Anti-O-specific polysaccharide (OSP) immune responses following vaccination with oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR correlate with protection against cholera after infection with wild-type Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor Inaba in North American volunteers

Kamrul Islam, Motaher Hossain, Meagan Kelly, Leslie M Mayo Smith, Richelle C Charles, Taufiqur Rahman Bhuiyan, Pavol Kováč, Peng Xu, Regina C LaRocque, Stephen B Calderwood, Jakub K Simon, Wilbur H Chen, Douglas Haney, Michael Lock, Caroline E Lyon, Beth D Kirkpatrick, Mitchell Cohen, Myron M Levine, Marc Gurwith, Jason B Harris, Firdausi Qadri, Edward T Ryan, Kamrul Islam, Motaher Hossain, Meagan Kelly, Leslie M Mayo Smith, Richelle C Charles, Taufiqur Rahman Bhuiyan, Pavol Kováč, Peng Xu, Regina C LaRocque, Stephen B Calderwood, Jakub K Simon, Wilbur H Chen, Douglas Haney, Michael Lock, Caroline E Lyon, Beth D Kirkpatrick, Mitchell Cohen, Myron M Levine, Marc Gurwith, Jason B Harris, Firdausi Qadri, Edward T Ryan

Abstract

Background: Cholera is an acute voluminous dehydrating diarrheal disease caused by toxigenic strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 and occasionally O139. A growing body of evidence indicates that immune responses targeting the O-specific polysaccharide (OSP) of V. cholerae are involved in mediating protection against cholera. We therefore assessed whether antibody responses against OSP occur after vaccination with live attenuated oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR, and whether such responses correlate with protection against cholera.

Methodology: We assessed adult North American volunteers (n = 46) who were vaccinated with 5 × 108 colony-forming units (CFU) of oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR and then orally challenged with approximately 1 × 105 CFU of wild-type V. cholerae O1 El Tor Inaba strain N16961, either 10 or 90 days post-vaccination.

Principal findings: Vaccination was associated with induction of significant serum IgM and IgA anti-OSP and vibriocidal antibody responses within 10 days of vaccination. There was significant correlation between anti-OSP and vibriocidal antibody responses. IgM and IgA anti-OSP responses on day 10 following vaccination were associated with lower post-challenge stool volume (r = -0.44, P = 0.002; r = -0.36, P = 0.01; respectively), and none of 27 vaccinees who developed a ≥1.5 fold increase in any antibody isotype targeting OSP on day 10 following vaccination compared to baseline developed moderate or severe cholera following experimental challenge, while 5 of 19 who did not develop such anti-OSP responses did (P = 0.01).

Conclusion: Oral vaccination with live attenuated cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR induces antibodies that target V. cholerae OSP, and these anti-OSP responses correlate with protection against diarrhea following experimental challenge with V. cholerae O1.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01895855.

Conflict of interest statement

Jakub K. Simon, Douglas Haney, Michael Lock, Marc Gurwith were employed by PaxVax, Inc. Wilbur H. Chen, Caroline E. Lyon, Beth D. Kirkpatrick, Mitchell Cohen, Myron M. Levine received research funding from PaxVax, Inc. Myron M. Levine is the patent holder of CVD 103-HgR. Jakub K. Simon is currently employed by Merck & Co. All other authors report no potential conflicts.

Figures

Fig 1. Serum IgM, IgA and IgG…
Fig 1. Serum IgM, IgA and IgG responses targeting V. cholerae O1 Inaba or Ogawa OSP in vaccine recipients of CVD 103-HgR.
Figure only contains results for samples collected prior to wild type experimental V. cholerae challenge. Day 0 is pre-vaccination and other dates are timed from vaccination. In total, 46 vaccinees are included until day 10, then 20 vaccinees until day 90. X axis indicates the time points of samples while Y-axis denotes OSP-specific antibody responses. Each single dot indicates an individual OSP antibody value, horizontal bars indicate the geometric mean (GM), and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. P values represent significant differences of the mean between groups. Asterisks represent differences in responder frequency in Fisher’s exact test (*** P ≤ 0.001, ** P ≤ 0.01). We defined a responder as having a ≥1.5-fold increase in anti-OSP units after vaccination compared to pre-vaccination value. Responder frequency is represented in parenthesis on x-axis.
Fig 2. Serum antibody responses against OSP…
Fig 2. Serum antibody responses against OSP in vaccinees of day 10 challenged group.
Serum IgM, IgA and IgG responses targeting V. cholerae O1 Inaba or Ogawa OSP in recipients (n = 26) of oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR who were then experimentally challenged with wild type V. cholerae O1 Inaba N16961 10 days after vaccination (denoted by top arrows). Day 0 is pre-vaccination and other dates are timed from vaccination. X axis indicates the time points of samples, while Y-axis denotes OSP-specific antibody responses. Each single dot indicates an individual OSP antibody value, horizontal bars indicate the geometric mean (GM), and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. P values represent differences of the mean between groups. Asterisks represent significant differences in responder frequency in Fisher’s exact test (*** P ≤ 0.001, ** P ≤ 0.01). We defined a responder as having a ≥1.5-fold increase in anti-OSP units compared to pre-vaccination value. Responder frequency is represented in parenthesis on x-axis.
Fig 3. Serum antibody responses against OSP…
Fig 3. Serum antibody responses against OSP in vaccinees of day 90 challenged group.
Serum IgM, IgA and IgG responses targeting V. cholerae O1 Inaba or Ogawa OSP in recipients (n = 20) of oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR who were then experimentally challenged with wild type V. cholerae O1 Inaba N16961 90 days after vaccination (denoted by top arrows). Day 0 is pre-vaccination and other dates are timed from vaccination. X axis indicates the time points of samples, while Y-axis denotes OSP-specific antibody responses. Each single dot indicates an individual OSP antibody value, horizontal bars indicate the geometric mean (GM), and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. P values represent differences of the mean between groups. Asterisks represent significant differences of responder frequency in Fisher’s exact test (*** P ≤ 0.001, ** P ≤ 0.01). We defined a responder as having a ≥1.5-fold increase in anti-OSP units compared to pre-vaccination value. Responder frequency is represented in parenthesis on x-axis.
Fig 4. Serum IgM, IgA and IgG…
Fig 4. Serum IgM, IgA and IgG antibody responses targeting V. cholerae O1 Inaba and Ogawa OSP 10 days after oral vaccination.
The figure shows the OSP specific antibodies responses 10 days after vaccination in volunteers who developed moderate (≥3L) or severe (≥5L) diarrhea versus no diarrhea following wild type V. cholerae O1 Inaba experimental infection 10 or 90 days after vaccination. X axis indicates the time points of samples while Y-axis denotes OSP specific antibody responses. Each single dot indicates an individual OSP antibody value, horizontal bars indicate the geometric mean (GM), and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Responders were defined as having an increase in kinetic ELISA units ≥ 1.5 fold on day 10 post-vaccination compared with day 0 pre-vaccination. Asterisk indicates statistical significant difference (* P ≤ 0.05) of responder frequency between no diarrhea versus moderate/severe diarrhea group in Fisher’s exact test.
Fig 5. Correlation between fold increase of…
Fig 5. Correlation between fold increase of Inaba OSP specific antibody responses and cumulative diarrheal volume.
X axis represents the fold-increase (day 10 to day 0) of IgM, IgA, and IgG responses against V. cholerae O1 Inaba OSP and Y axis represents cumulative diarrhea following experimental challenge with wild type V. cholerae O1 Inaba 10 or 90 days post vaccination with Inaba CVD 103-HgR. Dashed horizontal lines mark moderate (3L) or severe (5L) diarrheal values. Dashed vertical line denotes 1.5-fold anti-OSP antibody value change (day 10 post-vaccination compared to day 0 pre-vaccination).

References

    1. Uddin T, Aktar A, Xu P, Johnson RA, Rahman MA, Leung DT, et al. Immune responses to O-specific polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide of Vibrio cholerae O1 Ogawa in adult Bangladeshi recipients of an oral killed cholera vaccine and comparison to responses in patients with cholera. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 90(5):873–81. Epub 2014/04/02. doi: .
    1. Harris JB, LaRocque RC, Qadri F, Ryan ET, Calderwood SB. Cholera. Lancet. 379(9835):2466–76. Epub 2012/07/04. doi: .
    1. Lencer WI, de Almeida JB, Moe S, Stow JL, Ausiello DA, Madara JL. Entry of cholera toxin into polarized human intestinal epithelial cells. Identification of an early brefeldin A sensitive event required for A1-peptide generation. J Clin Invest. 1993;92(6):2941–51. Epub 1993/12/01. doi: .
    1. Spangler BD. Structure and function of cholera toxin and the related Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56(4):622–47. Epub 1992/12/01. .
    1. Albert MJ, Alam K, Rahman AS, Huda S, Sack RB. Lack of cross-protection against diarrhea due to Vibrio cholerae O1 after oral immunization of rabbits with V. cholerae O139 Bengal. J Infect Dis. 1994;169(3):709–10. Epub 1994/03/01. .
    1. Qadri F, Mohi G, Hossain J, Azim T, Khan AM, Salam MA, et al. Comparison of the vibriocidal antibody response in cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal with the response in cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O1. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995;2(6):685–8. Epub 1995/11/01. .
    1. Mayo-Smith LM, Simon JK, Chen WH, Haney D, Lock M, Lyon CE, et al. The Live Attenuated Cholera Vaccine CVD 103-HgR Primes Responses to the Toxin-Coregulated Pilus Antigen TcpA in Subjects Challenged with Wild-Type Vibrio cholerae. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 24(1). Epub 2016/11/17. doi: .
    1. Leung DT, Uddin T, Xu P, Aktar A, Johnson RA, Rahman MA, et al. Immune responses to the O-specific polysaccharide antigen in children who received a killed oral cholera vaccine compared to responses following natural cholera infection in Bangladesh. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 20(6):780–8. Epub 2013/03/22. doi: .
    1. Chen WH, Greenberg RN, Pasetti MF, Livio S, Lock M, Gurwith M, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR, prepared from new master and working cell banks. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21(1):66–73. Epub 2013/11/01. doi: ;
    1. Chen WH, Cohen MB, Kirkpatrick BD, Brady RC, Galloway D, Gurwith M, et al. Single-dose Live Oral Cholera Vaccine CVD 103-HgR Protects Against Human Experimental Infection With Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2016;62(11):1329–35. Epub 2016/03/24. doi: ;
    1. Johnson RA, Uddin T, Aktar A, Mohasin M, Alam MM, Chowdhury F, et al. Comparison of immune responses to the O-specific polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide of Vibrio cholerae O1 in Bangladeshi adult patients with cholera. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19(11):1712–21. Epub 2012/09/21. doi: ;
    1. Haney DJ, Lock MD, Simon JK, Harris J, Gurwith M. Antibody-Based Correlates of Protection Against Cholera Analysis of a Challenge Study in a Cholera-Naive Population. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2017. Epub 2017/06/02. doi: .
    1. Meeks MD, Saksena R, Ma X, Wade TK, Taylor RK, Kovac P, et al. Synthetic fragments of Vibrio cholerae O1 Inaba O-specific polysaccharide bound to a protein carrier are immunogenic in mice but do not induce protective antibodies. Infection and immunity. 2004;72(7):4090–101. Epub 2004/06/24. doi: ;
    1. Xu P, Alam MM, Kalsy A, Charles RC, Calderwood SB, Qadri F, et al. Simple, direct conjugation of bacterial O-SP-core antigens to proteins: development of cholera conjugate vaccines. Bioconjugate chemistry. 2011;22(10):2179–85. Epub 2011/09/09. doi: ;
    1. Sayeed MA, Bufano MK, Xu P, Eckhoff G, Charles RC, Alam MM, et al. A Cholera Conjugate Vaccine Containing O-specific Polysaccharide (OSP) of V. cholerae O1 Inaba and Recombinant Fragment of Tetanus Toxin Heavy Chain (OSP:rTTHc) Induces Serum, Memory and Lamina Proprial Responses against OSP and Is Protective in Mice. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2015;9(7):e0003881 Epub 2015/07/15. doi: ;
    1. Alam MM, Bufano MK, Xu P, Kalsy A, Yu Y, Freeman YW, et al. Evaluation in mice of a conjugate vaccine for cholera made from Vibrio cholerae O1 (Ogawa) O-specific polysaccharide. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2014;8(2):e2683 Epub 2014/02/12. doi: ;
    1. Cerutti A, Rescigno M. The biology of intestinal immunoglobulin A responses. Immunity. 2008;28(6):740–50. Epub 2008/06/14. doi: ;
    1. Brandtzaeg P, Bjerke K, Kett K, Kvale D, Rognum TO, Scott H, et al. Production and secretion of immunoglobulins in the gastrointestinal tract. Annals of allergy. 1987;59(5 Pt 2):21–39. Epub 1987/11/01. .
    1. Ogra PL, Faden H, Welliver RC. Vaccination strategies for mucosal immune responses. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2001;14(2):430–45. Epub 2001/04/09. doi: ;
    1. Harris AM, Bhuiyan MS, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, Hossain A, Kendall EA, et al. Antigen-specific memory B-cell responses to Vibrio cholerae O1 infection in Bangladesh. Infection and immunity. 2009;77(9):3850–6. Epub 2009/06/17. doi: ;
    1. Kendall EA, Tarique AA, Hossain A, Alam MM, Arifuzzaman M, Akhtar N, et al. Development of immunoglobulin M memory to both a T-cell-independent and a T-cell-dependent antigen following infection with Vibrio cholerae O1 in Bangladesh. Infection and immunity. 2010;78(1):253–9. Epub 2009/10/28. doi: ;
    1. Johansen FE, Braathen R, Brandtzaeg P. Role of J chain in secretory immunoglobulin formation. Scandinavian journal of immunology. 2000;52(3):240–8. Epub 2000/09/06. .
    1. Alam MM, Arifuzzaman M, Ahmad SM, Hosen MI, Rahman MA, Rashu R, et al. Study of avidity of antigen-specific antibody as a means of understanding development of long-term immunological memory after Vibrio cholerae O1 infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20(1):17–23. Epub 2012/11/02. doi: ;
    1. Coffin SE, Offit PA. Induction of mucosal B-cell memory by intramuscular inoculation of mice with rotavirus. Journal of virology. 1998;72(4):3479–83. Epub 1998/04/03. ;
    1. Son MS, Taylor RK. Vibriocidal assays to determine the antibody titer of patient sera samples. Current protocols in microbiology. 2011;Chapter 6:Unit6A.3. Epub 2011/11/03. doi: ;
    1. Weil AA, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, Leung DT, Uddin T, Begum YA, et al. Frequency of reexposure to Vibrio cholerae O1 evaluated by subsequent vibriocidal titer rise after an episode of severe cholera in a highly endemic area in Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;87(5):921–6. Epub 2012/09/12. doi: ;
    1. Uddin T, Harris JB, Bhuiyan TR, Shirin T, Uddin MI, Khan AI, et al. Mucosal immunologic responses in cholera patients in Bangladesh. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18(3):506–12. doi: ;
    1. Harris JB, LaRocque RC, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, Logvinenko T, Faruque AS, et al. Susceptibility to Vibrio cholerae infection in a cohort of household contacts of patients with cholera in Bangladesh. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2008;2(4):e221 doi: ;
    1. Losonsky GA, Yunyongying J, Lim V, Reymann M, Lim YL, Wasserman SS, et al. Factors influencing secondary vibriocidal immune responses: relevance for understanding immunity to cholera. Infection and immunity. 1996;64(1):10–5. Epub 1996/01/01. ;
    1. Losonsky GA, Tacket CO, Wasserman SS, Kaper JB, Levine MM. Secondary Vibrio cholerae-specific cellular antibody responses following wild-type homologous challenge in people vaccinated with CVD 103-HgR live oral cholera vaccine: changes with time and lack of correlation with protection. Infection and immunity. 1993;61(2):729–33. Epub 1993/02/01. ;
    1. Arifuzzaman M, Ahmed T, Rahman MA, Chowdhury F, Rashu R, Khan AI, et al. Individuals with Le(a+b-) blood group have increased susceptibility to symptomatic vibrio cholerae O1 infection. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2011;5(12):e1413 Epub 2012/01/05. doi: ;
    1. Harris JB, Khan AI, LaRocque RC, Dorer DJ, Chowdhury F, Faruque AS, et al. Blood group, immunity, and risk of infection with Vibrio cholerae in an area of endemicity. Infection and immunity. 2005;73(11):7422–7. Epub 2005/10/22. doi: ;
    1. Gupta RK, Taylor DN, Bryla DA, Robbins JB, Szu SC. Phase 1 evaluation of Vibrio cholerae O1, serotype Inaba, polysaccharide-cholera toxin conjugates in adult volunteers. Infection and immunity. 1998;66(7):3095–9. Epub 1998/06/25. ;
    1. Mosley WH, Aziz KM, Rahman AS, Chowdhury AK, Ahmed A. Field trials of monovalent Ogawa and Inaba cholera vaccines in rural Bangladesh—three years of observation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1973;49(4):381–7. Epub 1973/01/01. ;

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever