Maintenance vs. Change of Negative Therapy Expectation: An Experimental Investigation Using Video Samples

Kristina Braun-Koch, Winfried Rief, Kristina Braun-Koch, Winfried Rief

Abstract

Introduction: Therapy expectations contribute substantially to the outcome of psychotherapy. In contrast, psychotherapy expectations are rarely addressed and systematically optimised in studies on psychotherapy.

Materials and methods: A total of 142 mostly healthy participants with critical attitudes towards psychotherapy were randomised into two groups: (1) a control group that watched a video with patients who gave information about their symptoms or (2) an experimental group that watched an expectation-optimised video with the same patients giving additional information about their mostly positive therapy outcomes. The primary outcome was the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ), which was filled in before and after watching the video.

Results: Both groups showed a significant improvement of their process expectations and attitudes towards psychotherapy after watching the video. Participants in the experimental group changed their therapy outcome expectation while there was no change in the control group [F(1,140) = 9.72, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.065].

Conclusion: A video intervention with patients presenting their positive therapy experiences improves therapy expectations in persons with critical attitudes. Expectation-optimised videos could be used for prevention programmes and when starting therapy.

Trial registration: Trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03594903) on November 2018.

Keywords: ViolEx model; attitudes towards psychotherapy; expectation violation; therapy expectation; video intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Braun-Koch and Rief.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study design.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flow chart of participants.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean outcome expectation for participants in the control (n = 67) and experimental groups (n = 75). **p < 0.01.

References

    1. Harvey AG, Gumport NB. Evidence-based psychological treatments for mental disorders: modifiable barriers to access and possible solutions. Behav Res Ther. (2015) 68:1–12. 10.1016/j.brat.2015.02.004
    1. Jacobi F, Strehle J, Busch MA, Wagner M, Gerschler A, Maier W, et al. Psychische Störungen in der Allgemeinbevölkerung. Der Nervenarzt. (2014) 85:77–87. 10.1007/s00115-013-3961-y
    1. Lindinger-Sternart S. Help-seeking behaviors of men for mental health and the impact of diverse cultural backgrounds. Int J Soc Sci Stud. (2015) 3:1–6. 10.11114/ijsss.v3i1.519
    1. Glenn D, Golinelli D, Rose RD, Roy-Byrne P, Stein MB, Sullivan G. Who gets the most out of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders? The role of treatment dose and patient engagement. J Consult Clin Psychol. (2013) 81:639–49. 10.1037/a0033403
    1. Hinshaw SP, Stier A. Stigma as related to mental disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2008) 4:367–93.
    1. Walitzer KS, Dermen KH, Connors GJ. Strategies for preparing clients for treatment: a review. Behav Modif. (1999) 23:129–51. 10.1177/0145445599231006
    1. Andrade LH, Alonso J, Mneimneh Z, Wells JE, Al-Hamzawi A, Borges G, et al. Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World mental health surveys. Psychol Med. (2014) 44:1303–17. 10.1017/S0033291713001943
    1. Norcross JC, Grencavage LM. Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? Prof Psychol Res Pract. (1990) 21:372–8. 10.1037/0735-7028.21.5.372
    1. Sareen J, Jagdeo A, Cox BJ, Clara I, Ten Have M, Belik SL, et al. Perceived barriers to mental health service utilization in the United States, Ontario, and the Netherlands. Psychiatr Serv. (2007) 58:357–64. 10.1176/ps.2007.58.3.357
    1. Ten Have M, De Graaf R, Ormel J, Vilagut G, Kovess V, Alonso J. Are attitudes towards mental health help-seeking associated with service use? Results from the European study of epidemiology of mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2010) 45:153–63. 10.1007/s00127-009-0050-4
    1. Schwarz KA, Pfister R, Büchel C. Rethinking explicit expectations: connecting placebos, social cognition, and contextual perception. Trends Cogn Sci. (2016) 20:469–80. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.001
    1. Benedetti F. Mechanisms of placebo and placebo-related effects across diseases and treatments. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. (2008) 48:33–60. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094711
    1. Enck P, Bingel U, Schedlowski M, Rief W. The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize? Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2013) 12:191–204. 10.1038/nrd3923
    1. Constantino MJ, Ametrano RM, Greenberg RP. Clinician interventions and participant characteristics that foster adaptive patient expectations for psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic change. Psychotherapy. (2012) 49:557–69. 10.1037/a0029440
    1. Greenberg RP, Constantino MJ, Bruce N. Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome? Clin Psychol Rev. (2006) 26:657–78. 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.03.002
    1. Constantino MJ, Penek S, Bernecker SL, Overtree CE. A preliminary examination of participant characteristics in relation to patients’ treatment beliefs in psychotherapy in a training clinic. J Psychother Integr. (2014) 24:238–50. 10.1037/a0031424
    1. Mitchell N, Gordon PK. Attitudes towards computerized cbt for depression amongst a student population. Behav Cogn Psychother. (2007) 35:421–30. 10.1017/S1352465807003700
    1. Rief W, Glombiewski JA. Erwartungsfokussierte Psychotherapeutische Interventionen (EFPI). Verhaltenstherapie. (2016) 26:47–54. 10.1159/000442374
    1. Ebert DD, Baumeister H, Lehr D, Cuijpers P, Berking M, Pörtner M. Increasing the acceptance of internet-based mental health interventions in primary care patients with depressive symptoms. A randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. (2015) 176:9–17. 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.056
    1. Kazdin AE, Krouse R. The impact of variations in treatment rationales on expectancies for therapeutic change. Behav Ther. (1983) 14:657–71. 10.1016/S0005-7894(83)80058-6
    1. van Osch M, van Dulmen S, van Vliet L, Bensing J. Specifying the effects of physician’s communication on patients’ outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Counsel. (2017) 100:1482–9. 10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.009
    1. Constantino MJ. Believing is seeing: an evolving research program on patients’ psychotherapy expectations. Psychother Res. (2012) 22:127–38. 10.1080/10503307.2012.663512
    1. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. (1986) 19:123–205. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
    1. Petty RE, Haugtvedt CP, Smith SM. Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength. In: Petty RE, Krosnick JA. editors. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; (1995). p. 93–130.
    1. Ahmed M, Westra HA. Impact of a treatment rationale on expectancy and engagement in cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety. Cogn Ther Res. (2009) 33:314–22. 10.1007/s10608-008-9182-1
    1. Colloca L, Benedetti F. Placebo analgesia induced by social observational learning. Pain. (2009) 144:28–34. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.01.033
    1. Tinsley HEA, Bowman SL, Ray SB. Manipulation of expectancies about counseling and psychotherapy: review and analysis of expectancy manipulation strategies and results. J Counsel Psychol. (1988) 35:99–108. 10.1037/0022-0167.35.1.99
    1. Demyan AL, Anderson T. Effects of a brief media intervention on expectations, attitudes, and intentions of mental health help seeking. J Counsel Psychol. (2012) 59:222–9. 10.1037/a0026541
    1. Allport G. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley; (1954).
    1. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. (2009) 41:1149–60. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
    1. Norberg MM, Wetterneck CT, Sass DA, Kanter JW. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectations Questionnaire. J Clin Psychol (2011) 67. 10.1002/jclp.20781
    1. Bleyen K, Vertommen H, Vander Steene G, van Audenhove C. Psychometric properties of the psychotherapy expectancy inventory- revised (PEI-R). Psychother Res. (2001) 11:69–83. 10.1080/713663853
    1. Ditte D, Schulz W, Schmid-Ott G. Einstellung gegenüber der psychotherapie in der Russischen bevölkerung und in der bevölkerung mit einem Russischen/Sowjetischen kulturellen hintergrund in Deutschland. Eine pilotstudie. Der Nervenarzt. (2006) 77:64–72. 10.1007/s00115-005-1889-6
    1. Schmid-Ott G, Reibold S, Ernst G, Niederauer HH, Künsebeck HW, Schulz W, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess attitudes towards psychotherapeutic treatment. Dermatol Psychosom. (2003) 4:187–93. 10.1159/000075905
    1. Spitzer C, Hammer S, Löwe B, Grabe HJ, Barnow S, Rose M, et al. Die Kurzform des Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18): erste Befunde zu den psychometrischen Kennwerten der deutschen Version. Fortschritte Der Neurol Psychiatr. (2011) 79:517–23. 10.1055/s-0031-1281602
    1. Eid M, Gollwitzer M, Schmitt M. Statistik und Forschungsmethoden. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag; (2011).
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; (1988).
    1. Baumeister H, Seifferth H, Lin J, Nowoczin L, Lüking M, Ebert D. Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on patients’ acceptance of internet-based pain interventions: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain. (2015) 31:528–35. 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000118
    1. Rief W, Shedden-Mora MC, Laferton JA, Auer C, Petrie KJ, Salzmann S., et al. Preoperative optimization of patient expectations improves long-term outcome in heart surgery patients: results of the randomized controlled PSY-HEART trial. BMC Med. (2017) 15. 10.1186/s12916-016-0767-3
    1. Swift JK, Callahan JL. Decreasing treatment dropout by addressing expectations for treatment length. Psychother Res. (2011) 21:193–200. 10.1080/10503307.2010.541294
    1. Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2006) 90:751–83. 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
    1. Rosenthal R, Fode KL. The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat. Behav Sci. (1963) 8:183–9. 10.1002/bs.3830080302
    1. Kraut R, Olson J, Banaji M, Bruckman A, Cohen J, Couper M. Psychological research online: report of board of scientific affairs’ advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet. Am Psychol. (2004) 59:105–17. 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever