Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56-60

Helena Lamin, Carina Eklund, Klara Miriam Elfström, Agneta Carlsten-Thor, Maria Hortlund, Kristina Elfgren, Sven Törnberg, Joakim Dillner, Helena Lamin, Carina Eklund, Klara Miriam Elfström, Agneta Carlsten-Thor, Maria Hortlund, Kristina Elfgren, Sven Törnberg, Joakim Dillner

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this research is to implement and reliably evaluate primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in an established and routinely running organised, large-scale population-based screening programme.

Participants: Resident women in the Stockholm/Gotland region of Sweden, aged 56-60 years were randomised to either (1) screening with cervical cytology, with HPV test in triage of low-grade cytological abnormalities (old policy) or (2) screening with HPV testing, with cytology in triage of HPV positives (new policy).

Outcome: The primary evaluation was the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).

Results: During January 2012-May 2014, the organised screening programme sent 42 752 blinded invitations with a prebooked appointment time to the women in the target age group. 7325 women attended in the HPV policy arm and 7438 women attended in the cytology arm. In the new policy, the population HPV prevalence was 5.5%, using an accredited HPV test (Cobas 4800). HPV16 prevalence was 1.0% (73/7325) and HPV18 prevalence was 0.3% (22/7325). In the HPV policy arm, 78/405 (19%) HPV-positive women were also cytology positive. There were 19 cases of CIN2+ in histopathology, all among women who were both HPV positive and cytology positive. The positive predictive value for CIN2+ in this group was 33.3% (19/57). In the cytology policy, 153 women were cytology positive and there were 18 cases of CIN2+ in histopathology. Both the total number of cervical biopsies and the number of cervical biopsies with benign histopathology were much lower in thepositive predictive value policy (49 benign, 87 total vs 105 benign, 132 total).

Conclusion: Primary HPV screening had a similar detection rate for CIN2+ as cytology-based screening, already before follow-up of HPV-positive, cytology-negative women with new HPV test and referral of women with persistence.

Trial registration number: NCT01511328.

Keywords: HPV primary screening; cervical cancer; organised screening programme.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study chart. *One woman had two samples taken, one negative and one positive for HPV. †Constitutes 11 women with CIN3, 6 with CIN2, 1 woman with CIN2/3 (exact grading not given) and 1 woman with invasive cervical cancer. ‡Constitutes eight women with CIN3 and eight women with CIN2. §Two women with invasive cervical cancer. CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade; HPV, human papillomavirus; PAD, cervical histopathology.

References

    1. Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, et al. . Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012;30(Suppl 5):F88–F99. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095
    1. Naucler P, Ryd W, Törnberg S, et al. . Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1589–97. 10.1056/NEJMoa073204
    1. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, et al. . Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:492–501. 10.1093/jnci/djn065
    1. Elfström KM, Smelov V, Johansson AL, et al. . Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2014;348:g130 10.1136/bmj.g130
    1. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al. . Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2014;383:524–32. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7
    1. Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, et al. , IARC. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical Cancer screening. 2nd ed Belgium: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2008.
    1. Hakama M, Malila N, Dillner J. Randomised health services studies. Int J Cancer 2012;131:2898–902. 10.1002/ijc.27561
    1. Elfgren K, Elfström KM, Naucler P, et al. . Management of women with human papillomavirus persistence: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.042
    1. Elfström KM, Sparén P, Olausson P, et al. . Registry-based assessment of the status of cervical screening in Sweden. J Med Screen 2016;23:217–26. 10.1177/0969141316632023
    1. Preisler S, Rebolj M, Untermann A, et al. . Prevalence of human papillomavirus in 5,072 consecutive cervical SurePath samples evaluated with the Roche cobas HPV real-time PCR assay. PLoS One 2013;8:e59765 10.1371/journal.pone.0059765
    1. Anttila A, Kotaniemi-Talonen L, Leinonen M, et al. . Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme. BMJ 2010;340:c1804 10.1136/bmj.c1804
    1. Kitchener HC, Gilham C, Sargent A, et al. . A comparison of HPV DNA testing and liquid based cytology over three rounds of primary cervical screening: extended follow up in the ARTISTIC trial. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:864–71. 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.01.008
    1. Rijkaart DC, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, et al. . Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:78–88. 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0
    1. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, et al. . Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:249–57. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70360-2
    1. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, et al. . HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1385–94. 10.1056/NEJMoa0808516
    1. Leinonen MK, Nieminen P, Lönnberg S, et al. . Detection rates of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions within one screening round of primary human papillomavirus DNA testing: prospective randomised trial in Finland. BMJ 2012;345:e7789 10.1136/bmj.e7789
    1. Passamonti B, Gustinucci D, Giorgi Rossi P, et al. . Cervical human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA primary screening test: results of a population-based screening programme in central Italy. J Med Screen 2016. 10.1177/0969141316663580
    1. Dijkstra MG, van Zummeren M, Rozendaal L, et al. . Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands. BMJ 2016;355:i4924 10.1136/bmj.i4924

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever