Randomized double-blind controlled trial to assess the efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen associated with strong opioids in the treatment of acute pain in adult cancer patients: study protocol

Ofelia Leiva, Joel Castellano, Luz M Letelier, Luis Rojas, Paola Viviani, Antonio Gonzalez, Pedro Perez-Cruz, Ofelia Leiva, Joel Castellano, Luz M Letelier, Luis Rojas, Paola Viviani, Antonio Gonzalez, Pedro Perez-Cruz

Abstract

Background: Cancer pain is one of the most frequent and relevant symptoms in cancer patients and impacts on patient's quality of life. International and local standards recommend as an initial strategy the use of an analgesic scheme composed of strong opioids associated with adjuvants such as acetaminophen, based upon the assumption that combining drugs could have a better analgesic effect, could allow lowering opioid dosing, and could prevent the occurrence of adverse effects of opioids. However, there is uncertainty about the impact of acetaminophen as an adjuvant in patients who use strong opioids for moderate to severe pain management in cancer patients. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous acetaminophen associated with strong opioids in hospitalized adult cancer patients who have moderate to severe cancer-related pain.

Methods: We will perform a randomized double-blinded controlled study comparing intravenous acetaminophen 1 g 4 times a day versus placebo for 48 h as an adjuvant to strong opioids. We will assess pain intensity as a primary outcome, using the verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS, I0 to 10 scale with higher scores meaning higher pain intensity), and we will compare the mean difference in pain intensity between baseline and 48 h among the placebo and intervention groups. We estimate that a decrease of 1 point in the VNRS would be clinically significant. Assuming a standard deviation in pain intensity of 1.7 points, an alpha of 0.025, and a power of 0.8, we estimate a sample size of 112 patients, with 56 patients in each arm. Secondary outcomes include the difference in total opioid use between baseline and at 48 h among the groups, and adverse effects such as drowsiness, constipation, nausea, and vomiting would be evaluated.

Discussion: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design is the best strategy to assess the efficacy of acetaminophen as an adjuvant in adult cancer patients with moderate to severe pain who are receiving strong opioids. We expect to contribute to national and international guidelines with these results.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04779567 . Registered on March 3, 2021. Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Acetaminophen; Cancer pain; Inpatients; Opioids.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Standard analgesic protocol
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consort diagram

References

    1. Van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, Schouten HC, van Kleef M, Patijn J. High prevalence of pain in patients with cancer in a large population-based study in The Netherlands. Pain. 2007;132(3):312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.022.
    1. Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C, de Haes HC, Voest EE, de Graeff A. Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(1):94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015.
    1. Goudas LC, Bloch R, Gialeli-Goudas M, Lau J, Carr DB. The epidemiology of cancer pain. Cancer Invest. 2005;23(2):182–190. doi: 10.1081/CNV-50482.
    1. Portenoy RK, Ahmed E. Principles of opioid use in cancer pain. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(16):1662-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.5188. Epub 2014 May 5. Review. PubMed ID: 24799466.
    1. Organization WH . Cancer pain relief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1986.
    1. Organization WH . WHO’s cancer pain ladder for adults. 2016.
    1. Jadad AR, Browman GP. The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation. JAMA. 1995;274(23):1870–1873. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530230056031.
    1. Cherny N, Ripamonti C, Pereira J, Davis C, Fallon M, McQuay H, et al. Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: an evidence-based report. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(9):2542–2554. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.9.2542.
    1. Nabal M, Librada S, Redondo MJ, Pigni A, Brunelli C, Caraceni A. The role of paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in addition to WHO Step III opioids in the control of pain in advanced cancer. A systematic review of the literature. Palliat Med. 2012;26(4):305–312. doi: 10.1177/0269216311428528.
    1. Bridger S, Henderson K, Ellis AJ, Glucksman E, Williams R, Henry J. Deaths from low dose paracetamol poisoning - reply. Brit Med J. 1998;317(7173):1656–1657.
    1. Toms L, McQuay HJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2008(4):CD004602.
    1. Politi JR, Davis RL, 2nd, Matrka AK. Randomized prospective trial comparing the use of intravenous versus oral acetaminophen in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(4):1125–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.018.
    1. Hansen RN, Pham AT, Boing EA, Lovelace B, Wan GJ, Miller TE. Comparative analysis of length of stay, hospitalization costs, opioid use, and discharge status among spine surgery patients with postoperative pain management including intravenous versus oral acetaminophen. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(5):943–948. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1297702.
    1. Wien PJ, Derry S, Moore RA, McNicol ED, Bell RF, Carr DB, et al. Oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for cancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(7):CD012637.
    1. Caraceni A, Hanks G, Kaasa S, Bennett MI, Brunelli C, Cherny N, et al. Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(2):e58–e68. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70040-2.
    1. Vardy J, Agar M. Nonopioid drugs in the treatment of cancer pain. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(16):1677–1690. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.8356.
    1. Corsi O, Perez-Cruz PE. ¿Sirve agregar paracetamol a opioides fuertes en pacientes con dolor oncológico? Medwave. 2017;17(suppl2):e6944. doi: 10.5867//medwave.2017.6944.
    1. Axelsson B, Borup S. Is there an additive analgesic effect of paracetamol at step 3? A double-blind randomized controlled study. Palliat Med. 2003;17(8):724–725. doi: 10.1177/026921630301700816.
    1. Israel FJ, Parker G, Charles M, Reymond L. Lack of benefit from paracetamol (acetaminophen) for palliative cancer patients requiring high-dose strong opioids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(3):548–554. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.07.008.
    1. Cubero DI, del Giglio A. Early switching from morphine to methadone is not improved by acetaminophen in the analgesia of oncologic patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(2):235–242. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0649-8.
    1. Tasmacioglu B, Aydinli I, Keskinbora K, Pekel AF, Salihoglu T, Sonsuz A. Effect of intravenous administration of paracetamol on morphine consumption in cancer pain control. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(12):1475–1481. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0612-8.
    1. Stockler M, Vardy J, Pillai A, Warr D. Acetaminophen (paracetamol) improves pain and well-being in people with advanced cancer already receiving a strong opioid regimen: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(16):3389–3394. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.122.
    1. Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Moore RA, McNicol ED, Carr DB, Mclntyre M, et al. Oral Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for cancer pain (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(7):CD012637.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hróbjartsson A, Sculz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleža-Jerić K, Laupacis A, Moher D. Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Vigano A, Bruera E, Suarez-Almazor M. Age, pain intensity, and opioid dose in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer. 1998;83(6):1244–1250. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980915)83:6<1244::AID-CNCR26>;2-4.
    1. Hui D, Shamieh O, Paiva CE, Perez-Cruz PE, Kwon JH, Muckaden MA, Park M, Yennu S, Kang JH, Bruera E. Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in cancer patients: a prospective, multicenter study. Cancer. 2015;121(17):3027–3035. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29437.
    1. Johnston M, Pollard B, Hennessey P. Construct validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale with clinical populations. J Psychosom Res. 2000;48(6):579–584. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00102-1.
    1. Pérez-Cruz PE, Padilla Pérez O, Bonati P, Thomsen Parisi O, Tupper Satt L, Gonzalez Otaiza M, Ceballos Yáñez D, Maldonado Morgado A. Validation of the Spanish version of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD-ESP) in a home-based cancer palliative care program and development of the QODD-ESP-12. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(6):1042–1049.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.02.005.
    1. Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000;88(3):287–294. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00339-0.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever