Measuring behaviours for escaping from house fires: use of latent variable models to summarise multiple behaviours

G B Ploubidis, P Edwards, D Kendrick, Keeping Children Safe Study Group, Joanne Ablewhite, Penny Benford, Clare Bryan, Rose Clacy, Carol Coupland, Nicola Cooper, Toity Deave, Trudy Goodenough, Adrian Hawkins, Mike Hayes, Paul Hindmarch, Bryony Kay, Benita Laird-Hopkins, Gosia Majsak-Newman, Elaine McColl, Lisa McDaid, Richard Reading, Jane Stewart, Alex J Sutton, Elizabeth Towner, Michael Watson, Persephone Wynn, G B Ploubidis, P Edwards, D Kendrick, Keeping Children Safe Study Group, Joanne Ablewhite, Penny Benford, Clare Bryan, Rose Clacy, Carol Coupland, Nicola Cooper, Toity Deave, Trudy Goodenough, Adrian Hawkins, Mike Hayes, Paul Hindmarch, Bryony Kay, Benita Laird-Hopkins, Gosia Majsak-Newman, Elaine McColl, Lisa McDaid, Richard Reading, Jane Stewart, Alex J Sutton, Elizabeth Towner, Michael Watson, Persephone Wynn

Abstract

Background: This paper reports the development and testing of a construct measuring parental fire safety behaviours for planning escape from a house fire.

Methods: Latent variable modelling of data on parental-reported fire safety behaviours and plans for escaping from a house fire and multivariable logistic regression to quantify the association between groups defined by the latent variable modelling and parental-report of having a plan for escaping from a house fire. Data comes from 1112 participants in a cluster randomised controlled trial set in children's centres in 4 study centres in the UK.

Results: A two class model provided the best fit to the data, combining responses to five fire safety planning behaviours. The first group ('more behaviours for escaping from a house fire') comprised 86% of participants who were most likely to have a torch, be aware of how their smoke alarm sounds, to have external door and window keys accessible, and exits clear. The second group ('fewer behaviours for escaping from a house fire') comprised 14% of participants who were less likely to report these five behaviours. After adjusting for potential confounders, participants allocated to the 'more behaviours for escaping from a house fire group were 2.5 times more likely to report having an escape plan (OR 2.48; 95% CI 1.59-3.86) than those in the "fewer behaviours for escaping from a house fire" group.

Conclusions: Multiple fire safety behaviour questions can be combined into a single binary summary measure of fire safety behaviours for escaping from a house fire. Our findings will be useful to future studies wishing to use a single measure of fire safety planning behaviour as measures of outcome or exposure.

Trial registration number: NCT 01452191. Date of registration 13/10/2011.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01452191.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Standardised factor loadings and standard errors of confirmatory factor analysis with two dimensions f1 and f2. *f1 and f2circles are latent continuous dimensions. **“ecircles represent random error in each observed indicator, or unique variance not shared with other indicators of fire safety related behaviour
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Histogram of dimensional safety behaviour summary index (f1)

References

    1. Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J, Hyder A, Branche C, Rahman A, Rivara F, Bartolomeos K. World report on child injury prevention. In: World Health Organisation, UNICEF, Geneva. 2008.
    1. Department for Communities and Local Government: Fire Statistics 2011 to 2012. In: London. 2012.
    1. Edwards P, Roberts I, Green J, Lutchmun S. Deaths from injury in children and employment status in family: analysis of trends in class specific death rates. BMJ. 2006;333(7559):119–121. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38875.757488.4F.
    1. Runyan CW, Bangdiwala SI, Linzer MA, Sacks JJ, Butts J. Risk factors for fatal residential fires. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(12):859–863. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209173271207.
    1. Marshall SW, Runyan CW, Bangdiwala SI, Linzer MA, Sacks JJ, Butts JD. Fatal residential fires: who dies and who survives? JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1998;279(20):1633–1637. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.20.1633.
    1. . Accessed 21 Aug 2013.
    1. Department for Communities and Local Government . FRS operational statistics bulletin for England 2011-12. London: FRS; 2012.
    1. Campbell NR, Ayala GX, Litrownik AJ, Slymen DJ, Zavala F, Elder JP. Evaluation of a first aid and home safety program for hispanic migrant adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(4):258–265. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00300-2.
    1. Hwang V, Duchossois G, Garcia-Espana J, Durbin D. Impact of a community based fire prevention intervention on fire safety knowledge and behavior in elementary school children. Inj Prev. 2006;12(5):344–346. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011197.
    1. Petridou E, Tolma E, Dessypris N, Trichopoulos D. A controlled evaluation of a community injury prevention project in two Greek islands. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(1):173–179. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.1.173.
    1. Posner JC, Hawkins LA, Garcia-Espana F, Durbin DR. A randomised, clinical trial of a home safety intervention based in an Emergency Department setting. Pediatrics. 2004;113(6):1603–1608. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1603.
    1. Kendrick D, Young B, Mason-Jones AJ, Ilyas N, Achana FA, Cooper NJ, Hubbard SJ, Sutton AJ, Smith S, Wynn P et al: Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(9).
    1. Communities and Local Government: . Accessed 25 Aug 2013. In: Fire safety in the home. 2011.
    1. Ploubidis GB, Grundy E. Health measurement in population surveys: combining information from self-reported and observer-measured health indicators. Demography. 2011;48(2):699–724. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0028-1.
    1. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Classical latent variable models for medical research. Stat Methods Med Res. 2008;17(1):5–32. doi: 10.1177/0962280207081236.
    1. Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S. Generalized latent variable modeling: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2004.
    1. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus user’s guide. 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA. pp. 1998–2012.
    1. Gorsuch R. Factor analysis. 2. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1983.
    1. Hatfield PM, Staresinic AG, Sorkness CA, Peterson NM, Schirmer J, Katcher ML. Validating self reported home safety practices in a culturally diverse non-inner city population. Inj Prev. 2006;12(1):52–57. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.009399.
    1. Yorkston E, Turner C, Schluter P, McClure R. Validity and reliability of responses to a self-report home safety survey designed for use in a community-based child injury prevention programme. Int J Injr Contr Saf Promot. 2005;12(3):193–196. doi: 10.1080/1566097042000265791.
    1. Mason M, Kaufer Christoffel K, Sinacore J. Reliability and validity of the injury prevention project home safety survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(8):759–765. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.8.759.
    1. Chen L-H, Gielen AC, McDonald EM. Validity of self reported home safety practices. Inj Prev. 2003;9(1):73–75. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.1.73.
    1. Osborne JM, Shibl R, Cameron CM, Kendrick D, Lyons RA, Spinks AB, Sipe N, McClure RJ. Validity of parent’s self-reported responses to home safety questions. Int J Injr Contr Saf Promot. 2015;1–11.
    1. Watson MC, Benford P, Coupland CA, Clacy R, Hindmarsh P, Majsak-Newman G, Deave T, Kendrick D. team obotKCSp: Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a series of case control studies. Inj Prev. 2014;20(5):336–342. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-041006.
    1. Watson M, Kendrick D, Coupland D. Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial. Inj Prev. 2003;9:180–183. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.2.180.
    1. Clamp M, Kendrick D. A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years. BMJ. 1998;316(7144):1576–1579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7144.1576.
    1. Department for Communities and Local Government: English Indices of Deprivation 2010. . Accessed 27 Feb 2015.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever