Endovascular Recanalization and Standard Medical Management for Symptomatic Non-acute Intracranial Artery Occlusion: Study Protocol for a Non-randomized, 24-Month, Multicenter Study

Huijun Zhang, Jianjia Han, Xuan Sun, Zhongrong Miao, Xu Guo, Guodong Xu, Yaxuan Sun, Chao Wen, Chaobin Wang, Yingchun Wu, Yaoming Xu, Yuanfei Jiang, Shiyong Zhang, Chao Liu, Di Li, Yan Liu, Chenghua Xu, Feng Gao, Huijun Zhang, Jianjia Han, Xuan Sun, Zhongrong Miao, Xu Guo, Guodong Xu, Yaxuan Sun, Chao Wen, Chaobin Wang, Yingchun Wu, Yaoming Xu, Yuanfei Jiang, Shiyong Zhang, Chao Liu, Di Li, Yan Liu, Chenghua Xu, Feng Gao

Abstract

Background: The management of patients with symptomatic non-acute intracranial artery occlusion (sNA-ICAO), which is a special subset with high morbidity and a high probability of recurrent serious ischemic events despite standard medical therapy (SMT), has been clinically challenging. A number of small-sample clinical studies have also discussed endovascular recanalization (ER) for sNA-ICAO; however, there is currently a lack of evidence from multicenter, prospective, large-sample cohort trials. The purpose of our present study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of ER for sNA-ICAO. Methods: Our group is currently undertaking a multisite, non-randomized cohort, prospective registry study enrolling consecutive patients presenting with sNA-ICAO at 15 centers in China between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022. A cohort of patients who received SMT and a cohort of similar patients who received ER plus SMT were constructed and followed up for 2 years. The primary outcome is any stroke from enrollment to 2 years of follow-up. The secondary outcomes are all-cause mortality, mRS score, NIHSS score and cognitive function from enrollment to 30 days, 3 months, 8 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 2 years of follow-up. Descriptive statistics and linear/logistic multiple regression models will be generated. Clinical relevance will be measured as relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and the number needed to treat. Discussion: The management of patients with sNA-ICAO has been clinically challenging. The current protocol aims to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of ER for sNA-ICAO. Trial Registration Number: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04864691.

Keywords: endovascular recanalization; major and mild stroke; primary and secondary outcomes; standard medical therapy; symptomatic non-acute intracranial artery occlusion.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Han, Sun, Miao, Guo, Xu, Sun, Wen, Wang, Wu, Xu, Jiang, Zhang, Liu, Li, Liu, Xu and Gao.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
sNA-ICAO diagnosed by DSA. (A) Illustrations of non-acute occlusion of intracranial segment of internal carotid artery; (B) recanalization after endovascular treatment; (C) illustrations of non-acute occlusion of middle cerebral artery; (D) recanalization after endovascular treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of the trial design.

References

    1. Gorelick PB, Wong KS, Bae HJ, Pandey DK. Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: a large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier. Stroke. (2008) 39 8:2396-9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505776
    1. Wong LK. Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke. (2006) 1 3:158-9. 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2006.00045.x
    1. Yamauchi H, Higashi T, Kagawa S, Kishibe Y, Takahashi M. Chronic hemodynamic compromise and cerebral ischemic events in asymptomatic or remote symptomatic large-artery intracranial occlusive disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2013) 34 9:1704-10. 10.3174/ajnr.A3491
    1. Kuroda S, Houkin K, Kamiyama H, Mitsumori K, Iwasaki Y, Abe H. Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: can acetazolamide test predict it? Stroke. (2001) 32 9:2110-6. 10.1161/hs0901.095692
    1. Yamauchi H, Fukuyama H, Nagahama Y, Nabatame H, Nakamura K, Yamamoto Y, et al. . Evidence of misery perfusion and risk for recurrent stroke in major cerebral arterial occlusive diseases from PET. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1996) 61 1:18-25. 10.1136/jnnp.61.1.18
    1. Group EIBS. Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. N Engl J Med. (1985) 313:1191-200. 10.1056/NEJM198511073131904
    1. Powers WJ Clarke WR Grubb RL Jr Videen TO Adams HP Jr Derdeyn CP et al. . Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study randomized trial. JAMA. (2011) 306:1983-92. 10.1001/jama.2011.1610
    1. Kao HL, Lin MS, Wang CS, Lin YH, Lin LC, Chao CL, et al. . Feasibility of endovascular recanalization for symptomatic cervical internal carotid artery occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2007) 49:765-71. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.029
    1. Gao F, Guo X, Han J, Sun X, Zhou Z, Miao Z. Endovascular recanalization for symptomatic non-acute middle cerebral artery occlusion: proposal of a new angiographic classification. J Neurointerv Surg. (2020) 900–5. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016692
    1. Yao YD, Liu AF, Qiu HC, Zhou J, Li C, Wang Q, et al. . Outcomes of late endovascular recanalization for symptomatic non-acute atherosclerotic intracranial large artery occlusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2019) 187:105567. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105567
    1. Chen L, Jiang Y, Hu F, He L, Zheng H. Endovascular revascularization of nonacute symptomatic proximal extracranial vertebral artery occlusion. World Neurosurg. (2020) 134:39-44. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.059
    1. Zhao W, Zhang J, Song Y, Sun L, Zheng M, Yin H, et al. . Endovascular recanalization for symptomatic subacute to chronic atherosclerotic basilar artery occlusion. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:1290. 10.3389/fneur.2019.01290
    1. Gao F, Sun X, Zhang H, Ma N, Mo D, Miao Z. Endovascular recanalization for nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion according to a new classification. Stroke. (2020) 51:3340-3. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030440
    1. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, et al. . Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. (2011) 365:993-1003. 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335
    1. Murphy BD, Fox AJ, Lee DH, Sahlas DJ, Black SE, Hogan MJ, et al. . Identification of penumbra and infarct in acute ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion-derived blood flow and blood volume measurements. Stroke. (2006) 37:1771-7. 10.1161/01.STR.0000227243.96808.53
    1. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, et al. . Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378:708-18. 10.1056/NEJMoa1713973
    1. Meschia JF, Lojacono MA, Miller MJ, Brott TG, Atkinson EJ, O'Brien PC. Reliability of the questionnaire for verifying stroke-free status. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2004) 17:218-23. 10.1159/000075794
    1. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol. (2006) 5:603-12. 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70495-1
    1. Lyden P, Lu M, Jackson C, Marler J, Kothari R, Brott T, et al. . Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators. Stroke. (1999) 30:2347-54. 10.1161/01.STR.30.11.2347
    1. Chu LW, Chiu KC, Hui SL, Yu GK, Tsui WJ, Lee PW. The reliability and validity of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) among the elderly Chinese in Hong Kong. Ann Acad Med Singap. (2000) 29:474-85. 10.1016/S0197-4580(00)83371-0
    1. Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S, Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ. (1980) 58:113-30.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever