The concept of race and health status in America

D R Williams, R Lavizzo-Mourey, R C Warren, D R Williams, R Lavizzo-Mourey, R C Warren

Abstract

Race is an unscientific, societally constructed taxonomy that is based on an ideology that views some human population groups as inherently superior to others on the basis of external physical characteristics or geographic origin. The concept of race is socially meaningful but of limited biological significance. Racial or ethnic variations in health status result primarily from variations among races in exposure or vulnerability to behavioral, psychosocial, material, and environmental risk factors and resources. Additional data that capture the specific factors that contribute to group differences in disease must be collected. However, reductions in racial disparities in health will ultimately require change in the larger societal institutions and structures that determine exposure to pathogenic conditions. More attention needs to be given to the ways that racism, in its multiple forms, affects health status. Socio-economic status is a central determinant of health status, overlaps the concept of race, but is not equivalent to race. Inadequate attention has been given to the range of variation in social, cultural, and health characteristics within and between racial or ethnic minority populations. There is a growing emphasis, both within and without the Federal Government, on the collection of racial or ethnic identifiers in health data systems, but noncoverage of the Asian and Pacific Islander population, Native Americans, and subgroups of the Hispanic population is still a major problem. However, for all racial or ethnic groups, we need not only more data but better data. We must be more active in directly measuring the health-related aspects of belonging to these social categories.

References

    1. Hastings Cent Rep. 1978 Dec;8(6):21-9
    1. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993 Aug;13(8):1139-58
    1. J Stud Alcohol. 1982 Jul;43(7):767-801
    1. Am Sociol Rev. 1983 Feb;48(1):60-77
    1. Am Heart J. 1984 Sep;108(3 Pt 2):715-22
    1. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1984 Fall;62(4):567-90
    1. Br J Addict. 1985 Dec;80(4):397-410
    1. Public Health Rep. 1986 May-Jun;101(3):238-52
    1. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Spring;11(1):97-116
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(2):113-30
    1. Am J Public Health. 1987 Jan;77(1):61-8
    1. Am J Public Health. 1987 Jan;77(1):69-72
    1. Int J Health Serv. 1987;17(2):259-78
    1. JAMA. 1989 Jan 13;261(2):278-81
    1. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87-121
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1989;15(3):319-33
    1. Hypertension. 1989 Dec;14(6):598-603
    1. Am J Public Health. 1990 Jun;80(6):722-4
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(12):1273-81
    1. Milbank Q. 1990;68(3):383-411
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Apr 17;83(8):551-7
    1. Int J Addict. 1990 Dec;25(12):1415-27
    1. Am J Hypertens. 1991 Apr;4(4 Pt 1):382-4
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Nov 15;134(10):1079-84
    1. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 4;326(23):1522-6
    1. ASDC J Dent Child. 1992 May-Jun;59(3):216-20
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Jun 17;84(12):957-62
    1. Am J Public Health. 1992 Aug;82(8):1133-6
    1. J Public Health Dent. 1992 Summer;52(4):210-5
    1. Diabetes. 1992 Oct;41 Suppl 2:4-11
    1. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1992 Nov;14(4):285-8
    1. Ethn Dis. 1992 Spring;2(2):120-5
    1. Ethn Dis. 1992 Spring;2(2):126-41
    1. Ethn Dis. 1992 Summer;2(3):207-21
    1. Ethn Dis. 1992 Summer;2(3):273-87
    1. Ethn Dis. 1992 Summer;2(3):296-305
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Feb;36(3):217-25
    1. JAMA. 1993 Feb 24;269(8):993-7
    1. J Urol. 1979 Jul;122(1):134-5

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever