Secondary failure of metformin monotherapy in clinical practice

Jonathan B Brown, Christopher Conner, Gregory A Nichols, Jonathan B Brown, Christopher Conner, Gregory A Nichols

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We sought to document the secondary failure rate of metformin monotherapy in a clinical practice setting and to explore factors that predict therapeutic failure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied 1,799 type 2 diabetic patients who, between 2004 and 2006, lowered their A1C to <7% after initiating metformin monotherapy as their first-ever anti-hyperglycemic drug. We examined all A1C values recorded through 31 December 2008 (2-5 years of follow-up), defining secondary failure as a subsequent A1C > or =7.5% or the addition or substitution of another anti-hyperglycemic agent. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the probability of secondary failure. RESULTS Of the 1,799 patients studied, 42% (n = 748) experienced secondary failure; the mean failure rate was 17% per year. However, patients who initiated metformin within 3 months of diabetes diagnosis failed at an age-and A1C-adjusted rate of 12.2% (10.5-14.4%) per year, and patients who initiated while A1C was <7% failed at an adjusted rate of 12.3% per year. An interaction term between duration of diagnosed diabetes and A1C was not significant. Age, duration, and A1C at initiation were the only factors that predicted secondary failure. CONCLUSIONS Although metformin failure may occur more rapidly in clinical practice than in clinical trails, initiating it soon after diabetes diagnosis and while A1C is low might preserve beta-cell function, prolong the effectiveness of metformin, reduce lifetime glycemic burden, and prevent diabetes complications. Our findings support the current treatment algorithm for hyperglycemia management that recommends metformin initiation when diabetes is first diagnosed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier plot of secondary failure of metformin monotherapy by categories of duration of diabetes at metformin initiation adjusted for age and A1C at initiation and the percent per year (95% CIs) experiencing secondary failure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier plot of secondary failure of metformin monotherapy by categories of A1C at metformin initiation adjusted for age and diabetes duration at initiation and the percent per year (95% CIs) experiencing secondary failure.

References

    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM: Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002;346:393–403
    1. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, Salminen V, Uusitupa M: Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1343–1350
    1. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mary S, Mukesh B, Bhaskar AD, Vijay V: Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme (IDPP). The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia 2006;49:289–297
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Ferrannini E, Holman RR, Sherwin R, Zinman B: American Diabetes Association, European Association for Study of Diabetes. Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:193–203
    1. Nichols GA, Alexander CM, Girman CJ, Kamal-Bahl SJ, Brown JB: Treatment escalation and rise in HbA1c following successful initial metformin therapy. Diabetes Care 2006;29:504–509
    1. Nichols GA, Alexander CM, Girman CJ, Kamal-Bahl SJ, Brown JB: Contemporary analysis of secondary failure of successful sulfonylurea therapy. Endocr Pract 2007;13:37–44
    1. Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, Herman WH, Holman RR, Jones NP, Kravitz BG, Lachin JM, O'Neill MC, Zinman B, Viberti G: ADOPT Study Group. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2427–2443
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2009. Diabetes Care 2009;32 (Suppl. 1):S13–S61
    1. Kent DM, Hayward RA: Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification. JAMA 2007;298:1209–1212
    1. Pani LN, Nathan DM, Grant RW: Clinical predictors of disease progression and medication initiation in untreated patients with type 2 diabetes and A1C less than 7%. Diabetes Care 2008;31:386–390
    1. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA: 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1577–1589
    1. Skyler JS, Bergenstal R, Bonow RO, Buse J, Deedwania P, Gale EA, Howard BV, Kirkman MS, Kosiborod M, Reaven P, Sherwin RS: American Diabetes Association, American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association. Intensive glycemic control and the prevention of cardiovascular events: implications of the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VA diabetes trials: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and a scientific statement of the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association. Diabetes Care 2009;32:187–192
    1. DeFronzo RA, Goodman AM: Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1995;333:541–549
    1. Bailey CJ, Turner RC: Metformin. N Engl J Med 1996;334:574–579
    1. Grant R, Adams AS, Trinacty CM, Zhang F, Kleinman K, Soumerai SB, Meigs JB, Ross-Degnan D: Relationship between patient medication adherence and subsequent clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes glycemic management. Diabetes Care 2007;30:807–812
    1. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR: Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. JAMA 1999;281:2005–2012
    1. Brown JB, Nichols GA, Perry A: The burden of treatment failure in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1535–1540

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever