Increased bactericidal activity but dose-limiting intolerability at 50 mg·kg-1 rifampicin

Lindsey H M Te Brake, Veronique de Jager, Kim Narunsky, Naadira Vanker, Elin M Svensson, Patrick P J Phillips, Stephen H Gillespie, Norbert Heinrich, Michael Hoelscher, Rodney Dawson, Andreas H Diacon, Rob E Aarnoutse, Martin J Boeree, PanACEA Consortium, Lindsey H M Te Brake, Veronique de Jager, Kim Narunsky, Naadira Vanker, Elin M Svensson, Patrick P J Phillips, Stephen H Gillespie, Norbert Heinrich, Michael Hoelscher, Rodney Dawson, Andreas H Diacon, Rob E Aarnoutse, Martin J Boeree, PanACEA Consortium

Abstract

Background: Accumulating data indicate that higher rifampicin doses are more effective and shorten tuberculosis (TB) treatment duration. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and 7- and 14-day early bactericidal activity (EBA) of increasing doses of rifampicin. Here we report the results of the final cohorts of PanACEA HIGHRIF1, a dose escalation study in treatment-naive adult smear-positive patients with TB.

Methods: Patients received, in consecutive cohorts, 40 or 50 mg·kg-1 rifampicin once daily in monotherapy (day 1-7), supplemented with standard dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol between days 8 and 14.

Results: In the 40 mg·kg-1 cohort (n=15), 13 patients experienced a total of 36 adverse events during monotherapy, resulting in one treatment discontinuation. In the 50 mg·kg-1 cohort (n=17), all patients experienced adverse events during monotherapy, 93 in total; 11 patients withdrew or stopped study medication. Adverse events were mostly mild/moderate and tolerability rather than safety related, i.e. gastrointestinal disorders, pruritis, hyperbilirubinaemia and jaundice. There was a more than proportional increase in the rifampicin geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 h (AUC0-24 h) for 50 mg·kg-1 compared with 40 mg·kg-1; 571 (range 320-995) versus 387 (range 201-847) mg·L-1·h, while peak exposures saw proportional increases. Protein-unbound exposure after 50 mg·kg-1 (11% (range 8-17%)) was comparable with lower rifampicin doses. Rifampicin exposures and bilirubin concentrations were correlated (Spearman's ρ=0.670 on day 3, p<0.001). EBA increased considerably with dose, with the highest seen after 50 mg·kg-1: 14-day EBA -0.427 (95% CI -0.500- -0.355) log10CFU·mL-1·day-1.

Conclusion: Although associated with an increased bactericidal effect, the 50 mg·kg-1 dose was not well tolerated. Rifampicin at 40 mg·kg-1 was well tolerated and therefore selected for evaluation in a phase IIc treatment-shortening trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01392911.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: L.H.M. te Brake has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. de Jager has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Narunsky has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Vanker has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.M. Svensson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.P.J. Phillips reports grants from Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: S.H. Gillespie reports grants from the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership and TB Alliance, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: N. Heinrich reports grants from the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership and German Ministry for Education and Research, during the conduct of the study; other (paid presentation) from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Hoelscher has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Dawson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.H. Diacon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.E. Aarnoutse has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.J. Boeree has nothing to disclose.

Copyright ©ERS 2021. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
a, b) 7- and c, d) 14-day early bactericidal activity (EBA) (95% CI) of rifampicin based on a, c) CFU and b, d) time to positivity (TTP). Data from all patients were included with the exception of data from one patient from each of the 20 and 50 mg·kg−1 groups that had consistent negative cultures at baseline and throughout. The slight change in the estimates for 10 and 20 mg·kg−1 compared with previously [6] are because of data corrections (four CFU cultures were recorded as negative while they were actually missing).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Total serum bilirubin per day on rifampicin plotted against rifampicin total exposures (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to 12 h (AUC0–24 h) at day 7) in all patients with pharmacokinetic results (n=93) in the HIGHRIF1 study. The lines represent linear regressions (for illustration; statistical testing described in the text). The y-axis is capped at 70 µmol·L−1 for readability, excluding three outlying points (day 3 in one patient in the 40 mg·kg−1 group with AUC0–24 h 338 mg·L−1·h and bilirubin 111 µmol·L−1; day 7 and 10 in one patient in the 50 mg·kg−1 group with AUC0–24 h 980 mg·L−1·h and bilirubin 100 and 175 µmol·L−1, respectively).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Probability of tolerability-related adverse events during the first week of rifampicin monotherapy related to the rifampicin a) dose or b) exposure (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to 12 h (AUC0–24 h) at day 7). The shaded areas represent 90% confidence intervals based on the estimated parameter uncertainty

References

    1. van Ingen J, Aarnoutse RE, Donald PR, et al. . Why do we use 600 mg of rifampicin in tuberculosis treatment? Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: e194–e199. doi:10.1093/cid/cir184
    1. Jayaram R, Gaonkar S, Kaur P, et al. . Pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics of rifampin in an aerosol infection model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 2118–2124. doi:10.1128/AAC.47.7.2118-2124.2003
    1. Rosenthal IM, Tasneen R, Peloquin CA, et al. . Dose-ranging comparison of rifampin and rifapentine in two pathologically distinct murine models of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 4331–4340. doi:10.1128/AAC.00912-12
    1. de Steenwinkel JE, Aarnoutse RE, de Knegt GJ, et al. . Optimization of the rifampin dosage to improve the therapeutic efficacy in tuberculosis treatment using a murine model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 1127–1134. doi:10.1164/rccm.201207-1210OC
    1. World Health Organization . Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. Geneva, WHO, 2018.
    1. Boeree MJ, Diacon AH, Dawson R, et al. . A dose-ranging trial to optimize the dose of rifampin in the treatment of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 191: 1058–1065. doi:10.1164/rccm.201407-1264OC
    1. Svensson RJ, Aarnoutse RE, Diacon AH, et al. . A population pharmacokinetic model incorporating saturable pharmacokinetics and autoinduction for high rifampicin doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018; 103: 674–683. doi:10.1002/cpt.778
    1. Svensson RJ, Svensson EM, Aarnoutse RE, et al. . Greater early bactericidal activity at higher rifampicin doses revealed by modeling and clinical trial simulations. J Infect Dis 2018; 218: 991–999. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiy242
    1. Boeree MJ, Heinrich N, Aarnoutse R, et al. . High-dose rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and SQ109 for treating tuberculosis: a multi-arm, multi-stage randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 39–49. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30274-2
    1. Ewijk-Beneken Kolmer EWJ, Teulen MJA, van den Hombergh ECA, et al. . Determination of protein-unbound, active rifampicin in serum by ultrafiltration and ultra performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. A method suitable for standard and high doses of rifampicin. J Chromatogr B 2017; 1063: 42–49. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.08.004
    1. Ruslami R, Nijland HM, Alisjahbana B, et al. . Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a higher rifampin dose versus the standard dose in pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 2546–2551. doi:10.1128/AAC.01550-06
    1. Donald PR, Sirgel FA, Venter A, et al. . Early bactericidal activity of antituberculosis agents. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2003; 1: 141–155. doi:10.1586/14787210.1.1.141
    1. Long JS. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1997.
    1. Litjens CHC, Aarnoutse RE, van Ewijk-Beneken Kolmer EWJ, et al. . Protein binding of rifampicin is not saturated when using high-dose rifampicin. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74: 986–990. doi:10.1093/jac/dky527
    1. McColl KE, Thompson GG, el Omar E, et al. . Effect of rifampicin on haem and bilirubin metabolism in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 23: 553–559. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03091.x
    1. Chiou WJ, de Morais SM, Kikuchi R, et al. . OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 inhibition is associated with observations of benign clinical unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. Xenobiotica 2014; 44: 276–282. doi:10.3109/00498254.2013.820006
    1. te Brake LHM, Russel FG, van den Heuvel JJ, et al. . Inhibitory potential of tuberculosis drugs on ATP-binding cassette drug transporters. Tuberculosis 2016; 96: 150–157. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2015.08.004
    1. Savic RM, Lu Y, Bliven-Sizemore E, et al. . Population pharmacokinetics of rifapentine and desacetyl rifapentine in healthy volunteers: nonlinearities in clearance and bioavailability. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58: 3035–3042. doi:10.1128/AAC.01918-13
    1. Srivastava S, Pasipanodya JG, Meek C, et al. . Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis not due to noncompliance but to between-patient pharmacokinetic variability. J Infect Dis 2011; 204: 1951–1959. doi:10.1093/infdis/jir658
    1. Pasipanodya JG, Srivastava S, Gumbo T. Meta-analysis of clinical studies supports the pharmacokinetic variability hypothesis for acquired drug resistance and failure of antituberculosis therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55: 169–177. doi:10.1093/cid/cis353
    1. te Brake LHM, Ruslami R, Later-Nijland H, et al. . Exposure to total and protein-unbound rifampin is not affected by malnutrition in Indonesian tuberculosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59: 3233–3239. doi:10.1128/AAC.03485-14
    1. Svensson EM, Svensson RJ, te Brake LHM, et al. . The potential for treatment shortening with higher rifampicin doses: relating drug exposure to treatment response in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67: 34–41. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy026
    1. Velasquez GE, Brooks MB, Coit JM, et al. . Efficacy and safety of high-dose rifampin in pulmonary tuberculosis. A randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 198: 657–666. doi:10.1164/rccm.201712-2524OC
    1. Liu Y, Pertinez H, Ortega-Muro F, et al. . Optimal doses of rifampicin in the standard drug regimen to shorten tuberculosis treatment duration and reduce relapse by eradicating persistent bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 73: 724–731. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx467
    1. De Jager V, Le Roux S, Mnunu M, et al. . Transcutaneous rifampicin concentration monitoring. Abstract presented a the 10th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of Tuberculosis Drugs, Atlanta, GA, 2017.
    1. Susanto BO, Svensson RJ, Svensson EM, et al. . Rifampicin can be given as flat-dosing instead of weight-band dosing. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71: 3055–3060. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz1202
    1. Phillips PP, Dooley KE, Gillespie SH, et al. . A new trial design to accelerate tuberculosis drug development: the phase IIC Selection Trial with Extended Post-treatment follow-up (STEP). BMC Med 2016; 14: 51. doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0597-3
    1. Aarnoutse RE, Kibiki GS, Reither K, et al. . Pharmacokinetics, tolerability and bacteriological response of 600, 900 and 1200 mg rifampicin daily in patients with pulmonary TB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61: e01054-17. doi:10.1128/AAC.01054-17
    1. te Brake LHM, Boeree MJ, Aarnoutse RE. Conflicting findings on an intermediate dose of rifampicin for pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 199: 1166–1167. doi:10.1164/rccm.201811-2101LE

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever