Predicting the difficulty in performing a neuraxial blockade

Jong Hae Kim, Seok Young Song, Baek Jin Kim, Jong Hae Kim, Seok Young Song, Baek Jin Kim

Abstract

Background: Traumatic placement of a needle during a neuraxial blockade has been related to many complications such as postdural puncture headache, trauma to neural structures and even spinal hematoma, causing permanent neurologic deficits. Although efforts to minimize the complications caused by traumatic neuraxial blockade have been made, nothing was found to be clear. The authors investigated the predictors of difficult neuraxial blockade using the first puncture success and number of attempts as measures to assess the difficulty.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 253 patients scheduled for elective surgery underwent spinal or epidural anesthesia. Patient data (age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, and quality of anatomical landmarks), the provider's level of experience, type of blockade (spinal or epidural), needle type/gauge and the distance from skin to subarachnoid or epidural space were recorded. Significant variables were first determined by Student's t-test and Pearson's chi square test and then logistic and Poisson regression tested the association of the first puncture success and number of attempts with the significant variables.

Results: The provider's level of experience and the distance from skin to subarachnoid or epidural space were significant in logistic and Poisson regression. Body mass index was significant only in Poisson regression and the quality of anatomical landmarks was significant only in logistic regression.

Conclusions: Provider's level of experience and the distance from skin to subarachnoid or epidural space influenced the difficulty in performing a neuraxial blockade.

Keywords: Epidural anesthesia; Epidural space; Intraoperative complications; Spinal anesthesia; Subarachnoid space.

References

    1. Gaiser R. Postdural puncture headache. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19:249–253.
    1. Auroy Y, Narchi P, Messiah A, Litt L, Rouvier B, Samii K. Serious complications related to regional anesthesia: Results of a prospective survey in france. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:479–486.
    1. de Filho GR, Gomes HP, da Fonseca MH, Hoffman JC, Pederneiras SG, Garcia JH. Predictors of successful neuraxial block: A prospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002;19:447–451.
    1. Sprung J, Bourke DL, Grass J, Hammel J, Mascha E, Thomas P, et al. Predicting the difficult neuraxial block: A prospective study. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:384–389.
    1. Kestin IG. A statistical approach to measuring the competence of anaesthetic trainees at practical procedures. Br J Anaesth. 1995;75:805–809.
    1. Kopacz DJ, Neal JM, Pollock JE. The regional anesthesia "learning curve". what is the minimum number of epidural and spinal blocks to reach consistency? Reg Anesth. 1996;21:182–190.
    1. Munhall RJ, Sukhani R, Winnie AP. Incidence and etiology of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital: A prospective study. Anesth Analg. 1988;67:843–848.
    1. Dashfield AK, Coghill JC, Langton JA. Correlating obstetric epidural anaesthesia performance and psychomotor aptitude. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:744–749.
    1. Tessler MJ, Kardash K, Wahba RM, Kleiman SJ, Trihas ST, Rossignol M. The performance of spinal anesthesia is marginally more difficult in the elderly. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:126–130.
    1. Harrison GR. Topographical anatomy of the lumbar epidural region: An in vivo study using computerized axial tomography. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:229–234.
    1. Capogna G, Celleno D, Simonetti C, Lupoi D. Anatomy of the lumbar epidural region using magnetic resonance imaging: A study of dimensions and a comparison of two postures. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1997;6:97–100.
    1. Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:64–67.
    1. Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. The lumbar epidural space in pregnancy: Visualization by ultrasonography. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:798–804.
    1. Hoffmann VL, Vercauteren MP, Buczkowski PW, Vanspringel GL. A new combined spinal-epidural apparatus: Measurement of the distance to the epidural and subarachnoid spaces. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:350–355.
    1. Meiklejohn BH. Distance from skin to the lumbar epidural space in an obstetric population. Reg Anesth. 1990;15:134–136.
    1. Watts RW. The influence of obesity on the relationship between body mass index and the distance to the epidural space from the skin. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993;21:309–310.
    1. Harrison GR, Clowes NW. The depth of the lumbar epidural space from the skin. Anaesthesia. 1985;40:685–687.
    1. Stamatakis E, Moka E, Siafaka I, Argyra E, Vadalouca A. Prediction of the distance from the skin to the lumbar epidural space in the greek population, using mathematical models. Pain Pract. 2005;5:125–134.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever