The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women's feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences

Sahar J Hassan, Johanne Sundby, Abdullatif Husseini, Espen Bjertness, Sahar J Hassan, Johanne Sundby, Abdullatif Husseini, Espen Bjertness

Abstract

Background: Vaginal examination (VE), is a frequent procedure during childbirth. It is the most accepted ways to assess progress during childbirth, but its repetition at short intervals has no value. Over years, VE continued to be plagued by a nature that implies negative feelings and experiences of women. The aim of this exploratory qualitative study was to explore women's feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences of vaginal examinations (VE) during normal childbirth.

Methods: We interviewed 176 postpartum women using semi-structured questionnaire in a Palestinian public hospital in the oPt. Descriptive statistics were conducted; frequency counts and percentages for the quantitative questions. The association between the frequency of VE and age, parity, years of education, locale and the time of delivery was tested by Chi-squared and Fisher's Exact test. The open-ended qualitative questions were read line-by-line for the content and coded. The assigned codes for all responses were entered to the SPSS statistical software version 18.

Results: As compared with WHO recommendations, VE was conducted too frequently, and by too many providers during childbirth. The proportion of women who received a 'too high' frequency of VEs during childbirth was significantly larger in primipara as compared to multipara women (P = .037). 82% of women reported pain or severe pain and 68% reported discomfort during VE. Some women reported insensitive approaches of providers, insufficient means of privacy and no respect of dignity or humanity during the exam.

Conclusions: Palestinian women are undergoing unnecessary and frequent VEs during childbirth, conducted by several different providers and suffer pain and discomfort un-necessarily.

Practice implications: Adhering to best evidence, VE during childbirth should be conducted only when necessary, and if possible, by the same provider. This will decrease the laboring women's unnecessary suffering from pain and discomfort. Providers should advocate for women's right to information, respect, dignity and privacy.

References

    1. Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Women's lived experience of fear of childbirth. Midwifery. 2009;25:e1–e9.
    1. Larsen M, Oldeide CC, Malterud K. Not so bad after all… Women’s experiences of pelvis examinations. Fam Pract. 1997;14(2):148–152. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.2.148.
    1. Larsen SB, Kragstrup J. Experiences of the first pelvic examination in a random sample of Danish teenagers. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74:137–141. doi: 10.3109/00016349509008923.
    1. Wijma B, Gullberg M, Kjessler B. Attitudes towards pelvic examination in a random sample of Swedish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:422–428. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.1998.770411.x.
    1. Oscarsson M, Benzein E. Women's experiences of pelvic examination: an interview study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2002;23:17–25. doi: 10.3109/01674820209093411.
    1. Hilden M, Sidenius K, Langhoff-Roos J, Wijma B, Schei B. Women’s experiences of the gynecologic examination: factors associated with discomforts. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:1030–1036. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00253.x.
    1. Yanikkerem E, Ozdemir M, Bingol H, Tatar A, Karadeniz G. Women's attitudes and expectations regarding gynaecological examination. Midwifery. 2009;25:500–508. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.08.006.
    1. Grundstorm H, Wallin K, Bertero C. you expose yourself in so many ways”: young women’s experiences of pelvic examination. J Psychosom Obst Gyn. 2011;32(2):59–64. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2011.560692.
    1. Moettus A, sklar D, Tandberg D. The effect of physician gender on women's perceived pain and embarrassment during pelvic examination. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17(7):635–637. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(99)90148-1.
    1. Patton KR, Bartfield JM, McErlean M. The Effect of Practitioner Characteristics on Patient Pain and Embarrassment During ED Internal Examination. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21(3):205–207. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(03)00058-5.
    1. Huber JD, Pukall CF, Boyer SC. Reissing, Chamberlain sM: “Just Relax”: Physicians’ experiences’ with women who are difficult or impossible to examine gynecologically. J Sex Med. 2009;6:791–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01139.x.
    1. Ker JS. Developing professional clinical skills for practice-the results of a feasibility study using a reflective approach to intimate examination. Medical Education. 2003;37(Suppl. 1):34–41.
    1. Coldicott Y, Pope C, Roberts C. The ethics of intimate examination-teaching tomorrow's doctors. BMJ. 2003;326:11.
    1. Wall L, Brown D. Ethical issues arising from the performance of pelvic examination by medical students on anesthetized patients. Am J Obst Gyn. 2004;190:319–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.035.
    1. Carr SE, Carmody D. Outcomes of teaching medical students core skills for women’s health: The pelvic examination educational program. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1382–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.697.
    1. Jha V, Setna Z, Al-Hity A, Quinton ND, Roberts TE. Patient involvement in teaching and assessing intimate examination skills: a systematic review. Medical Education. 2010;44:347–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03608.x.
    1. Lai CY, Levy V. Hong Kong Chinese Women's experience of vaginal examination in labour. Midwifery. 2002;18:296–303. doi: 10.1054/midw.2002.0326.
    1. Lewin D, Fearon B, Hemmings V, Johnson G. Women’s experiences of vaginal examinations in labor. Midwifery. 2005;21:267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.10.003.
    1. Bergstrom L, Roberts J, Skillman L, Seidel J. "You'll feel me touching you, Sweetie": Vaginal examinations during the second stage of labor. Birth. 1992;19(1):10–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1992.tb00365.x.
    1. Stewart M. 'I'm just going to wash you down': sanitizing the vaginal examination. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51(6):687–694.
    1. Enkin M, Keirse M, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, Hofmeyr J. A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth is an overview of results of the best available research about effects of specific maternity practices. 3rd. NewYork: Oxford University Press; 2000.
    1. Letic M. Inaccuracy in cervical dilatation assessment and the progress of labour monitoring. Medical Hypothesis. 2003;2:199–201.
    1. Hoffman MS, Cardosi RJ, Roberts WS, Fiorica JV Jr, Grendys EC, Griffin D. Accuracy of vaginal examination in the assessment of patients with operable cervical cancer. Am J Obst Gyn. 2004;190:986–993. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.019.
    1. Clement S. Unwanted vaginal examinations. Br J Midwifery. 1994;2:268–370.
    1. Imseis HM, Trout WC, Gabbe SG. The microbiological effect of digital cervical examination. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;180:578–580. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70257-7.
    1. Enkin M, Keirse JNC, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, Hofmeyr J. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Synopsis. Birth. 2001;28(1):41–51. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00041.x.
    1. WHO. Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and Newborn care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. (A guide for essential practice).
    1. NICE. Intrapartum care. UK: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007. (Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth).
    1. Hammoud MM, White CB, Fetters MD. Opening cultural doors: Providing culturally sensitive healthcare to Arab American and American Muslim patients. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;193:1307–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.065.
    1. Kridli SA-O. Health beliefs and practices among Arab women. MCN-Am J Maternal/Child Nurs. 2002;27(3):178–182. doi: 10.1097/00005721-200205000-00010.
    1. Shalhoub-Kevorkian N. Towards a cultural definition of rape: dilemmas in dealing with rape victims in Palestinian society. Women's Studies International Forum. 1999;22(2):157–173. doi: 10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00004-7.
    1. Hassan-Bitar S, Wick L. Evoking the Guardian Angel: Childbirth Care in a Palestinian Hospital. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(30):103–113. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(07)30321-2.
    1. Hassan S, Sundby J, Husseini A, Bjertness E. Translating evidence into practice in childbirth: A case from the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Women and Birth. 2013. pp. 1–8. .
    1. Hassan-Bitar S, Narraine S. ‘Shedding light’ on the challenges faced by Palestinian maternal health care providers. Midwifery. 2011;27(2):154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.05.007.
    1. Ramallah JM, PCBS. The Annual statistical book for Ramallah and Al Bireh Governorate. Palestine: PCBS; 2010. p. 37. (Volume 2).
    1. Mikki N, Wick L, Abu-Asab N, Abu-Rmeileh NM-E. A trial of amniotomy in a Palestinian hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(4):368–373. doi: 10.1080/01443610701327537.
    1. Royal College of Nursing. Midwives uncomfortable with vaginal examination. Clinical digest. 2005;20(5):18.
    1. Midwives ICo. The Philosophy and Model of Midwifery Care. ICM: In Policy and Practice;
    1. Davis-Floyd RE. U. of California Press: The rituals of American hospital birth; 1992.
    1. Marland H, Rafferty AM. Midwives, society and childbirth: debates and controversies in the modern period. New York: Routledge; 1997.
    1. Wick L, Mikki N, Giacaman R, Rahim HA. Childbirth in Palestine. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;89(2):174–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.01.029.
    1. Pylypa J. Arizona Anthropolgist: Power and bodily practice: applying the work of Foucault to an anthropology of the body; 1998. p. 13.
    1. Santos R, Hernandez-Ayup S, Galache P, Morales FG, Batiza VA, Montoya D. Sever latex allergy after a vaginal examination during labor: A case report. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;177:1543–1544. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70108-X.
    1. McLean M, Ahbabi SA, Ameri MA, Mansoori MA, Yahyaei FA, Bernsen R. Muslim women and medical students in the clinical encounter. Medical Education. 2010;44:306–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03599.x.
    1. Cook RJ. International Human Rights and Women's Reproductive Health. Stud Fam Plann. 1993;24(2):73–86.
    1. Manson NC, O'Neill O. Rethinking informed consent in Bioethics. JAMA. 2007;298(23):2799–2800.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever