Randomised trial of proton vs. carbon ion radiation therapy in patients with low and intermediate grade chondrosarcoma of the skull base, clinical phase III study

Anna V Nikoghosyan, Geraldine Rauch, Marc W Münter, Alexandra D Jensen, Stephanie E Combs, Meinhard Kieser, Jürgen Debus, Anna V Nikoghosyan, Geraldine Rauch, Marc W Münter, Alexandra D Jensen, Stephanie E Combs, Meinhard Kieser, Jürgen Debus

Abstract

Background: Low and intermediate grade chondrosarcomas are relative rare bone tumours. About 5-12% of all chondrosarcomas are localized in base of skull region. Low grade chondrosarcoma has a low incidence of distant metastasis but is potentially lethal disease. Therefore, local therapy is of crucial importance in the treatment of skull base chondrosarcomas. Surgical resection is the primary treatment standard. Unfortunately the late diagnosis and diagnosis at the extensive stage are common due to the slow and asymptomatic growth of the lesions. Consequently, complete resection is hindered due to close proximity to critical and hence dose limiting organs such as optic nerves, chiasm and brainstem. Adjuvant or additional radiation therapy is very important for the improvement of local control rates in the primary treatment. Proton therapy is the gold standard in the treatment of skull base chondrosarcomas. However, high-LET (linear energy transfer) beams such as carbon ions theoretically offer advantages by enhanced biologic effectiveness in slow-growing tumours.

Methods/design: The study is a prospective randomised active-controlled clinical phase III trial. The trial will be carried out at Heidelberger Ionenstrahl-Therapie (HIT) centre as monocentric trial. Patients with skull base chondrosarcomas will be randomised to either proton or carbon ion radiation therapy. As a standard, patients will undergo non-invasive, rigid immobilization and target volume definition will be carried out based on CT and MRI data. The biologically isoeffective target dose to the PTV (planning target volume) in carbon ion treatment will be 60 Gy E ± 5% and 70 Gy E ± 5% (standard dose) in proton therapy respectively. The 5 year local-progression free survival (LPFS) rate will be analysed as primary end point. Overall survival, progression free and metastasis free survival, patterns of recurrence, local control rate and morbidity are the secondary end points.

Discussion: Up to now it was impossible to compare two different particle therapies, i.e. protons and carbon ions, directly at the same facility in connection with the treatment of low grade skull base chondrosarcomas.This trial is a phase III study to demonstrate that carbon ion radiotherapy (experimental treatment) is not relevantly inferior and at least as good as proton radiotherapy (standard treatment) with respect to 5 year LPFS in the treatment of chondrosarcomas. Additionally, we expect less toxicity in the carbon ion treatment arm.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01182753.

References

    1. Lee. et al.Chondrosarcoma of the head and neck. Yonsai Med J. 2005;46:228–332. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.2.228.
    1. Rosenberg. et al.Chondrosarcoma of the base of the skull: a clinicopathologic study of 200 cases with emphasis on its distinction from chordoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23(11):1370–8. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199911000-00007.
    1. Mendenhall WM, Mendenhall CM, Lewis SB, Villaret DB, Mendenhall NP. Skull base chordoma. Head Neck. 2005;27(2):159–65. doi: 10.1002/hed.20144.
    1. Heffelfinger MJ. et al.Chordomas and cartilaginous tumours at the skull base. Cancer. 1973;32:410–420. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197308)32:2<410::AID-CNCR2820320219>;2-S.
    1. Lanzino G, Dumont AS, Lopes MB, Laws ER Jr. Skull base chordomas: overview of disease, management options, and outcome. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;10(3):E12. doi: 10.3171/foc.2001.10.3.13. Review.
    1. Noël. et al.Radiation therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base and the cervical spine. Prognostic factors and patterns of failure. Strahlenther Onkol. 2003;179(4):241–8. doi: 10.1007/s00066-003-1065-5.
    1. Cho. et al.Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: comparative analysis of clinical results in 30 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31:35–43. doi: 10.1007/s10143-007-0099-z.
    1. Munzenrider. et al.Proton therapy for tumours of the skull base. Strahlenther Onkol. 1999;175(Suppl 2):57–63. doi: 10.1007/BF03038890.
    1. van Herk. Different styles of image-guided radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007;17(4):258–67. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.07.003.
    1. Amichetti M, Amelio D, Cianchetti M, Enrici RM, Minniti G. A systematic review of proton therapy in the treatment of chondrosarcoma of the skull base. Neurosurg Rev. 2010;33(2):155–65. doi: 10.1007/s10143-009-0235-z.
    1. Hug. et al.Proton radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base. J Neurosurg. 1999;91(3):432–9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.3.0432.
    1. Weber. et al.Results of spot-scanning proton radiation therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skulll base: the Paul Scherrer Institute experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:401–409.
    1. Ares, Effectiveness and Safety of Spot Scanning Proton Radiation Therapy for Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base: First Long-Term Report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009. in press .
    1. DeLaney, KooyProton and charged particle radiotherapy. 2008.
    1. Tsujii. et al.Clinical results of carbon ion therapy at NIRS. J Radiat Res. 2007;48(Suppl):A1–A13. doi: 10.1269/jrr.48.A1.
    1. Schulz-Ertner. et al.Carbon ion radiotherapy of skull base chondrosarcomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:171–177.
    1. Emami. et al.Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:109–122.
    1. O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979;35:549–556. doi: 10.2307/2530245.
    1. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. John Wiley, New York; 1980. pp. 14–16.
    1. Farrington CP, Manning G. Test Statistics and Sample Size Formulae for Comparative Binomial Trials with Null Hypothesis of Non-Zero Risk Difference or Non-Unity Relative Risk. Stat Med. 1990;9:14447–1454.
    1. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481. doi: 10.2307/2281868.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever