. At data-cutoff, fifty-four patients received a median of 13 cycles (range 2.6-43.5). The rate of G3 + ANC was 21.3% (95% CI: 11.2-36.1%) without G4 in C1, and 40.7% (95% CI: 27.9-54.9%), including 38.9% G3 and 1.8% G4, in all cycles. The clinical benefit rate was 80.4% (95% CI: 66.5-89.7%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) (95% CI) was 19.75 (12.11-34.89), 33.5 (17.25-not reached [NR]), and 11.96 (10.43-NR) months, in the overall, endocrine sensitive or resistant population, respectively. High sTK1 at baseline, C1 day 15 (C1D15), and C2D1 were independently prognostic for shorter PFS (p = 9.91 × 10-4, 0.001, 0.007, respectively). sTK1 decreased on C1D15 (p = 4.03 × 10-7), indicating target inhibition. Rise in sTK1 predicted progression, with the median lead time of 59.5 (inter-quartile range: -206.25-0) days. Palbociclib, 5-days-on/2-days-off weekly, met its primary endpoint with reduced G3 + ANC, without compromising efficacy. sTK1 is prognostic and shows promise in monitoring the palbociclib response. ClinicalTrials.gov#: NCT3007979.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03007979.

Conflict of interest statement

J.K. holds consulting or advisory roles from Abbvie, Pfizer, Sanofi, Rigel, Guidepoint Global, Gerson Lehrman Group, and AstraZeneca. A.F. reports stock and ownership interests in Athenex and research funding from Menarini, Seagen, and Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly. M.B. is employed by Biovica Inc and has stock and ownership interests in Biovica Inc. C.M. holds consultant or advisory roles from Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Agendia, AstraZeneca, Athenex, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Biovica Inc, Eisai, Olaris Inc, Philips Electronics North America, Puma Biotechnology and Sanofi-Genzyme, in addition to, research funding from Pfizer and Puma Biotechnology. All authors not listed declare no potential conflicts of interest.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Progression-free survival (PFS) of all…
Fig. 1. Progression-free survival (PFS) of all treated patients.
a the overall population, and b by endocrine sensitivity.
Fig. 2. Serum TK1 activity over time.
Fig. 2. Serum TK1 activity over time.
a Box plot of log (sTK1 Du/L) along the 5-time points indicated. b Time to progression by TK1 increase from the previous time point (sTK1 PD) or by RECIST/investigator decision (Clinical PD). c The lead time from TK1 progression to clinical/RECIST progression. BL baseline, C1D15 cycle 1 day 15, C2D1 cycle 2 day 1, Progression PFS events that included RECIST progression (n = 17) and investigator decision (n = 7). The center horizontal line of the box plot indicates the median, while the box limits indicate the upper and lower quartiles. The box-plot whiskers show a 1.5× interquartile range. Those points outside the whisker line are indicated as outliers. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Fig. 3. PFS by sTK1 and time…
Fig. 3. PFS by sTK1 and time points of baseline (BL), C1D15, C2D1, C4D1.
sTK1 cutoff for high versus low is 200 at BL (a) and 20 at time points C1D15 (b) and C2D1 (c). Shown in legends are even/n (number of events/total samples), median PFS, 95% CI by group, log rank test P, and HR (hazard ratio: high sTK1 vs. low sTK1) with 95% CI. The number of patients at risk is indicated at the bottom of each plot.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020;70:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590.
    1. Howlader N, et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju055. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju055.
    1. Spring LM, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: past, present, and future. Lancet. 2020;395:817–827. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30165-3.
    1. Finn RS, et al. PD 0332991, a selective cyclin D kinase 4/6 inhibitor, preferentially inhibits proliferation of luminal estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cell lines in vitro. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11:R77. doi: 10.1186/bcr2419.
    1. Rugo HS, et al. Palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer with extended follow-up. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019;174:719–729. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-05125-4.
    1. Hortobagyi GN, et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1738–1748. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609709.
    1. Hortobagyi GN, et al. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:1541–1547. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy155.
    1. Goetz MP, et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35:3638–3646. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155.
    1. Finn RS, et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1925–1936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607303.
    1. Finn RS, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25–35. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71159-3.
    1. Tripathy D, et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:904–915. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30292-4.
    1. Slamon DJ, et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36:2465–2472. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909.
    1. Turner NC, et al. Palbociclib in hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:209–219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505270.
    1. Sledge GW, Jr, et al. MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35:2875–2884. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585.
    1. Sledge GWJr, et al. The effect of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy-MONARCH 2: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;6:116–124. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4782.
    1. Slamon DJ, et al. Overall survival with Ribociclib plus Fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:514–524. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911149.
    1. Im S-A, et al. Overall survival with Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:307–316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903765.
    1. Dieras V, et al. Long-term pooled safety analysis of Palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2019;111:419–430. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy109.
    1. Xu, B. et al. Biomarker analysis from a phase 1 study of palbociclib (PAL) plus letrozole (L) as first-line treatment for ER + /HER2‒ advanced breast cancer (ABC) in Chinese women, AACR Annual Meeting 2018 abstract CT048. (Chicago, 2018).
    1. Bagegni N, et al. Serum thymidine kinase 1 activity as a pharmacodynamic marker of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant palbociclib. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:123. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0913-7.
    1. Cardoso F, et al. 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5) Ann. Oncol. 2020;31:1623–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010.
    1. Infante JR, et al. A phase I study of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib (LEE011) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:5696–5705. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1248.
    1. Flaherty KT, et al. Phase I, dose-escalation trial of the oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor PD 0332991, administered using a 21-day schedule in patients with advanced cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:568–576. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0509.
    1. Malorni, L. et al. Serum thymidine kinase activity in patients with luminal metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib and fulvestrant within the PYTHIA trial. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (December 8-12, 2020, San Antonio TX), poster presentation, abst. PS5-05 (2020).
    1. Turner NC, et al. Overall survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:1926–1936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810527.
    1. McCartney A, et al. Prognostic role of serum thymidine kinase 1 activity in patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: analysis of the randomised phase III Evaluation of Faslodex versus Exemestane Clinical Trial (EFECT) Eur. J. Cancer. 2019;114:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.002.
    1. Bonechi M, et al. Plasma thymidine kinase-1 activity predicts outcome in patients with hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. Oncotarget. 2018;9:16389–16399. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24700.
    1. Larsson A-M, et al. Serial evaluation of serum thymidine kinase activity is prognostic in women with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:4484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61416-1.
    1. Paoletti, C. et al. Evaluating serum thymidine kinase 1 in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer patients receiving first line endocrine therapy in the SWOG S0226 trial. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (December 8-12, 2020, San Antonio TX), poster presentation, abst. PS2-04 (2020).
    1. McCartney A, et al. Plasma thymidine kinase activity as a biomarker in patients with luminal metastatic breast cancer treated with Palbociclib within the TREnd trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;26:2131–2139. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3271.
    1. Cabel L, et al. Plasma thymidine kinase 1 activity and outcome of ER+ HER2− metastatic breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22:98. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01334-2.
    1. Bjöhle J, et al. Serum thymidine kinase activity compared with CA 15-3 in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer within a randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013;139:751–758. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2579-x.
    1. Flaherty KT, et al. Phase I, dose-escalation trial of the oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 Inhibitor PD 0332991, administered using a 21-day schedule in patients with advanced cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:568–576. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0509.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever