Safety and immunogenicity of an anti-Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus DNA vaccine: a phase 1, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation trial

Kayvon Modjarrad, Christine C Roberts, Kristin T Mills, Amy R Castellano, Kristopher Paolino, Kar Muthumani, Emma L Reuschel, Merlin L Robb, Trina Racine, Myoung-Don Oh, Claude Lamarre, Faraz I Zaidi, Jean Boyer, Sagar B Kudchodkar, Moonsup Jeong, Janice M Darden, Young K Park, Paul T Scott, Celine Remigio, Ajay P Parikh, Megan C Wise, Ami Patel, Elizabeth K Duperret, Kevin Y Kim, Hyeree Choi, Scott White, Mark Bagarazzi, Jeanine M May, Deborah Kane, Hyojin Lee, Gary Kobinger, Nelson L Michael, David B Weiner, Stephen J Thomas, Joel N Maslow, Kayvon Modjarrad, Christine C Roberts, Kristin T Mills, Amy R Castellano, Kristopher Paolino, Kar Muthumani, Emma L Reuschel, Merlin L Robb, Trina Racine, Myoung-Don Oh, Claude Lamarre, Faraz I Zaidi, Jean Boyer, Sagar B Kudchodkar, Moonsup Jeong, Janice M Darden, Young K Park, Paul T Scott, Celine Remigio, Ajay P Parikh, Megan C Wise, Ami Patel, Elizabeth K Duperret, Kevin Y Kim, Hyeree Choi, Scott White, Mark Bagarazzi, Jeanine M May, Deborah Kane, Hyojin Lee, Gary Kobinger, Nelson L Michael, David B Weiner, Stephen J Thomas, Joel N Maslow

Abstract

Background: Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus causes a highly fatal lower-respiratory tract infection. There are as yet no licensed MERS vaccines or therapeutics. This study (WRAIR-2274) assessed the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the GLS-5300 MERS coronavirus DNA vaccine in healthy adults.

Methods: This study was a phase 1, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study of GLS-5300 done at the Walter Reed Army Institute for Research Clinical Trials Center (Silver Spring, MD, USA). We enrolled healthy adults aged 18-50 years; exclusion criteria included previous infection or treatment of MERS. Eligible participants were enrolled sequentially using a dose-escalation protocol to receive 0·67 mg, 2 mg, or 6 mg GLS-5300 administered by trained clinical site staff via a single intramuscular 1 mL injection at each vaccination at baseline, week 4, and week 12 followed immediately by co-localised intramuscular electroporation. Enrolment into the higher dose groups occurred after a safety monitoring committee reviewed the data following vaccination of the first five participants at the previous lower dose in each group. The primary outcome of the study was safety, assessed in all participants who received at least one study treatment and for whom post-dose study data were available, during the vaccination period with follow-up through to 48 weeks after dose 3. Safety was measured by the incidence of adverse events; administration site reactions and pain; and changes in safety laboratory parameters. The secondary outcome was immunogenicity. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT02670187) and is completed.

Findings: Between Feb 17 and July 22, 2016, we enrolled 75 individuals and allocated 25 each to 0·67 mg, 2 mg, or 6 mg GLS-5300. No vaccine-associated serious adverse events were reported. The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions, reported in 70 participants (93%) of 75. Overall, 73 participants (97%) of 75 reported at least one solicited adverse event; the most common systemic symptoms were headache (five [20%] with 0·67 mg, 11 [44%] with 2 mg, and seven [28%] with 6 mg), and malaise or fatigue (five [20%] with 0·67 mg, seven [28%] with 2 mg, and two [8%] with 6 mg). The most common local solicited symptoms were administration site pain (23 [92%] with all three doses) and tenderness (21 [84%] with all three doses). Most solicited symptoms were reported as mild (19 [76%] with 0·67 mg, 20 [80%] with 2 mg, and 17 [68%] with 6 mg) and were self-limiting. Unsolicited symptoms were reported for 56 participants (75%) of 75 and were deemed treatment-related for 26 (35%). The most common unsolicited adverse events were infections, occurring in 27 participants (36%); six (8%) were deemed possibly related to study treatment. There were no laboratory abnormalities of grade 3 or higher that were related to study treatment; laboratory abnormalities were uncommon, except for 15 increases in creatine phosphokinase in 14 participants (three participants in the 0·67 mg group, three in the 2 mg group, and seven in the 6 mg group). Of these 15 increases, five (33%) were deemed possibly related to study treatment (one in the 2 mg group and four in the 6 mg group). Seroconversion measured by S1-ELISA occurred in 59 (86%) of 69 participants and 61 (94%) of 65 participants after two and three vaccinations, respectively. Neutralising antibodies were detected in 34 (50%) of 68 participants. T-cell responses were detected in 47 (71%) of 66 participants after two vaccinations and in 44 (76%) of 58 participants after three vaccinations. There were no differences in immune responses between dose groups after 6 weeks. At week 60, vaccine-induced humoral and cellular responses were detected in 51 (77%) of 66 participants and 42 (64%) of 66, respectively.

Interpretation: The GLS-5300 MERS coronavirus vaccine was well tolerated with no vaccine-associated serious adverse events. Immune responses were dose-independent, detected in more than 85% of participants after two vaccinations, and durable through 1 year of follow-up. The data support further development of the GLS-5300 vaccine, including additional studies to test the efficacy of GLS-5300 in a region endemic for MERS coronavirus.

Funding: US Department of the Army and GeneOne Life Science.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile Ten participants did not complete the vaccination series: four relocated, three were lost-to-follow-up, two became pregnant during the study, and one declined the final vaccination.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Vaccine-associated antibody responses. Antibody responses for each dose are shown for available specimens from the modified intention-to-treat population. (A) shows the geometric mean endpoint titre (95% CI error bars) and the proportion of participants who developed antibodies against Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus determined by S1-ELISA. B shows the geometric mean endpoint titre (95% CI error bars) and the proportion of participants who developed neutralising antibodies against MERS coronavirus determined by EMC-2012 MERS-coronavirus infection of Vero cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Vaccine-associated cellular responses Cellular responses to Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus S peptides were determined by IFNγ-enzyme-linked immunospot assay for available specimens of peripheral blood mononuclear cells at each timepoint in the modified intention-to-treat dataset. (A) shows the proportion of participants with a positive response. (B) shows the total spot-forming units per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells as the sum of average responses to each of the five peptide pools by participants' peripheral blood mononuclear cells in each group at each time, with a representation of the region of the S glycoprotein included in each peptide pool below.

References

    1. Corman VM, Eckerle I, Zaki A. Detection of a novel human coronavirus by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Euro Surveill. 2012;17 PII: 20285.
    1. WHO MERS situation update. February 2019.
    1. WHO Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) 2018.
    1. Bak SL, Jun KI, Jung J. An atypical case of Middle East Respiratory syndrome in a returning traveler to Korea from Kuwait. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33:e348.
    1. WHO Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)—UK. August 31, 2018.
    1. WHO Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection—South Korea. Sept 12, 2018.
    1. Oh MD, Park WB, Park SW. Middle East respiratory syndrome: what we learned from the 2015 outbreak in the Republic of Korea. Korean J Intern Med. 2018;33:233–246.
    1. Coleman CM, Venkatraman N, Liu T. MERS-CoV spike nanoparticles protect mice from MERS-CoV infection. Vaccine. 2017;35:1586–1589.
    1. Malczyk AH, Kupke A, Prufer S. A highly immunogenic and protective Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine based on a recombinant measles virus vaccine platform. J Virol. 2015;89:11654–11667.
    1. Muthumani K, Falzarano D, Reuschel EL. A synthetic consensus anti-spike protein DNA vaccine induces protective immunity against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in nonhuman primates. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7
    1. Wang L, Shi W, Joyce MG. Evaluation of candidate vaccine approaches for MERS-CoV. Nat Commun. 2015;6
    1. Choe PG, Perera RA, Park WB. MERS-CoV antibody responses 1 year after symptom onset, South Korea, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1079–1084.
    1. Payne DC, Iblan I, Rha B. Persistence of antibodies against Middle East respiratory coronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1824–1826.
    1. Zhao J, Alshukairi AN, Baharoon SA. Recovery from the Middle East respiratory syndrome is associated with antibody and T-cell responses. Sci Immunol. 2017;2
    1. Luke T, Wu H, Zhao J. Human polyclonal immunoglobulin G from transchromosomic bovines inhibits MERS-CoV in vivo. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8
    1. Pascal KE, Coleman CM, Mujica AO. Pre- and postexposure efficacy of fully immunized antibodies against spike protein in a novel humanized mouse model of MERS-CoV infection. PNAS. 2015;112:8738–8743.
    1. Corman VM, Albarrak AM, Omrani AS. Viral shedding and antibody response in 37 patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:477–483.
    1. Park WB, Perera RA, Choe PG. Kinetics of serologic responses to MERS coronavirus infection in humans, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:2186–2189.
    1. Diehl MC, Lee JC, Daniels SE. Tolerability of intramuscular and intradermal delivery by CELLECTRA((R)) adaptive constant current electroporation device in healthy volunteers. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;9:2246–2252.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Toxicity grading scale for healthy adult and adolescent volunteers enrolled in preventive vaccine clinical trials. September 2007.
    1. Trimble CL, Morrow MP, Kraynyak KA. Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of VGX-3100, a therapeutic synthetic DNA vaccine targeting human papillomavirus 16 and 18 E6 and E7 proteins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2015;386:2078–2088.
    1. Maslow JN. Vaccines for emerging infectious diseases: lessons from MERS coronavirus and Zika virus. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;12:2918–2930.
    1. Bodmer BS, Fiedler AH, Hanauer JRH, Prüfer S, Mülebach MD. Live-attenuated bivalent measles virus-derived vaccines targeting Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus induce robust and multifunctional T cell responses against both viruses in an appropriate mouse model. Virology. 2018;521:99–107.
    1. Munster VJ, Wells D, Lanmbe T. Protective efficacy of a novel simian adenovirus vaccine against lethal MERS-CoV challenge in a transgenic DPP4 mouse model. NPJ Vaccines. 2017;2:28.
    1. Haagmans BL, van den Brand JM, Raj VS. An orthopoxvirus-based vaccine reduces virus excretion after MERS coronavirus infection in dromedary camels. Science. 2016;351:77–81.
    1. Song F, Fux R, Provacia LB. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein delivered by modified vaccinia virus Ankara efficiently induces virus-neutralizing antibodies. J Virol. 2013;87:11950–11954.
    1. Volz A, Kupke A, Song F. Protective efficacy of recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara delivering Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus spike glycoprotein. J Virol. 2015;89:8651–8656.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever