Repurposing bromocriptine for Aβ metabolism in Alzheimer's disease (REBRAnD) study: randomised placebo-controlled double-blind comparative trial and open-label extension trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of bromocriptine in Alzheimer's disease with presenilin 1 (PSEN1) mutations

Takayuki Kondo, Haruhiko Banno, Taro Okunomiya, Yoko Amino, Kayoko Endo, Akiyoshi Nakakura, Ryuji Uozumi, Akemi Kinoshita, Harue Tada, Satoshi Morita, Hidehiro Ishikawa, Akihiro Shindo, Ken Yasuda, Yosuke Taruno, Takakuni Maki, Takashi Suehiro, Kohji Mori, Manabu Ikeda, Koji Fujita, Yuishin Izumi, Kazutomi Kanemaru, Kenji Ishii, Kazue Shigenobu, Yumiko Kutoku, Yoshihide Sunada, Shinobu Kawakatsu, Shunji Shiota, Toshifumi Watanabe, Osamu Uchikawa, Ryosuke Takahashi, Hidekazu Tomimoto, Haruhisa Inoue, Takayuki Kondo, Haruhiko Banno, Taro Okunomiya, Yoko Amino, Kayoko Endo, Akiyoshi Nakakura, Ryuji Uozumi, Akemi Kinoshita, Harue Tada, Satoshi Morita, Hidehiro Ishikawa, Akihiro Shindo, Ken Yasuda, Yosuke Taruno, Takakuni Maki, Takashi Suehiro, Kohji Mori, Manabu Ikeda, Koji Fujita, Yuishin Izumi, Kazutomi Kanemaru, Kenji Ishii, Kazue Shigenobu, Yumiko Kutoku, Yoshihide Sunada, Shinobu Kawakatsu, Shunji Shiota, Toshifumi Watanabe, Osamu Uchikawa, Ryosuke Takahashi, Hidekazu Tomimoto, Haruhisa Inoue

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common causes of dementia. Pathogenic variants in the presenilin 1 (PSEN1) gene are the most frequent cause of early-onset AD. Medications for patients with AD bearing PSEN1 mutation (PSEN1-AD) are limited to symptomatic therapies and no established radical treatments are available. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based drug repurposing identified bromocriptine as a therapeutic candidate for PSEN1-AD. In this study, we used an enrichment strategy with iPSCs to select the study population, and we will investigate the safety and efficacy of an orally administered dose of bromocriptine in patients with PSEN1-AD.

Methods and analysis: This is a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. AD patients with PSEN1 mutations and a Mini Mental State Examination-Japanese score of ≤25 will be randomly assigned, at a 2:1 ratio, to the trial drug or placebo group (≥4 patients in TW-012R and ≥2 patients in placebo). This clinical trial consists of a screening period, double-blind phase (9 months) and extension phase (3 months). The double-blind phase for evaluating the efficacy and safety is composed of the low-dose maintenance period (10 mg/day), high-dose maintenance period (22.5 mg/day) and tapering period of the trial drug. Additionally, there is an open-labelled active drug extension period for evaluating long-term safety. Primary outcomes are safety and efficacy in cognitive and psychological function. Also, exploratory investigations for the efficacy of bromocriptine by neurological scores and biomarkers will be conducted.

Ethics and dissemination: The proposed trial is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (K070). The study results are expected to be disseminated at international or national conferences and published in international journals following the peer-review process.

Trial registration number: jRCT2041200008, NCT04413344.

Keywords: clinical trials; dementia; neurobiology; neurogenetics; neurology.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: TK has a patent, agent for preventing and/or treating Alzheimer’s disease, licensed to HIn and TK; HB reports funding for this clinical trial from Time Therapeutics, trial drugs from Towa Pharmaceutical Co., during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., outside the submitted work; RU reports personal fees from Eisai, Sawai Pharmaceutical Co. and CAC Croit, outside the submitted work; SM reports personal fees from AstraZeneca KK, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Eli Lilly Japan KK, MSD KK, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Pfizer Japan and Taiho Pharmaceutical Co.; YT reports personal fees from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., AbbVie GK, Kyowa Kirin Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Tsumura & Co., Eisai Co., Sanofi KK, Mylan EPD GK and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., outside the submitted work; TM reports personal fees from Bayer Yakuhin and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., outside the submitted work; MI reports grants and personal fees from Eisai Co., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., MSD KK, Daiichi Sankyo Co. and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, Nihon Medi-Physics Co., Fujifilm, Novartis Japan, Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Nippon Chemiphar Co., Eli Lily Japan KK and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., outside the submitted work; KF reports grants from Novartis, outside the submitted work; YI reports grants from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Eisai Co., Japan Blood Products Organisation, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Kyowa Kirin Co., Teijin Pharma, Nihon Pharmaceutical Co. and FP Pharmaceutical Corporation, outside the submitted work; KI reports grants, personal fees and other from GE Healthcare, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Nihon Medi-Physics Co., and Eli Lilly Japan KK, personal fees and other from Eisai Co. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., other from Biogen, personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work; YK reports personal fees from Tsumura & Co., Novartis Japan, UCB Japan Co. and Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, outside the submitted work; YS reports grants from Nippon Shinyaku Co. and The Nakatomi Foundation, personal fees from FP Pharmaceutical Corporation, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., and Novartis Japan, outside the submitted work; SK reports grants and personal fees from Eisai Co., personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, Novartis Japan, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Fujifilm Toyama Chemical Co., Nippon Chemiphar, Nihon Medi-Physics Co., Tsumura & Co. and Eli Lily Japan KK, outside the submitted work; SS is an employee of Time Therapeutics; TW is an employee of Time Therapeutics, during the conduct of the study; TW reports personal fees from KanonCure, Tsubota Laboratory, Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A., and Novaliq GmbH, outside the submitted work; OU is an employee of Towa Pharmaceutical Co.; RT reports grants and personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Eisai Co., Kyowa Kirin Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. and Sanofi KK, grants from Astellas Pharma, Novartis Japan, and Nihon Medi-Physics Co., personal fees from AbbVie GK, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Mylan NV, Japan Blood Products Organization, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., FP Pharmaceutical Corporation, Tsumura & Co., KAN Research Institute, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., and Biogen, outside the submitted work; HTo reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co., outside the submitted work; HIn reports grants and personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Eisai Co., Suntory Wellness, Institute for Health Care Science, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, grants from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Toray Industries, KAN Research Institute, Shimadzu Corporation, MicroBiopharm Japan Co., Kaneka Corporation, Panasonic Corporation, Biogen and Stem Cell & Device Laboratory (SCAD), personal fees from Nomura Securities Co., FP Pharmaceutical Corporation, Nippon Chemiphar Co., Kansai Pharmaceutical Industries Association, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Kyowa Kirin Co., outside the submitted work. HIn possesses unlisted stocks of Time Therapeutics. In addition, Kyoto University grants an exclusive license to Time Therapeutics through iPS Academia Japan regarding the invention of the trial drug (intellectual property) which was discovered through drug screening by the principal investigator (HIn). Thereby, Kyoto University and the principal investigator obtain a patent income from Time Therapeutics. HIn does not engage in data management, monitoring and statistical analyses. The coordinating investigators (HTo and HB) and Time Therapeutics will conduct the trial under the investigator-initiated clinical trial agreement. Prior to the trial, the principal investigator and the coordinating investigators underwent a review and received approval by the Conflict of Interest Review Committee based on the conflict of interest management policy at each site. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of REBRAnD study. The study consists of the screening period (8 weeks), double-blind phase (37 weeks) and extension phase (13 weeks). The double-blind phase for evaluating the efficacy and safety is composed of the low-dose maintenance period (up to 10 mg/day), high-dose maintenance period (up to 22.5 mg/day) and tapering period of the trial drug. Additionally, there is an open-labelled active drug extension period (up to 10 or 22.5 mg/day) for evaluating long-term safety.

References

    1. Alzheimer’s Disease International . World Alzheimer report 2019: attitudes to dementia. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International, 2019.
    1. Cummings J, Lee G, Ritter A, et al. . Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2020. Alzheimers Dement 2020;65:e12050.
    1. Ryan NS, Nicholas JM, Weston PSJ, et al. . Clinical phenotype and genetic associations in autosomal dominant familial Alzheimer’s disease: a case series. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1326–35. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30193-4
    1. Larner AJ, Doran M. Clinical phenotypic heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease associated with mutations of the presenilin-1 gene. J Neurol 2006;253:139–58. 10.1007/s00415-005-0019-5
    1. Duff K, Eckman C, Zehr C, et al. . Increased amyloid-beta42(43) in brains of mice expressing mutant presenilin 1. Nature 1996;383:710–3. 10.1038/383710a0
    1. Borchelt DR, Thinakaran G, Eckman CB, et al. . Familial Alzheimer's disease-linked presenilin 1 variants elevate Abeta1-42/1-40 ratio in vitro and in vivo. Neuron 1996;17:1005–13. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80230-5
    1. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 2002;297:353–6. 10.1126/science.1072994
    1. Bentahir M, Nyabi O, Verhamme J, et al. . Presenilin clinical mutations can affect gamma-secretase activity by different mechanisms. J Neurochem 2006;96:732–42. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03578.x
    1. De Strooper B, Iwatsubo T, Wolfe MS. Presenilins and γ-secretase: structure, function, and role in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012;2:a006304. 10.1101/cshperspect.a006304
    1. Kondo T, Imamura K, Funayama M, et al. . iPSC-Based Compound Screening and In Vitro Trials Identify a Synergistic Anti-amyloid β Combination for Alzheimer's Disease. Cell Rep 2017;21:2304–12. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.109
    1. WIPO|PCT . WIPO PCT/JP2016/089217, 2020. Available:
    1. United States Patent Application Publication, INOUE . US20190008860A1, 2020. Available:
    1. Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd . Interview form bromocriptine tablets 2.5 mg “Towa”, 20. Available:
    1. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. . The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2011;7:263–9. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013: 611–4.
    1. Tokuchi R, Hishikawa N, Kurata T, et al. . Clinical and demographic predictors of mild cognitive impairment for converting to Alzheimer's disease and reverting to normal cognition. J Neurol Sci 2014;346:288–92. 10.1016/j.jns.2014.09.012
    1. JFAD . Japanese Familial Alzheimer’s Disease (JFAD) database, 2020. Available:
    1. FY 2013 subsidy for geriatric health promotion, project for geriatric health enhancement: report of research project on the support system for individuals with familial alzheimer’s disease and their families. 2013.
    1. Shea Y-F, Chu L-W, Chan AO-K, et al. . A systematic review of familial Alzheimer's disease: differences in presentation of clinical features among three mutated genes and potential ethnic differences. J Formos Med Assoc 2016;115:67–75. 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.08.004
    1. Tang M, Ryman DC, McDade E, et al. . Neurological manifestations of autosomal dominant familial Alzheimer's disease: a comparison of the published literature with the dominantly inherited Alzheimer network observational study (DIAN-OBS). Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1317–25. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30229-0
    1. Sun Pharma Japan Ltd . Interview form Parlodel tablets 2.5 Mg, 2021. Available:
    1. Saxton J, McGonigle-Gibson KL, Swihart AA, et al. . Assessment of the severely impaired patient: description and validation of a new neuropsychological test battery. Psychol Assess 1990;2:298–303. 10.1037/1040-3590.2.3.298
    1. Saxton J, McGonigle K, Swihart A. Severe impairment battery (SIB). London, UK: Pearson Assessment, 1993.
    1. Niina R, Homma A, Sugai Y. Reliability, validity and clinical availability of a Japanese version of Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) and a Japanese version of modified Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL). Jpn J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005;16:683–91.
    1. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, et al. . The neuropsychiatric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 1994;44:2308–14. 10.1212/WNL.44.12.2308
    1. Cummings JL. The neuropsychiatric inventory: assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology 1997;48:10S–16. 10.1212/WNL.48.5_Suppl_6.10S
    1. Hirono N, Mori E, Ikejiri Y, et al. . [Japanese version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory--a scoring system for neuropsychiatric disturbance in dementia patients]. No To Shinkei 1997;49:266–71.
    1. Homma A, Niina R, Ishii T. Development of a new rating scale for dementia in the elderly: mental function impairment scale (MENFIS) (in Japanese). Jpn J Geriatr Psychiatry 1991;2:1217–22.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
    1. Sugishita M, Hemmi I, Takeuchi T. Reexamination of the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Mini-Mental state examination (MMSE-J). Japanese Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2016;18:168–83.
    1. Sugishita M, Koshizuka Y, Sudou S. The validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Mini- Mental State Examination(MMSE-J) with the original procedure of the attention and calculation task(2001). Japanese Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2018;20:91–110.
    1. Galasko D, Bennett D, Sano M. An inventory to assess activities of daily living for clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease. The Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2002;11:S33–9.
    1. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, et al. . Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov. Disord. 2008;23:2129–70. 10.1002/mds.22340
    1. Marin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S. Reliability and validity of the apathy evaluation scale. Psychiatry Res 1991;38:143–62. 10.1016/0165-1781(91)90040-V
    1. Kasai M, Meguro K, Nakamura K. [Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale]. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi 2014;51:445–52. 10.3143/geriatrics.51.445
    1. Palmqvist S, Janelidze S, Stomrud E, et al. . Performance of fully automated plasma assays as screening tests for Alzheimer disease-related β-amyloid status. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:1060–9. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1632
    1. Schultz SA, Strain JF, Adedokun A, et al. . Serum neurofilament light chain levels are associated with white matter integrity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis 2020;142:104960. 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104960
    1. Mielke MM, Hagen CE, Wennberg AMV, et al. . Association of plasma total tau level with cognitive decline and risk of mild cognitive impairment or dementia in the Mayo clinic study on aging. JAMA Neurol 2017;74:1073–80. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.1359
    1. Karikari TK, Pascoal TA, Ashton NJ, et al. . Blood phosphorylated tau 181 as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease: a diagnostic performance and prediction modelling study using data from four prospective cohorts. Lancet Neurol 2020;19:422–33. 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30071-5
    1. Tatebe H, Kasai T, Ohmichi T, et al. . Quantification of plasma phosphorylated tau to use as a biomarker for brain Alzheimer pathology: pilot case-control studies including patients with Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome. Mol Neurodegener 2017;12:63. 10.1186/s13024-017-0206-8
    1. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TLS, et al. . Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:795–804. 10.1056/NEJMoa1202753
    1. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. . Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:614–29. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0
    1. Kimura N, Aso Y, Yabuuchi K, et al. . Association between objectively measured walking steps and sleep in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0243910. 10.1371/journal.pone.0243910
    1. Kandori A, Yokoe M, Sakoda S, et al. . Quantitative magnetic detection of finger movements in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Res 2004;49:253–60. 10.1016/j.neures.2004.03.004
    1. Suzumura S, Osawa A, Nagahama T, et al. . Assessment of finger motor skills in individuals with mild cognitive impairment and patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Relationship between finger-to-thumb tapping and cognitive function. Japanese J Compr Rehabil Sci 2016;7:19–28.
    1. Scheinin NM, Tolvanen TK, Wilson IA, et al. . Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the amyloid imaging agent 11C-PiB in humans. J Nucl Med 2007;48:128–33.
    1. Koole M, Lohith TG, Valentine JL, et al. . Preclinical safety evaluation and human dosimetry of [18F]MK-6240, a Novel PET tracer for imaging neurofibrillary tangles. Mol Imaging Biol 2020;22:173–80. 10.1007/s11307-019-01367-w
    1. Brettschneider J, Toledo JB, Van Deerlin VM, et al. . Microglial activation correlates with disease progression and upper motor neuron clinical symptoms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One 2012;7:e39216. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039216
    1. Nakamura A, Kaneko N, Villemagne VL, et al. . High performance plasma amyloid-β biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Nature 2018;554:249–54. 10.1038/nature25456
    1. Watanabe M, Nakamura Y, Yoshiyama Y, et al. . Analyses of natural courses of Japanese patients with Alzheimer's disease using placebo data from placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials: Japanese study on the estimation of clinical course of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2019;5:398–408. 10.1016/j.trci.2019.07.004
    1. Noguchi-Shinohara M, Ono K, Hamaguchi T, et al. . Safety and efficacy of Melissa officinalis extract containing rosmarinic acid in the prevention of Alzheimer's disease progression. Sci Rep 2020;10:18627. 10.1038/s41598-020-73729-2
    1. Satir TM, Agholme L, Karlsson A, et al. . Partial reduction of amyloid β production by β-secretase inhibitors does not decrease synaptic transmission. Alzheimers Res Ther 2020;12:63. 10.1186/s13195-020-00635-0
    1. Weinberg MS, Patrick RE, Schwab NA, et al. . Clinical trials and tribulations in the COVID-19 era. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020;28:913–20. 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.05.016

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever