Patient and clinician perspectives on a patient-facing dashboard that visualizes patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis

Lucy H Liu, Sarah B Garrett, Jing Li, Dana Ragouzeos, Beth Berrean, Daniel Dohan, Patricia P Katz, Jennifer L Barton, Jinoos Yazdany, Gabriela Schmajuk, Lucy H Liu, Sarah B Garrett, Jing Li, Dana Ragouzeos, Beth Berrean, Daniel Dohan, Patricia P Katz, Jennifer L Barton, Jinoos Yazdany, Gabriela Schmajuk

Abstract

Background: Poor patient-clinician communication around patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is a barrier to the effective management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to develop an RA 'dashboard' that could facilitate conversations about PROs and that would be acceptable to a wide range of patients, including English and Spanish speakers and patients with adequate or limited health literacy.

Methods: A diverse group of RA patients along with clinicians from two academic rheumatology clinics joined separate focus groups. We solicited feedback and made iterative changes to mock-ups of an RA dashboard that visualized PROs using a human-centred design process. We used the thematic analysis method to identify and characterize themes from the focus groups and used these insights to refine the dashboard.

Results: We conducted six focus groups involving 25 RA patients and three groups with 11 clinicians. Patients and clinicians agreed that the dashboard could enhance communication about PROs and RA disease activity and could promote patient self-management. Patients varied in their (a) comprehension, (b) preferences for the display and features of the dashboard, and (c) desired uses for the dashboard. Clinicians expressed significant concerns about the logistics of using the dashboard in clinical practice.

Conclusion: Using principles of human-centred design, we created an RA dashboard that was well-accepted among patients and clinicians. The ability to customize the data display is important for tailoring the dashboard to patients with diverse needs and preferences. Special attention should be given to feasibility concerns voiced by clinicians.

Keywords: dashboard; patient-reported outcomes; rheumatoid arthritis.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interests.

© 2020 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Prototype A mock‐up of RA dashboard. Sections include ‘My RA symptoms’, representing the CDAI disease activity score, ‘How well can I function’ showing PROMIS physical function scores, and ‘My pain’. Medication and laboratory information are also displayed
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Prototype B mock‐up of RA dashboard, showing collapsed (A) and expanded (B) views. Sections include ‘My RA symptoms’, representing the CDAI disease activity score along with homunculus with red circles representing areas of disease activity, ‘How well can I function’ showing PROMIS physical function scores, and ‘My pain’. Medication and laboratory information are also included, but collapsible in case less detail is desired. Key changes from earlier prototype include flipping the direction of ‘good’ for the disease activity score; removing reference to ‘CDAI’ and ‘PROMIS’; the addition of the homunculus; making all sections collapsible; and changing ‘ideal’ to ‘goal’ and ‘better’

References

    1. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: ACR RA treatment recommendations. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(1):1‐26.
    1. NQF: NQF‐Endorsed Measures for Musculoskeletal Conditions. . Accessed January 22, 2019.
    1. Fu H, McMahon SK, Gross CR, Adam TJ, Wyman JF. Usability and clinical efficacy of diabetes mobile applications for adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;131:70‐81.
    1. Cronin RM, Conway D, Condon D, Jerome RN, Byrne DW, Harris PA. Patient and healthcare provider views on a patient‐reported outcomes portal. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(11):1470‐1480.
    1. Hartzler AL, Izard JP, Dalkin BL, Mikles SP, Gore JL. Design and feasibility of integrating personalized PRO dashboards into prostate cancer care. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA. 2016;23(1):38‐47.
    1. Hartzler AL, Chaudhuri S, Fey BC, Flum DR, Lavallee D. Integrating patient‐reported outcomes into spine surgical care through visual dashboards: lessons learned from human‐centered design. eGEMs. 2015;3(2):1133.
    1. Wilson J, Arshad F, Nnamoko N, Whiteman A, Ring J, Roy B. Patient‐reported outcome measures: an on‐line system empowering patient choice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(4):725‐729.
    1. Jongen PJ, Sinnige LG, van Geel BM, et al. The interactive web‐based program MSmonitor for self‐management and multidisciplinary care in multiple sclerosis: concept, content, and pilot results. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1741‐1750.
    1. Nelson EC, Dixon‐Woods M, Batalden PB, et al. Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science. BMJ. 2016;354:i3319.
    1. Barber C, MacMullan P, Barnabe C, et al. Rheum4u‐preliminary results of piloting a web‐based tool for quality improvement in rheumatology clinics. J Rheumatol. 2017;44(6):884.
    1. Barber CEH, Sandhu N, Rankin JA, et al. Rheum4U: Development and testing of a web‐based tool for improving the quality of care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019;37(3):385‐392.
    1. Newman ED, Lerch V, Billet J, et al. Improving the quality of care of patients with rheumatic disease using patient‐centric electronic redesign software. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67(4):546‐553.
    1. Ragouzeos D, Gandrup J, Berrean B, et al. “Am I OK?” using human centered design to empower rheumatoid arthritis patients through patient reported outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(3):503‐510.
    1. McCreary L. Kaier permanente’s innovation on the front lines. Harv Bus Rev. 2010;88(9):92, 94‐97, 126
    1. Brown T. Design thinking. Harvard Business Review. 2008. . Accessed November 23, 2019.
    1. England BR, Tiong BK, Bergman MJ, et al. 2019 Update of the American College of Rheumatology recommended rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71(12):1540‐1555.
    1. Barber CEH, Zell J, Yazdany J, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology recommended patient‐reported functional status assessment measures in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71(12):1531‐1539.
    1. IDEO . The Field Guide to Human‐Centered Design. San Francisco, CA: IDEO; 2015.
    1. Chew LD, Griffin JM, Partin MR, et al. Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):561‐566.
    1. Boyatzis RE. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
    1. Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied Thematic Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2012.
    1. Gossec L, Cantagrel A, Soubrier M, et al. An e‐health interactive self‐assessment website (Sanoia®) in rheumatoid arthritis. A 12‐month randomized controlled trial in 320 patients. Joint Bone Spine. 2018;85(6):709‐714.
    1. Nayak JG, Hartzler AL, Macleod LC, Izard JP, Dalkin BM, Gore JL. Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient‐centered communication tools. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(3):448‐454.
    1. Barton JL, Trupin L, Tonner C, et al. English language proficiency, health literacy, and trust in physician are associated with shared decision making in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(7):1290‐1297.
    1. Bruce B, Fries JF, Murtagh KN. Health status disparities in ethnic minority patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross‐sectional study. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(7):1475‐1479.
    1. Barton JL, Trupin L, Schillinger D, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in disease activity and function among persons with rheumatoid arthritis from university‐affiliated clinics. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(9):1238‐1246.
    1. Caplan L, Wolfe F, Michaud K, Quinzanos I, Hirsh JM. Strong association of health literacy with functional status among rheumatoid arthritis patients: a cross‐sectional study. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(4):508‐514.
    1. van Gemert‐Pijnen JE, Nijland N, van Limburg M, et al. A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e111.
    1. Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;28(1):CD001431.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever