A novel training simulator for portable ultrasound identification of incorrect newborn endotracheal tube placement - observational diagnostic accuracy study protocol

Hasan S Merali, Mark O Tessaro, Khushboo Q Ali, Shaun K Morris, Sajid B Soofi, Shabina Ariff, Hasan S Merali, Mark O Tessaro, Khushboo Q Ali, Shaun K Morris, Sajid B Soofi, Shabina Ariff

Abstract

Background: Endotracheal tube (ETT) placement is a critical procedure for newborns that are unable to breathe. Inadvertent esophageal intubation can lead to oxygen deprivation and consequent permanent neurological impairment. Current standard-of-care methods to confirm ETT placement in neonates (auscultation, colorimetric capnography, and chest x-ray) are time consuming or unreliable, especially in the stressful resuscitation environment. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the neck has recently emerged as a powerful tool for detecting esophageal ETTs. It is accurate and fast, and is also easy to learn and perform, especially on children.

Methods: This will be an observational diagnostic accuracy study consisting of two phases and conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. In phase 1, neonatal health care providers that currently perform standard-of-care methods for ETT localization, regardless of experience in portable ultrasound, will undergo a two-hour training session. During this session, providers will learn to detect tracheal vs. esophageal ETTs using POCUS. The session will consist of a didactic component, hands-on training with a novel intubation ultrasound simulator, and practice with stable, ventilated newborns. At the end of the session, the providers will undergo an objective structured assessment of technical skills, as well as an evaluation of their ability to differentiate between tracheal and esophageal endotracheal tubes. In phase 2, newborns requiring intubation will be assessed for ETT location via POCUS, at the same time as standard-of-care methods. The initial 2 months of phase 2 will include a quality assurance component to ensure the POCUS accuracy of trained providers. The primary outcome of the study is to determine the accuracy of neck POCUS for ETT location when performed by neonatal providers with focused POCUS training, and the secondary outcome is to determine whether neck POCUS is faster than standard-of-care methods.

Discussion: This study represents the first large investigation of the benefits of POCUS for ETT confirmation in the sickest newborns undergoing intubations for respiratory support.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03533218. Registered May 2018.

Keywords: Endotracheal tube (ETT); Intubation; Newborn resuscitation; Pakistan; Point of care ultrasound (POCUS); Simulation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Low-cost ultrasound simulator. a The beef gelatine and psyllium fiber block, with cut-off 10 mL syringe barrel. b With cut-off 10 mL syringe barrel being used to create staggered hollow cylinders within the block. c Block with staggered hollow cylinders, with retained plug from cylinder creation. More superior cylinder is simulated trachea (white arrow), and more inferior cylinder is simulated esophagus (black arrow). d Plug partial insertion into more inferior cylinder (model esophagus)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Ultrasound images on the model: Tracheal Intubation. a Static ultrasound image of a patient with the ETT in the trachea, with linear ultrasound probe held in transverse orientation over the anterior neck at the level of the sternal notch. b & c Static ultrasound images of beef gelatine model with plug inserted into simulated esophagus, simulating the ultrasound appearance of a tracheal intubation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Ultrasound images on the model: Esophageal Intubation. a Static ultrasound image of an esophageal intubation in a patient, with linear ultrasound probe held in transverse orientation over the anterior neck at the level of the sternal notch. b & c Static ultrasound images of beef gelatine model with plug removed from simulated esophagus, simulating the ultrasound appearance of an esophageal intubation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Placement of the probe on the Simulator. a The first image shows placement of linear probe over the side of the model to obtain images in transverse plane. b Demonstrates a towel with a square hole of 1 X 3 cm and c Shows the towel is placed over the beef gelatin model to hide the location of the plug from the ultrasound operator
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Learner Evaluation Form
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Learner Demographic Form
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Learner feedback form
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Patient Data Collection Form

References

    1. Jehan I, Harris H, Salat S, Zeb A, Mobeen N, Pasha O, et al. Neonatal mortality, risk factors and causes: a prospective population-based cohort study in urban Pakistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(2):130–138. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.050963.
    1. Pakistan statistics summary (2002 - present). WHO. 2018. Available from: . Accessed 2 Dec 2018.
    1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. Lancet neonatal survival steering T. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? where? why? Lancet. 2005;365(9462):891–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5.
    1. Halloran DR, McClure E, Chakraborty H, Chomba E, Wright LL, Carlo WA. Birth asphyxia survivors in a developing country. J Perinatol. 2009;29(3):243–249. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.192.
    1. Askin DF. Complications in the transition from fetal to neonatal life. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31(3):318–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00054.x.
    1. Hillman NH, Kallapur SG, Jobe AH. Physiology of transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life. Clin Perinatol. 2012;39(4):769–783. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.09.009.
    1. Stenson BJ, Boyle DW, Szyld EG. Initial ventilation strategies during newborn resuscitation. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33(1):65–82. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2005.11.015.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics/American Heart A American Academy of Pediatrics/American Heart Association clarification of statement on cardiovascular evaluation and monitoring of children and adolescents with heart disease receiving medications for ADHD: May 16, 2008. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008;29(4):335. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31318185dc14.
    1. Schmolzer GM, Kumar M, Pichler G, Aziz K, O'Reilly M, Cheung PY. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f5980. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5980.
    1. Carbajal R, Eble B, Anand KJ. Premedication for tracheal intubation in neonates: confusion or controversy? Semin Perinatol. 2007;31(5):309–317. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.07.006.
    1. Schmolzer GM, O'Reilly M, Davis PG, Cheung PY, Roehr CC. Confirmation of correct tracheal tube placement in newborn infants. Resuscitation. 2013;84(6):731–737. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.028.
    1. Peterson J, Johnson N, Deakins K, Wilson-Costello D, Jelovsek JE, Chatburn R. Accuracy of the 7-8-9 rule for endotracheal tube placement in the neonate. J Perinatol. 2006;26(6):333–336. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211503.
    1. Foglia Elizabeth E., Ades Anne, Sawyer Taylor, Glass Kristen M., Singh Neetu, Jung Philipp, Quek Bin Huey, Johnston Lindsay C., Barry James, Zenge Jeanne, Moussa Ahmed, Kim Jae H., DeMeo Stephen D., Napolitano Natalie, Nadkarni Vinay, Nishisaki Akira. Neonatal Intubation Practice and Outcomes: An International Registry Study. Pediatrics. 2018;143(1):e20180902. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0902.
    1. Sitzwohl C, Langheinrich A, Schober A, Krafft P, Sessler DI, Herkner H, et al. Endobronchial intubation detected by insertion depth of endotracheal tube, bilateral auscultation, or observation of chest movements: randomised trial. BMJ. 2010;341:c5943. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5943.
    1. Roberts WA, Maniscalco WM, Cohen AR, Litman RS, Chhibber A. The use of capnography for recognition of esophageal intubation in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995;19(5):262–268. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950190504.
    1. Schmolzer GM, Poulton DA, Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Assessment of flow waves and colorimetric CO2 detector for endotracheal tube placement during neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(3):307–312. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.008.
    1. Aziz HF, Martin JB, Moore JJ. The pediatric disposable end-tidal carbon dioxide detector role in endotracheal intubation in newborns. J Perinatol. 1999;19(2):110–113. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200136.
    1. Blank D, Rich W, Leone T, Garey D, Finer N. Pedi-cap color change precedes a significant increase in heart rate during neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2014;85(11):1568–1572. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.027.
    1. Das SK, Choupoo NS, Haldar R, Lahkar A. Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(4):413–423. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0301-z.
    1. Chou EH, Dickman E, Tsou PY, Tessaro M, Tsai YM, Ma MH, et al. Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015;90:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.013.
    1. Galicinao J, Bush AJ, Godambe SA. Use of bedside ultrasonography for endotracheal tube placement in pediatric patients: a feasibility study. Pediatrics. 2007;120(6):1297–1303. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2959.
    1. Chou HC, Chong KM, Sim SS, Ma MH, Liu SH, Chen NC, et al. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2013;84(12):1708–1712. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.06.018.
    1. Chou HC, Tseng WP, Wang CH, Ma MH, Wang HP, Huang PC, et al. Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(10):1279–1284. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.016.
    1. Schmolzer GM, Roehr CC. Techniques to ascertain correct endotracheal tube placement in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD010221. 10.1002/14651858.CD010221.pub2.
    1. Seguin J, Tessaro MO. A simple, inexpensive phantom model for intubation ultrasonography training. Chest. 2017;151(5):1194–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.014.
    1. O'Shea JE, Loganathan P, Thio M, Kamlin COF, Davis PG. Analysis of unsuccessful intubations in neonates using videolaryngoscopy recordings. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(5):F408–FF12. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313628.
    1. Sharma Deepak, Tabatabaii Seyyed Ahmad, Farahbakhsh Nazanin. Role of ultrasound in confirmation of endotracheal tube in neonates: a review. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2017;32(8):1359–1367. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1403581.
    1. Alonso Quintela P, Oulego Erroz I, Mora Matilla M, Rodriguez Blanco S, Mata Zubillaga D, Regueras Santos L. Usefulness of bedside ultrasound compared to capnography and X-ray for tracheal intubation. An Pediatr (Barc) 2014;81(5):283–288. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.01.004.
    1. Mora-Matilla M, Alonso-Quintela P, Oulego-Erroz I, Rodriguez-Blanco S, Gautreaux-Minaya S, Mata-Zubillaga D. Is ultrasound a feasible tool to verify endotracheal tube position in neonates? Resuscitation. 2013;84(1):e19–e20. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.09.026.
    1. Ng V, Plitt J, Biffar D. Development of a novel ultrasound-guided Peritonsillar abscess model for simulation training. West J Emerg Med. 2018;19(1):172–176. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.11.36427.
    1. Chen SW, Fu W, Liu J, Wang Y. Routine application of lung ultrasonography in the neonatal intensive care unit. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96(2):e5826. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005826.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever