Navafenterol (AZD8871) in healthy volunteers: safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of multiple ascending doses of this novel inhaled, long-acting, dual-pharmacology bronchodilator, in two phase I, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled studies

Victor Balaguer, Muna Albayaty, Eulalia Jimenez, Ulrika Wählby-Hamrén, Carol Astbury, Beatriz Seoane, Marie-Pierre Malice, Alejhandra Lei, Ajay Aggarwal, Ioannis Psallidas, Victor Balaguer, Muna Albayaty, Eulalia Jimenez, Ulrika Wählby-Hamrén, Carol Astbury, Beatriz Seoane, Marie-Pierre Malice, Alejhandra Lei, Ajay Aggarwal, Ioannis Psallidas

Abstract

Background: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a novel, long-acting, dual-pharmacology (muscarinic receptor antagonist and β2-adrenoceptor agonist) molecule in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.

Methods: These two phase I, randomised, single-blind, multiple-ascending-dose studies evaluated inhaled navafenterol and placebo (3:1 ratio) in healthy, male, non-Japanese (study A; NCT02814656) and Japanese (study B; NCT03159442) volunteers. In each study, volunteers were dosed in three cohorts, allowing gradual dose escalation from 300 μg to 600 μg to 900 μg. The primary objective was to investigate the safety and tolerability of navafenterol at steady state. Pharmacokinetics were also assessed.

Results: Twenty-four volunteers completed each study (navafenterol, n = 6; placebo, n = 2 in each cohort). There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation of navafenterol. The most frequent TEAEs were vessel puncture-site bruise (placebo, n = 2; navafenterol 900 μg; n = 3) in study A and diarrhoea (placebo, n = 1; navafenterol 300 μg, n = 2; navafenterol 900 μg, n = 3) in study B. No dose-response relationship was observed for TEAEs. There was a dose-dependent increase in mean heart rate on day 16 in both studies. The pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar between non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers.

Conclusions: Multiple ascending doses of navafenterol were well-tolerated and the safety and pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar in non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers. The findings support navafenterol clinical development.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ; Nos.: NCT02814656 and NCT03159442; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov .

Keywords: Bronchodilator; COPD; Dual-pharmacology muscarinic receptor antagonist β2-adrenoceptor agonist; MABA; Pharmacokinetics; Safety.

Conflict of interest statement

VB was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time these studies were conducted and is now a current employee of IQVIA. LJ, UW-H, CA, BS, AL and IP are employees of AstraZeneca, and may own stock or stock options. AA was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time these studies were conducted and is now a current employee of Eloxx Pharmaceuticals. M-PM was a contractor to AstraZeneca at the time these studies were conducted. MA is an employee of PAREXEL. AstraZeneca provided funding to PAREXEL for the conduct of these studies.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design for (a) study A and (b) study B
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient disposition and flow in (a) study A and (b) study B. PK = pharmacokinetic; PP = per protocol. aOne volunteer withdrew prior to the first dose and was replaced by a reserve volunteer as per the protocol
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean change from baseline on day 16 (safety population) in glucose i-STAT concentration in (a) study A and (b) study B, and mean change from baseline in potassium i-STAT concentration in (c) study A and (d) study B. SD = standard deviation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean change from baseline in heart rate over time at day 16 (safety population) in (a) study A and (b) study B. aexcept for navafenterol 600 μg at 12 h post dose on day 16, n = 5. bpm = beats per minute; SD = standard deviation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Geometric mean plasma concentration-time profiles of navafenterol (pharmacokinetic population) on days 1 and 16 in (a) study A and (b) study B, and pre-dose concentrations from days 6 to 16 in (c) study A and (d) study B. Note that a longer sampling scheme was used in study B (samples collected up to 336 h following the last dose) than in study A (samples collected up to 96 h following the last dose). SD = geometric standard deviation

References

    1. GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(9):691–706. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30293-X.
    1. GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.
    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease . Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. 2019.
    1. Global Initiative for Asthma . 2018 GINA Report, Global Strategy For Asthma Management and Prevention. 2018.
    1. Aparici M, Carcasona C, Ramos I, et al. Pharmacological preclinical characterization of LAS190792, a novel inhaled bifunctional muscarinic receptor antagonist /β2-adrenoceptor agonist (MABA) molecule. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.07.003.
    1. Aparici M, Carcasona C, Ramos I, et al. Pharmacological profile of AZD8871 (LAS191351), a novel inhaled dual M3 receptor antagonist/ β2-adrenoceptor agonist molecule with long-lasting effects and favorable safety profile. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2019;370(1):127–136. doi: 10.1124/jpet.118.255620.
    1. Hughes AD, Jones LH. Dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist and β2 agonist molecules for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Future Med Chem. 2011;3(13):1585–1605. doi: 10.4155/fmc.11.106.
    1. Singh D, Astbury C, Jimenez L, et al. A randomized placebo and active controlled trial of AZD8871 a novel dual acting bronchodilator in COPD patients. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(Suppl. 61):PA1798.
    1. Ramamoorthy A, Pacanowski MA, Bull J, Zhang L. Racial/ethnic differences in drug disposition and response: review of recently approved drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97(3):263–273. doi: 10.1002/cpt.61.
    1. Salpeter SR, Ormiston TM, Salpeter EE. Cardiovascular effects of beta-agonists in patients with asthma and COPD: a meta-analysis. Chest. 2004;125(6):2309–2321. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.6.2309.
    1. Singh D, Fuhr R, Jimenez L, et al. A randomized trial of dual-acting bronchodilator AZD8871 for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(10):1282–1284. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201812-2345LE.
    1. Battisti WP, Wager E, Baltzer L, et al. Good publication practice for communicating company-sponsored medical research: GPP3. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(6):461–464. doi: 10.7326/M15-0288.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever