Brain oscillations differentially encode noxious stimulus intensity and pain intensity

Moritz M Nickel, Elisabeth S May, Laura Tiemann, Paul Schmidt, Martina Postorino, Son Ta Dinh, Joachim Gross, Markus Ploner, Moritz M Nickel, Elisabeth S May, Laura Tiemann, Paul Schmidt, Martina Postorino, Son Ta Dinh, Joachim Gross, Markus Ploner

Abstract

Noxious stimuli induce physiological processes which commonly translate into pain. However, under certain conditions, pain intensity can substantially dissociate from stimulus intensity, e.g. during longer-lasting pain in chronic pain syndromes. How stimulus intensity and pain intensity are differentially represented in the human brain is, however, not yet fully understood. We therefore used electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate the cerebral representation of noxious stimulus intensity and pain intensity during 10min of painful heat stimulation in 39 healthy human participants. Time courses of objective stimulus intensity and subjective pain ratings indicated a dissociation of both measures. EEG data showed that stimulus intensity was encoded by decreases of neuronal oscillations at alpha and beta frequencies in sensorimotor areas. In contrast, pain intensity was encoded by gamma oscillations in the medial prefrontal cortex. Contrasting right versus left hand stimulation revealed that the encoding of stimulus intensity in contralateral sensorimotor areas depended on the stimulation side. In contrast, a conjunction analysis of right and left hand stimulation revealed that the encoding of pain in the medial prefrontal cortex was independent of the side of stimulation. Thus, the translation of noxious stimulus intensity into pain is associated with a change from a spatially specific representation of stimulus intensity by alpha and beta oscillations in sensorimotor areas to a spatially independent representation of pain by gamma oscillations in brain areas related to cognitive and affective-motivational processes. These findings extend the understanding of the brain mechanisms of nociception and pain and their dissociations during longer-lasting pain as a key symptom of chronic pain syndromes.

Keywords: Alpha; Beta; Gamma; Nociception; Oscillations; Pain; Tonic.

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Time courses of stimulus intensity and pain intensity. Group mean time courses of stimulus intensity and pain intensity during tonic pain left and tonic pain right conditions. The blue and red shaded areas depict the standard error of the mean. VAS, visual analogue scale. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Brain oscillations encoding stimulus intensity and pain intensity. Linear mixed model-based whole-brain t-maps of the fixed effects showing the encoding of stimulus and pain intensity for different frequency bands. T-maps were thresholded at p

Fig. 3

Differences and similarities between tonic…

Fig. 3

Differences and similarities between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the…

Fig. 3
Differences and similarities between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of stimulus intensity and pain intensity. A) T-maps showing significant differences between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of pain intensity and stimulus intensity for different frequency bands. T-maps were masked for sensorimotor cortices and thresholded at p<0.05, false discovery rate corrected for the sensorimotor cortices. B) Whole-brain t-maps showing significant similarities (conjunction analysis) between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of stimulus intensity and pain intensity for different frequency bands. T-maps were thresholded at p<0.05, false discovery rate corrected for the whole brain.

Fig. 4

Similarities between tonic pain left…

Fig. 4

Similarities between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of…

Fig. 4
Similarities between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of stimulus intensity controlled for pain intensity and vice versa. Whole-brain t-maps for the gamma frequency band showing significant similarities between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of stimulus intensity when controlled for pain intensity (upper panel) and in the encoding of pain intensity when controlled for stimulus intensity (lower panel). T-maps were thresholded at p<0.05, false discovery rate corrected for the whole brain. The controlled conjunction analysis indicates that prefrontal gamma activity was more closely related to pain intensity than to stimulus intensity.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Differences and similarities between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of stimulus intensity and pain intensity. A) T-maps showing significant differences between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of pain intensity and stimulus intensity for different frequency bands. T-maps were masked for sensorimotor cortices and thresholded at p<0.05, false discovery rate corrected for the sensorimotor cortices. B) Whole-brain t-maps showing significant similarities (conjunction analysis) between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of stimulus intensity and pain intensity for different frequency bands. T-maps were thresholded at p<0.05, false discovery rate corrected for the whole brain.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Similarities between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of stimulus intensity controlled for pain intensity and vice versa. Whole-brain t-maps for the gamma frequency band showing significant similarities between tonic pain left and tonic pain right in the encoding of stimulus intensity when controlled for pain intensity (upper panel) and in the encoding of pain intensity when controlled for stimulus intensity (lower panel). T-maps were thresholded at p<0.05, false discovery rate corrected for the whole brain. The controlled conjunction analysis indicates that prefrontal gamma activity was more closely related to pain intensity than to stimulus intensity.

References

    1. Adair E.R., Stevens J.C., Marks L.E. Thermally induced pain, the Dol scale, and the psychophysical power law. Am. J. Psychol. 1968;81:147–164.
    1. Apkarian A.V., Bushnell M.C., Treede R.D., Zubieta J.K. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur. J. Pain. 2005;9:463–484.
    1. Arnal L.H., Giraud A.L. Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012;16:390–398.
    1. Atlas L.Y., Lindquist M.A., Bolger N., Wager T.D. Brain mediators of the effects of noxious heat on pain. Pain. 2014;155:1632–1648.
    1. Baliki M.N., Apkarian A.V. Nociception, pain, negative moods, and behavior selection. Neuron. 2015;87:474–491.
    1. Baliki M.N., Geha P.Y., Apkarian A.V. Parsing pain perception between nociceptive representation and magnitude estimation. J. Neurophysiol. 2009;101:875–887.
    1. Baliki M.N., Chialvo D.R., Geha P.Y., Levy R.M., Harden R.N., Parrish T.B., Apkarian A.V. Chronic pain and the emotional brain: specific brain activity associated with spontaneous fluctuations of intensity of chronic back pain. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:12165–12173.
    1. Bastos A.M., Usrey W.M., Adams R.A., Mangun G.R., Fries P., Friston K.J. Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron. 2012;76:695–711.
    1. Bastos A.M., Vezoli J., Bosman C.A., Schoffelen J.M., Oostenveld R., Dowdall J.R., De Weerd P., Kennedy H., Fries P. Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels. Neuron. 2015;85:390–401.
    1. Bates D., Machler M., Bolker B.M., Walker S.C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015;67:1–48.
    1. Beck A.T., Steer R.A., Brown G.K. Psychological Corporation; San Antonio, TX: 1996. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II.
    1. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate – a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1995;57:289–300.
    1. Bornhovd K., Quante M., Glauche V., Bromm B., Weiller C., Buchel C. Painful stimuli evoke different stimulus-response functions in the amygdala, prefrontal, insula and somatosensory cortex: a single-trial fMRI study. Brain. 2002;125:1326–1336.
    1. Buchel C., Bornhovd K., Quante M., Glauche V., Bromm B., Weiller C. Dissociable neural responses related to pain intensity, stimulus intensity, and stimulus awareness within the anterior cingulate cortex: a parametric single-trial laser functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:970–976.
    1. Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 2013;36:181–204.
    1. Coghill R.C., Sang C.N., Maisog J.M., Iadarola M.J. Pain intensity processing within the human brain: a bilateral, distributed mechanism. J. Neurophysiol. 1999;82:1934–1943.
    1. Derbyshire S.W., Jones A.K., Gyulai F., Clark S., Townsend D., Firestone L.L. Pain processing during three levels of noxious stimulation produces differential patterns of central activity. Pain. 1997;73:431–445.
    1. Donner T.H., Siegel M. A framework for local cortical oscillation patterns. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011;15:191–199.
    1. Dowman R., Rissacher D., Schuckers S. EEG indices of tonic pain-related activity in the somatosensory cortices. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008;119:1201–1212.
    1. Fries P. Rhythms for cognition: communication through coherence. Neuron. 2015;88:220–235.
    1. Giehl J., Meyer-Brandis G., Kunz M., Lautenbacher S. Responses to tonic heat pain in the ongoing EEG under conditions of controlled attention. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 2014;31:40–48.
    1. Gram M., Graversen C., Olesen S.S., Drewes A.M. Dynamic spectral indices of the electroencephalogram provide new insights into tonic pain. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2015;126:763–771.
    1. Gross J., Schnitzler A., Timmermann L., Ploner M. Gamma oscillations in human primary somatosensory cortex reflect pain perception. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e133.
    1. Hashmi J.A., Baliki M.N., Huang L., Baria A.T., Torbey S., Hermann K.M., Schnitzer T.J., Apkarian A.V. Shape shifting pain: chronification of back pain shifts brain representation from nociceptive to emotional circuits. Brain. 2013;136:2751–2768.
    1. Hauck M., Lorenz J., Engel A.K. Attention to painful stimulation enhances gamma-band activity and synchronization in human sensorimotor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:9270–9277.
    1. Huang Y., Rao R.P. Predictive coding. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2011;2:580–593.
    1. Huishi Zhang C., Sohrabpour A., Lu Y., He B. Spectral and spatial changes of brain rhythmic activity in response to the sustained thermal pain stimulation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016;37:2976–2991.
    1. Jensen O., Gips B., Bergmann T.O., Bonnefond M. Temporal coding organized by coupled alpha and gamma oscillations prioritize visual processing. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37:357–369.
    1. Jung T.P., Makeig S., Humphries C., Lee T.W., McKeown M.J., Iragui V., Sejnowski T.J. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology. 2000;37:163–178.
    1. Klimesch W. Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012;16:606–617.
    1. Kong J., White N.S., Kwong K.K., Vangel M.G., Rosman I.S., Gracely R.H., Gollub R.L. Using fMRI to dissociate sensory encoding from cognitive evaluation of heat pain intensity. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006;27:715–721.
    1. Loggia M.L., Edwards R.R., Kim J., Vangel M.G., Wasan A.D., Gollub R.L., Harris R.E., Park K., Napadow V. Disentangling linear and nonlinear brain responses to evoked deep tissue pain. Pain. 2012;153:2140–2151.
    1. Michalareas G., Vezoli J., van Pelt S., Schoffelen J.M., Kennedy H., Fries P. Alpha-beta and gamma rhythms subserve feedback and feedforward influences among human visual cortical areas. Neuron. 2016;89:384–397.
    1. Moulton E.A., Pendse G., Becerra L.R., Borsook D. BOLD responses in somatosensory cortices better reflect heat sensation than pain. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:6024–6031.
    1. Mouraux A., Guerit J.M., Plaghki L. Non-phase locked electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to CO2 laser skin stimulations may reflect central interactions between A-delta- and C-fibre afferent volleys. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003;114:710–722.
    1. Nichols T., Brett M., Andersson J., Wager T., Poline J.B. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage. 2005;25:653–660.
    1. Nir R.R., Sinai A., Moont R., Harari E., Yarnitsky D. Tonic pain and continuous EEG: prediction of subjective pain perception by alpha-1 power during stimulation and at rest. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012;123:605–612.
    1. Oostenveld R., Fries P., Maris E., Schoffelen J.M. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869.
    1. Peng W., Hu L., Zhang Z., Hu Y. Changes of spontaneous oscillatory activity to tonic heat pain. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91052.
    1. Ploner M., Gross J., Timmermann L., Pollok B., Schnitzler A. Pain suppresses spontaneous brain rhythms. Cereb. Cortex. 2006;16:537–540.
    1. Porro C.A., Cettolo V., Francescato M.P., Baraldi P. Temporal and intensity coding of pain in human cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1998;80:3312–3320.
    1. Price D.D. IASP Press; Seattle: 1999. Psychological Mechanisms of Pain and Analgesia.
    1. R Core Team . R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
    1. Schulz E., Tiemann L., Schuster T., Gross J., Ploner M. Neurophysiological coding of traits and states in the perception of pain. Cereb. Cortex. 2011;21:2408–2414.
    1. Schulz E., May E.S., Postorino M., Tiemann L., Nickel M.M., Witkovsky V., Schmidt P., Gross J., Ploner M. Prefrontal gamma oscillations encode tonic pain in humans. Cereb. Cortex. 2015;25:4407–4414.
    1. Shao S., Shen K., Yu K., Wilder-Smith E.P., Li X. Frequency-domain EEG source analysis for acute tonic cold pain perception. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012;123:2042–2049.
    1. Spielberger C.D., Gorsuch R.L., Lushene R., Vagg P.R., Jacobs G.A. Consulting Psychologists Press; Palo Alto, CA: 1983. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
    1. Stevens S.S. On the psychophysical law. Psychol. Rev. 1957;64:153–181.
    1. Tiemann L., May E.S., Postorino M., Schulz E., Nickel M.M., Bingel U., Ploner M. Differential neurophysiological correlates of bottom-up and top-down modulations of pain. Pain. 2015;156:289–296.
    1. Timmermann L., Ploner M., Haucke K., Schmitz F., Baltissen R., Schnitzler A. Differential coding of pain intensity in the human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2001;86:1499–1503.
    1. Tracey I., Mantyh P.W. The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation. Neuron. 2007;55:377–391.
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Landeau B., Papathanassiou D., Crivello F., Etard O., Delcroix N., Mazoyer B., Joliot M. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002;15:273–289.
    1. Van Veen B.D., van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1997;44:867–880.
    1. Veerasarn P., Stohler C.S. The effect of experimental muscle pain on the background electrical brain activity. Pain. 1992;49:349–360.
    1. Vidaurre C., Sander T.H., Schlogl A. BioSig: the free and open source software library for biomedical signal processing. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011;2011:935364.
    1. Zhang Z.G., Hu L., Hung Y.S., Mouraux A., Iannetti G.D. Gamma-band oscillations in the primary somatosensory cortex – a direct and obligatory correlate of subjective pain intensity. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:7429–7438.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever