A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD

Helen Arievich, Tim Overend, Didier Renard, Michael Gibbs, Vijay Alagappan, Michael Looby, Donald Banerji, Helen Arievich, Tim Overend, Didier Renard, Michael Gibbs, Vijay Alagappan, Michael Looby, Donald Banerji

Abstract

Background: Glycopyrronium bromide (NVA237) is an inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist in development for treatment of COPD. This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily (OD) and twice-daily (BID) glycopyrronium bromide regimens, using a novel model-based approach, in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.

Methods: Double-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial with an eight-treatment, two-period, balanced incomplete block design. Patients (smoking history ≥10 pack-years, post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥30% and <80% predicted, FEV1/FVC <0.7) were randomized to one of 16 independent sequences for 28 days. Primary endpoint: mean trough FEV1 at Day 28.

Results: 385 patients (mean age 61.2 years; mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 53% predicted) were randomized; 88.6% completed. All OD and BID dosing regimens produced dose-dependent bronchodilation; at Day 28, increases in mean trough FEV1 versus placebo were statistically significant for all regimens, ranging from 51 mL (glycopyrronium bromide 12.5 μg OD) to 160 mL (glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg BID). Pharmacodynamic steady-state was reached by Day 7. There was a small separation (≤37 mL) between BID and OD dose-response curves for mean trough FEV1 at steady-state in favour of BID dosing. Over 24 hours, separation between OD and BID regimens was even smaller (FEV1 AUC0-24h maximum difference for equivalent daily dose regimens: 8 mL). Dose-response results for FEV1 at 12 hours, FEV1 AUC0-12h and FEV1 AUC0-4h at steady-state showed OD regimens provided greater improvement over placebo than BID regimens for total daily doses of 25 μg, 50 μg and 100 μg, while the reverse was true for OD versus BID regimens from 12-24 hours. The 12.5 μg BID dose produced a marginally higher improvement in trough FEV1 versus placebo than 50 μg OD, however, the response at 12 hours over placebo was suboptimal (74 mL). Glycopyrronium bromide was safe and well tolerated at all doses.

Conclusions: Glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg OD provides significant bronchodilation over a 24 hour period, and in terms of FEV1 AUC0-24h is not significantly different than the same total daily dose administered BID. Importantly, OD dosing may confer better patient adherence. The results are consistent with previous glycopyrronium bromide studies and support once-daily dosing of glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01119950.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trough FEV1dose−response results at 24 hours at steady-state (modified intent-to-treat population). Model average placebo-adjusted values for OD and BID dosing regimens, with 90% confidence limits (red and blue shaded areas, respectively). FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; OD: once daily; BID: twice daily.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose−response results of FEV1AUC0-24hat steady-state (modified intent-to-treat population). Model average placebo-adjusted values for OD and BID dosing regimens, with 90% confidence limits (red and blue shaded areas, respectively). FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; AUC: area under the curve; OD: once daily; BID: twice daily.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dose−response results of peak FEV1at steady-state (modified intent-to-treat population). Model average values for OD and BID dosing regimens, with 90% confidence limits (red and blue shaded areas, respectively). FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; OD: once daily; BID: twice daily.
Figure 4
Figure 4
24-hour spirometry results at steady-state (modified intent-to-treat population). Model-based placebo-adjusted values for OD and BID dosing regimens, with 90% confidence limits (red and blue shaded areas, respectively). MCID = 100 mL [12]. MCID: minimal clinically important difference; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; OD: once daily; BID: twice daily.

References

    1. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung diseases (GOLD) Executive Summary: Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD. ( ) 2010.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) The global burden of disease 2004 update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Troosters T, Celli B, Lystig T, Kesten S, Mehra S, Tashkin DP, Decramer M. UPLIFT Study Investigators. Tiotropium as a first maintenance drug in COPD: secondary analysis of the UPLIFT trial. Eur Respir J. 2010;36:65–73. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00127809.
    1. Vogelmeier C, Banerji D. NVA237, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, as an emerging therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2011;5:163–173. doi: 10.1177/1753465811406001.
    1. Verkindre C, Fukuchi Y, Flémale A, Takeda A, Overend T, Prasad N, Dolker M. Sustained 24-h efficacy of NVA237, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in COPD patients. Respir Med. 2010;104:1482–1489. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.04.006.
    1. Kerwin E, Hébert J, Gallagher N, Martin C, Overend T, Alagappan VKT, Lu Y, Banerji D. Efficacy and safety of NVA237 versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD over 52 weeks: The GLOW2 study. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1106–14. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00040712.
    1. Overend T, Lu Y, Dolker M, Banerji D. Dose response of NVA237, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist for the treatment of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:A4422.
    1. Fogarty C, Hattersley H, Di Scala L, Drollmann A. Bronchodilatory effects of NVA237, a once daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in COPD patients. Respir Med. 2010;105:334–342.
    1. Vogelmeier C, Verkindre C, Cheung D, Galdiz JB, Güçlü SZ, Spangenthal S, Overend T, Henley M, Mizutani G, Zeldin RK. Safety and tolerability of NVA237, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in COPD patients. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2010;23:438–444. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2010.04.005.
    1. Renard D, Looby M, Kramer B, Lawrence D, Morris D, Stanski DR. Characterization of the bronchodilatory dose response to indacaterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using model-based approaches. Respir Res. 2011;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-54.
    1. Renard D, Stanski DR, Morris D, Looby M. Improving dose–response assessments of bronchodilators, using indacaterol as an example. RDD Europe. 2011;1:167–176.
    1. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung diseases (GOLD) Executive Summary: Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD. 2008. .
    1. Donohue JF. Minimal clinically important differences in COPD lung function. COPD. 2005;2:111–124. doi: 10.1081/COPD-200053377.
    1. Fuhr R, Magnussen H, Sarem K, Llovera AR, Kirsten A-M, Falques M, Caracta CF, Gil EG. Efficacy of aclidinium bromide 400 μg twice daily compared with placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Chest. 2012;141:745–752. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0406.
    1. Agusti A, Vestbo J. Current controversies and future perspectives in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:507–513. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201103-0405PP.
    1. Bourbeau J, Bartlett SJ. Patient adherence in COPD. Thorax. 2008;63:831–838. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.086041.
    1. Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1296–1310. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(01)80109-0.
    1. Breekveldt-Postma NS, Koerselman J, Erkens JA, Lammers JW, Herings RM. Enhanced persistence with tiotropium compared with other respiratory drugs in COPD. Respir Med. 2007;101:1398–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.01.025.
    1. Tashkin DP, Fabbri LM. Long-acting beta-agonists in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current and future agents. Respir Res. 2010;11:149. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-149.
    1. Toy EL, Beaulieu NU, McHale JM, Welland TR, Plauschinat CA, Swensen A, Duh MS. Treatment of COPD: relationships between daily dosing frequency, adherence, resource use, and costs. Respir Med. 2011;105:435–441. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.09.006.
    1. Calverley PM, Anderson JA, Celli B, Ferguson GT, Jenkins C, Jones PW, Yates JC, Yates BS, Vestbo J. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:775–789. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063070.
    1. Beeh KM, Beier J. The short, the long and the "ultra-long": why duration of bronchodilator action matters in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Adv Ther. 2010;27:150–159. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0017-6.
    1. Vestbo J, Anderson JA, Calverley PMA, Celli B, Ferguson GT, Jenkins C, Knobil K, Willits LR, Yates JC, Jones PW. Adherence to inhaled therapy, mortality and hospital admission in COPD. Thorax. 2009;64:939–943. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.113662.
    1. Rand CS, Nides M, Cowles MK, Wise RA, Connett J. Long-term metered-dose inhaler adherence in a clinical trial. The Lung Health Study Research Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:580–588.
    1. van Grunsven PM, van Schayck CP, van Deuveren M, van Herwaarden CL, Akkermans RP, van Weel C. Compliance during long term treatment with fluticasone propionate in subjects with early signs of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): results of the Detection, Intervention, and Monitoring Program of COPD and Asthma (DIMCA) Study. J Asthma. 2000;37:225–234. doi: 10.3109/02770900009055445.
    1. Haupt D, Krigsman K, Nilsson JL. Medication persistence among patients with asthma/COPD drugs. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:509–514. doi: 10.1007/s11096-008-9197-4.
    1. Krigsman K, Nilsson JL, Ring L. Refill adherence for patients with asthma and COPD: comparison of a pharmacy record database with manually collected repeat prescriptions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16:441–448. doi: 10.1002/pds.1321.
    1. Krigsman K, Moen J, Nilsson JL, Ring L. Refill adherence by the elderly for asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease drugs dispensed over a 10-year period. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32:603–611. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2007.00866.x.
    1. D'Urzo A, Ferguson G, van Noord JA, Hirata K, Martin C, Horton R, Lu Y, Banerji D, Overend T. Efficacy and safety of once-daily NVA237 in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: the GLOW1 trial. Respir Res. 2011;12:156. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-156.
    1. Beeh KM, Singh D, Di Scala L, Drollmann A. Once-daily NVA237 improves exercise tolerance from the first dose in patients with COPD: the GLOW3 trial. Int J COPD. 2012;7:503–513.
    1. Korenblat PE, Hebert J, Gallagher N, Martin C, Banerji D, Lu Y. NVA237 once daily improves dyspnea and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: the GLOW2 trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:A2254.
    1. Sechaud R, Renard D, Zhang-Auberson L, de la Motte S, Drollmann A, Kaiser G. The pharmacokinetics of multiple inhaled NVA237 doses at four dose levels in COPD patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;50:118–128.
    1. Westwood M, Bourbeau J, Jones PW, Cerulli A, Capkun-Niggli G, Worthy G. Relationship between FEV1 change and patient-reported outcomes in randomised trials of inhaled bronchodilators for stable COPD: a systematic review. Respir Res. 2011;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-40.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever