Development and validation of a driving simulator for evaluating the residual effects of drugs on driving performance - sensitivity analysis using zopiclone as a positive control: Study Protocol Clinical Trial (SPIRIT Compliant)

Mari Iwata, Kunihiro Iwamoto, Daiji Kambe, Naoki Tachibana, Masahiko Ando, Norio Ozaki, Mari Iwata, Kunihiro Iwamoto, Daiji Kambe, Naoki Tachibana, Masahiko Ando, Norio Ozaki

Abstract

Introduction: Drugs acting on the central nervous system (CNS), especially hypnotics, can impair driving. The US Food and Drug Administration started requiring pharmaceutical companies to evaluate the residual influence of CNS agents on driving performance to review their recommended doses. Although it is important for physicians to discuss automobile driving while on medication with patients to promote traffic safety, the package inserts of most CNS agents in Japan uniformly prohibit patients from driving. Although more evidence-based information regarding the effects of drugs on driving performance is needed, the current evaluation methods for driving performance abroad cannot be applied directly to Japanese drivers because of differences in traffic environments, laws, and constitutions. Therefore, we plan to establish a new driving simulator (DS) that would enable the next-day residual effects of drugs on driving performance to be examined.

Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, we plan to recruit 26 healthy Japanese males aged 21 to 64 years through advertisements. During the test periods, which will take place twice every other week, the participants will undergo a DS evaluation in the hospital for 2 days/1 night after the first and last doses of the study drug following 8 days of administration. The participants in the study drug group will take zopiclone 7.5 mg at bedtime on the first and eighth days in the hospital, and placebo on the other days. The DS evaluation consists of road tracking, car following, and harsh braking tests. The primary outcome is the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), which is a gold standard evaluation item, in the 60-min road-tracking test. The exploratory outcomes are other evaluation items in the DS tests, in the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale sleep questionnaire, and the Profile of Mood States Second Edition rating scale. The estimated difference in the SDLP between the zopiclone and placebo groups will then be calculated.

Trial registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04108351, on September 30, 2019. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee at Hakata Clinic and the Nagoya University Medical School Hospital Bioethics Review Committee.

Conflict of interest statement

MI has no conflicts of interest to declare. KI has received speakers’ honoraria from, or has served as a consultant to, Dainippon Sumitomo, Janssen, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mochida, Otsuka, Taisho, Takeda, Tanabe Mitsubishi, and Pfizer. DK and NT are employees of Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan. MA has received subsidies from Eisai. NO has received research support or speakers’ honoraria from, or has served as a consultant to, Abbvie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mochida, MSD, Novartis Pharma, Ono, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shionogi, Takeda, Tanabe Mitsubishi, Sanofi, and Yoshitomi.

References

    1. Chang CM, Wu EC, Chen CY, et al. Psychotropic drugs and risk of motor vehicle accidents: a population-based case-control study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2013;75:1125–33.
    1. Orriols L, Philip P, Moore N, et al. Benzodiazepine-like hypnotics and the associated risk of road traffic accidents. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:595–601.
    1. Ravera S, van Rein N, de Gier JJ, et al. Road traffic accidents and psychotropic medication use in The Netherlands: a case-control study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011;72:505–13.
    1. Orriols L, Queinec R, Philip P, et al. Risk of injurious road traffic crash after prescription of antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73:1088–94.
    1. World Health Organization. Drug use and road safety: a policy brief. 2016; [access date October 22, 2019].
    1. Kuehn BM. FDA warning: Driving may be impaired the morning following sleeping pill use. JAMA 2013;309:645–6.
    1. Farkas RH, Unger EF, Temple R. Zolpidem and driving impairment--identifying persons at risk. N Engl J Med 2013;369:689–91.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: risk of next-morning impairment after use of insomnia drugs; FDA requires lower recommended doses for certain drugs containing zolpidem (Ambien, Ambien CR, Edluar, and Zolpimist). 2013; [access date on October 22, 2019].
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Evaluating Drug Effects on the Ability to Operate a Motor Vehicle Guidance for Industry. 2017; [access date on October 22, 2019].
    1. Vermeeren A, Sun H, Vuurman EF, et al. On-the-road driving performance the morning after bedtime use of suvorexant 20 and 40 mg: a study in non-elderly healthy volunteers. Sleep 2015;38:1803–13.
    1. Kay GG, Hochadel T, Sicard E, et al. Next-day residual effects of flibanserin on simulated driving performance in premenopausal women. Hum Psychopharmacol 2017;32:e2603.
    1. Verster JC, Roth T. Standard operation procedures for conducting the on-the-road driving test, and measurement of the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP). Int J Gen Med 2011;4:359–71.
    1. Iwata M, Iwamoto K, Kawano N, et al. Evaluation method regarding the effect of psychotropic drugs on driving performance: A literature review. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2018;72:747–73.
    1. Ravera S, Monteiro SP, de Gier JJ, et al. A European approach to categorizing medicines for fitness to drive: outcomes of the DRUID project. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2012;74:920–31.
    1. Verster JC, Spence DW, Shahid A, et al. Zopiclone as positive control in studies examining the residual effects of hypnotic drugs on driving ability. Curr Drug Saf 2011;6:209–18.
    1. Verster JC, van de Loo AJ, Roth T. Mirtazapine as positive control drug in studies examining the effects of antidepressants on driving ability. Eur J Pharmacol 2015;753:252–6.
    1. Iwata M, Iwamoto K, Omura T, et al. Protocol for the development and validation of a driving simulator for evaluating the influence of drugs on driving performance. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e14613.
    1. Walsh JM, Verstraete AG, Huestis MA, et al. Guidelines for research on drugged driving. Addiction 2008;103:1258–68.
    1. Leufkens TR, Ramaekers JG, de Weerd AW, et al. Residual effects of zopiclone 7.5 mg on highway driving performance in insomnia patients and healthy controls: a placebo controlled crossover study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2014;231:2785–98.
    1. Bocca ML, Le Doze F, Etard O, et al. Residual effect of zolpidem 10 mg and zopiclone 7.5 mg versus flunitrazepam 1 mg and placebo on driving performance and ocular saccades. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999;143:373–9.
    1. Bocca ML, Marie S, Lelong-Boulouard V, et al. Zolpidem and zopiclone impair similarly monotonous driving performance after a single nighttime intake in aged subjects. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011;214:699–706.
    1. Vermeeren A, Riedel WJ, van Boxtel MP, et al. Differential residual effects of zaleplon and zopiclone on actual driving: a comparison with a low dose of alcohol. Sleep 2002;25:224–31.
    1. Simen AA, Gargano C, Cha JH, et al. A randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the sensitivity of the CRCDS Mini-Sim to the next-day residual effects of zopiclone. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2015;6:86–97.
    1. Vermeeren A, Jongen S, Murphy P, et al. On-the-road driving performance the morning after bedtime administration of lemborexant in healthy adult and elderly volunteers. Sleep 2019;42:zsy260.doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy260.
    1. Mets MA, de Vries JM, de Senerpont Domis LM, et al. Next-day effects of ramelteon (8 mg), zopiclone (7.5 mg), and placebo on highway driving performance, memory functioning, psychomotor performance, and mood in healthy adult subjects. Sleep 2011;34:1327–34.
    1. Harrison C, Subhan Z, Hindmarch I. Residual effects of zopiclone and benzodiazepine hypnotics on psychomotor performance related to car driving. Drugs Exp Clin Res 1985;11:823–9.
    1. Verster JC, Roth T. Effects of central nervous system drugs on driving: speed variability versus standard deviation of lateral position as outcome measure of the on-the-road driving test. Hum Psychopharmacol 2014;29:19–24.
    1. Kaida K, Takahashi M, Akerstedt T, et al. Validation of the Karolinska sleepiness scale against performance and EEG variables. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:1574–81.
    1. Huizinga CR, Zuiker RG, de Kam ML, et al. Evaluation of simulated driving in comparison to laboratory-based tests to assess the pharmacodynamics of alprazolam and alcohol. J Psychopharmacol 2019;33:791–800.
    1. Leufkens TR, Vermeeren A. Highway driving in the elderly the morning after bedtime use of hypnotics: a comparison between temazepam 20 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg, and placebo. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2009;29:432–8.
    1. Leufkens TR, Lund JS, Vermeeren A. Highway driving performance and cognitive functioning the morning after bedtime and middle-of-the-night use of gaboxadol, zopiclone and zolpidem. J Sleep Res 2009;18:387–96.
    1. Barbone F, McMahon AD, Davey PG, et al. Association of road-traffic accidents with benzodiazepine use. Lancet 1998;352:1331–6.
    1. Iwamoto K, Takahashi M, Nakamura Y, et al. The effects of acute treatment with paroxetine, amitriptyline, and placebo on driving performance and cognitive function in healthy Japanese subjects: a double-blind crossover trial. Hum Psychopharmacol 2008;23:399–407.
    1. O’Hanlon JF. Driving performance under the influence of drugs: rationale for, and application of, a new test. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1984;18: Suppl 1: 121S–9S.
    1. Robbe HW, O’Hanlon JF. Acute and subchronic effects of paroxetine 20 and 40 mg on actual driving, psychomotor performance and subjective assessments in healthy volunteers. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1995;5:35–42.
    1. Wingen M, Bothmer J, Langer S, et al. Actual driving performance and psychomotor function in healthy subjects after acute and subchronic treatment with escitalopram, mirtazapine, and placebo: a crossover trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66:436–43.
    1. Sasada K, Iwamoto K, Kawano N, et al. Effects of repeated dosing with mirtazapine, trazodone, or placebo on driving performance and cognitive function in healthy volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol 2013;28:281–6.
    1. Anderson GD. Gender differences in pharmacological response. Int Rev Neurobiol 2008;83:1–0.
    1. Leufkens TR, Vermeeren A. Zopiclone's residual effects on actual driving performance in a standardized test: a pooled analysis of age and sex effects in 4 placebo-controlled studies. Clin Ther 2014;36:141–50.
    1. Ramaekers JG, Conen S, de Kam PJ, et al. Residual effects of esmirtazapine on actual driving performance: overall findings and an exploratory analysis into the role of CYP2D6 phenotype. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011;215:321–32.
    1. Vermeeren A, Danjou PE, O’Hanlon JF. Residual effects of evening and middle-of-the-night administration of zaleplon 10 and 20 mg on memory and actual driving performance. Hum Psychopharmacol 1998;13:S98–107.
    1. Vermeeren A. Residual effects of hypnotics: epidemiology and clinical implications. CNS Drugs 2004;18:297–328.
    1. Volkerts ER, Louwerens JW, Gloerich ABM, et al. Zopiclone's residual effect upon actual driving performance versus those of nitrazepam and flunitrazepam. Technical report VK-84-10 Groningen, The Netherlands; Traffic Research Center, University of Groningen; 1984.
    1. Hindmarch I, Subhan Z, Stoker MJ. The effects of zimeldine and amitriptyline on car driving and psychomotor performance. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1983;308:141–6.
    1. Boyle J, Trick L, Johnsen S, et al. Next-day cognition, psychomotor function, and driving-related skills following nighttime administration of eszopiclone. Hum Psychopharmacol 2008;23:385–97.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever