Efficacy of Tildrakizumab Across Different Body Weights in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis Over 5 Years: Pooled Analyses from the reSURFACE Pivotal Studies

Diamant Thaçi, Sascha Gerdes, Kristian Gaarn Du Jardin, Jean-Luc Perrot, Lluís Puig, Diamant Thaçi, Sascha Gerdes, Kristian Gaarn Du Jardin, Jean-Luc Perrot, Lluís Puig

Abstract

Introduction: Tildrakizumab (TIL), a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-23p19, has been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. According to the European Medicines Agency Summary of Product Characteristics, the recommended dose is 100 mg, but a 200 mg dose can be used in patients with certain characteristics, such as a high disease burden or body weight (BW) ≥ 90 kg. Fixed one-dose biological therapies tend to become less effective in patients with high BW. This post-hoc study describes the long-term efficacy of TIL across different BWs in pivotal clinical trials.

Methods: A 5-year pooled analysis of two double-blind, randomised, controlled phase III trials-reSURFACE 1 and 2-was performed. Efficacy measures were the proportions of the patients with an absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of < 3 and < 1 and a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1. The study population included patients randomised to TIL 100 mg or TIL 200 mg who received ≥ 1 TIL dose up to week 12 (part 1 of the trial) or up to week 28 (part 2) and patients who were responders (≥ 75% improvement in PASI) to TIL 100 or TIL 200 mg at week 28 and who were maintained on the same dose up to week 244. Efficacy was evaluated by analysing BW subgroups at weeks 28, 52 and 244. Missing data were analysed using multiple imputation. Safety was assessed in the all-patients-as-treated population.

Results: The proportions of TIL-treated patients with PASI < 3 and < 1 (up to week 244) and DLQI 0/1 (up to week 52) were similar for patients with BW < 90 or ≥ 90 kg, regardless of dose. Patients ≥ 120 kg had greater efficacy outcomes at the 200 mg dose. Safety outcomes were similar regardless of treatment dose and weight (< 120/≥ 120 kg).

Conclusion: In patients with BW ≥ 120 kg, TIL 200 mg is more efficacious than TIL 100 mg, with similar favourable safety profiles obtained regardless of dose and BW group.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01722331 (reSURFACE 1) and NCT01729754 (reSURFACE 2).

Keywords: Body weight; DLQI; PASI; Psoriasis; Tildrakizumab.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. White letters represent differences between the reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2 trials. The sample assessed for efficacy in this study is shown in red. D/C discontinued, NR non-responder (< 50% improvement in PASI), PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PR partial responder (50–75% improvement in PASI), R responder (≥ 75% improvement in PASI), TIL tildrakizumab
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PASI  vertical lines on the bars represent 95% confidence intervals. These analyses were performed using a multiple imputation approach. BW body weight, PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, TIL tildrakizumab
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PASI  vertical lines on the bars represent the 95% confidence intervals. These analyses were performed using a multiple imputation approach. BW body weight, PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
PASI vertical lines on the bars represent the 95% confidence intervals. These analyses were performed using a multiple imputation approach. BW body weight, PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
DLQI 0/1 responders over time by BW group and TIL dose. The vertical lines on the bars represent the 95% confidence intervals. These analyses were performed using a multiple imputation approach. BW body weight, DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, TIL tildrakizumab
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Sensitivity analysis: correlation between BW and the absolute PASI change from baseline at week 28. BW body weight, PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Sensitivity analysis: correlation between BW and the absolute DLQI change from baseline at week 28. BW body weight, DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index

References

    1. Campanati A, Marani A, Martina E, Diotallevi F, Radi G, Offidani A. Psoriasis as an immune-mediated and inflammatory systemic disease: from pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1511. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111511.
    1. Balci A, Balci DD, Yonden Z, Korkmaz I, Yenin JZ, Celik E, et al. Increased amount of visceral fat in patients with psoriasis contributes to metabolic syndrome. Dermatology. 2010;220:32–37. doi: 10.1159/000254482.
    1. Puig L. Obesity and psoriasis: body weight and body mass index influence the response to biological treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:1007–1011. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04065.x.
    1. Clark L, Lebwohl M. The effect of weight on the efficacy of biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:443–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.11.011.
    1. Loft N, Egeberg A, Rasmussen MK, Bryld LE, Nissen CV, Dam TN, et al. Prevalence and characterization of treatment-refractory psoriasis and super-responders to biologic treatment: a nationwide study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. Available from: 10.1111/jdv.18126. Cited 8 Apr 2022.
    1. Zhao L, Ren T, Wang DD. Clinical pharmacology considerations in biologics development. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012;33:1339–1347. doi: 10.1038/aps.2012.51.
    1. Zhu Y, Hu C, Lu M, Liao S, Marini JC, Yohrling J, et al. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting IL-12/23p40, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;49:162–175. doi: 10.1177/0091270008329556.
    1. Weisman M, Moreland L, Furst D, Weinblatt M, Keystone E, Paulus H, et al. Efficacy, pharmacokinetic, and safety assessment of adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody, in adults with rheumatoid arthritis receiving concomitant methotrexate: a pilot study. Clin Ther. 2003;25:1700–1721. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80164-9.
    1. Wong Y, Nakamizo S, Tan KJ, Kabashima K. An update on the role of adipose tissues in psoriasis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1507. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01507.
    1. Rodríguez-Cerdeira C, Cordeiro-Rodríguez M, Carnero-Gregorio M, López-Barcenas A, Martínez-Herrera E, Fabbrocini G, et al. Biomarkers of inflammation in obesity-psoriatic patients. Mediators Inflamm. 2019;2019:7353420. doi: 10.1155/2019/7353420.
    1. Tildrakizumab MA. First global approval. Drugs. 2018;78:845–849. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0917-3.
    1. Papp K, Thaçi D, Reich K, Riedl E, Langley RG, Krueger JG, et al. Tildrakizumab (MK-3222), an anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody, improves psoriasis in a phase IIb randomized placebo-controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173:930–939. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13932.
    1. Beck K, Sanchez I, Yang E, Liao W. Profile of tildrakizumab-asmn in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: evidence to date. Psoriasis (Auckl) 2018;8:49–58.
    1. Yiu ZZN, Warren RB. The potential utility of tildrakizumab: an interleukin-23 inhibitor for the treatment of psoriasis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017;26:243–249. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2017.1274734.
    1. Gupta AK, Versteeg SG, Abramovits W, Vincent KD. Ilumya® (tildrakizumab): a newly approved interluekin-23 antagonist for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Skinmed. 2018;16:321–4.
    1. Paton DM. Tildrakizumab: monoclonal antibody against IL-23p19 for moderate to severe psoriasis. Drugs Today (Barc) 2018;54:433–444. doi: 10.1358/dot.2018.54.7.2866117.
    1. Frampton JE. Tildrakizumab: a review in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019;20:295–306. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00435-9.
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Ilumetri. 2018. Available from: . Cited 7 Feb 2022.
    1. Thaci D, Piaserico S, Warren RB, Gupta AK, Cantrell W, Draelos Z, et al. Five-year efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who respond at week 28: pooled analyses of two randomized phase III clinical trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2) Br J Dermatol. 2021;185:323–334. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19866.
    1. Drerup KA, Seemann C, Gerdes S, Mrowietz U. Effective and safe treatment of psoriatic disease with the anti-IL-23p19 biologic tildrakizumab: results of a real-world prospective cohort study in nonselected patients. Dermatology. 2021;2:1–5.
    1. Galán-Gutierrez M, Freire L, Ruiz-Villaverde R. Tildrakizumab: short-term efficacy and safety in real clinical practice. Int J Dermatol. 2021;2:5.
    1. Burlando M, Castelli R, Cozzani E, Parodi A. Treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with tildrakizumab in the real-life setting. Drugs Context. 2021;10:2–6.
    1. Wei NW, Chi S, Lebwohl MG. Retrospective analysis in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis treated with tildrakizumab: real-life clinical data. J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2022;7:55–59. doi: 10.1177/24755303221077211.
    1. Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Tyring SK, Sinclair R, Thaçi D, et al. Tildrakizumab versus placebo or etanercept for chronic plaque psoriasis (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): results from two randomised controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2017;390:276–288. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31279-5.
    1. Reich K, Warren RB, Iversen L, Puig L, Pau-Charles I, Igarashi A, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: pooled analyses of two randomized phase III clinical trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2) through 148 weeks. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182:605–617. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18232.
    1. Johnston A, Arnadottir S, Gudjonsson JE, Aphale A, Sigmarsdottir AA, Gunnarsson SI, et al. Obesity in psoriasis: leptin and resistin as mediators of cutaneous inflammation. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:342–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08655.x.
    1. Xu C, Ji J, Su T, Wang H-W, Su Z-L. The association of psoriasis and obesity: focusing on IL-17A-related immunological mechanisms. Int J Dermatol Venereol. 2021;4:116–121. doi: 10.1097/JD9.0000000000000155.
    1. Jensen P, Skov L. Psoriasis and obesity. Dermatology. 2016;232:633–639. doi: 10.1159/000455840.
    1. Carrascosa JM, Vilavella M, Garcia-Doval I, Carretero G, Vanaclocha F, Daudén E, et al. Body mass index in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Spain and its impact as an independent risk factor for therapy withdrawal: results of the Biobadaderm Registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:907–914. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12208.
    1. Shalom G, Naldi L, Lebwohl M, Nikkels A, Jong E, Fakharzadeh S, et al. Biological treatment for psoriasis and the risk of herpes zoster: results from the psoriasis longitudinal assessment and registry (PSOLAR) J Dermatolog Treat. 2019;30:534–539. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1445193.
    1. Bassi M, Singh S. Impact of obesity on response to biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. BioDrugs. 2022;36:197–203. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00522-0.
    1. Eder L, Thavaneswaran A, Chandran V, Cook RJ, Gladman DD. Obesity is associated with a lower probability of achieving sustained minimal disease activity state among patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:813–817. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204448.
    1. Kurnool S, Nguyen NH, Proudfoot J, Dulai PS, Boland BS, Vande Casteele N, et al. High body mass index is associated with increased risk of treatment failure and surgery in biologic-treated patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47:1472–1479. doi: 10.1111/apt.14665.
    1. Mourad A, Straube S, Armijo-Olivo S, Gniadecki R. Factors predicting persistence of biologic drugs in psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:450–458. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17738.
    1. Pirro F, Caldarola G, Chiricozzi A, Burlando M, Mariani M, Parodi A, et al. Impact of body mass index on the efficacy of biological therapies in patients with psoriasis: a real-world study. Clin Drug Investig. 2021;41:917–925. doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01080-z.
    1. Singh S, Facciorusso A, Singh AG, Casteele NV, Zarrinpar A, Prokop LJ, et al. Obesity and response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents in patients with select immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0195123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195123.
    1. Strober B, Gottlieb A, Leonardi C, Papp K. Levels of response of psoriasis patients with different baseline characteristics treated with etanercept. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:220.
    1. Gordon K, Korman N, Frankel E, Wang H, Jahreis A, Zitnik R, et al. Efficacy of etanercept in an integrated multistudy database of patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:S101–S111. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1088.
    1. Menter A, Gordon KB, Leonardi CL, Gu Y, Goldblum OM. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab across subgroups of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:448–456. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.09.040.
    1. Kaushik SB, Lebwohl MG. Psoriasis: which therapy for which patient: psoriasis comorbidities and preferred systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.057.
    1. Lebwohl M, Yeilding N, Szapary P, Wang Y, Li S, Zhu Y, et al. Impact of weight on the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: rationale for dosing recommendations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:571–579. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.012.
    1. Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Krueger GG, Szapary P, Yeilding N, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2) Lancet. 2008;371:1675–1684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60726-6.
    1. Kimball AB, Papp KA, Wasfi Y, Chan D, Bissonnette R, Sofen H, et al. Long-term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated for up to 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:1535–1545. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12046.
    1. Young M, Horn E, Cather J. The ACCEPT study: Ustekinumab versus etanercept in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2011;7:9–13. doi: 10.1586/eci.10.92.
    1. Herrera-Acosta E, Garriga-Martina GG, Suárez-Pérez JA, Martínez-García E, Herrera-Ceballos E. Ixekizumab vs ustekinumab for skin clearance in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis after a year of treatment: real-world practice. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e14202.
    1. Megna M, Di Costanzo L, Argenziano G, Balato A, Colasanti P, Cusano F, et al. Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in Italian patients with psoriasis: an 84 week, multicenter, retrospective real-world study. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2019;19:855–861. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1622678.
    1. Augustin M, Reich K, Yamauchi P, Pinter A, Bagel J, Dahale S, et al. Secukinumab dosing every 2 weeks demonstrated superior efficacy compared with dosing every 4 weeks in patients with psoriasis weighing 90 kg or more: results of a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186:942–954. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20971.
    1. European Medicines Agerncy. Bimzelx (internet). Available from: . Cited 12 Apr 2022.
    1. del Alcázar E, López-Ferrer A, Martínez-Doménech Á, Ruiz-Villaverde R, Llamas-Velasco M, Rocamora V, et al. Effectiveness and safety of guselkumab for the treatment of psoriasis in real-world settings at 24 weeks: A retrospective, observational, multicentre study by the Spanish Psoriasis Group. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35:e15231.
    1. Gerdes S, Bräu B, Hoffmann M, Korge B, Mortazawi D, Wiemers F, et al. Real-world effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis: Health-related quality of life and efficacy data from the noninterventional, prospective German multicenter PERSIST trial. J Dermatol. 2021;48:1854–1862. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16128.
    1. Hansel K, Zangrilli A, Bianchi L, Peris K, Chiricozzi A, Offidani A, et al. A multicenter study on effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in psoriasis: an Italian 16-week real-life experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:e169–e170. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17003.
    1. Mastorino L, Susca S, Megna M, Siliquini N, Quaglino P, Ortoncelli M, et al. Risankizumab shows high efficacy and maintenance in improvement of response until week 52. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35:e15378. doi: 10.1111/dth.15378.
    1. Ritchlin CT, Mease PJ, Boehncke W-H, Tesser J, Schiopu E, Chakravarty SD, et al. Sustained and improved guselkumab response in patients with active psoriatic arthritis regardless of baseline demographic and disease characteristics: pooled results through week 52 of two phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled studies. RMD Open. 2022;8:e002195. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002195.
    1. Strober B, Menter A, Leonardi C, Gordon K, Lambert J, Puig L, et al. Efficacy of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by baseline demographics, disease characteristics and prior biologic therapy: an integrated analysis of the phase III UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 studies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:2830–2838. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16521.
    1. Iskandar IYK, Ashcroft DM, Warren RB, Evans I, McElhone K, Owen CM, et al. Patterns of biologic therapy use in the management of psoriasis: cohort study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) Br J Dermatol. 2017;176:1297–1307. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15027.
    1. Gottlieb AB, Kalb RE, Langley RG, Krueger GG, de Jong EMGJ, Guenther L, et al. Safety observations in 12095 patients with psoriasis enrolled in an international registry (PSOLAR): experience with infliximab and other systemic and biologic therapies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13:1441–1448.
    1. Ruggiero A, Fabbrocini G, Cinelli E, Megna M. Guselkumab and risankizumab for psoriasis: a 44-week indirect real-life comparison. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:1028–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.01.025.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever