REMOTE Ischemic Perconditioning Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in Catalonia: REMOTE-CAT PROJECT

Francisco Purroy, Gloria Arque, Gerard Mauri, Cristina García-Vázquez, Mikel Vicente-Pascual, Cristina Pereira, Daniel Vazquez-Justes, Coral Torres-Querol, Ana Vena, Sònia Abilleira, Pere Cardona, Carles Forné, Xavier Jiménez-Fàbrega, Jorge Pagola, Manuel Portero-Otin, Ana Rodríguez-Campello, Àlex Rovira, Joan Martí-Fàbregas, Francisco Purroy, Gloria Arque, Gerard Mauri, Cristina García-Vázquez, Mikel Vicente-Pascual, Cristina Pereira, Daniel Vazquez-Justes, Coral Torres-Querol, Ana Vena, Sònia Abilleira, Pere Cardona, Carles Forné, Xavier Jiménez-Fàbrega, Jorge Pagola, Manuel Portero-Otin, Ana Rodríguez-Campello, Àlex Rovira, Joan Martí-Fàbregas

Abstract

Rationale: Remote ischemic perconditioning during cerebral ischemia (RIPerC) refers to the application of brief episodes of transient limb ischemia commonly to a limb, it represents a new safe, simple and low-cost paradigm in neuroprotection. Aim and/or Hypothesis: To evaluate the effects of RIPerC on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, applied in the ambulance, to improve functional outcomes compared with standard of care. Sample Size Estimates: A sample size of 286 patients in each arm achieves 80% power to detect treatment differences of 14% in the outcome, using a two-sided binomial test at significance level of 0.05, assuming that 40% of the control patients will experience good outcome and an initial misdiagnosis rate of 29%. Methods and Design: We aim to conduct a multicentre study of pre-hospital RIPerC application in AIS patients. A total of 572 adult patients diagnosed of suspected clinical stroke within 8 h of symptom onset and clinical deficit >0 according to prehospital rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) scale score will be randomized, in blocks of size 4, to RIPerC or sham. Patients will be stratified by RACE score scale. RIPerC will be started in the ambulance before hospital admission and continued in the hospital if necessary. It will consist of five cycles of electronic tourniquet inflation and deflation (5 min each). The cuff pressure for RIPerC will be 200 mmHg during inflation. Sham will only simulate vibration of the device. Study Outcome(s): The primary outcome will be the difference in the proportion of patients with good outcomes as defined by a mRS score of 2 or less at 90 days. Secondary outcomes to be monitored will include early neurological improvement rate, treatment related serious adverse event rates, size of the infarct volume, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, metabolomic and lipidomic response to RIPerC and Neuropsychological evaluation at 90 days. Discussion: Neuroprotective therapies could not only increase the benefits of available reperfusion therapies among AIS patients but also provide an option for patients who are not candidates for these treatments. REMOTE-CAT will investigate the clinical benefit of RIC as a new neuroprotective strategy in AIS. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03375762.

Keywords: infarct size (IS); ischemic stroke; metabolomics (OMICS); neuroprotection; remote ischemic perconditioning (rPerC).

Copyright © 2020 Purroy, Arque, Mauri, García-Vázquez, Vicente-Pascual, Pereira, Vazquez-Justes, Torres-Querol, Vena, Abilleira, Cardona, Forné, Jiménez-Fàbrega, Pagola, Portero-Otin, Rodríguez-Campello, Rovira and Martí-Fàbregas.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical representation of REMOTE-CAT clinical trial procedures. After Stroke Code activation in the ambulance, remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPerC) is applied by an automatic device during transportion to the nearest Stroke care center. Usual medical care will be performed in the stroke center.

References

    1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. American heart association statistics and stroke statistics, heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. (2016) 133:e38–360. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350
    1. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, Demchuk AM, Fugate JE, Grotta JC, et al. . American heart association stroke, council on and prevention, scientific rationale for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. (2016) 47:581–641. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000086
    1. Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, et al. . Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. (2016) 316:1279–88. 10.1001/jama.2016.13647
    1. Chamorro A, Dirnagl U, Urra X, Planas AM. Neuroprotection in acute stroke: targeting excitotoxicity, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and inflammation. Lancet Neurol. (2016) 15:869–81. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00114-9
    1. Hess DC, Blauenfeldt RA, Andersen G, Hougaard KD, Hoda MN, Ding Y, et al. . Remote ischaemic conditioning-a new paradigm of self-protection in the brain. Nat Rev Neurol. (2015) 11:698–710. 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.223
    1. Purroy F, Garcia C, Mauri G, Pereira C, Torres C, Vazquez-Justes D, et al. . Induced neuroprotection by remote ischemic perconditioning as a new paradigm in ischemic stroke at the acute phase, a systematic review. BMC Neurol. (2020) 20:266. 10.1186/s12883-020-01836-8
    1. Man C, Gong D, Zhou Y, Fan Y. Meta-analysis of remote ischemic conditioning in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:43529. 10.1038/srep43529
    1. England TJ, Hedstrom A, O'Sullivan S, Donnelly R, Barrett DA, Sarmad S, et al. . RECAST (Remote ischemic conditioning after stroke trial): a pilot randomized placebo controlled phase II trial in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2017) 48:1412–15. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016429
    1. Che R, Zhao W, Ma Q, Jiang F, Wu L, Yu Z, et al. . rt-PA with remote ischemic postconditioning for acute ischemic stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. (2019) 6:364–72. 10.1002/acn3.713
    1. Pico F, Lapergue B, Ferrigno M, Rosso C, Meseguer E, Chadenat ML, et al. . Effect of in-hospital remote ischemic perconditioning on brain infarction growth and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke: the RESCUE BRAIN randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. (2020) 77:1–11. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0326
    1. Hougaard KD, Hjort N, Zeidler D, Sørensen L, Nørgaard A, Hansen TM, et al. . Remote ischemic perconditioning as an adjunct therapy to thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a randomized trial. Stroke. (2014) 45:159–67. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001346
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. (2010) 340:c332. 10.1136/bmj.c332
    1. Harbison J, Hossain O, Jenkinson D, Davis J, Louw SJ, Ford GA. Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care, emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face arm speech test. Stroke. (2003) 34:71–6. 10.1161/01.STR.0000044170.46643.5E
    1. Perez de la Ossa N, Carrera D, Gorchs M, Querol M, Millan M, Gomis M, et al. . Design and validation of a prehospital stroke scale to predict large arterial occlusion: the rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale. Stroke. (2014) 45:87–91. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003071
    1. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W, et al. . Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke-monitoring study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet. (2007) 369:275–82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-4
    1. Purroy F, Cambray S, Mauri-Capdevila G, Jove M, Sanahuja J, Farre J, et al. Metabolomics predicts neuroimaging characteristics of transient ischemic attack patients. EBioMed. (2016) 3964:30514–X. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.11.010
    1. Jove M, Mauri-Capdevila G, Suarez I, Cambray S, Sanahuja J, Quilez A, et al. . Metabolomics predicts stroke recurrence after transient ischemic attack. Neurology. (2015) 84:36–45. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001093
    1. Kim K, DeMets DL. Confidence intervals following group sequential tests in clinical trials. Biometrics. (1987) 43:857–64. 10.2307/2531539
    1. Lan KKG, DeMets DL. Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika. (1983) 70:659–63. 10.1093/biomet/70.3.659
    1. Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, Wetterslev J, Winkel P. When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2017) 17:162. 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1
    1. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. (2011) 30:377–99. 10.1002/sim.4067
    1. Hoda MN, Siddiqui S, Herberg S, Periyasamy-Thandavan S, Bhatia K, Hafez SS, et al. . Remote ischemic perconditioning is effective alone and in combination with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator in murine model of embolic stroke. Stroke. (2012) 43:2794–9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.660373
    1. Hahn CD, Manlhiot C, Schmidt MR, Nielsen TT, Redington AN. Remote ischemic per-conditioning: a novel therapy for acute stroke? Stroke. (2011) 42:2960–2. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.622340
    1. McLeod SL, Iansavichene A, Cheskes S. Remote ischemic perconditioning to reduce reperfusion injury during acute st-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. (2017) 6:e005522. 10.1161/JAHA.117.005522
    1. Zhao W, Che R, Li S, Ren C, Li C, Wu C, et al. . Remote ischemic conditioning for acute stroke patients treated with thrombectomy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. (2018) 5:850–6. 10.1002/acn3.588
    1. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. (1986) 74:1124–36. 10.1161/01.CIR.74.5.1124
    1. Johnsen J, Pryds K, Salman R, Lofgren B, Kristiansen SB, Botker HE. The remote ischemic preconditioning algorithm: effect of number of cycles, cycle duration and effector organ mass on efficacy of protection. Basic Res Cardiol. (2016) 111:10. 10.1007/s00395-016-0529-6
    1. Zhao W, Meng R, Ma C, Hou B, Jiao L, Zhu F, et al. . Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis before carotid artery stenting: a proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial. Circulation. (2017) 135:1325–35. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024807
    1. Meng R, Asmaro K, Meng L, Liu Y, Ma C, Xi C, et al. . Upper limb ischemic preconditioning prevents recurrent stroke in intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology. (2012) 79:1853–61. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318271f76a
    1. Purroy F, Coll B, Oró M, Setó E, Piñol-Ripoll G, Plana A. Predictive value of ankle brachial index in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol. (2010) 17:602–6. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02874.x

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever