Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness comparison between U-100 human regular insulin and rapid acting insulin when delivered by V-Go wearable insulin delivery device in type 2 diabetes

Pablo F Mora, David R Sutton, Ashwini Gore, Bantwal Baliga, Rebecca F Goldfaden, Carla Nikkel, John Sink Ii, Beverley Adams-Huet, Pablo F Mora, David R Sutton, Ashwini Gore, Bantwal Baliga, Rebecca F Goldfaden, Carla Nikkel, John Sink Ii, Beverley Adams-Huet

Abstract

Introduction: We compared the efficacy and safety of human regular insulin (HRI) versus rapid-acting insulin (RAI) in a type 2 diabetes population already using the V-Go insulin delivery device.

Research design and methods: This was a 14-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IV, non-inferiority study. Patients ≥21years of age, with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes who were currently using the V-Go insulin delivery system with RAI, with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5% (≥48 mmol/L) to ≤12.5% (≤108 mmol/L) were randomized 1:1 to RAI continuation or switch to HRI. The primary outcome was estimated treatment difference (ETD) in HbA1c least-squares mean change from baseline at 14 weeks (prespecified non-inferiority hypothesis with 95% CI upper limit <0.4%). Primary analysis was by per protocol (PP); safety analysis was by intention to treat.

Results: We randomized 136 patients to continued RAI treatment (n=67) or HRI (n=69); 113 patients were included in the PP analysis (RAI, n=54; HRI, n=59). Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to study end was -0.60±1.1% (95% CI -0.90 to -0.29); -6.6±12.0 mmol/mol (95% CI -9.8 to -3.2) with HRI treatment and -0.38±1.3% (95% CI -0.70 to -0.05); -4.2±14.2 mmol/mol (95% CI -7.7 to -0.5) with RAI treatment, with ETD of -0.22% (95% CI -0.67 to 0.22); -2.4 mmol/mol (95% CI -7.3 to 2.4), p=0.007, confirming non-inferiority of HRI to RAI. No between-group differences in changes in total daily insulin doses, number of hypoglycemic values (≤70 mg/dL (≤39 mmol/L) or body weight were observed. No severe hypoglycemic events were reported. Direct pharmacy cost savings (-US$265.85; 95% CI -US$288.60 to -US$243.11; p<0.0001) were observed with HRI treatment.

Conclusions: Individuals with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin can be treated with V-Go wearable insulin delivery device using HRI, safely and effectively, and potentially at a much lower cost compared with RAI, which can lead to improved access to insulin therapy for these individuals.

Trial registration number: NCT03495908.

Keywords: costs and cost analysis; diabetes mellitus; insulin; insulin infusion systems; type 2.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: PFM reports grants from Valeritas, Inc., and consulting fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk and Merck. DRS received grants from Valeritas during the conduct of the study; consulting fees from Valeritas, Novo Nordisk, Lilly USA, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, AbbVie, Amarin. AG reports grants from Valeritas during the conduct of the study; consulting fees from Valeritas, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk and Merck. BB reports grants from Valeritas, Inc. acquired by Zealand Pharma during the conduct of the study; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Valeritas Eli Lilly, Amarin, Senseonics. RFG reports no financial disclosures. CN and JS II are employees of Zealand Pharma. BA-H reports consulting fees from Valeritas, Inc. acquired by Zealand Pharma during the conduct of the study.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disposition of study participants. HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HRI, human regular insulin; ITT, intent-to-treat; PP, per protocol; RAI, rapid acting insulin; SMBG, self-monitoring of blood glucose.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in HbA1c in the PP population. Changes and ETD in HbA1c from baseline. ETD are mean change (95% CI) derived from a mixed model analysis. Upper limit of 95% CI is

Figure 3

Pharmacy budget impact in PP…

Figure 3

Pharmacy budget impact in PP population. Baseline and 14-week insulin costs per patient.…

Figure 3
Pharmacy budget impact in PP population. Baseline and 14-week insulin costs per patient. Insulin cost is based on 30-day costs for HRI and RAI using published wholesale acquisition costs from ProspectoRx (database online). Elsevier, 2020, Tampa, Florida, USA (https://prospectorx.com/Home.aspx). Accessed November 28, 2019. At baseline, RAI was used to fill V-Go by both cohorts. ETD, estimated treatment difference; HRI, human regular insulin; PP, per protocol; RAI, rapid acting insulin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pharmacy budget impact in PP population. Baseline and 14-week insulin costs per patient. Insulin cost is based on 30-day costs for HRI and RAI using published wholesale acquisition costs from ProspectoRx (database online). Elsevier, 2020, Tampa, Florida, USA (https://prospectorx.com/Home.aspx). Accessed November 28, 2019. At baseline, RAI was used to fill V-Go by both cohorts. ETD, estimated treatment difference; HRI, human regular insulin; PP, per protocol; RAI, rapid acting insulin.

References

    1. DeWitt DE, Hirsch IB. Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: scientific review. JAMA 2003;289:2254–64. 10.1001/jama.289.17.2254
    1. Edelman S, Dailey G, Flood T, et al. . A practical approach for implementation of a basal-prandial insulin therapy regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes. Osteopath Med Prim Care 2007;1:9. 10.1186/1750-4732-1-9
    1. Peyrot M, Barnett AH, Meneghini LF, et al. . Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational global attitudes of patients and physicians in insulin therapy study. Diabet Med 2012;29:682–9. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03605.x
    1. Lipska KJ, Hirsch IB, Riddle MC. Human insulin for type 2 diabetes: an effective, less-expensive option. JAMA 2017;318:23–4. 10.1001/jama.2017.6939
    1. Sokol R. Understanding the high cost of insulin: what family physicians can do to help our patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am Fam Physician 2019;99:416–7.
    1. American Diabetes Association Insulin stories. Available: [Accessed 22 Oct 2019].
    1. QuickStats: Percentage* of Adults Aged ≥45 Years Who Reduced or Delayed Medication to Save Money† in the Past 12 Months Among Those Who Were Prescribed Medication, by Diagnosed Diabetes Status and Age§ - National Health Interview Survey, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:679. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6625a5
    1. Herkert D, Vijayakumar P, Luo J, et al. . Cost-related insulin underuse among patients with diabetes. JAMA Intern Med 2019;179:112–4. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5008
    1. Fullerton B, Siebenhofer A, Jeitler K, et al. . Short-Acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adult, non-pregnant persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;12:CD013228. 10.1002/14651858.CD013228
    1. Singh SR, Ahmad F, Lal A, et al. . Efficacy and safety of insulin analogues for the management of diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2009;180:385–97. 10.1503/cmaj.081041
    1. Plank J, Siebenhofer A, Berghold A, et al. . Systematic review and meta-analysis of short-acting insulin analogues in patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1337–44. 10.1001/archinte.165.12.1337
    1. Anderson JH, Brunelle RL, Keohane P, et al. . Mealtime treatment with insulin analog improves postprandial hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. multicenter insulin lispro Study Group. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1249–55. 10.1001/archinte.1997.00440320157015
    1. Ross SA, Zinman B, Campos RV, et al. . A comparative study of insulin lispro and human regular insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic agents. Clin Invest Med 2001;24:292–8.
    1. Tylee T, Hirsch IB. Costs associated with using different insulin preparations. JAMA 2015;314:665–6. 10.1001/jama.2015.7032
    1. Mui K. Don’t write off older insulins just yet: they may work just as well as newer insulins for type 2 diabetes, 2019. Available: [Accessed 25 Oct 2019].
    1. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Guzman S, et al. . Psychological insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes: the scope of the problem. Diabetes Care 2005;28:2543–5. 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2543
    1. Ross SA, Tildesley HD, Ashkenas J. Barriers to effective insulin treatment: the persistence of poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27 Suppl 3:13–20. 10.1185/03007995.2011.621416
    1. Peyrot M, Skovlund SE, Landgraf R. Epidemiology and correlates of weight worry in the multinational diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs study. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:1985–93. 10.1185/03007990903073654
    1. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Kruger DF, et al. . Correlates of insulin injection omission. Diabetes Care 2010;33:240–5. 10.2337/dc09-1348
    1. Petrak F, Stridde E, Leverkus F, et al. . Development and validation of a new measure to evaluate psychological resistance to insulin treatment. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2199–204. 10.2337/dc06-2042
    1. Rosenfeld CR, Bohannon NJ, Bode B, et al. . The V-Go insulin delivery device used in clinical practice: patient perception and retrospective analysis of glycemic control. Endocr Pract 2012;18:660–7. 10.4158/EP11362.OR
    1. Reznik Y, Cohen O, Aronson R, et al. . Insulin pump treatment compared with multiple daily injections for treatment of type 2 diabetes (OpT2mise): a randomised open-label controlled trial. Lancet 2014;384:1265–72. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61037-0
    1. Valeritas Inc V-Go® disposable insulin delivery device: Instructions for patient use. Available: [Accessed 15 Oct 2019].
    1. Lajara R, Davidson JA, Nikkel CC, et al. . Clinical and cost-effectiveness of insulin delivery with V-GO(®) disposable insulin delivery device versus multiple daily injections in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin. Endocr Pract 2016;22:726–35. 10.4158/EP151182.OR
    1. Lajara R, Fetchick DA, Morris TL, et al. . Use of V-Go® insulin delivery device in patients with sub-optimally controlled diabetes mellitus: a retrospective analysis from a large specialized diabetes system. Diabetes Ther 2015;6:531–45. 10.1007/s13300-015-0138-7
    1. Johns BR, Jones TC, Sink JH, et al. . Real-World assessment of glycemic control after V-Go® initiation in an endocrine practice in the southeastern United States. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;8:1060–1. 10.1177/1932296814537041
    1. Cziraky MJ, Abbott S, Nguyen M, et al. . A pragmatic clinical trial to compare the real-world effectiveness of V-Go versus standard delivery of insulin in patients with advanced type 2 diabetes. J Health Econ Outcomes Res 2019;6:70–83. 10.36469/9731
    1. Everitt B, Harrison HC, Nikkel C, et al. . Clinical and economic considerations based on persistency with a novel insulin delivery device versus conventional insulin delivery in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm 2019;15:1126–32. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.09.016
    1. Huie S, Abbott S, Nguyen M. Stability of u100 human regular insulin in the V-Go insulin delivery device. Diabetes 2013;62:656.
    1. Sutton D, Higdon C, Carmon M, et al. . Regular insulin administered with the retrospective analysis of efficacy and cost. Clin Diabetes 2016;34:201–5.
    1. Wangge G, Putzeist M, Knol MJ, et al. . Regulatory scientific advice on non-inferiority drug trials. PLoS One 2013;8:e74818. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074818
    1. EMECHEBE N, Agu N, MALMI M, et al. . Examining the association between treatment satisfaction and medication adherence among patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2018;67:724-P 10.2337/db18-724-P
    1. Barbosa CD, Balp M-M, Kulich K, et al. . A literature review to explore the link between treatment satisfaction and adherence, compliance, and persistence. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012;6:39–48. 10.2147/PPA.S24752
    1. Kang H, Lobo JM, Kim S, et al. . Cost-related medication non-adherence among U.S. adults with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;143:24–33. 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.06.016
    1. Salas M, Hughes D, Zuluaga A, et al. . Costs of medication nonadherence in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and critical analysis of the literature. Value Health 2009;12:915–22. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00539.x
    1. Egede LE, Gebregziabher M, Dismuke CE, et al. . Medication nonadherence in diabetes: longitudinal effects on costs and potential cost savings from improvement. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2533–9. 10.2337/dc12-0572

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever