Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of RIPK1 Inhibitor GSK2982772 in Healthy Western and Japanese Subjects

Debra J Tompson, Carwyn Davies, Nicola E Scott, Edward P Cannons, Michalis Kostapanos, Annette S Gross, Marcy Powell, Hiroko Ino, Ryutaro Shimamura, Hirofumi Ogura, Takashi Nagakubo, Harue Igarashi, Atsushi Nakano, Debra J Tompson, Carwyn Davies, Nicola E Scott, Edward P Cannons, Michalis Kostapanos, Annette S Gross, Marcy Powell, Hiroko Ino, Ryutaro Shimamura, Hirofumi Ogura, Takashi Nagakubo, Harue Igarashi, Atsushi Nakano

Abstract

Background and objectives: GSK2982772 is an oral small-molecule RIPK1 inhibitor with potential therapeutic efficacy in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). An inter-ethnic comparison of GSK2982772 pharmacokinetics was conducted based on data from Western (Study 1) and Japanese subjects (Study 2).

Methods: Both studies were single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with objectives to assess the safety and characterise the pharmacokinetics of GSK2982772. Western subjects in Study 1 (NCT03305419), Part A (N = 15), were randomly assigned to receive 120 mg three times daily (TID), 240 mg TID, or 360 mg twice daily (BID) doses of GSK2982772, or placebo (TID or BID) for 1 day. Part B subjects (N = 47) received GSK2982772 120 mg TID, 240 mg TID, or placebo TID for 14 days. Japanese subjects in Study 2 (N = 13) (NCT03590613) were randomly assigned to receive TID doses of GSK2982772 60, 120, 240 mg TID or placebo TID for 1 day.

Results: GSK2982772 was well tolerated and adverse events were generally mild. Maximum observed plasma drug concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), area under the plasma drug concentration versus time curve after the first GSK2982772 dose (AUC(0-7)) of 120 and 240 mg, and (AUC(0-24)) values for the 120 and 240 mg TID doses over a single day were similar in Japanese and Western subjects.

Conclusions: The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of GSK2982772 were similar between Western and Japanese subjects, justifying inclusion of Japanese subjects in future global clinical studies to assess the therapeutic potential of RIPK1 inhibition for the treatment of IMIDs. Clinical Trials: NCT03305419 and NCT03590613 available from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov .

Conflict of interest statement

Debra J. Tompson, Carwyn Davies, Nicola E. Scott, Edward P. Cannons, Annette S. Gross, Marcy Powell, Ryutaro Shimamura, Takashi Nagakubo, Atsushi Nakano are employees of and hold equity stock in GlaxoSmithKline. Hirofumi Ogura and Harue Igarashi are employees of GSK. Michalis Kostapanos is an NHS consultant working with a 50% secondment in GSK’s Clinical Unit Cambridge and has no other relevant conflicts of interests for this study. Hiroko Ino is a former employee of GSK.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Design of the Western (Study 1) and Japanese (Study 2) studies. A fifth cohort (360 mg BID) was planned in Study 1 but was not conducted because one subject in cohort 1 exceeded the Cmax stopping criteria at the 360 mg BID dose level. aA 7-day washout period was required between each single-day dosing period in Study 1, Part A, and Study 2. bEach cohort in Part B included different subjects. BID twice daily, Cmax maximum blood/plasma concentration, TID three times daily
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of subjects. a Western subjects, b Japanese subjects. Once an allocation number was assigned to a subject, it was not reassigned to any other subject. When a subject prematurely discontinued the study, replacement subjects were recruited and assigned to the same sequence as the replaced subject
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Plasma GSK2982772 concentration-time profiles (arithmetic mean ± SD) for 120 mg TID and 240 mg TID in Western subjects. SD standard deviation, TID three times daily
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Plasma GSK2982772 concentration-time profiles (arithmetic mean ± SD) in healthy Western and Japanese subjects. a 120 mg TID. b 240 mg TID. SD standard deviation, TID three times daily
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of GSK2982772 Cmax, AUC(0–7), and AUC(0–24) in healthy Western and Japanese subjects. aCmax after first dose of GSK2982772. b AUC(0–7) after first dose of GSK2982772. c AUC(0–24). Boxes represent the 25th–75th percentiles with median shown and whiskers represent the 10th–90th percentiles with individual data points superimposed. AUC(07) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 7 h, AUC(024) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h, BID twice daily, Cmax maximum plasma concentration, TID three times daily

References

    1. Weisel K, Scott NE, Tompson DJ, Votta BJ, Madhavan S, Povey K, et al. Randomized clinical study of safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of RIPK1 inhibitor GSK2982772 in healthy volunteers. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2017 doi: 10.1002/prp2.365.
    1. Zhou W, Yuan J. Necroptosis in health and diseases. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;35:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.07.013.
    1. Kopalli SR, Kang T-B, Koppula S. Necroptosis inhibitors as therapeutic targets in inflammation mediated disorders—a review of the current literature and patents. Expert Opin Ther Patents. 2016;26(11):1239–56.
    1. Weisel K, Berger S, Papp K, Maari C, Krueger J, et al. Response to inhibition of receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) in active psoriasis: a randomized placebo-controlled study. J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 doi: 10.1002/cpt.1852.
    1. Mao J, Martin I, McLeod J, Nolan G, van Horn R, et al. Perspective: 4beta-hydroxycholesterol as an emerging endogenous biomarker of hepatic CYP3A. Drug Metab Rev. 2017;49(1):18–34. doi: 10.1080/03602532.2016.1239630.
    1. Assessing the effects of food on drugs in INDs and NDAs—clinical pharmacology considerations: guidance for industry. In: US Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed 3 Apr 2019.
    1. Bioanalytical method validation—guidance for industry. In: US Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed 18 Aug 2020.
    1. Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. In: European Medicines Agency. Accessed 18 Aug 2020.
    1. Queckenberg C, Fuhr U. Influence of posture on pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65(2):109–119. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0579-2.
    1. Maeda H, Hazama S, Shavkat A, Okamoto K, Oba K, Sakamoto J, et al. Differences in UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 polymorphisms between Uzbek and Japanese populations. Mol Diagn Ther. 2014;18(3):333–342. doi: 10.1007/s40291-014-0083-6.
    1. Xie XC, Li J, Wang HY, Li HL, Liu J, Fu Q, et al. Associations of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases polymorphisms with mycophenolate mofetil pharmacokinetics in Chinese renal transplant patients. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2015;36(5):644–650. doi: 10.1038/aps.2015.7.
    1. Mazidi T, Rouini, Ghahremani MH, Dashti-Khavidaki S, Lessan-Pezeshki M, Ahmadi FL, et al. Impact of UGT1A9 polymorphism on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters in stable renal transplant patients. Iran J Pharm Res. 2013;12(3):547–556.
    1. Inoue K, Miura M, Satoh S, Kagaya H, Saito M, Habuchi T, et al. Influence of UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 intronic I399 genetic polymorphisms on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in Japanese renal transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit. 2007;29(3):299–304. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3180686146.
    1. Sandanaraj E, Jada SR, Shu X, Lim R, Lee SC, Zhou Q, et al. Influence of UGT1A9 intronic I399C > T polymorphism on SN-38 glucuronidation in Asian cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics J. 2008;8(3):174–85.
    1. Han JY, Lim HS, Park YH, Lee SY, Lee JS. Integrated pharmacogenetic prediction of irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2009;63(1):115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.12.003.
    1. Cecchin E, Innocenti F, D’Andrea M, Corona G, De Mattia E, Biason P, et al. Predictive role of the UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 genetic variants and their haplotypes on the outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15):2457–2465. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.0314.
    1. van Schaik RH, van Agteren M, de Fijter JW, Hartmann A, Schmidt J, Budde K, et al. UGT1A9 −275T > A/− 2152C > T polymorphisms correlate with low MPA exposure and acute rejection in MMF/tacrolimus-treated kidney transplant patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86(3):319–327. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.83.
    1. Hingorani P, Karnad, Rohekar B, Kerkar V, Lokhandwala YY, Kothari S. Arrhythmias seen in baseline 24-hour Holter ECG recordings in healthy normal volunteers during phase 1 clinical trials. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56(7):885–893. doi: 10.1002/jcph.679.
    1. Min SS, Turner JR, Nada A, DiMino TL, Hynie I, Kleiman R, et al. Evaluation of ventricular arrhythmias in early clinical pharmacology trials and potential consequences for later development. Am Heart J. 2010;159(5):716–29.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever