A multi-task, multi-stage deep transfer learning model for early prediction of neurodevelopment in very preterm infants

Lili He, Hailong Li, Jinghua Wang, Ming Chen, Elveda Gozdas, Jonathan R Dillman, Nehal A Parikh, Lili He, Hailong Li, Jinghua Wang, Ming Chen, Elveda Gozdas, Jonathan R Dillman, Nehal A Parikh

Abstract

Survivors following very premature birth (i.e., ≤ 32 weeks gestational age) remain at high risk for neurodevelopmental impairments. Recent advances in deep learning techniques have made it possible to aid the early diagnosis and prognosis of neurodevelopmental deficits. Deep learning models typically require training on large datasets, and unfortunately, large neuroimaging datasets with clinical outcome annotations are typically limited, especially in neonates. Transfer learning represents an important step to solve the fundamental problem of insufficient training data in deep learning. In this work, we developed a multi-task, multi-stage deep transfer learning framework using the fusion of brain connectome and clinical data for early joint prediction of multiple abnormal neurodevelopmental (cognitive, language and motor) outcomes at 2 years corrected age in very preterm infants. The proposed framework maximizes the value of both available annotated and non-annotated data in model training by performing both supervised and unsupervised learning. We first pre-trained a deep neural network prototype in a supervised fashion using 884 older children and adult subjects, and then re-trained this prototype using 291 neonatal subjects without supervision. Finally, we fine-tuned and validated the pre-trained model using 33 preterm infants. Our proposed model identified very preterm infants at high-risk for cognitive, language, and motor deficits at 2 years corrected age with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86, 0.66 and 0.84, respectively. Employing such a deep learning model, once externally validated, may facilitate risk stratification at term-equivalent age for early identification of long-term neurodevelopmental deficits and targeted early interventions to improve clinical outcomes in very preterm infants.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An overview of proposed multi-task, multi-stage deep transfer learning framework for early joint prediction of neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2-years corrected age in very preterm infants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Detailed model architectures in source domain (A), intermediate domain (B), and target domain (C). Layer types are color-coded. Purple: input layer; green: fully connected layer; orange: batch normalization layer; yellow: output layer. The number of nodes in each layer are listed below individual layers. Red color dotted boxes highlight the transferred/reused neural network layers between consecutive domains.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Top discriminative functional connectomes explored by our multi-task, multi-stage deep transfer learning model for each of the three neurodevelopmental outcomes. (A) The top 20 functional connections were displayed in the circos plot. (B) Overlapped connections were listed. We found 9 common connections predictive to all three outcomes (red), 12 common connections predictive to both language and motor outcomes (green, red); 14 common connections predictive to both cognitive and language outcomes (blue, red); and 9 common connections predictive to both cognitive and motor outcomes (covered by red).

References

    1. Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A. & Osterman, M. J. Births: Preliminary Data for 2015. National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System65, 1–15 (2016).
    1. Blencowe H, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379:2162–2172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4.
    1. Rogers EE, Hintz SR. Early neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants. Semin. Perinatol. 2016;40:497–509. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.002.
    1. Jarjour IT. Neurodevelopmental outcome after extreme prematurity: a review of the literature. Pediatr. Neurol. 2015;52:143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.10.027.
    1. He L, Parikh NA. Brain functional network connectivity development in very preterm infants: the first six months. Early Human Dev. 2016;98:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.06.002.
    1. Parikh, N. A. In Seminars in Perinatology, 530–541 (Elsevier).
    1. He L, Parikh NA. Aberrant executive and frontoparietal functional connectivity in very preterm infants with diffuse white matter abnormalities. Pediatr. Neurol. 2015;53:330–337. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.05.001.
    1. Sporns O. The human connectome: origins and challenges. Neuroimage. 2013;80:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.023.
    1. Glasser MF, et al. The human connectome project's neuroimaging approach. Nat. Neurosci. 2016;19:1175–1187. doi: 10.1038/nn.4361.
    1. Cao M, Huang H, He Y. Developmental connectomics from infancy through early childhood. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40:494–506. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.06.003.
    1. Plis SM, et al. Deep learning for neuroimaging: a validation study. Front. Neurosci. 2014;8:229. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00229.
    1. Hjelm RD, et al. Restricted Boltzmann machines for neuroimaging: an application in identifying intrinsic networks. Neuroimage. 2014;96:245–260. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.048.
    1. Barkhof F, Haller S, Rombouts SA. Resting-state functional MR imaging: a new window to the brain. Radiology. 2014;272:29–49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132388.
    1. Wee CY, et al. Identification of MCI individuals using structural and functional connectivity networks. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2045–2056. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.015.
    1. Ziv E, et al. A machine learning approach to automated structural network analysis: application to neonatal encephalopathy. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078824.
    1. Kawahara J, et al. BrainNetCNN: convolutional neural networks for brain networks; towards predicting neurodevelopment. Neuroimage. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.046.
    1. Dreiseitl S, Ohno-Machado L. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2002;35:352–359. doi: 10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00034-0.
    1. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
    1. Fei-Fei L, Fergus R, Perona P. One-shot learning of object categories. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006;28:594–611. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.79.
    1. Pan SJ, Yang Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010;22:1345–1359. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2009.191.
    1. Rosenstein MT, Marx Z, Kaelbling LP, Dietterich TG. To transfer or not to transfer. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. Transf. Learn. Workshop. 2005;898:1–4.
    1. Shin HC, et al. Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2016;35:1285–1298. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2528162.
    1. Kooi T, van Ginneken B, Karssemeijer N, den Heeten A. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network. Med. Phys. 2017;44:1017–1027. doi: 10.1002/mp.12110.
    1. Samala RK, et al. Evolutionary pruning of transfer learned deep convolutional neural network for breast cancer diagnosis in digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys. Med. Biol. 2018;63:095005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aabb5b.
    1. Samala RK, et al. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography. Med. Phys. 2016;43:6654. doi: 10.1118/1.4967345.
    1. Azizi S, et al. Transfer learning from RF to B-mode temporal enhanced ultrasound features for prostate cancer detection. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2017;12:1111–1121. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1573-x.
    1. Zheng J, Miao S, Jane Wang Z, Liao R. Pairwise domain adaptation module for CNN-based 2-D/3-D registration. J. Med. Imaging (Bellingham) 2018;5:021204. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.2.021204.
    1. Li H, Parikh NA, He L. A novel transfer learning approach to enhance deep neural network classification of brain functional connectomes. Front. Neurosci. 2018;12:491. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00491.
    1. He L, et al. Early prediction of cognitive deficits in very preterm infants using functional connectome data in an artificial neural network framework. NeuroImage Clin. 2018;18:290–297. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.032.
    1. Di Martino A, et al. The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Mol. Psychiatry. 2014;19:659. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.78.
    1. Abraham A, et al. Deriving reproducible biomarkers from multi-site resting-state data: an Autism-based example. NeuroImage. 2017;147:736–745. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.045.
    1. Spencer-Smith MM, Spittle AJ, Lee KJ, Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Bayley-III cognitive and language scales in preterm children. Pediatrics. 2015;135:e1258–e1265. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3039.
    1. Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2142–2154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018.
    1. Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu TT. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007;37:90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042.
    1. Craddock, R. et al. The Neuro Bureau Preprocessing Initiative: open sharing of preprocessed neuroimaging data and derivatives. Front. Neuroinf. (Neuroinform. 2013) (2013).
    1. Craddock, C. et al. Towards automated analysis of connectomes: The configurable pipeline for the analysis of connectomes (c-pac). 42 (2013).
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002;15:273–289. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978.
    1. Shi F, et al. Infant brain atlases from neonates to 1- and 2-year-olds. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018746.
    1. dos Santos Siqueira A, Biazoli Junior CE, Comfort WE, Rohde LA, Sato JR. Abnormal functional resting-state networks in ADHD: graph theory and pattern recognition analysis of fMRI data. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;2014:380531. doi: 10.1155/2014/380531.
    1. Betzel RF, Bassett DS. Multi-scale brain networks. Neuroimage. 2017;160:73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.006.
    1. Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2012;2:125–141. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0073.
    1. Heinsfeld AS, Franco AR, Craddock RC, Buchweitz A, Meneguzzi F. Identification of autism spectrum disorder using deep learning and the ABIDE dataset. NeuroImage Clin. 2018;17:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.08.017.
    1. Johnson, R. & Zhang, T. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 315–323.
    1. Xia M, Wang J, He Y. BrainNet Viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e68910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068910.
    1. Kassebaum, P. circularGraph (). GitHub (2020).
    1. Schmitt LI, et al. Thalamic amplification of cortical connectivity sustains attentional control. Nature. 2017;545:219–223. doi: 10.1038/nature22073.
    1. Linsell L, et al. Cognitive trajectories from infancy to early adulthood following birth before 26 weeks of gestation: a prospective, population-based cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child. 2018;103:363–370. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313414.
    1. Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Stability of general cognition in children born extremely preterm as they grow older: good or bad news? Arch. Dis. Child Fetal. Neonatal. Ed. 2018;103:F299–f300. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313987.
    1. Costa DS, et al. Executive function and academic outcomes in children who were extremely preterm. Pediatrics. 2017 doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0257.
    1. Doyle LW, Davis PG, Schmidt B, Anderson PJ. Cognitive outcome at 24 months is more predictive than at 18 months for IQ at 8–9 years in extremely low birth weight children. Early Human Dev. 2012;88:95–98. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.07.013.
    1. Bolisetty S, et al. Preterm outcome table (POT): a simple tool to aid counselling parents of very preterm infants. Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006;46:189–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00564.x.
    1. Dobbing J, Sands J. Quantitative growth and development of human brain. Arch. Dis. Child. 1973;48:757–767. doi: 10.1136/adc.48.10.757.
    1. Johnston MV. Plasticity in the developing brain: implications for rehabilitation. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2009;15:94–101. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.64.
    1. Tyson J. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Intensive care for extreme prematurity-moving beyond gestational age. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1672–1681. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073059.
    1. Ambalavanan N, et al. Outcome trajectories in extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e115–e125. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3693.
    1. Broitman E, et al. Clinical data predict neurodevelopmental outcome better than head ultrasound in extremely low birth weight infants. J. Pediatrics. 2007;151:500–505.e502. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.013.
    1. Parikh NA. Advanced neuroimaging and its role in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants. Semin. Perinatol. 2016;40:530–541. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.005.
    1. George JM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of early magnetic resonance imaging to determine motor outcomes in infants born preterm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2018;60:134–146. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13611.
    1. Huang H, Huppi PS, He Y, Lerch J. Imaging baby brain development. NeuroImage. 2019;203:116142. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116142.
    1. Volpe JJ. Dysmaturation of premature brain: importance, cellular mechanisms, and potential interventions. Pediatr. Neurol. 2019;95:42–66. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.02.016.
    1. Gano, D., Cowan, F. M. & de Vries, L. S. Cerebral palsy after very preterm birth—an imaging perspective. In Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 101106, 10.1016/j.siny.2020.101106 (2020).
    1. Kawahara J, et al. BrainNetCNN: convolutional neural networks for brain networks; towards predicting neurodevelopment. Neuroimage. 2017;146:1038–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.046.
    1. Girault JB, et al. White matter connectomes at birth accurately predict cognitive abilities at age 2. NeuroImage. 2019;192:145–155. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.060.
    1. Ball G, et al. Thalamocortical connectivity predicts cognition in children born preterm. Cerebral Cortex (New York NY 1991) 2015;25:4310–4318. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu331.
    1. Chau V, et al. Abnormal brain maturation in preterm neonates associated with adverse developmental outcomes. Neurology. 2013;81:2082–2089. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000437298.43688.b9.
    1. Saha S, et al. Predicting motor outcome in preterm infants from very early brain diffusion MRI using a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) model. Neuroimage. 2020;215:116807. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116807.
    1. Chen M, et al. A multichannel deep neural network model analyzing multiscale functional brain connectome data for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder detection. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2019;2:e190012. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019190012.
    1. Shi F, Salzwedel AP, Lin W, Gilmore JH, Gao W. Functional brain parcellations of the infant brain and the associated developmental trends. Cereb. Cortex. 2017;28:1358–1368. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx062.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever