Genotyping-guided approach versus the conventional approach in selection of oral P2Y12 receptor blockers in Chinese patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome

Chor Cheung Tam, Janette Kwok, Anthony Wong, Arthur Yung, Catherine Shea, Shun Ling Kong, Wing Hong Tang, David Siu, Raymond Chan, Stephen Lee, Chor Cheung Tam, Janette Kwok, Anthony Wong, Arthur Yung, Catherine Shea, Shun Ling Kong, Wing Hong Tang, David Siu, Raymond Chan, Stephen Lee

Abstract

Objective The CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) allele is present in half of the East Asian population and is associated with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). This study aimed to investigate whether a rapid genotyping-guided approach is feasible and efficacious for selecting P2Y12 receptor blockers in Chinese patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods This was a single-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label study. A total of 132 patients with ACS were randomized to the rapid genotyping-guided treatment group (GG, N = 65) or the standard treatment group (SG, N = 67). Patients in the GG group were genotyped by the Verigene system. Patients with the CYP2C19 LoF allele were switched to ticagrelor and all remaining patients continued on clopidogrel. The endpoints were HTPR at 24 hours after the first loading dose of clopidogrel and 1 month afterwards. Results Forty patients in the GG group switched to ticagrelor, while others continued on clopidogrel. The incidence of HTPR in the GG vs SG groups was 9.2% vs 40.3% at 24 hours and 6.5% vs 32.3% at 1 month, respectively. Rapid point-of-care genotyping showed 100% concordance with conventional genotyping by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Conclusions In Chinese patients suffering from ACS, the rapid genotyping-guided approach for selecting P2Y12 receptor blockers is feasible and reduces the incidence of HTPR. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01994941" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT01994941.

Keywords: CYP2C19; P2Y12 receptor; acute coronary syndrome.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design. Patients were provided loading doses of clopidogrel and then randomized into the genotyping-guided treatment group or the standard treatment group. Patients in the genotyping-guided treatment group were genotyped with the Verigene system and those with CYP2C19 LoF allele were switched to ticagrelor. All of the patients in the standard treatment group continued on clopidogrel. Platelet reactivity was assessed at 24 hours after the first loading dose of clopidogrel and 1 month afterwards.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Study patients.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
On-treatment platelet reactivity at 24 hours and 1 month. The red line denotes patients with clinical events. Patient 1 suffered from subarachnoid haemorrhage. Patient 2 suffered from recurrent NSTEMI and acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which required intervention. Patient 3 had recurrent NSTEMI and patient 4 suffered from acute ischemic stroke.

References

    1. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Etherington A, et al. Assessment of clopidogrel responsiveness: measurements of maximum platelet aggregation, final platelet aggregation and their correlation with vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein in resistant patients. Thromb Res 2007; 121: 107–115. Epub 2007/04/03.
    1. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL, et al. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation 2003; 107: 2908–2913. Epub 2003/06/11.
    1. Husted S, Emanuelsson H, Heptinstall S, et al. Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist AZD6140 with aspirin in patients with atherosclerosis: a double-blind comparison to clopidogrel with aspirin. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1038–1047. Epub 2006/02/16.
    1. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045–1057. Epub 2009/09/01.
    1. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2999–3054. Epub 2011/08/30.
    1. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2013; 127: e362–425. Epub 2012/12/19.
    1. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2569–2619. Epub 2012/08/28.
    1. Jeong YH. “East Asian paradox”: challenge for the current antiplatelet strategy of “one-guideline-fits-all races” in acute coronary syndrome. Curr Cardiol Rep 2014; 16: 485 Epub 2014/03/29.
    1. Levine GN, Jeong YH, Goto S, et al. Expert consensus document: world heart federation expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Nat Rev Cardiol 2014; 11: 597–606. Epub 2014/08/27.
    1. Mega JL, Simon T, Collet JP, et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2010; 304: 1821–1830. Epub 2010/10/28.
    1. Shuldiner AR, O’Connell JR, Bliden KP, et al. Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. JAMA 2009; 302: 849–857. Epub 2009/08/27.
    1. Sorich MJ, Rowland A, McKinnon RA, et al. CYP2C19 genotype has a greater effect on adverse cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention and in Asian populations treated with clopidogrel: a meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2014; 7: 895–902. Epub 2014/09/27.
    1. Jang JS, Cho KI, Jin HY, et al. Meta-analysis of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among coronary artery disease patients of different ethnic groups treated with clopidogrel. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110: 502–508. Epub 2012/05/18.
    1. Zhang L, Chen Y, Jin Y, et al. Genetic determinants of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel treated Chinese patients. Thromb Res 2013; 132: 81–87. Epub 2013/06/04.
    1. Tang XF, Wang J, Zhang JH, et al. Effect of the CYP2C19 2 and 3 genotypes, ABCB1 C3435T and PON1 Q192R alleles on the pharmacodynamics and adverse clinical events of clopidogrel in Chinese people after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 69: 1103–1112. Epub 2012/11/15.
    1. Xie X, Ma YT, Yang YN, et al. CYP2C19 phenotype, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and mortality in patients with coronary stent placement in a Chinese population. PloS One 2013; 8: e59344 Epub 2013/04/05.
    1. Roberts JD, Wells GA, Le May MR, et al. Point-of-care genetic testing for personalisation of antiplatelet treatment (RAPID GENE): a prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1705–1711. Epub 2012/04/03.
    1. Buchan BW, Peterson JF, Cogbill CH, et al. Evaluation of a microarray-based genotyping assay for the rapid detection of cytochrome P450 2C19 *2 and *3 polymorphisms from whole blood using nanoparticle probes. Am J Clin Pathol 2011; 136: 604–608. Epub 2011/09/16.
    1. Chae H, Kim M, Koh YS, et al. Feasibility of a microarray-based point-of-care CYP2C19 genotyping test for predicting clopidogrel on-treatment platelet reactivity. Biomed Res Int 2013. 2013: 154073. Epub 2013/04/23.
    1. Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Stein CM, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2013; 94: 317–323. Epub 2013/05/24.
    1. Frere C, Cuisset T, Gaborit B, et al. The CYP2C19*17 allele is associated with better platelet response to clopidogrel in patients admitted for non-ST acute coronary syndrome. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7: 1409–1411. Epub 2009/06/06.
    1. Tiroch KA, Sibbing D, Koch W, et al. Protective effect of the CYP2C19 *17 polymorphism with increased activation of clopidogrel on cardiovascular events. Am Heart J 2010; 160: 506–512. Epub 2010/09/10.
    1. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, et al. Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multicentre registry study. Lancet 2013; 382: 614–623. Epub 2013/07/31.
    1. Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D, et al. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 2261–2273. Epub 2013/10/01.
    1. Nagashima Z, Tsukahara K, Morita S, et al. Platelet reactivity in the early and late phases of acute coronary syndromes according to cytochrome P450 2C19 phenotypes. J Cardiol 2013; 62: 158–164. Epub 2013/07/28.
    1. Becker RC, Bassand JP, Budaj A, et al. Bleeding complications with the P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel and ticagrelor in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2933–2944. Epub 2011/11/18.
    1. Lutsey PL, Cushman M, Steffen LM, et al. Plasma hemostatic factors and endothelial markers in four racial/ethnic groups: the MESA study. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 2629–2635. Epub 2006/09/28.
    1. Mak KH, Bhatt DL, Shao M, et al. Ethnic variation in adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding complications in the Clopidogrel for high Atherothrombotic risk and Ischemic stabilization, management, and avoidance (CHARISMA) study. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 658–665. Epub 2009/04/01.
    1. Shen AY, Yao JF, Brar SS, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage among patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 309–315. Epub 2007/07/31.
    1. Li H, Butler K, Yang L, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of single and multiple doses of ticagrelor in healthy Chinese subjects: an open-label, sequential, two-cohort, single-centre study. Clin Drug Investig 2012; 32: 87–97. Epub 2011/12/16.
    1. Teng R, Butler K. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of single and multiple doses of ticagrelor in Japanese and Caucasian volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014; 52: 478–491. Epub 2014/04/24.
    1. Goto S, Huang CH, Park SJ, et al. Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese patients with acute coronary syndrome – randomized, double-blind, phase III PHILO study. Circulation journal: official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society 2015; 79: 2452–2460. Epub 2015/09/18.
    1. Luo M, Li J, Xu X, et al. ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and risk of adverse clinical events in clopidogrel treated patients: a meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2012; 129: 754–759. Epub 2012/01/03.
    1. Simon T, Verstuyft C, Mary-Krause M, et al. Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 363–375. Epub 2008/12/25.
    1. Bouman HJ, Schomig E, van Werkum JW, et al. Paraoxonase-1 is a major determinant of clopidogrel efficacy. Nat Med 2011; 17: 110–116. Epub 2010/12/21.
    1. Lewis JP, Horenstein RB, Ryan K, et al. The functional G143E variant of carboxylesterase 1 is associated with increased clopidogrel active metabolite levels and greater clopidogrel response. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2013; 23: 1–8. Epub 2012/11/01.
    1. Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Fromm MF, et al. Impact of cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism and of major demographic characteristics on residual platelet function after loading and maintenance treatment with clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2427–2434. Epub 2010/06/01.
    1. Geisler T, Grass D, Bigalke B, et al. The residual platelet aggregation after deployment of intracoronary stent (PREDICT) score. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 54–61. Epub 2007/10/24.
    1. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Goudevenos J. Effects of P2Y12 receptor inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113: 2064–2069. Epub 2014/05/06.
    1. Alexopoulos D, Theodoropoulos KC, Stavrou EF, et al. Prasugrel versus high dose clopidogrel to overcome early high on clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2012; 26: 393–400. Epub 2012/08/30.
    1. Breet NJ, van Werkum JW, Bouman HJ, et al. Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. JAMA 2010; 303: 754–762. Epub 2010/02/25.
    1. Cayla G, Cuisset T, Silvain J, et al. Platelet function monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients stented for an acute coronary syndrome (ANTARCTIC): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet 2016. Epub 2016/09/02.
    1. Collet JP, Cuisset T, Range G, et al. Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2100–2109. Epub 2012/11/06.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever