Prevalence of thoracic aortic aneurysm in patients referred for no/low-charge coronary artery calcium scoring: Insights from the CLARIFY registry

Tasveer Khawaja, Scott E Janus, Nour Tashtish, Matthew Janko, Cristian Baeza, Robert Gilkeson, Sadeer G Al-Kindi, Sanjay Rajagopalan, Tasveer Khawaja, Scott E Janus, Nour Tashtish, Matthew Janko, Cristian Baeza, Robert Gilkeson, Sadeer G Al-Kindi, Sanjay Rajagopalan

Abstract

Objective: Low-dose cardiac-gated chest CTs allow for simultaneous evaluation of coronary artery calcification and aortic size. We sought to evaluate the prevalence of thoracic aortic dilation (TAD) and thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) in a large cohort of patients undergoing coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening.

Methods: We reviewed all patients from a large, prospective no-charge CAC screening program (CLARIFY, Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04075162) for whom measurements of the ascending aorta were available. TAD was defined as an ascending aortic diameter ≥4.0cm, while TAA was defined as ascending aortic diameter ≥ 4.5cm. We explored associations between patient characteristics, CAC, and the prevalence of TAD/TAA.

Results: A total of 36,356 patients enrolled in the CLARIFY program underwent analysis for TAD/TAA. 3,130 patients (8.6%) had TAD and 237 (0.7%) had TAA. Patients with TAA were older (63±8 vs 59±10 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be male (87% vs 49%, p < 0.001), have higher BMI (32 vs 30 kg/m2, p < 0.001), and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease estimated risk (18% vs 12%, p < 0.001). Similar differences were observed for individuals with TAD compared to individuals without TAD with respect to age (63 vs 59 years, p < 0.001), percent male (76% vs 46%, p < 0.001), BMI (32 vs 30 kg/m2, p < 0.001), and 10-year predicted risk (17% vs 11%, p < 0.001). CAC score was associated with prevalence of TAD (4.9% in those with CAC 0 to 16.5% in those with CAC≥400) and TAA (0.3% in those with CAC of 0 to 1.5% in those with CAC ≥400).

Conclusion: In this large, prospective study of patients undergoing no-charge CAC screening, 8.6% had TAD (≥4.0cm) and 0.7% had TAA (≥4.5cm). Our results highlight a high yield of TAD/TAA diagnosis in this targeted cohort with cardiovascular risk factors and supports the role of no-charge CAC as a population-level strategy.

Keywords: Aneurysm; Aorta; Calcium scorel; Epidemiology.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Central Illustration: Prevalence of TAD and TAA by CAC score group and sex. TAD = thoracic aortic dilation; TAA = thoracic aortic dilation; CAC = coronary artery calcium.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Prevalence of TAD and TAA by AHA/ACC PCE risk group. TAD = thoracic aortic dilation; TAA = thoracic aortic dilation; ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

References

    1. Goldfinger JZ, Halperin JL, Marin ML, Stewart AS, Eagle KA, Fuster V. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1725–1739.
    1. Abdulameer H, Al Taii H, Al-Kindi SG, Milner R. Epidemiology of fatal ruptured aortic aneurysms in the United States (1999-2016) J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:378–384. e2.
    1. Criado FJ. Aortic dissection: a 250-year perspective. Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38:694–700.
    1. Guirguis-Blake JM, Beil TL, Senger CA, Coppola EL. Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2019;322:2219–2238.
    1. Al-Kindi SG, Costa M, Tashtish N, et al. No-charge coronary artery calcium screening for cardiovascular risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1259–1262.
    1. Hecht HS, Cronin P, Blaha MJ, et al. 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology. J Thorac Imaging. 2017;32:W54–W66.
    1. Elefteriades JA, Mukherjee SK, Mojibian H. Discrepancies in measurement of the thoracic aorta: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:201–217.
    1. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010;121:e266–e369.
    1. Goff DC, Jr., Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S49–S73.
    1. Doherty JU, Kort S, Mehran R, Schoenhagen P, Soman P. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1647–1672.
    1. Al-Kindi S, Tashtish N, Rashid I, et al. Effect of no-charge coronary artery calcium scoring on cardiovascular prevention. Am J Cardiol. 2022;174:40–47.
    1. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019. 2018;139:e1082–e1143.
    1. Cho IJ, Heo R, Chang HJ, et al. Correlation between coronary artery calcium score and aortic diameter in a high-risk population of elderly male hypertensive patients. Coronary Artery Dis. 2014;25:698–704.
    1. Chowdhury MM, Zielinski LP, Sun JJ, et al. Editor's Choice - calcification of thoracic and abdominal aneurysms is associated with mortality and morbidity. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55:101–108.
    1. Tadic M, Gherbesi E, Sala C, Carugo S, Cuspidi C. Is thoracic aortic diameter an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality? A narrative review. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9
    1. Isselbacher EM. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 2005;111:816–828.
    1. Gouveia EMR, Silva Duarte G, Lopes A, et al. Incidence and prevalence of thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021
    1. Clouse WD, Hallett JW, Jr., Schaff HV, Gayari MM, Ilstrup DM, Melton LJ., 3rd Improved prognosis of thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. JAMA. 1998;280:1926–1929.
    1. Rueckel J, Reidler P, Fink N, et al. Artificial intelligence assistance improves reporting efficiency of thoracic aortic aneurysm CT follow-up. Eur J Radiol. 2021;134

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever