Mortality Reduction in Septic Shock by Plasma Adsorption (ROMPA): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Francisco Colomina-Climent, Carola Giménez-Esparza, Cristina Portillo-Requena, José Manuel Allegue-Gallego, María Galindo-Martínez, Cristina Mollà-Jiménez, José Luis Antón-Pascual, Manuel Rodríguez-Serra, José Luis Martín-Ruíz, Pablo Juan Fernández-Arroyo, Eugenia María Blasco-Císcar, José Cánovas-Robles, Miguel Herrera-Murillo, Enrique González-Hernández, Fernando Sánchez-Morán, Manuel Solera-Suárez, Jesús Torres-Tortajada, José María Nuñez-Martínez, David Martín-Langerwerf, Eugenio Herrero-Gutiérrez, Isabel Sebastián-Muñoz, Antonio Palazón-Bru, Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillén, Francisco Colomina-Climent, Carola Giménez-Esparza, Cristina Portillo-Requena, José Manuel Allegue-Gallego, María Galindo-Martínez, Cristina Mollà-Jiménez, José Luis Antón-Pascual, Manuel Rodríguez-Serra, José Luis Martín-Ruíz, Pablo Juan Fernández-Arroyo, Eugenia María Blasco-Císcar, José Cánovas-Robles, Miguel Herrera-Murillo, Enrique González-Hernández, Fernando Sánchez-Morán, Manuel Solera-Suárez, Jesús Torres-Tortajada, José María Nuñez-Martínez, David Martín-Langerwerf, Eugenio Herrero-Gutiérrez, Isabel Sebastián-Muñoz, Antonio Palazón-Bru, Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillén

Abstract

Introduction: There is a lack of evidence in the efficacy of the coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) to reduce the mortality rate in septic shock. To fill this gap, we have designed the ROMPA study (Mortality Reduction in Septic Shock by Plasma Adsorption) to confirm whether treatment with an adequate dose of treated plasma by CPFA could confer a clinical benefit.

Methods and analysis: Our study is a multicentric randomised clinical trial with a 28-day and 90-day follow-up and allocation ratio 1:1. Its aim is to clarify whether the application of high doses of CPFA (treated plasma ≥0.20 L/kg/day) in the first 3 days after randomisation, in addition to the current clinical practice, is able to reduce hospital mortality in patients with septic shock in intensive care units (ICUs) at 28 and 90 days after initiation of the therapy. The study will be performed in 10 ICUs in the Southeast of Spain which follow the same protocol in this disease (based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign). Our trial is designed to be able to demonstrate an absolute mortality reduction of 20% (α=0.05; 1-β=0.8; n=190(95×2)). The severity of the process, ensuring the recruitment of patients with a high probability of death (50% in the control group), will be achieved through an adequate stratification by using both severity scores and classical definitions of severe sepsis/septic shock and dynamic parameters. Our centres are fully aware of the many pitfalls associated with previous medical device trials. Trying to reduce these problems, we have developed a training programme to improve the CPFA use (especially clotting problems).

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of all the participant centres. The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, as well as national and international conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT02357433; Pre-results.

Keywords: INFECTIOUS DISEASES; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
AMPLYA system from Bellco Societa unipersonales a r.l. The resin cartridge and plasma filter are in position and ready for use. The copyright holder (Bellco) has approved the usage of this figure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of the CPFA circuit. The extracorporeal circuit consisting of a plasma filter (A), a resin cartridge (B) and a high-flux dialyser (C). Blood pass through a plasma filter, extracted plasma is purified by adsorption on a resin cartridge and the reconstituted blood (●) flows through a high-permeability haemofilter, in which convective exchanges are realised in a postdilution mode (substitution). The copyright holder (Bellco) has approved the usage of this figure. CPFA, coupled plasma filtration adsorption; UF, ultrafiltrate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study diagram. This shows the general study design and includes: (1) registration: the patient is considered ‘enrolled’ once informed consent has been obtained. (2) Recruitment phase: must occur within the first 12 hours of septic shock diagnosis. (3) Randomisation: group A (CPFA) or group B (control). (4) Statistical evaluations: at the end of the study and after follow-up. ARF, acute renal failure; CPFA, coupled plasma filtration adsorption; CVVH, continuous veno-venous haemofiltration.

References

    1. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2013;369:840–51. 10.1056/NEJMra1208623
    1. van der Poll T, Opal SM. Host-pathogen interactions in sepsis. Lancet Infect Dis 2008;8:32–43. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70265-7
    1. Bone RC, Grodzin CJ, Balk RA. Sepsis: a new hypothesis for pathogenesis of the disease process. Chest 1997;112:235–43. 10.1378/chest.112.1.235
    1. McCloskey RV, Straube RC, Sanders C et al. . Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA-1A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. CHESS trial study group. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:1–5. 10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00001
    1. Beutler B, Greenwald D, Hulmes JD et al. . Identity of tumour necrosis factor and the macrophage-secreted factor cachectin. Nature 1985;316:552–4. 10.1038/316552a0
    1. Bernard GR, Wheeler AP, Russell JA et al. . The effects of ibuprofen on the physiology and survival of patients with sepsis. The ibuprofen in sepsis study group. N Engl J Med 1997;336:912–18. 10.1056/NEJM199703273361303
    1. Wiersinga WJ, Leopold SJ, Cranendonk DR et al. . Host innate immune responses to sepsis. Virulence 2014;5:36–44. 10.4161/viru.25436
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Immunosuppression in sepsis: a novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:260–8. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70001-X
    1. Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, Kallan MJ et al. . Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med 2013;41:1167–74. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c09f8
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al. . Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013;41:580–637. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af
    1. Angus DC. The search for effective therapy for sepsis: back to the drawing board? JAMA 2011;306:2614–15. 10.1001/jama.2011.1853
    1. Drewry AM, Hotchkiss RS. Sepsis: revising definitions of sepsis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2015;11:326–8. 10.1038/nrneph.2015.66
    1. Opal SM, Dellinger RP, Vincent JL et al. . The next generation of sepsis clinical trial designs: what is next after the demise of recombinant human activated protein C? Crit Care Med 2014;42:1714–21. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000325
    1. Rimmelé T, Kellum JA. Clinical review: blood purification for sepsis. Crit Care 2011;15:205 10.1186/cc9411
    1. Panagiotou A, Gaiao S, Cruz DN. Extracorporeal therapies in sepsis. J Intensive Care Med 2013;28:281–95. 10.1177/0885066611425759
    1. Rimmelé T, Kellum JA. High-volume hemofiltration in the intensive care unit: a blood purification therapy. Anesthesiology 2012;116:1377–87. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318256f0c0
    1. Clark E, Molnar AO, Joannes-Boyau O et al. . High-volume hemofiltration for septic acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2014;18:R7 10.1186/cc13184
    1. Tetta C, Cavaillon JM, Schulze M et al. . Removal of cytokines and activated complement components in an experimental model of continuous plasma filtration coupled with sorbent adsorption. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:1458–64. 10.1093/ndt/13.6.1458
    1. Ronco C, Brendolan A, d'Intini V et al. . Coupled plasma filtration adsorption: rationale, technical development and early clinical experience. Blood Purif 2003;21:409–16.
    1. Hassan J, Cader RA, Kong NC et al. . Coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) plus continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) versus CVVH alone as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of sepsis. EXCLI J 2013;12:681–92. 10.1007/s00134-003-1724-0
    1. Abdul Cader R, Abdul Gafor H, Mohd R et al. . Coupled plasma filtration and adsorption (CPFA): a single center experience. Nephrourol Mon 2013;5:891–6. 10.5812/numonthly.11904
    1. Formica M, Olivieri C, Livigni S et al. . Hemodynamic response to coupled plasmafiltration-adsorption in human septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:703–8. 10.1007/s00134-003-1724-0
    1. Ronco C, Brendolan A, Lonnemann G et al. . A pilot study of coupled plasma filtration with adsorption in septic shock. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1250–5. 10.1097/00003246-200206000-00015
    1. Moretti R, Scarrone S, Pizzi B et al. . Coupled plasma filtration-adsorption in Weil's syndrome: case report. Minerva Anestesiol 2011;77:846–9. 10.1097/00003246-200206000-00015
    1. Berlot G, Agbedjro A, Tomasini A et al. . Effects of the volume of processed plasma on the outcome, arterial pressure and blood procalcitonin levels in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with coupled plasma filtration and adsorption. Blood Purif 2014;37:146–51. 10.1159/000360268
    1. Fabbri LP, Macchi A, Lecchini R et al. . Post influenza vaccination Guillain-Barré syndrome. An exceptional recovery case after cardiac arrest for two hours in hyperthermia and septic shock. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care 2015;18:166–9. 10.1159/000360268
    1. Livigni S, Bertolini G, Rossi C et al. . Efficacy of coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) in patients with septic shock: a multicenter randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open 2014;4:e003536 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003536
    1. Schoenberg MH, Weiss M, Radermacher P. Outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock after ICU treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998;383:44–8. 10.1007/s004230050090
    1. Wakefield CH, Fearon KCH. Laparotomy for abdominal sepsis in the critically ill. In: Holzheimer RG, Mannick JA, eds. Surgical treatment: evidence-based and problem-oriented. Munich: Zuckschwerdt, 2001:792–7.
    1. Chow S, Wang H, Shao J. Sample size calculations in clinical research. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2008.
    1. Stevenson EK, Rubenstein AR, Radin GT et al. . Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2014;42:625–31. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000026
    1. Martin GS. Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: changes in incidence, pathogens and outcomes. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2012;10:701–6. 10.1586/eri.12.50
    1. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S et al. . Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically Ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA 2014;311:1308–16. 10.1001/jama.2014.2637
    1. Asfar P, Claessens YE, Duranteau J, et al. , French Opinion Group in Sepsis (FrOGS) . Residual rates of mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a fatality or a new challenge? Ann Intensive Care 2013;3:27 10.1186/2110-5820-3-27

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever