Investigation of the role of X chromosome inactivation and androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphisms in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: a prospective case-control study

Yilun Sui, Jing Fu, Shuo Zhang, Lu Li, Xiaoxi Sun, Yilun Sui, Jing Fu, Shuo Zhang, Lu Li, Xiaoxi Sun

Abstract

Background: Previous research has revealed that skewed X chromosome inactivation (SXCI) and androgen receptor (AR) CAG polymorphisms are associated with increased risk of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL); however, the results are conflicting, and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated the role of SXCI and AR CAG polymorphisms in patients with RPL and explored whether the underlying mechanisms were related to the ovarian reserve and preimplantation embryo aneuploidy.

Methods: This was a prospective case-control study carried out in a tertiary hospital-based reproductive medicine center. An external validation RPL cohort was recruited during the study period. Data on baseline and cycle characteristics were collected. X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) was measured using a human AR assay. AR polymorphisms were assessed using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reactions and direct sequencing. Blastocysts of the patients with RPL were tested by single nucleotide polymorphism microarray based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Results: In total, 131 patients with idiopathic RPL and 126 controls were included for the case-control study. Patients with RPL exhibited a significantly more skewed XCI distribution pattern (67.71 ± 10.50 vs. 64.22 ± 10.62, p = 0.011), as well as significantly shorter bi-allelic mean (18.56 ± 1.97 vs. 19.34 ± 2.38, p = 0.005) and X-weighted bi-allelic mean (18.46 ± 2.02 vs. 19.38 ± 2.53, p = 0.001) of AR CAG repeats. Multivariate logistic regression models indicated that CAG repeat < 20, SXCI, and duration of stimulation were independently associated with the risk of RPL. However, SXCI and AR CAG polymorphisms were not associated with ovarian reserve or preimplantation embryo aneuploidy in the RPL group, and the same results were attained in a separate validation cohort of 363 patients with RPL.

Conclusion: SXCI and AR CAG polymorphisms are related to RPL; however, these two factors do not lead to RPL by affecting the ovarian reserve or increasing embryo aneuploidy. The roles of SXCI and AR CAG in RPL may involve other mechanisms that require further investigation.

Trial registration: NCT02504281, https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov (Date of registration, 21/07/2015; date of enrolment of the first subject, 30/07/2015).

Keywords: Androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphisms; Ovarian reserve; Preimplantation embryo aneuploidy; Recurrent pregnancy loss; X-chromosome inactivation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the study. PL = pregnancy loss; PGT-A = preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy; ICSI = intracytoplasmic sperm injection; AR = androgen receptor; DOR = diminished ovarian reserve
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
 A) Comparison of the XCI skew between the RPL and control groups. The XCI skew is significantly higher in patients with RPL than in the controls (mean ± standard deviation, 67.71 ± 10.50 vs. 64.22 ± 10.62, p = 0.011). XCI = X-chromosome inactivation; RPL = recurrent pregnancy loss B) Comparison of the AR CAG repeat polymorphism between the RPL and control groups. The short allele (16.87 ± 2.39, vs. 17.77 ± 2.37, p = 0.003) and BAM (18.56 ± 1.97 vs. 19.34 ± 2.38, p = 0.005) were significantly shorter in patients with RPL than in controls. The difference in bioactive CAG repeats (XWBM) was more pronounced (18.46 ± 2.02 vs. 19.38 ± 2.53, p = 0.001). AR CAG = androgen receptor CAG; RPL = recurrent pregnancy loss; XWBM = X-weighted-biallelic-mean. C) Percentage of women with XCI skew > 90, 85–90, and < 85 in the RPL and control groups. The prevalence of highly skewed XCI (≥ 85%) and extremely skewed XCI (≥ 90%) were not significantly different between the two groups. XCI = X-chromosome inactivation; RPL = recurrent pregnancy loss D) Comparison of patients with RPL and controls according to CAG repeats. The median CAG repeat length of the control group was 19.50 or 19.72 calculated as BAM or XWBM, such that 20 was used as the cut-off value. The distribution was significantly different between the two groups (chi-square test, p-value = 0.000 for BAM, p-value = 0.000 for XWBM). RPL = recurrent pregnancy loss; XWBM = X-weighted biallelic mean; BAM = biallelic mean.

References

    1. Kolte AM, Bernardi LA, Christiansen OB, Quenby S, Farquharson RG, Goddijn M, et al. ESHRE Special Interest Group, Early Pregnancy. Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability: a consensus statement from the ESHRE early pregnancy special interest group. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:495–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu299.
    1. Green Top RCOG. 2011 Guideline. The investigation and treatment of couples with recurrent miscarriage (Green-Top Guideline No. 17). . Accessed 4 April 2022.
    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:533–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025.
    1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2683–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep343.
    1. Early E. Pregnancy Guideline Development Group. Guideline on the management of recurrent pregnancy loss, 2017. . Accessed 4 April 2022.
    1. Liu XY, Fan Q, Wang J, Li R, Xu Y, Guo J, et al. Higher chromosomal abnormality rate in blastocysts from young patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:853–64. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.016.
    1. Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B, Laskin CA, Glassner M, et al. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:675–80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.025.
    1. Bhatt SJ, Marchetto NM, Roy J, Morelli SS, McGovern PG. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:2339–44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab117.
    1. Yoshida T, Miyado M, Mikami M, Suzuki E, Kinjo K, Matsubara K, et al. Aneuploid rescue precedes X-chromosome inactivation and increases the incidence of its skewness by reducing the size of the embryonic progenitor cell pool. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1762–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez117.
    1. Monteiro J, Derom C, Vlietinck R, Kohn N, Lesser M, Gregersen PK. Commitment to X inactivation precedes the twinning event in monochorionic MZ twins. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:339–46. doi: 10.1086/301978.
    1. Tonon L, Bergamaschi G, Dellavecchia C, Rosti V, Lucotti C, Malabarba L, et al. Unbalanced X-chromosome inactivation in haemopoietic cells from normal women. Br J Haematol. 1998;102:996–1003. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00867.x.
    1. Zito A, Davies MN, Tsai PC, Roberts S, Andres-Ejarque R, Nardone S, et al. Heritability of skewed X-inactivation in female twins is tissue-specific and associated with age. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5339. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13340-w.
    1. Sui Y, Chen Q, Sun X. Association of skewed X chromosome inactivation and idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:140–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.05.007.
    1. Miranda-Furtado CL, Luchiari HR, Chielli Pedroso DC, Kogure GS, Caetano LC, Santana BA, et al. Skewed X-chromosome inactivation and shorter telomeres associate with idiopathic premature ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:476–85.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.017.
    1. Santiwatana S, Mahachoklertwattana P, Limwongse C, Khlairit P, Pongratanakul S, Roothumnong E, et al. Skewed X chromosome inactivation in girls and female adolescents with autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Endocrinol. 2018;89:863–9. doi: 10.1111/cen.13857.
    1. Wu C, Sun Z. X chromosome abnormal inactivation: a unique factor for women’s diseases? Epigenomics. 2016;8:447–50. doi: 10.2217/epi.16.2.
    1. Kanaan SB, Onat OE, Balandraud N, Martin GV, Nelson JL, Azzouz DF, et al. Evaluation of X chromosome inactivation with respect to HLA genetic susceptibility in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158550.
    1. Kristiansen M, Knudsen GP, Maguire P, Margolin S, Pedersen J, Lindblom A, et al. High incidence of skewed X chromosome inactivation in young patients with familial non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer. J Med Genet. 2005;42:877–80. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.032433.
    1. Borgbo T, Macek M, Sr., Chrudimska J, Jeppesen JV, Hansen LL, Andersen CY. Size matters: associations between the androgen receptor CAG repeat length and the intrafollicular hormone milieu. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;419:12–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.09.015.
    1. Gelmann EP. Molecular biology of the androgen receptor. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3001–15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.10.018.
    1. Buchanan G, Yang M, Cheong A, Harris JM, Irvine RA, Lambert PF, et al. Structural and functional consequences of glutamine tract variation in the androgen receptor. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:1677–92. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh181.
    1. Chamberlain NL, Driver ED, Miesfeld RL. The length and location of CAG trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor N-terminal domain affect transactivation function. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:3181–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.15.3181.
    1. Zhang T, Liang W, Fang M, Yu J, Ni Y, Li Z. Association of the CAG repeat polymorphisms in androgen receptor gene with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Gene. 2013;524:161–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.04.040.
    1. Mao Q, Qiu M, Dong G, Xia W, Zhang S, Xu Y, et al. CAG repeat polymorphisms in the androgen receptor and breast cancer risk in women: a meta-analysis of 17 studies. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:2111–20. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S85130.
    1. Kimura S, Matsumoto T, Matsuyama R, Shiina H, Sato T, Takeyama K, et al. Androgen receptor function in folliculogenesis and its clinical implication in premature ovarian failure. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2007;18:183–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2007.04.002.
    1. Aruna M, Dasgupta S, Sirisha PVS, Andal Bhaskar SA, Tarakeswari S, Singh L, et al. Role of androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphism and X-inactivation in the manifestation of recurrent spontaneous abortions in Indian women. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017718.
    1. Kristensen SG, Ebbesen P, Andersen CY. Transcriptional profiling of five isolated size-matched stages of human preantral follicles. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;401:189–201. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.12.012.
    1. Chuan Z, Jie D, Hao X, Junhua B, Mengjing G, Liguo P, et al. Associations between androgen receptor CAG & GGN repeat polymorphism & recurrent spontaneous abortions in Chinese women. Indian J Med Res. 2014;139:730–6.
    1. Blyth U, Craciunas L, Hudson G, Choudhary M. Maternal germline factors associated with aneuploid pregnancy loss: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27:866–84. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmab010.
    1. Sangha KK, Stephenson MD, Brown CJ, Robinson WP. Extremely skewed X-chromosome inactivation is increased in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:913–7. doi: 10.1086/302552.
    1. Beever CL, Stephenson MD, Peñaherrera MS, Jiang RH, Kalousek DK, Hayden M, et al. Skewed X-chromosome inactivation is associated with trisomy in women ascertained on the basis of recurrent spontaneous abortion or chromosomally abnormal pregnancies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:399–407. doi: 10.1086/346119.
    1. Warburton D, Kline J, Kinney A, Yu CY, Levin B, Brown S. Skewed X chromosome inactivation and trisomic spontaneous abortion: no association. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85:179–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.07.002.
    1. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BCJM, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition ESHRE consensus on the definition of “poor response” to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1616–24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092.
    1. Bunnewell SJ, Honess ER, Karia AM, Keay SD, Al Wattar BH, Quenby S. Diminished ovarian reserve in recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:818–27.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.014.
    1. King JL, Yang B, Sparks AET, Mains LM, Murray JC, Van Voorhis BJ. Skewed X inactivation and IVF-conceived infants. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:660–3. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.011.
    1. Yuan C, Gao C, Qian Y, Liu Y, Jiang SW, Cui Y, et al. Polymorphism of CAG and GGN repeats of androgen receptor gene in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:790–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.007.
    1. Kaare M, Painter JN, Ulander VM, Kaaja R, Aittomäki K. Sex chromosome characteristics and recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2328–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.048.
    1. Hickey T, Chandy A, Norman RJ. The androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphism and X-chromosome inactivation in Australian Caucasian women with infertility related to polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:161–5. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.1.8137.
    1. Bagislar S, Ustuner I, Cengiz B, Soylemez F, Akyerli CB, Ceylaner S, et al. Extremely skewed X-chromosome inactivation patterns in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46:384–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00622.x.
    1. Kuo PL, Huang SC, Chang LW, Lin CH, Tsai WH, Teng YN. Association of extremely skewed X-chromosome inactivation with Taiwanese women presenting with recurrent pregnancy loss. J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107:340–3. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60096-0.
    1. Hogge WA, Prosen TL, Lanasa MC, Huber HA, Reeves MF. Recurrent spontaneous abortion and skewed X-inactivation: is there an association? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:384.e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.012.
    1. Pasquier E, Bohec C, De Saint Martin L, Le Maréchal C, Le Martelot MT, Roche S, et al. Strong evidence that skewed X-chromosome inactivation is not associated with recurrent pregnancy loss: an incident paired case control study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2829–33. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem264.
    1. Karvela M, Stefanakis N, Papadopoulou S, Tsitilou SG, Tsilivakos V, Lamnissou K. Evidence for association of the G1733A polymorphism of the androgen receptor gene with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2010.e9–12. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.071.
    1. Jahaninejad T, Ghasemi N, Kalantar SM, Sheikhha MH, Pashaiefar H. StuI polymorphism on the androgen receptor gene is associated with recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:437–40. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-9949-5.
    1. Harris BS, Steiner AZ, Jukic AM. Ovarian reserve biomarkers and menstrual cycle length in a prospective cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:e3748–59. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab204.
    1. Bakkensen JB, Christou G, Dimitriadis I, James K, Souter I. The effect of follicular phase length on cycle outcomes and endometrial development in gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation/intrauterine insemination cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40:362–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.12.007.
    1. Vassena R, Vidal R, Coll O, Vernaeve V. Menstrual cycle length in reproductive age women is an indicator of oocyte quality and a candidate marker of ovarian reserve. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;177:130–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.027.
    1. Lledó B, Llácer J, Turienzo A, Ortiz JA, Guerrero J, Morales R, et al. Androgen receptor CAG repeat length is associated with ovarian reserve but not with ovarian response. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:509–15. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.012.
    1. Holubcová Z, Blayney M, Elder K, Schuh M. Error-prone chromosome-mediated spindle assembly favors chromosome segregation defects in human oocytes. Science. 2015;348:1143–7. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9529.
    1. Pu D, Wu J, Liu J. Skewed X chromosome inactivation may be not associated with premature ovarian failure. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26:423–8. doi: 10.3109/09513591003632217.
    1. Sugawa F, Wada Y, Maruyama T, Uchida H, Ishizuka B, Ogata T. Premature ovarian failure and androgen receptor gene CAG repeat lengths weighted by X chromosome inactivation patterns. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:649–52. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.085.
    1. Laisk T, Haller-Kikkatalo K, Laanpere M, Jakovlev U, Peters M, Karro H, et al. Androgen receptor epigenetic variations influence early follicular phase gonadotropin levels. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:1557–63. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.526182.
    1. Lledo B, Llácer J, Ortiz JA, Martinez B, Morales R, Bernabeu R. A pharmacogenetic approach to improve low ovarian response: the role of CAG repeats length in the androgen receptor gene. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;227:41–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.001.
    1. Chatterjee S, Singh R, Kadam S, Maitra A, Thangaraj K, Meherji P, et al. Longer CAG repeat length in the androgen receptor gene is associated with premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3230–5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep296.
    1. Panda B, Rao L, Tosh D, Dixit H, Padmalatha V, Kanakavalli M, et al. Germline study of AR gene of Indian women with ovarian failure. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27:572–8. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2010.507282.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever