Rehabilitation Including Structured Active Play for Preschoolers With Cancer (RePlay)-Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Anna Pouplier, Helle Winther, Jan Christensen, Peter Schmidt-Andersen, He Zhang, Thomas Leth Frandsen, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Martin Kaj Fridh, Hanne Bækgaard Larsen, Anna Pouplier, Helle Winther, Jan Christensen, Peter Schmidt-Andersen, He Zhang, Thomas Leth Frandsen, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Martin Kaj Fridh, Hanne Bækgaard Larsen

Abstract

Background: Children diagnosed with cancer experience muscle weakness and impaired physical function caused by treatment and related immobility. The situation forces them into a negative cycle of diminished participation in physical and leisure activities and isolation from peers; inhibiting the natural development of social and gross motor skills. This manuscript presents a protocol for a study that explores the effects of using structured active play to maintain preschoolers' age specific gross motor function and social and personal skills while undertaking intensive cancer treatment.

Methods: The study is a two-arm, superiority randomized controlled trial with an intervention and a control group designed to evaluate the effects of a structured active play intervention on gross motor function. Gross motor subtests of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2) are used for measurement; with the primary end-point at 6 months post-treatment initiation. Eighty-four preschool children (aged 1-5 years), newly diagnosed with cancer at the Copenhagen University Hospital are randomly assigned to either an intervention or control group, using a 1:1 allocation. The intervention group receives a combined in-hospital and home-based program that includes structured active play activities, while the control group receives standard care, including physiotherapy. During hospital admission, the intervention group undertakes 45-min structured active play group sessions three times weekly, conducted by exercise professionals. Parents receive training and supervision to facilitate daily individual sessions outside of group sessions. Secondary study outcomes target the children's overall function level in everyday life, general physical performance, and health-related quality of life. As well, children's and parents' experiences within the intervention are explored and the children's social and personal development is observed.

Discussion: Limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions, particularly those including active play, for preschoolers diagnosed with cancer. This manuscript reporting on a study protocol will enhance clarity and transparency in reporting and offer insights for others with interest in this same topic. Once completed, findings from this study could extend knowledge about the conduct and measurement of effectiveness in rehabilitation initiatives. If study findings suggest that the intervention is effective, structured active play may become a standard part of rehabilitation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04672681. Registered December 17, 2020. https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04672681.

Keywords: gross motor function; pediatric oncology; physical activity; preschool children; randomized; rehabilitation; social skills; structured active play.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Pouplier, Winther, Christensen, Schmidt-Andersen, Zhang, Frandsen, Schmiegelow, Fridh and Larsen.

References

    1. Ness KK, Kaste SC, Zhu L, Pui CH, Jeha S, Nathan PC, et al. . Skeletal, neuromuscular and fitness impairments among children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymph. (2015) 56:1004–11. 10.3109/10428194.2014.944519
    1. Thorsteinsson T, Larsen HB, Schmiegelow K, Thing LF, Krustrup P, Pedersen MT, et al. . Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical function in children with cancer from diagnosis throughout treatment. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. (2017) 3:e000179. 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000179
    1. Vainionpää L. Clinical neurological findings of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia at diagnosis and during treatment. Eur J Pediatr. (1993) 152:115–9. 10.1007/BF02072486
    1. Nielsen MKF, Christensen JF, Frandsen TL, Thorsteinsson T, Andersen LB, Christensen KB, et al. . Effects of a physical activity program from diagnosis on cardiorespiratory fitness in children with cancer: a national non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. (2020) 18:1–12. 10.1186/s12916-020-01634-6
    1. Hartman A, Winkel ML, van Beek RD, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SMPF, Kemper HCG, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, et al. . A randomized trial investigating an exercise program to prevent reduction of bone mineral density and impairment of motor performance during treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2009) 53:64–71. 10.1002/pbc.21942
    1. Darcy L, Enskär K, Björk M. Young children's experiences of living an everyday life with cancer – a three year interview study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. (2019) 39:1–9. 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.007
    1. Björk M, Nordström B, Hallström I. Needs of young children with cancer during their initial hospitalization: an observational study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. (2006) 23:210–9. 10.1177/1043454206289737
    1. Nielsen MKF, Christensen JF, Frandsen TL, Thorsteinsson T, Andersen LB, Christensen KB, et al. . Testing physical function in children undergoing intense cancer treatment—a RESPECT feasibility study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2018) 65:1–9. 10.1002/pbc.27100
    1. Thorsteinsson T, Schmiegelow K, Thing LF, Andersen LB, Helms AS, Ingersgaard MV, et al. . Classmates motivate childhood cancer patients to participate in physical activity during treatment: a qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care. (2019) 28:1–10. 10.1111/ecc.13121
    1. Braam K, Van der Torre P, Takken T, Veening MA, Van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Kaspers GJL. Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer (Review) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2016) 3:CD008796. 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3
    1. Fiuza-Luces C, Padilla JR, Soares-Miranda L, Santana-Sosa E, Quiroga J V., Santos-Lozano A, et al. Exercise intervention in pediatric patients with solid tumors: the physical activity in pediatric cancer trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2017) 49:223–30. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001094
    1. WOLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION,. Guidelines on Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour Sleep. World Health Organization (2019). p. 4. Available online at:
    1. Timmons BW, Leblanc AG, Carson V, Gorber SC, Dillman C, Janssen I, et al. . Systematic review of physical activity and health in the early years (aged 0-4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. (2012) 37:773–92. 10.1139/h2012-070
    1. Barnett LM, Salmon J, Hesketh KD. More active pre-school children have better motor competence at school starting age: an observational cohort study. BMC Public Health. (2016) 16:1–8. 10.1186/s12889-016-3742-1
    1. Clark JE. On the problem of motor skill development. J Phys Educ Recreat Danc. (2007) 78:39–44. 10.1080/07303084.2007.10598023
    1. Logan SW, Robinson LE, Wilson AE, Lucas WA. Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health Dev. (2012) 38:305–15. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01307.x
    1. Williams HG, Pfeiffer KA, O'Neill JR, Dowda M, McIver KL, Brown WH, et al. . Motor skill performance and physical activity in preschool children. Obesity. (2008) 16:1421–6. 10.1038/oby.2008.214
    1. Wrotniak BH, Epstein LH, Dorn JM, Jones KE, Kondilis VA. The relationship between motor proficiency and physical activity in children. Pediatrics. (2006) 118:e1758–65. 10.1542/peds.2006-0742
    1. Piek JP, Baynam GB, Barrett NC. The relationship between fine and gross motor ability, self-perceptions and self-worth in children and adolescents. Hum Mov Sci. (2006) 25:65–75. 10.1016/j.humov.2005.10.011
    1. Garcia C, Garcia L, Floyd J, Lawson J. Improving public health through early childhood movement programs. J Phys Educ Recreat Danc. (2002) 73:27–31. 10.1080/07303084.2002.10605876
    1. Bellows LL, Davies PL, Anderson J, Kennedy C. Effectiveness of a physical activity intervention for head start preschoolers: a randomized intervention study. Am J Occup Ther. (2013) 67:28–36. 10.5014/ajot.2013.005777
    1. Zeng N, Ayyub M, Sun H, Wen X, Xiang P, Gao Z. Effects of physical activity on motor skills and cognitive development in E.: GCU library resources - all subjects. Biomed Res Int. (2017) 2017:1–13. 10.1155/2017/2760716
    1. Veldman SLC, Jones RA, Okely AD. Efficacy of gross motor skill interventions in young children: an updated systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. (2016) 2:e000067. 10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000067
    1. Reilly JJ, Kelly LA, Montgomery C, Willamson A, Fisher A, McColl JH, et al. . Physical activity to prevent obesity in young children: cluster randomised controlled trial. Bmj. (2006) 333:1171. 10.1136/bmj.38979.623773.55
    1. Pellegrini AD, Smith PK. Physical activity play: the nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Dev. (1998) 69:577–98. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06226.x
    1. Ginsburg KR, Shifrin DL, Broughton DD, Dreyer BP, Milteer RM, Mulligan DA, et al. . The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics. (2007) 119:182–91. 10.1542/peds.2006-2697
    1. Leonard HC, Hill EL. Review: the impact of motor development on typical and atypical social cognition and language: a systematic review. Child Adolesc Ment Health. (2014) 19:163–70. 10.1111/camh.12055
    1. Hart S (editor). Inclusion, Play and Empathy: Neuroaffective Development in Children's Groups. 1st ed. London; Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publisher; (2017).
    1. Bjorklund DF, Brown RD. Physical play and cognitive development: integrating activity, cognition, and education. Child Dev. (1998) 69:604–6. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06229.x
    1. Hart S. Inclusion, play and empathy: neuroaffective development in children's groups. 1 ed. In: Hart S, editor. Jessica Kingsley Publisher (2017). Available online at:
    1. Chan A, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials | The EQUATOR Network. Ann Intern Med. (2016) 158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Henderson K, Glancy M, Little S. Putting the fun into physical activity. J Phys Educ Recreat Danc. (1999) 70:43–5. 10.1080/07303084.1999.10605706
    1. Spagnola M, Fiese BH. Family routines and rituals. Encycl Hum Relations. (2013) 20:284–99. 10.1097/01.IYC.0000290352.32170.5a
    1. University of Minnesota. Developmental Skills for Ages 2 to 3 Years. Fairview Heal Serv. (2010). p. 3–6. Available online at:
    1. University of Minnesota. Developmental Skills for Ages 4 to 5 Years. Fairview Heal Serv. (2010). Available online at:
    1. Schmidt-Andersen P, Møller T, Mogensen PR, Schmiegelow K, Larsen HB, Nielsen MKF. Feasibility and validity of the actiheart activity monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates: a RESPECT study. Pediatr Phys Ther. (2020) 32:226–33. 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712
    1. Wilson RW, Jacobsen PB, Fields KK. Pilot study of a home-based aerobic exercise program for sedentary cancer survivors treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2005) 35:721–7. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704815
    1. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, et al. . How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. (2009) 36:452–7. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
    1. Folio MR, Fewell, RR,. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales - Second Edition - Examiner's Manual. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: PRO-ED. (2000). Available online at:
    1. Wang HH, Liao HF, Hsieh CL. Reliability, sensitivity to change, and responsiveness of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. (2006) 86:1351–9. 10.2522/ptj.20050259
    1. Stahlhut M, Christensen J, Aadahl M. Applicability and intrarespondent reliability of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory in a random danish sample. Pediatr Phys Ther. (2010) 22:161–9. 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181dbf965
    1. Berg M, Jahnsen R, Frøslie KF, Hussain A, Berg M, Frøslie KF, et al. . Reliability of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. (2004) 24:61–77. 10.1300/J006v24n03_05
    1. Neumann S, Kwisda S, Krettek C, Gaulke R. Comparison of the grip strength using the martin-vigorimeter and the JAMAR-dynamometer: establishment of normal values. In Vivo. (2017) 31:917–24. 10.21873/invivo.11147
    1. Robertson A, Deitz J. A Description of gripstrength in preschool children. Am J Occup Ther. (1987) 42:647–52. 10.5014/ajot.42.10.647
    1. Enright PL. The six-minute walk test. Respir Care. (2003) 48:783–5.
    1. Bohannon RW, Wang YC, Bubela D, Gershon RC. Normative two-minute walk test distances for boys and girls 3 to 17 years of age. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. (2018) 38:39–45. 10.1080/01942638.2016.1261981
    1. Bohannon RW, Bubela D, Magasi S, McCreath H, Wang YC, Reuben D, et al. . Comparison of walking performance over the first 2 minutes and the full 6 minutes of the Six-Minute Walk Test. BMC Res Notes. (2014) 7:1–6. 10.1186/1756-0500-7-269
    1. Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Katz ER, Meeske K, Dickinson P. The PedsQLTM in pediatric cancer: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventoryTM generic core scales, multidimensional fatigue scale, and cancer module. Cancer. (2002) 94:2090–106. 10.1002/cncr.10428
    1. Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T. The 36-Ltem short form. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. (2007) 15:126–34. 10.5435/00124635-200702000-00007
    1. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Dir Progr Eval. (1986) 1986:73–84. 10.1002/ev.1427
    1. Smith B, Sparkes AC. Interview - qualitative interviewing in the sport and exercise sciences. In: Smith B, Sparkes AC, editors. Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. 1st ed. London; New York, NY: Routledge; (2017). p. 103–23.
    1. Darcy L, Björk M, Enskär K, Knutsson S. The process of striving for an ordinary, everyday life, in young children living with cancer, at six months and one year post diagnosis. Eur J Oncol Nurs. (2014) 18:605–12. 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.06.006
    1. Ciesielska M, Broström KW, Ölhander M. Observation Methods. In: Ciesielska M, Jemielniak D, editors. Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; (2018). p. 33–52.
    1. Winther H. Pratitioner research. In: Thing LF, Ottesen L, editors. Methods in Sport and Physioterapy Research. 2 ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard. (2015). p. 172–89.
    1. Winther H. Let's move: embodiment, leadership, and dance in education. In: Tin MB, Telseth F, Tangen JO, Giulianotti R, editors. The Nordic Model and Physical Culture. Routledge Reasearch in Sport, Culture and Society. 1 ed. Oxon; New York, NY: Routhledge; (2020). p. 51–67.
    1. Sparkes AC. Researching the senses in sport and exercise. In: Smith B, Sparkes A, editors. Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. New York, NY: Routledge; (2017). p. 343–54.
    1. Thorpe H, Olive R. Conducting observations in sport and exercise settings. In: Smith B, Sparkes AC, editors. Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. 1st ed. London; New York, NY: Routledge; (2017). p. 124–38.
    1. Morse JM. Data were saturated. Qual Health Res. (2015) 25:587–8. 10.1177/1049732315576699
    1. Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2018) 18:1–18. 10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
    1. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. (2004) 24:105–12. 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
    1. Patton M. Purposeful sampling. In: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; (1990). p. 169–86.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. (2006) 3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. (2012) 40:795–805. 10.1177/1403494812465030
    1. Lima RA, Bugge A, Ersbøll AK, Stodden DF, Andersen LB. The longitudinal relationship between motor competence and measures of fatness and fitness from childhood into adolescence. J Pediatr. (2019) 95:482–8. 10.1016/j.jped.2018.02.010
    1. Utesch T, Bardid F, Büsch D, Strauss B. The relationship between motor competence and physical fitness from early childhood to early adulthood: a meta-analysis. Sport Med. (2019) 49:541–51. 10.1007/s40279-019-01068-y
    1. Hartman A, Van Bos C Den, Stijnen T, Pieters R. Decrease in motor performance in children with cancer is independent of the cumulative dose of vincristine. Cancer. (2006) 106:1395–401. 10.1002/cncr.21706
    1. Morales JS, Santana-Sosa E, Santos-Lozano A, Baño-Rodrigo A, Valenzuela PL, Rincón-Castanedo C, et al. . Inhospital exercise benefits in childhood cancer: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sport. (2020) 30:126–34. 10.1111/sms.13545
    1. FDA. What is a Serious Adverse Event?. FDA (2016). Available online at:

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever