Does Guanfacine Extended Release Impact Functional Impairment in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Mark A Stein, Vanja Sikirica, Margaret D Weiss, Brigitte Robertson, Andrew Lyne, Jeffrey H Newcorn, Mark A Stein, Vanja Sikirica, Margaret D Weiss, Brigitte Robertson, Andrew Lyne, Jeffrey H Newcorn

Abstract

Background: In clinical trials of medications to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, effects on functional impairment have been less well-studied than changes in ADHD symptoms.

Objective: Data regarding functional impairment were analyzed from a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of guanfacine extended release (GXR) in children with ADHD, using the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P). The correspondence of changes in WFIRS-P scores with symptomatic and global response to GXR treatment was also examined, with treatment response defined by scores on both the ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale (CGI-I).

Methods: In this 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose optimization study at 47 sites across the USA and Canada, children aged 6-12 years with a diagnosis of ADHD [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria, and an ADHD-RS-IV score ≥28 and CGI-Severity of Illness Scale score ≥4 at baseline], were randomized 1:1:1 into three groups: GXR AM [GXR (1-4 mg/day) in the morning, placebo in the evening], GXR PM [placebo in the morning, GXR (1-4 mg/day) in the evening], or twice-daily placebo. Parents rated their children on the WFIRS-P at screening, baseline, the end of dose optimization, and at the final on-treatment assessment.

Results: The efficacy population was composed of 333 subjects (GXR AM: n = 107; GXR PM: n = 114; placebo: n = 112). At the final on-treatment assessment, there were significant improvements from baseline in the placebo-adjusted difference in least-squares (LS) mean (95 % confidence interval) WFIRS-P Total scores for both GXR treatment groups combined [GXR all-active: -0.16 (-0.25, -0.07), effect size (ES) = 0.448, P <0.001] and separately [GXR AM: -0.15 (-0.26, -0.05), ES = 0.417, P = 0.004; GXR PM: -0.18 (-0.28, -0.07), ES = 0.478, P = 0.001]. Significant improvements in WFIRS-P domain scores for Family, Learning and School (including Academic Performance and Behavior in School), Social, and Risky Behavior were found for both GXR cohorts compared with placebo. However, the Life Skills and Self-Concept domain scores of the WFIRS-P did not improve with GXR treatment. Post hoc stratification by responder status revealed that significant (P <0.001) improvements in WFIRS-P Total and all domain scores were associated with symptomatic treatment response in the GXR all-active group.

Conclusions: GXR treatment in children with ADHD was associated with reductions in WFIRS-P functional impairment scores compared with placebo, regardless of time of GXR administration. Changes in WFIRS-P scores were congruent with clinical response, as determined by both ADHD symptom reduction and CGI-I scores. CLINICALTRIALS.

Gov identifier: NCT00997984.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
LS mean change from baseline in WFIRS-P scores at Visit 10 (last observation carried forward) for a GXR am [GXR (1–4 mg/day) in the morning, placebo in the evening], b GXR pm [placebo in the morning, GXR (1–4 mg/day) in the evening], and c GXR all-active; full analysis set. LS mean and P values were based on type III sum of squares from an analysis of covariance model for the change from baseline, including treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. A negative difference in LS mean (GXR-placebo) indicates a positive effect of the active treatment over placebo. LS least-squares, WFIRS-P Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale–Parent Report, GXR guanfacine extended release. *P <0.05
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean change from baseline in WFIRS-P scores at Visit 10 (last observation carried forward) by treatment response to GXR treatment; full analysis set (GXR all-active group). Responders are defined as subjects with ADHD-RS-IV Total score reduction from baseline ≥30 % and a CGI-I score of 1 or 2. WFIRS-P Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale–Parent Report, GXR guanfacine extended release, ADHD-RS-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, CGI-I Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement Scale. ***P <0.001

References

    1. Visser SN, Danielson ML, Bitsko RH, Holbrook JR, Kogan MD, Ghandour RM, et al. Trends in the parent-report of health care provider-diagnosed and medicated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: United States, 2003–2011. J Am Acad Child Adoles Psychiatry. 2014;53(1):34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.09.001.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and evaluation of the child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2000;105(5):1158–1170. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.5.1158.
    1. Stein MA, Szumowski E, Blondis TA, Roizen NJ. Adaptive skills dysfunction in ADD and ADHD children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1995;36(4):663–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb02320.x.
    1. Parens E, Johnston J. Facts, values, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an update on the controversies. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2009;3(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-3-1.
    1. Gathje RA, Lewandowski LJ, Gordon M. The role of impairment in the diagnosis of ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2008;11(5):529–537.
    1. Gajria K, Livote E, Sikirica V, Reilly K, Erder MH. Validation of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale—Parent Report Form in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24(Suppl 2):S711. doi: 10.1016/S0924-977X(14)71147-2.
    1. Tarakçıoğlu MC, Cakin Memik N, Olgun NN, Aydemir O, Weiss MD. Turkish validity and reliability study of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale–Parent Report. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2015;7(2):129–139. doi: 10.1007/s12402-014-0158-6.
    1. Banaschewski T, Soutullo C, Lecendreux M, Johnson M, Zuddas A, Hodgkins P, et al. Health-related quality of life and functional outcomes from a randomized, controlled study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. CNS Drugs. 2013;27(10):829–840. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0095-5.
    1. Fuentes J, Danckaerts M, Cardo E, Puvanendran K, Berquin P, De Bruyckere K, et al. Long-term quality-of-life and functioning comparison of atomoxetine versus other standard treatment in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013;33(6):766–774. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31829c762b.
    1. Baer S, Bogusz E, Green DA. Stuck on screens: patterns of computer and gaming station use in youth seen in a psychiatric clinic. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;20(2):86–94.
    1. Hantson J, Wang PP, Grizenko-Vida M, Ter-Stepanian M, Harvey W, Joober R, et al. Effectiveness of a therapeutic summer camp for children with ADHD: Phase I Clinical Intervention Trial. J Atten Disord. 2012;16(7):610–617. doi: 10.1177/1087054711416800.
    1. Stein MA, Waldman ID, Charney E, Aryal S, Sable C, Gruber R, et al. Dose effects and comparative effectiveness of extended release dexmethylphenidate and mixed amphetamine salts. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011;21(6):581–588. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0018.
    1. Maziade M, Rouleau N, Lee B, Rogers A, Davis L, Dickson R. Atomoxetine and neuropsychological function in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results of a pilot study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2009;19(6):709–718. doi: 10.1089/cap.2008.0166.
    1. Nagy P, Hage A, Coghill DR, Caballero B, Adeyi B, Anderson CS, et al. Functional outcomes from a head-to-head, randomized, double-blind trial of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and atomoxetine in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and an inadequate response to methylphenidate. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Biederman J, Melmed RD, Patel A, McBurnett K, Konow J, Lyne A, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of guanfacine extended release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2008;121(1):e73–e84. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3695.
    1. Sallee FR, McGough J, Wigal T, Donahue J, Lyne A, Biederman J. Guanfacine extended release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48(2):155–165. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318191769e.
    1. Wilens TE, Bukstein O, Brams M, Cutler AJ, Childress A, Rugino T, et al. A controlled trial of extended-release guanfacine and psychostimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(1):74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.10.012.
    1. Newcorn JH, Stein MA, Childress AC, Youcha S, White C, Enright G, et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of guanfacine extended release in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: morning or evening administration. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52(9):921–930. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.06.006.
    1. The Canadian Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Resource Alliance (CADDRA). Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS) instructions. . Accessed June 25 2015.
    1. The Canadian Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Resource Alliance (CADDRA). Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale—Parent Report (WFIRS-P). . Accessed June 25 2015.
    1. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
    1. Vidal R, Castells J, Richarte V, Palomar G, Garcia M, Nicolau R, et al. Group therapy for adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54(4):275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.12.016.
    1. Hervas A, Huss M, Johnson M, McNicholas F, van Stralen J, Sreckovic S, et al. Efficacy and safety of extended-release guanfacine hydrochloride in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, controlled, phase III trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24(12):1861–1872. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.09.014.
    1. Brod M, Pohlman B, Lasser R, Hodgkins P. Comparison of the burden of illness for adults with ADHD across seven countries: a qualitative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:47. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-47.
    1. Coghill D, Soutullo C, d’Aubuisson C, Preuss U, Lindback T, Silverberg M, et al. Impact of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on the patient and family: results from a European survey. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2008;2(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-2-31.
    1. Holmberg K. Adolescent academic outcome of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder—a population-based study. In: Norvilitis JM, editor. Contemporary Trends in ADHD Research. Rijeka: InTech; 2012.
    1. Doshi JA, Hodgkins P, Kahle J, Sikirica V, Cangelosi MJ, Setyawan J, et al. Economic impact of childhood and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the United States. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(10):990–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.07.008.
    1. Gjervan B, Torgersen T, Nordahl HM, Rasmussen K. Functional impairment and occupational outcome in adults with ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2012;16(7):544–552. doi: 10.1177/1087054711413074.
    1. Dalsgaard S, Leckman JF, Mortensen PB, Nielsen HS, Simonsen M. Effect of drugs on the risk of injuries in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(8):702–709. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00271-0.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever