Anatomic stemless shoulder arthroplasty and related outcomes: a systematic review

Nael Hawi, Mark Tauber, Michael Joseph Messina, Peter Habermeyer, Frank Martetschläger, Nael Hawi, Mark Tauber, Michael Joseph Messina, Peter Habermeyer, Frank Martetschläger

Abstract

Background: The latest generation of shoulder arthroplasty includes canal-sparing respectively stemless designs that have been developed to allow restoration of the glenohumeral center of rotation independently from the shaft, and to avoid stem-related complications. The stemless prosthesis design has also recently been introduced for use in reverse arthroplasty systems.

Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature for studies of currently available canal-sparing respectively stemless shoulder arthroplasty systems. From the identified series, we recorded the indications, outcome measures, and humeral-sided complications.

Results: We identified 11 studies of canal-sparing respectively stemless anatomic shoulder arthroplasty implants, published between 2010 and 2016. These studies included 929 cases, and had a mean follow-up of 26 months (range, 6 to 72 months). The rates of humeral component-related complications ranged between 0 and 7.9 %. The studies reported only a few isolated cases of complications of the humeral component. Some arthroplasty systems are associated with radiological changes, but without any clinical relevance.

Conclusions: All of the published studies of canal-sparing respectively stemless shoulder arthroplasty reported promising clinical and radiological outcomes in short to midterm follow-up. Long-term studies are needed to demonstrate the long-term value of these kind of implants.

Keywords: Canal-sparing; Posttraumatic shoulder arthritis; Shoulder arthritis; Shoulder arthroplasty; Stemless; Total shoulder arthroplasty.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Biomet Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS; Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) (Figure provided by the manufacturer)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Mathys Affinis Short Stemless Prosthesis (Mathys, Betlach, Switzerland) (Figure provided by the manufacturer)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The Arthrex Eclipse Prosthesis (Arthrex, Naples, USA) (Figure provided by the manufacturer)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The Simpliciti Stemless Prosthesis (Tornier, Bloomington, MN, US) (Figure provided by the manufacturer)

References

    1. Neer CS., 2nd Articular replacement for the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37-A:215–28.
    1. Neer CS., 2nd Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1–13.
    1. Churchill RS. Stemless shoulder arthroplasty: current status. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23:1409–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.005.
    1. Athwal GS, Sperling JW, Rispoli DM, Cofield RH. Periprosthetic humeral fractures during shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:594–603. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00439.
    1. Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA., Jr Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2279–92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00125.
    1. Chin PY, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Schleck C. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:19–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.05.005.
    1. Deshmukh AV, Koris M, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS. Total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:471–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.009.
    1. Farng E, Zingmond D, Krenek L, Soohoo NF. Factors predicting complication rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:557–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.005.
    1. Kumar S, Sperling JW, Haidukewych GH, Cofield RH. Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:680–9.
    1. Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:604–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.013.
    1. Wirth MA, Rockwood CA., Jr Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:603–16.
    1. Levy O, Copeland SA. Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder. 5- to 10-year results with the Copeland mark-2 prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:213–21. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B2.11238.
    1. Levy O, Copeland SA. Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:266–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.005.
    1. Levy O, Funk L, Sforza G, Copeland SA. Copeland surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:512–8.
    1. Mullett H, Levy O, Raj D, Even T, Abraham R, Copeland SA. Copeland surface replacement of the shoulder. Results of an hydroxyapatite-coated cementless implant in patients over 80 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1466–9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.18850.
    1. Al-Hadithy N, Domos P, Sewell MD, Naleem A, Papanna MC, Pandit R. Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder for osteoarthritis: results of fifty Mark III Copeland prosthesis from an independent center with four-year mean follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:1776–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.01.024.
    1. Alizadehkhaiyat O, Kyriakos A, Singer MS, Frostick SP. Outcome of Copeland shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty with a 4-year mean follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:1352–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.027.
    1. Churchill RS, Chuinard C, Wiater JM, Friedman R, Freehill M, Jacobson S, Spencer E, Jr, Holloway GB, Wittstein J, Lassiter T, Smith M, Blaine T, Nicholson GP. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the simpliciti canal-sparing shoulder arthroplasty system: a prospective two-year multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:552–60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00181.
    1. Huguet D, DeClercq G, Rio B, Teissier J, Zipoli B, Group T Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: radiologic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:847–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.009.
    1. Kadum B, Mafi N, Norberg S, Sayed-Noor AS. Results of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS): a single-centre study of 56 consecutive patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:1623–9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1368-4.
    1. Razmjou H, Holtby R, Christakis M, Axelrod T, Richards R. Impact of prosthetic design on clinical and radiologic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:206–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.04.016.
    1. Berth A, Pap G. Stemless shoulder prosthesis versus conventional anatomic shoulder prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis: a comparison of the functional outcome after a minimum of two years follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013;14:31–7. doi: 10.1007/s10195-012-0216-9.
    1. Maier MW, Lauer S, Klotz MC, Bulhoff M, Spranz D, Zeifang F. Are there differences between stemless and conventional stemmed shoulder prostheses in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:275. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0723-y.
    1. Bell SN, Coghlan JA. Short stem shoulder replacement. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2014;8:72–5. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.140113.
    1. Schoch C, Huth J, Aghajev E, Bauer G, Mauch F. Die metaphysär verankerte Prothese bei posttraumatischer und primärer Omarthrose. Obere Extremität. 2011;6:275–81. doi: 10.1007/s11678-011-0137-x.
    1. Brunner UH, Fruth M, Rückl K, Magosch P, Tauber M, Resch H, Habermeyer P. Die schaftfreie Eclipse-Prothese – Indikation und mittelfristige Ergebnisse. Obere Extremität. 2012;7:22–8. doi: 10.1007/s11678-011-0152-y.
    1. Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Tauber M, Magosch P. Midterm results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:1463–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.023.
    1. Ho AG, Gowda AL, Wiater JM. Stemless humeral component in total shoulder arthroplasty: 2-year age-related clinical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.023.
    1. Athwal GS. Spare the canal: stemless shoulder arthroplasty is finally here: commentary on an article by R. Sean Churchill, MD, et al.: “Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the simpliciti canal-sparing shoulder arthroplasty system. A prospective two-year multicenter study”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:e28. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01350.
    1. Kadum B, Hassany H, Wadsten M, Sayed-Noor A, Sjoden G. Geometrical analysis of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a radiological study of seventy TESS total shoulder prostheses. Int Orthop. 2015. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2935-z.
    1. Boileau P, Trojani C, Walch G, Krishnan SG, Romeo A, Sinnerton R. Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:299–308. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.115985.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever