Automated versus physician assignment of cause of death for verbal autopsies: randomized trial of 9374 deaths in 117 villages in India

Prabhat Jha, Dinesh Kumar, Rajesh Dikshit, Atul Budukh, Rehana Begum, Prabha Sati, Patrycja Kolpak, Richard Wen, Shyamsundar J Raithatha, Utkarsh Shah, Zehang Richard Li, Lukasz Aleksandrowicz, Prakash Shah, Kapila Piyasena, Tyler H McCormick, Hellen Gelband, Samuel J Clark, Prabhat Jha, Dinesh Kumar, Rajesh Dikshit, Atul Budukh, Rehana Begum, Prabha Sati, Patrycja Kolpak, Richard Wen, Shyamsundar J Raithatha, Utkarsh Shah, Zehang Richard Li, Lukasz Aleksandrowicz, Prakash Shah, Kapila Piyasena, Tyler H McCormick, Hellen Gelband, Samuel J Clark

Abstract

Background: Verbal autopsies with physician assignment of cause of death (COD) are commonly used in settings where medical certification of deaths is uncommon. It remains unanswered if automated algorithms can replace physician assignment.

Methods: We randomized verbal autopsy interviews for deaths in 117 villages in rural India to either physician or automated COD assignment. Twenty-four trained lay (non-medical) surveyors applied the allocated method using a laptop-based electronic system. Two of 25 physicians were allocated randomly to independently code the deaths in the physician assignment arm. Six algorithms (Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC), King-Lu, InSilicoVA, InSilicoVA-NT, InterVA-4, and SmartVA) coded each death in the automated arm. The primary outcome was concordance with the COD distribution in the standard physician-assigned arm. Four thousand six hundred fifty-one (4651) deaths were allocated to physician (standard), and 4723 to automated arms.

Results: The two arms were nearly identical in demographics and key symptom patterns. The average concordances of automated algorithms with the standard were 62%, 56%, and 59% for adult, child, and neonatal deaths, respectively. Automated algorithms showed inconsistent results, even for causes that are relatively easy to identify such as road traffic injuries. Automated algorithms underestimated the number of cancer and suicide deaths in adults and overestimated other injuries in adults and children. Across all ages, average weighted concordance with the standard was 62% (range 79-45%) with the best to worst ranking automated algorithms being InterVA-4, InSilicoVA-NT, InSilicoVA, SmartVA, NBC, and King-Lu. Individual-level sensitivity for causes of adult deaths in the automated arm was low between the algorithms but high between two independent physicians in the physician arm.

Conclusions: While desirable, automated algorithms require further development and rigorous evaluation. Lay reporting of deaths paired with physician COD assignment of verbal autopsies, despite some limitations, remains a practicable method to document the patterns of mortality reliably for unattended deaths.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02810366. Submitted on 11 April 2016.

Keywords: Algorithms; COD classification; Physician coding; Verbal autopsies.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years, and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for the 9529 deaths in 117 mainly rural villages randomly allocated to either physician or computer COD assignment of verbal autopsies and analytic design. ϮThe following deaths were excluded for the physician and automated assignment arms, respectively: 9 and 5 refused consent after the randomization 83 and 39 were unable to provide consent (as the respondent was determined to be < 18 years), and 7 and 8 were test records from field training by surveyors. As well, 4 stillborn deaths were excluded in the physician assignment arm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Average population-level concordance (%) of algorithms with standard (physician-assigned) in a randomized trial and the average population-level concordance in earlier non-randomized studies. 100% concordance would indicate complete agreement with the standard. The horizontal bars indicate the range of the mean concordance estimates (weighted by sample size) in each study

References

    1. Jha P. Reliable direct measurement of causes of death in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Med. 2014;12:19. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-19.
    1. Mikkelsen L, Phillips DE, AbouZahr C, et al. A global assessment of civil registration and vital statistics systems: monitoring data quality and progress. Lancet. 2015;386:1395–1406. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60171-4.
    1. Gomes M, Begum R, Sati P, et al. Nationwide mortality studies to quantify causes of death: relevant lessons from India's million death study. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36:1887–1895. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0635.
    1. Nichols EK, Byass P, Chandramohan D, et al. The WHO 2016 verbal autopsy instrument: an international standard suitable for automated analysis by InterVA, InSilicoVA, and Tariff 2.0. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002486.
    1. Soleman N, Chandramohan D, Shibuya K. Verbal autopsy: current practices and challenges. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(3):239–245. doi: 10.2471/BLT.05.027003.
    1. Gajalakshmi V, Peto R. Verbal autopsy of 80,000 adult deaths in Tamilnadu, South India. BMC Public Health. 2004;4:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-47.
    1. Aleksandrowicz L, Malhotra V, Dikshit R, et al. Performance criteria for verbal autopsy-based systems to estimate national causes of death: development and application to the Indian Million Death Study. BMC Med. 2014;12:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-21.
    1. Instituto Nacional de Estatística . Mortalidade em Moçambique Inquérito Nacional sobre Causas de Mortalidade, 2007/8 - Relatório Preliminar. Maputo: Instituto Nacional de Estatística; 2009.
    1. Million Death Study Collaborators Changes in cause-specific neonatal and 1-59-month child mortality in India from 2000 to 2015: a nationally representative survey. Lancet. 2017;390:1972–1980. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32162-1.
    1. Morris SK, Bassani DG, Kumar R, Awasthi S, Paul VK, Jha P. Factors associated with physician agreement on verbal autopsy of over 27000 childhood deaths in India. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009583.
    1. McCormick TH, Li ZR, Calvert C, Crampin AC, Kahn K, Clark SJ. Probabilistic cause-of-death assignment using verbal autopsies. J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111:1036–1049. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1152191.
    1. Byass P, Herbst K, Fottrell E, et al. Comparing verbal autopsy cause of death findings as determined by physician coding and probabilistic modelling: a public health analysis of 54 000 deaths in Africa and Asia. J Glob Health. 2015;5:010402.
    1. Murray CJ, Lozano R, Flaxman AD, et al. Using verbal autopsy to measure causes of death: the comparative performance of existing methods. BMC Med. 2014;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-5.
    1. Miasnikof P, Giannakeas V, Gomes M, et al. Naive Bayes classifiers for verbal autopsies: comparison to physician-based classification for 21,000 child and adult deaths. BMC Med. 2015;13:286. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0521-2.
    1. King G, Lu Y. Verbal autopsy methods with multiple causes of death. Stat Sci. 2008;23:78–91. doi: 10.1214/07-STS247.
    1. Clark SJ, Li ZR, McCormick TH. Quantifying the contributions of training data and algorithm logic to the performance of automated cause-assignment algorithms for verbal autopsy. ArXiv e-prints [Internet]. 2018 May 17, 2018. Available from: .
    1. Desai N, Aleksandrowicz L, Miasnikof P, et al. Performance of four computer-coded verbal autopsy methods for cause of death assignment compared with physician coding on 24,000 deaths in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Med. 2014;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-20.
    1. Leitao J, Desai N, Aleksandrowicz L, et al. Comparison of physician-certified verbal autopsy with computer-coded verbal autopsy for cause of death assignment in hospitalized patients in low-and middle-income countries: systematic review. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):22. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-22.
    1. Serina P, Riley I, Stewart A, et al. Improving performance of the tariff method for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies. BMC Med. 2015;13(291):1-13.
    1. Byass P, Chandramohan D, Clark SJ, et al. Strengthening standardised interpretation of verbal autopsy data: the new InterVA-4 tool. Glob Health Action. 2012;5:1–8. doi: 10.3402/gha.v5i0.19281.
    1. Ram F, Ram U, Singh A, Bansod DW, Pedgaonka S. Use of verbal autopsy for assessing the causes of death in Amravati district of Maharashtra. Maharashtra: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2016.
    1. Kumar R, Thakur JS, Rao BT, Singh MM, Bhatia SP. Validity of verbal autopsy in determining causes of adult deaths. Indian J Public Health. 2006;50:90–94.
    1. Mpimbaza A, Filler S, Katureebe A, Quick L, Chandramohan D, Staedke SG. Verbal autopsy: evaluation of methods to certify causes of death in Uganda. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0128801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128801.
    1. Garenne M. Prospects for automated diagnosis of verbal autopsies. BMC Med. 2014;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-18.
    1. Ram U, Dikshit R, Jha P. Level of evidence of verbal autopsy. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4:e368–e3e9. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30045-6.
    1. Dongre A, Singh A, Deshmukh P, Garg B. A community based cross sectional study on feasibility of lay interviewers in ascertaining causes of adult deaths by using verbal autopsy in rural Wardha. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2008;7:4.
    1. Berkley JA, Lowe BS, Mwangi I, et al. Bacteremia among children admitted to a rural hospital in Kenya. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:39–47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040275.
    1. Bassat Q, Castillo P, Martinez MJ, et al. Validity of a minimally invasive autopsy tool for cause of death determination in pediatric deaths in Mozambique: an observational study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(6):e1002317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002317.
    1. Byass P. Usefulness of the population health metrics research consortium gold standard verbal autopsy data for general verbal autopsy methods. BMC Med. 2014;12:23. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-23.
    1. Dowell SF, Blazes D, Desmond-Hellmann S. Four steps to precision public health. Nature. 2016;540:189–191. doi: 10.1038/540189a.
    1. Jha P, Gajalakshmi V, Gupta PC, et al. Prospective study of one million deaths in India: rationale, design, and validation results. PLoS Med. 2006;3:191–200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030191.
    1. Norheim OF. Jha P, Admasu K, et al. Avoiding 40% of the premature deaths in each country, 2010-30: review of national mortality trends to help quantify the UN sustainable development goal for health. Lancet. 2015;385:239–252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61591-9.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever