Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the open-label, randomised controlled ORAL Surveillance trial

Andra-Rodica Balanescu, Gustavo Citera, Virginia Pascual-Ramos, Deepak L Bhatt, Carol A Connell, David Gold, All-Shine Chen, Gosford Sawyerr, Andrea B Shapiro, Janet E Pope, Hendrik Schulze-Koops, Andra-Rodica Balanescu, Gustavo Citera, Virginia Pascual-Ramos, Deepak L Bhatt, Carol A Connell, David Gold, All-Shine Chen, Gosford Sawyerr, Andrea B Shapiro, Janet E Pope, Hendrik Schulze-Koops

Abstract

Objectives: To characterise infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in ORAL Surveillance.

Methods: In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, patients with RA aged≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg two times per day or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). Incidence rates (IRs; patients with first events/100 patient-years) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for infections, overall and by age (50-<65 years; ≥65 years). Probabilities of infections were obtained (Kaplan-Meier estimates). Cox modelling identified infection risk factors.

Results: IRs/HRs for all infections, serious infection events (SIEs) and non-serious infections (NSIs) were higher with tofacitinib (10>5 mg two times per day) versus TNFi. For SIEs, HR (95% CI) for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, respectively, were 1.17 (0.92 to 1.50) and 1.48 (1.17 to 1.87). Increased IRs/HRs for all infections and SIEs with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi were more pronounced in patients aged≥65 vs 50-<65 years. SIE probability increased from month 18 and before month 6 with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, respectively. NSI probability increased before month 6 with both tofacitinib doses versus TNFi. Across treatments, the most predictive risk factors for SIEs were increasing age, baseline opioid use, history of chronic lung disease and time-dependent oral corticosteroid use, and, for NSIs, female sex, history of chronic lung disease/infections, past smoking and time-dependent Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, C-reactive protein.

Conclusions: Infections were higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi. Findings may inform future treatment decisions.

Trial registration number: NCT02092467.

Keywords: antirheumatic agents; arthritis, rheumatoid; therapeutics; tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: A-RB has acted as a consultant for AbbVie, Akros, Alfasigma, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, has received speaker fees or honoraria from AbbVie, Alfasigma, Amgen, Angelini, AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Teva, UCB and Zentiva, and has been a principal investigator in studies sponsored by Akros, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. GC has received grants and/or research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gema Pharma, Genzyme, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi-Genzyme, and has acted as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gema Pharma, Genzyme, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi-Genzyme. VP-R is an employee of Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición and is a principal investigator in studies sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer.DLB is a member of the advisory board for: AngioWave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, Stasys; Board of Directors: AngioWave (stock options), Boston VA Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), High Enroll (stock), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, TobeSoft; Chair: Inaugural Chair, American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; Data Monitoring Committees: Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (Chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute; Rutgers University (for the NIH-funded MINT Trial); Honoraria: American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Chair, ACC Accreditation Oversight Committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol-Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (Course Director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees), Wiley (steering committee); Other: Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Patent: Sotagliflozin (named on a patent for sotagliflozin assigned to Brigham and Women's Hospital who assigned to Lexicon; DLB/Brigham and Women's Hospital do not receive any income from this patent); Research Funding: Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, 89Bio; Royalties: Elsevier (Editor, Braunwald’s Heart Disease); Site Co-Investigator: Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, SpectraWAVE, Svelte, Vascular Solutions; Trustee: American College of Cardiology; Unfunded Research: FlowCo, Takeda. He served as a member of the Steering Committee for ORAL Surveillance, with funding from Pfizer paid to Brigham and Women’s Hospital. CAC, DG and ABS are employees and stockholders of Pfizer. A-SC is an employee of Pfizer. GS is an employee of Syneos Health, who were paid contractors to Pfizer in the development of this manuscript. JEP has received grants and/or research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Seattle Genetics and UCB, and has acted as a consultant for AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB. HS-K has acted as a consultant for, and been an advisor or review panel member for, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Pfizer and UCB.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
IRs (patients with first events/100 PY; 95% CIs) for (A) all infections, overall and stratified by age, and (B) all infections excluding HZ; and HRs (95% CIs) for (C) all infections, overall and stratified by age, and (D) all infections excluding HZ, in ORAL Surveillance. HRs are shown on a logarithmic scale. For patients randomised to the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group who had their dose of tofacitinib reduced to 5 mg two times per day, the data collected after patients were switched to tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day were counted in the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group. *Excludes HZ adjudicated as opportunistic infections and non-adjudicated HZ events from the clinical database. †HRs (95% CIs) based on a simple Cox proportional hazard model for pairwise treatment comparisons, with treatment as covariate. ‡HRs (95% CIs) based on a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model for pairwise treatment comparisons with treatment, sex, region and smoking as covariates. BID, two times per day; HR, hazard ratio; HZ, herpes zoster; IR, incidence rate; N, number of evaluable patients; n, number of patients with events; PY, patient-years; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) IRs (patients with first events/100 PY; 95% CIs) and (B) HRs (95% CIs) for SIEs, overall and stratified by age; and (C) cumulative probabilities of experiencing a first SIE (Kaplan-Meier method), in ORAL Surveillance. HRs are shown on a logarithmic scale. For patients randomised to the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group who had their dose of tofacitinib reduced to 5 mg two times per day, the data collected after patients were switched to tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day were counted in the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group. IRs and HRs for SIEs overall have been reported previously. *Number of PY of exposure to tofacitinib required to have one additional event, relative to a TNFi †Number of patients who would need to be treated over 5 years with tofacitinib rather than a TNFi to result in one additional event. ‡HRs (95% CIs) based on a simple Cox proportional hazard model for pairwise treatment comparisons, with treatment as covariate. BID, two times per day; HR, hazard ratio; IR, incidence rate; N, number of evaluable patients; n, number of patients with events; PY, patient-years; SIE, serious infection event; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IRs (patients with first events/100 PY; 95% CIs) for (A) NSIs and (B) NSIs excluding HZ; HRs (95% CIs) for (C) NSIs and (D) NSIs excluding HZ; and (E) cumulative probabilities of experiencing a first NSI (Kaplan-Meier method), in ORAL Surveillance. HRs are shown on a logarithmic scale. For patients randomised to the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group who had their dose of tofacitinib reduced to 5 mg two times per day, the data collected after patients were switched to tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day were counted in the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group. *Excludes HZ adjudicated as opportunistic infections and non-adjudicated HZ events from the clinical database. †HRs (95% CIs) based on a simple Cox proportional hazard model for pairwise treatment comparisons, with treatment as covariate. BID, two times per day; HR, hazard ratio; HZ, herpes zoster; IR, incidence rate; N, number of evaluable patients; n, number of patients with events; NSI, non-serious infection; PY, patient-years; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) IRs (patients with first events/100 PY; 95% CIs) and (B) HRs (95% CIs) for all HZ (non-serious/serious), overall and stratified by age; and (C) cumulative probabilities of experiencing a first HZ (non-serious/serious) event (Kaplan-Meier method), in ORAL Surveillance. HRs are shown on a logarithmic scale. For patients randomised to the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group who had their dose of tofacitinib reduced to 5 mg two times per day, the data collected after patients were switched to tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day were counted in the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group. All HZ events (non-serious/serious) include HZ adjudicated as opportunistic infections and non-adjudicated HZ events from the clinical database. *HRs based on a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model for pairwise treatment comparisons with treatment, age, region, smoking and baseline corticosteroid use as covariates. BID, two times per day; HR, hazard ratio; HZ, herpes zoster; IR, incidence rate; N, number of evaluable patients; n, number of patients with events; PY, patient-years; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.
Figure 5
Figure 5
HRs (95% CIs) of potential baseline and time-dependent risk factors for (A) SIEs, (B) NSIs and (C) all HZ (non-serious/serious) in ORAL Surveillance (multivariable Cox analyses across treatments). For patients randomised to the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group who had their dose of tofacitinib reduced to 5 mg two times per day, the data collected after patients were switched to tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day were counted in the tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day group. *p†HRs were based on a backward model selection algorithm on a multivariable Cox model, including effects of treatment group (tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day, 10 mg two times per day and TNFi) and a set of candidate baseline risk factors previously selected via a simple Cox model; risk factors with p<0.10 in the simple model (see online supplemental table 3) were entered into the multivariable model, and the risk factors with p<0.10 were retained in the multivariable model, with p<0.05 interpreted as predictive. ‡In North America (the USA, Puerto Rico and Canada), patients randomised to TNFi received adalimumab 40 mg once every 2 weeks; in the ROW, patients randomised to TNFi received etanercept 50 mg once weekly. §HRs were based on a multivariable Cox time-dependent model including the fixed effects of treatment group (tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day, tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day and TNFi), the final set of baseline covariates selected from the previous multivariable Cox model, using a backward selection algorithm and a time-dependent covariate (a separate model was generated for each individual time-dependent risk factor). ¶All HZ events (non-serious/serious) include HZ adjudicated as opportunistic infections and non-adjudicated HZ events from the clinical database. BID, two times per day; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DAS28-4(CRP), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR, hazard ratio; HZ, herpes zoster; ILD, interstitial lung disease; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NSI, non-serious infection; ROW, rest of the world; SIE, serious infection event; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.

References

    1. Croia C, Bursi R, Sutera D, et al. . One year in review 2019: pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019;37:347–57.
    1. Doran MF, Crowson CS, Pond GR, et al. . Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2287–93. 10.1002/art.10524
    1. Listing J, Gerhold K, Zink A. The risk of infections associated with rheumatoid arthritis, with its comorbidity and treatment. Rheumatology 2013;52:53–61. 10.1093/rheumatology/kes305
    1. Kelly C, Hamilton J. What kills patients with rheumatoid arthritis? Rheumatology 2007;46:183–4. 10.1093/rheumatology/kel332
    1. Sokka T, Abelson B, Pincus T. Mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: 2008 update. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008;26:S35–61.
    1. Du Pan SM, Dehler S, Ciurea A, et al. . Comparison of drug retention rates and causes of drug discontinuation between anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:560–8. 10.1002/art.24463
    1. Singh JA, Cameron C, Noorbaloochi S, et al. . Risk of serious infection in biological treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2015;386:258–65. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61704-9
    1. Bechman K, Halai K, Yates M, et al. . Nonserious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for rheumatology biologics register for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73:1800–9. 10.1002/art.41754
    1. van Dartel SAA, Fransen J, Kievit W, et al. . Difference in the risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept: results from the Dutch rheumatoid arthritis monitoring (DREAM) registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:895–900. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201338
    1. Dixon WG, Hyrich KL, Watson KD, et al. . Drug-Specific risk of tuberculosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR). Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:522–8. 10.1136/ard.2009.118935
    1. Atzeni F, Sarzi-Puttini P, Botsios C, et al. . Long-Term anti-TNF therapy and the risk of serious infections in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab in the GISEA registry. Autoimmun Rev 2012;12:225–9. 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.06.008
    1. Pawar A, Desai RJ, Gautam N, et al. . Risk of admission to hospital for serious infection after initiating tofacitinib versus biologic DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multidatabase cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol 2020;2:e84–98. 10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30137-7
    1. Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, et al. . Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2022;386:316–26. 10.1056/NEJMoa2109927
    1. European Medicines Agency . Xeljanz® (tofacitinib): summary of product characteristics, 2020. Available: [Accessed 01 Sep 2021].
    1. European Medicines Agency . EMA confirms Xeljanz to be used with caution in patients at high risk of blood clots, 2020. Available: [Accessed 01 Sep 2021].
    1. Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, et al. . Long-Term safety of tofacitinib up to 9.5 years: a comprehensive integrated analysis of the rheumatoid arthritis clinical development programme. RMD Open 2020;6:e001395. 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001395
    1. Daly L. Simple SAS macros for the calculation of exact binomial and Poisson confidence limits. Comput Biol Med 1992;22:351–61. 10.1016/0010-4825(92)90023-g
    1. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1972;34:187–202.
    1. Curtis JR, Winthrop K, O'Brien C, et al. . Use of a baseline risk score to identify the risk of serious infectious events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during certolizumab pegol treatment. Arthritis Res Ther 2017;19:276. 10.1186/s13075-017-1466-y
    1. Doran MF, Crowson CS, Pond GR, et al. . Predictors of infection in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2294–300. 10.1002/art.10529
    1. Struyf T, Nuyts S, Tournoy J, et al. . Burden of infections on older patients presenting to general practice: a registry-based study. Fam Pract 2021;38:166–72. 10.1093/fampra/cmaa105
    1. Curtis JR, Schulze-Koops H, Takiya L, et al. . Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in older and younger patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2017;35:390–400.
    1. Winthrop KL, Citera G, Gold D, et al. . Age-based (<65 vs ≥65 years) incidence of infections and serious infections with tofacitinib versus biological DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials and the US Corrona RA registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:134–6. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218992
    1. Kremer JM, Bingham CO, Cappelli LC, et al. . Postapproval comparative safety study of tofacitinib and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 5-year results from a United States-based rheumatoid arthritis registry. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021;3:173–84. 10.1002/acr2.11232
    1. Pfizer Inc . Xeljanz® (tofacitinib): highlights of prescribing information, 2020. Available: [Accessed 14 Oct 2021].
    1. Jani M, Barton A, Hyrich K. Prediction of infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologics: are we any closer to risk stratification? Curr Opin Rheumatol 2019;31:285–92. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000598
    1. Wiese AD, Griffin MR, Stein CM, et al. . Opioid analgesics and the risk of serious infections among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a self-controlled case series study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:323–31. 10.1002/art.39462
    1. Redeker I, Albrecht K, Kekow J, et al. . Risk of herpes zoster (shingles) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biologic, targeted synthetic and conventional synthetic DMARD treatment: data from the German RABBIT register. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:41–7. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220651
    1. Kivitz AJ, Cohen S, Keystone E, et al. . A pooled analysis of the safety of tofacitinib as monotherapy or in combination with background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in a phase 3 rheumatoid arthritis population. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2018;48:406–15. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.006
    1. Chowdhury MZI, Turin TC. Variable selection strategies and its importance in clinical prediction modelling. Fam Med Community Health 2020;8:e000262. 10.1136/fmch-2019-000262
    1. Heinze G, Wallisch C, Dunkler D. Variable selection - A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician. Biom J 2018;60:431–49. 10.1002/bimj.201700067
    1. Charles-Schoeman C, Fleischmann R, Mysler E. The risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with RA aged ≥50 years with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor: results from a phase 3b/4 randomized safety study of tofacitinib vs TNF inhibitors [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73(Suppl 10):1941.
    1. Bălănescu AR, Citera G, Pascual-Ramos V. Incidence of infections in patients aged ≥ 50 years with RA and ≥ 1 additional cardiovascular risk factor: results from a Phase 3b/4 randomized safety study of tofacitinib vs TNF inhibitors [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73(Suppl 10):1684.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever