Behavior change techniques for increasing physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Emily Finne, Melanie Glausch, Anne-Kathrin Exner, Odile Sauzet, Friederike Stölzel, Nadja Seidel, Emily Finne, Melanie Glausch, Anne-Kathrin Exner, Odile Sauzet, Friederike Stölzel, Nadja Seidel

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate how physical activity (PA) can be effectively promoted in cancer survivors. The effect of PA-promoting interventions in general, behavior change techniques (BCTs), and further variables as moderators in particular are evaluated.

Methods: This study included randomized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions aiming at an increase in PA that can be carried out independently at home, published by December 2016, for adults diagnosed with cancer after completion of the main treatment. Primary outcomes were subjective and objective measures of PA prior to and immediately after the intervention. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to estimate effect sizes (ES) in terms of standardized mean differences, variation between ES in terms of heterogeneity indices (I2), and moderator effects in terms of regression coefficients.

Results: This study included 30 studies containing 45 ES with an overall significant small positive effect size of 0.28 (95% confidence interval=0.18-0.37) on PA, and I2=54.29%. The BCTs Prompts, Reduce prompts, Graded tasks, Non-specific reward, and Social reward were significantly related to larger effects, while Information about health consequences and Information about emotional consequences, as well as Social comparison were related to smaller ES. The number of BCTs per intervention did not predict PA effects. Interventions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior were associated with smaller ES, and interventions with a home-based setting component were associated with larger ES. Neither the duration of the intervention nor the methodological quality explained differences in ES.

Conclusion: Certain BCTs were associated with an increase of PA in cancer survivors. Interventions relying on BCTs congruent with (social) learning theory such as using prompts and rewards could be especially successful in this target group. However, large parts of between-study heterogeneity in ES remained unexplained. Further primary studies should directly compare specific BCTs and their combinations.

Keywords: behavior change; exercise; intervention methods; lifestyle; moderator effects; tumor.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of literature search for PA interventions in cancer survivors. Abbreviations: CG, Control group; PA, physical activity; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Quality assessment results presented as percentages across all included studies (k=30).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of included studies. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; COM, combination of PM and PED; IG, intervention group; MET, metabolic equivalent; MVPA, moderate to vigorous physical activity; PA, physical activity; PED, step pedometer; PM, print materials; RE model, random-effects model.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Prediction of effect sizes by number of BCTs. Notes: Solid line: predicted effect size of mixed-effects model; dashed lines: 95% confidence bounds; dotted line: reference line for null effect; bubbles: individual study effect sizes with size relative to inverse variance weight; red: subjective PA outcome; black: objective PA outcome. Abbreviations: BCTs, Behavior Change Techniques; PA, physical activity.

References

    1. Stewart BW, Wild CP. World Cancer Report 2014. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization; 2014. online ed.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cancer survivors—United States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(9):269–272.
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2017;67(1):7–30.
    1. Cancer Research UK Cancer survival statistics. [Accessed September 15, 2017]. Available from: .
    1. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, editors. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2006.
    1. Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(7):1409–1426.
    1. World Cancer Research Fund InternationalAmerican Institute for Cancer Research Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective 1. publ.Washington, DC: AICR; 2007
    1. Speck RM, Gross CR, Hormes JM, et al. Changes in the Body Image and Relationship Scale following a one-year strength training trial for breast cancer survivors with or at risk for lymphedema. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;121(2):421–430.
    1. Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Geigle PM, et al. Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8(29):CD007566.
    1. Bouillet T, Bigard X, Brami C, et al. Role of physical activity and sport in oncology: scientific commission of the National Federation Sport and Cancer CAMI. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;94(1):74–86.
    1. Fong DY, Ho JW, Hui BP, et al. Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:e70. Jan 30 5.
    1. Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, et al. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):242–274.
    1. Littman AJ, Tang M-T, Rossing MA. Longitudinal study of recreational physical activity in breast cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(2):119–127.
    1. Harrison S, Hayes SC, Newman B. Level of physical activity and characteristics associated with change following breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Psychooncology. 2009;18(4):387–394.
    1. Irwin ML, Crumley D, McTiernan A, et al. Physical activity levels before and after a diagnosis of breast carcinoma: The Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) study. Cancer. 2003;97(7):1746–1757.
    1. Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM. Relationship between exercise pattern across the cancer experience and current quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 1997;3(3):215–226.
    1. Devoogdt N, van Kampen M, Geraerts I, et al. Physical activity levels after treatment for breast cancer: one-year follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(2):417–425.
    1. Pinto BM, Ciccolo JT. Physical activity motivation and cancer survivorship. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2011;186:367–387.
    1. Courneya KS, Karvinen KH, Vallance JKH. Exercise motivation and behavior change. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Handbook of Cancer Survivorship. Boston: Springer US; 2007. pp. 113–132.
    1. Lee MK, Kim NK, Jeon JY. Effect of the 6-week home-based exercise program on physical activity level and physical fitness in colorectal cancer survivors: a randomized controlled pilot study. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0196220.
    1. Demark-Wahnefried W, Jones LW. Promoting a healthy lifestyle among cancer survivors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2008;22(2):319–342.
    1. Pekmezi DW, Demark-Wahnefried W. Updated evidence in support of diet and exercise interventions in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):167–178.
    1. Bluethmann SM, Vernon SW, Gabriel KP, Murphy CC, Bartholomew LK. Taking the next step: a systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity and behavior change interventions in recent post-treatment breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;149(2):331–342.
    1. Bourke L, Homer KE, Thaha MA, et al. Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD010192.
    1. Short CE, James EL, Stacey F, Plotnikoff RC. A qualitative synthesis of trials promoting physical activity behaviour change among post-treatment breast cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2013;7(4):570–581.
    1. Stacey FG, James EL, Chapman K, Courneya KS, Lubans DR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2015;9(2):305–338.
    1. Bernard P, Carayol M, Gourlan M, et al. Moderators of theory-based interventions to promote physical activity in 77 randomized controlled trials. Health Education & Behavior. 2017;44(2):227–235.
    1. Painter JE, Borba CPC, Hynes M, Mays D, Glanz K. The use of theory in health behavior research from 2000 to 2005: a systematic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2008;35(3):358–362.
    1. Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31(1):399–418.
    1. Avery L, Flynn D, Dombrowski SU, van Wersch A, Sniehotta FF, Trenell MI. Successful behavioural strategies to increase physical activity and improve glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine. 2015;32(8):1058–1062.
    1. Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):119.
    1. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2013;46(1):81–95.
    1. Michie S, Carey RN, Johnston M, et al. From theory-inspired to theory-based interventions: a protocol for developing and testing a methodology for linking behaviour change techniques to theoretical mechanisms of action. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2016;369(10)
    1. Williams SL, French DP. What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behavior–and are they the same? Health Educ Res. 2011;26(2):308–322.
    1. French DP, Olander EK, Chisholm A, Mc Sharry J. Which behaviour change techniques are most effective at increasing older adults’ self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour? A systematic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2014;48(2):225–234.
    1. Cradock KA, Ólaighin G, Finucane FM, Gainforth HL, Quinlan LR, Ginis KAM. Behaviour change techniques targeting both diet and physical activity in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):18.
    1. Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta FF, Avenell A, Johnston M, MacLennan G, Araújo-Soares V. Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;6(1):7–32.
    1. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychology. 2009;28(6):690–701.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, for the PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. Jul 21 1.
    1. Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool for Quantitative Studies. [Accessed August 7, 2017]. Available from: .
    1. BCTTv1 Online Training [Accessed August 7, 2017]. Available from:
    1. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(5):423–429.
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Repr. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
    1. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(3)
    1. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.
    1. Del Re AC. : Compute Effect Sizes: R Package version 0.2-2. 2013. [Accessed June 30, 2017]. Available from: .
    1. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009.
    1. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5(1):56.
    1. Boyle T, Lynch BM, Courneya KS, Vallance JK. Agreement between accelerometer-assessed and self-reported physical activity and sedentary time in colon cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2015;23(4):1121–1126.
    1. Rau J, Teichmann J, Petermann F. Motivation zu sportlicher Aktivität bei onkologischen Patienten nach der Rehabilitationsmaßnahme – Ergebnisse einer randomisiert-kontrollierten Wirksamkeitsstudie. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie. 2009;59(08):300–306.
    1. Gleser LJ, Olkin I. Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Aeta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. pp. 357–376.
    1. Pustejovsky JE. Correlations between standardized mean differences. [Accessed August 2, 2017]. Available from: .
    1. Jackson D, White IR, Riley RD. Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses. Stat Med. 2012;31(29):3805–3820.
    1. Bantum EO, Albright CL, White KK, et al. Surviving and thriving with cancer using a web-based health behavior change intervention: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e54.
    1. Basen-Engquist K, Taylor CLC, Rosenblum C, et al. Randomized pilot test of a lifestyle physical activity intervention for breast cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):225–234.
    1. Bennett JA, Lyons KS, Winters-Stone K, Nail LM, Scherer J. Motivational interviewing to increase physical activity in long-term cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Nurs Res. 2007;56(1):18–27.
    1. Bloom JR, Stewart SL, D’Onofrio CN, Luce J, Banks PJ. Addressing the needs of young breast cancer survivors at the 5 year milestone: can a short-term low intensity intervention produce change? J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2(3):190–204.
    1. Carmack Taylor CL, Smith MA, de Moor C, et al. Quality of life intervention for prostate cancer patients: design and baseline characteristics of the active for life after cancer trial. Control Clin Trials. 2004;25(3):265–285.
    1. Carmack Taylor CL, Demoor C, Smith MA, et al. Active for Life After Cancer: a randomized trial examining a lifestyle physical activity program for prostate cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2006;15(10):847–862.
    1. Culos-Reed SN, Robinson JW, Lau H, et al. Physical activity for men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: benefits from a 16-week intervention. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2010;18(5):591–599.
    1. Demark-Wahnefried W, Clipp EC, McBride C, et al. Design of FRESH START: a randomized trial of exercise and diet among cancer survivors. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2003;35(3):415–424.
    1. Demark-Wahnefried W, Clipp EC, Lipkus IM, et al. Main outcomes of the FRESH START trial: a sequentially tailored, diet and exercise mailed print intervention among breast and prostate cancer survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25(19):2709–2718.
    1. Ottenbacher AJ, Day RS, Taylor WC, et al. Long-term physical activity outcomes of home-based lifestyle interventions among breast and prostate cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2012;20(10):2483–2489.
    1. Hatchett A, Hallam JS, Ford MA. Evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based email intervention designed to influence the physical activity of survivors of breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22(4):829–836.
    1. Hébert JR, Hurley TG, Harmon BE, Heiney S, Hebert CJ, Steck SE. A diet, physical activity, and stress reduction intervention in men with rising prostate-specific antigen after treatment for prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36(2):e128–e136.
    1. Ibfelt E, Rottmann N, Kjaer T, et al. No change in health behavior, BMI or self-rated health after a psychosocial cancer rehabilitation: results of a randomized trial. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):289–298.
    1. Irwin ML, Cadmus L, Alvarez-Reeves M, et al. Recruiting and retaining breast cancer survivors into a randomized controlled exercise trial: the Yale Exercise and Survivorship Study. Cancer. 2008;112(11 Suppl):2593–2606.
    1. Høybye MT, Dalton SO, Christensen J, et al. Research in Danish cancer rehabilitation: social characteristics and late effects of cancer among participants in the FOCARE research project. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(1):47–55.
    1. James EL, Stacey F, Chapman K, et al. Exercise and nutrition routine improving cancer health (ENRICH): the protocol for a randomized efficacy trial of a nutrition and physical activity program for adult cancer survivors and carers. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):236.
    1. James EL, Stacey FG, Chapman K, et al. Impact of a nutrition and physical activity intervention (ENRICH: Exercise and Nutrition Routine Improving Cancer Health) on health behaviors of cancer survivors and carers: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):710.
    1. Kim SH, Shin MS, Lee HS, et al. Randomized pilot test of a simultaneous stage-matched exercise and diet intervention for breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011;38(2):106–E106.
    1. Lahart IM, Metsios GS, Nevill AM, Kitas GD, Carmichael AR. Randomised controlled trial of a home-based physical activity intervention in breast cancer survivors. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):234.
    1. Ligibel JA, Meyerhardt J, Pierce JP, et al. Impact of a telephone-based physical activity intervention upon exercise behaviors and fitness in cancer survivors enrolled in a cooperative group setting. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132(1):205–213.
    1. Livingston PM, Salmon J, Courneya KS, et al. Efficacy of a referral and physical activity program for survivors of prostate cancer [ENGAGE]: rationale and design for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11(1):237.
    1. Livingston PM, Craike MJ, Salmon J, et al. Effects of a clinician referral and exercise program for men who have completed active treatment for prostate cancer: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial (ENGAGE) Cancer. 2015;121(15):2646–2654.
    1. Matthews CE, Wilcox S, Hanby CL, et al. Evaluation of a 12-week home-based walking intervention for breast cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2007;15(2):203–211.
    1. Morey MC, Snyder DC, Sloane R, et al. Effects of home-based diet and exercise on functional outcomes among older, overweight long-term cancer survivors: RENEW: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301(18):1883–1891.
    1. Demark-Wahnefried W, Morey MC, Sloane R, et al. Reach out to enhance wellness home-based diet-exercise intervention promotes reproducible and sustainable long-term improvements in health behaviors, body weight, and physical functioning in older, overweight/obese cancer survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30(19):2354–2361.
    1. Snyder DC, Morey MC, Sloane R, et al. Reach out to ENhancE Wellness in Older Cancer Survivors (RENEW): design, methods and recruitment challenges of a home-based exercise and diet intervention to improve physical function among long-term survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Psychooncology. 2009;18(4):429–439.
    1. Park JH, Lee J, Oh M, et al. The effect of oncologists’ exercise recommendations on the level of exercise and quality of life in survivors of breast and colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2015;121(16):2740–2748.
    1. Pinto BM, Frierson GM, Rabin C, Trunzo JJ, Marcus BH. Home-based physical activity intervention for breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3577–3587.
    1. Pinto BM, Rabin C, Papandonatos GD, Frierson GM, Trunzo JJ, Marcus BH. Maintenance of effects of a home-based physical activity program among breast cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2008;16(11):1279–1289.
    1. Pinto BM, Papandonatos GD, Goldstein MG. A randomized trial to promote physical activity among breast cancer patients. Health Psychology. 2013;32(6):616–626.
    1. Pinto BM, Papandonatos GD, Goldstein MG, Marcus BH, Farrell N. Home-based physical activity intervention for colorectal cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2013;22(1):54–64.
    1. Rabin C, Pinto B, Fava J. Randomized trial of a physical activity and meditation intervention for young adult cancer survivors. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2016;5(1):41–47.
    1. Reif K, de Vries U, Petermann F, Görres S. Chronische Fatigue bei Krebspatienten. Med Klin. 2010;105(11):779–786.
    1. Reif K, de Vries U, Petermann F, Görres S. A patient education program is effective in reducing cancer-related fatigue: a multi-centre randomised two-group waiting-list controlled intervention trial. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2013;17(2):204–213.
    1. Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Anton PM, et al. Better exercise adherence after treatment for cancer (BEAT Cancer) study: rationale, design, and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33(1):124–137.
    1. Rogers LQ, Courneya KS, Anton PM, et al. Effects of the BEAT cancer physical activity behavior change intervention on physical activity, aerobic fitness, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;149(1):109–119.
    1. Sheppard VB, Hicks J, Makambi K, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Demark-Wahnefried W, Adams-Campbell L. The feasibility and acceptability of a diet and exercise trial in overweight and obese black breast cancer survivors: The Stepping STONE study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;46:106–113.
    1. Short CE, James EL, Girgis A, McElduff P, Plotnikoff RC. Move more for life: the protocol for a randomised efficacy trial of a tailored-print physical activity intervention for post-treatment breast cancer survivors. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):172.
    1. Short CE, James EL, Plotnikoff RC. Theory-and evidence-based development and process evaluation of the Move More for Life program: a tailored-print intervention designed to promote physical activity among post-treatment breast cancer survivors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(1):124.
    1. Short CE, James EL, Girgis A, D’Souza MI, Plotnikoff RC. Main outcomes of the Move More for Life Trial: a randomised controlled trial examining the effects of tailored-print and targeted-print materials for promoting physical activity among post-treatment breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2015;24(7):771–778.
    1. Vallance JKH, Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Yasui Y, Mackey JR. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of print materials and step pedometers on physical activity and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25(17):2352–2359.
    1. Vallance JK, Courneya KS, Taylor LM, Plotnikoff RC, Mackey JR. Development and evaluation of a theory-based physical activity guidebook for breast cancer survivors. Health Education & Behavior. 2008;35(2):174–189.
    1. von Gruenigen V, Frasure H, Kavanagh MB, et al. Survivors of uterine cancer empowered by exercise and healthy diet (SUCCEED): a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(3):699–704.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
    1. Bourke L, Homer KE, Thaha MA, et al. Interventions to improve exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(4):831–841.
    1. Lee MK, Park H-A, Yun YH, Chang YJ. Development and Formative evaluation of a web-based self-management exercise and diet intervention program with tailored motivation and action planning for cancer survivors. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(1):e11.
    1. Samdal GB, Eide GE, Barth T, Williams G, Meland E. Effective behaviour change techniques for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight and obese adults; systematic review and meta-regression analyses. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):42.
    1. McDermott MS, Oliver M, Iverson D, Sharma R. Effective techniques for changing physical activity and healthy eating intentions and behaviour: asystematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2016;21(4):827–841.
    1. Michie S, West R. Behaviour change theory and evidence: a presentation to Government. Health Psychol Rev. 2013;7(1):1–22.
    1. Peters GY, de Bruin M, Crutzen R. Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler: towards a protocol for accumulating evidence regarding the active content of health behaviour change interventions. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(1):1–14.
    1. Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Peters GY, et al. A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(3):297–312.
    1. Gourlan M, Bernard P, Bortolon C, et al. Efficacy of theory-based interventions to promote physical activity. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):50–66.
    1. Prestwich A, Sniehotta FF, Whittington C, Dombrowski SU, Rogers L, Michie S. Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Health Psychology. 2014;33(5):465–474.
    1. Husebø AML, Dyrstad SM, Søreide JA, Bru E. Predicting exercise adherence in cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of motivational and behavioural factors. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(1–2):4–21.
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. Oct 2.
    1. Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):12–18.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever