6-month results of TransDiscal Biacuplasty on patients with discogenic low back pain: preliminary findings

Haktan Karaman, Adnan Tüfek, Gönül Ölmez Kavak, Sedat Kaya, Zeynep Baysal Yildirim, Ersin Uysal, Feyzi Celik, Haktan Karaman, Adnan Tüfek, Gönül Ölmez Kavak, Sedat Kaya, Zeynep Baysal Yildirim, Ersin Uysal, Feyzi Celik

Abstract

Study design: Prospective observational study.

Objective: Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of TransDiscal Biacuplasty.

Summary of background data: Chronic discogenic pain is one of the leading causes of low back pain; however, the condition is not helped by most non-invasive methods. The results of major surgical operations for these patients are unsatisfactory. Recently, attention has shifted to disk heating methods for treatment. TransDiscal Biacuplasty is one of the minimally invasive treatment methods. The method was developed as an alternative to spinal surgical practices and Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy for treatment of patients with chronic discogenic pain.

Methods: The candidates for this study were patients with chronic discogenic pain that did not respond to conservative treatment. The main criteria for inclusion were: the existence of axial low back pain present for 6 months; disc degeneration or internal disc disruption at a minimum of one level, and maximum of two levels, in MR imaging; and positive discography. Physical function was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index when measuring the pain with VAS. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a 4-grade scale. Follow-ups were made 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.

Results: 15 patients were treated at one or two levels. The mean patient age was 43.1 ± 9.2 years. We found the mean symptom duration to be 40.5 ± 45.7 months. At the sixth month, 57.1% of patients reported a 50% or more reduction in pain, while 78.6% of patients reported a reduction of at least two points in their VAS values. In the final check, 78.6% of patients reported a 10-point improvement in their Oswestry Disability scores compared to the initial values. No complications were observed in any of the patients.

Conclusions: TransDiscal Biacuplasty is an effective and safe method.

Keywords: cool radiofrequency; discogenic pain; intradiscal electrothermal therapy; low back pain; transdiscal biacuplasty.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphic showing decreases of the VAS pain scores over the time in patients. Values are shown as means (error bars: 95% CI for mean). VAS, Visual Analog Scale. *Statistically significant decrease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphic showing improvements of the ODI scores over the time in patients. Values are shown as means (error bars: 95% CI for mean). ODI, Oswestry Disability Index. *Statistically significant improvement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graphic showing disability indexes of the patients over the time. There are significant improvements in disability indexes at all follow-up periods.

References

    1. Carey TS, Garrett JM, Jackman AM. Beyond the good prognosis. Examination of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2000;25:115–20.
    1. Nachemson AL. Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look. Clin Orthop. 1992;279:8–20.
    1. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R. et al.The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1995;20:1878–83.
    1. Smith SE, Darden BV, Rhyne AL. et al.Outcome of unoperated discogram-positive low back pain. Spine. 1995;20:1997–2000.
    1. Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal fusion surgery—the case for restraint. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:722–6.
    1. Singh V. Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy: A Preliminary Report. Pain Physician. 2000;3:367–73.
    1. Freeman BJ, Fraser RD, Cain CM. et al.A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:2369–77.
    1. Karasek M, Bogduk N. Twelve month follow-up of a controlled trial of intradiscal thermal anuloplasty for back pain due to internal disc disruption. Spine. 2000;25:2601–7.
    1. Maurer P, Block JE, Squillante D. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) provides effective symptom relief in patients with discogenic low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:55–62.
    1. Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Brandao SM. et al.Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for low back pain in worker's compensation patients: can it provide a potential answer? Long-term results. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:11–8.
    1. Saal JA, Saal JS. Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain. A prospective outcome study with minimum 1-year follow-up. Spine. 2000;25:2622–7.
    1. Kapural L, Ng A, Dalton J. et al.Intervertebral disc biacuplasty for the treatment of lumbar discogenic pain: results of a six-month follow-up. Pain Med. 2008;9:60–7.
    1. Pauza KJ, Howell S, Dreyfuss P. et al.A randomized, placebo controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Spine J. 2004;4:27–35.
    1. Freeman BJ, Fraser RD, Cain CM. et al.A randomized, double blinded, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:2369–77.
    1. Kapural L, Mekhail N. Novel Intradiscal Biacuplasty (IDB) for the Treatment of Lumbar Discogenic Pain. Pain Practice. 2007;7:130–4.
    1. Pilcher TA, Sabford AL, Saul JP. et al.Convective cooling effect on cooled-tip catheter compared to large-tip catheter radiofrequency ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29:1368–74.
    1. Kapural L, Mekhail N, Hicks D. et al.Histological changes and temperature distribution studies of a novel bipolar radiofrequency heating system in degenerated and nondegenerated human cadaver lumbar discs. Pain Med. 2008;9:68–75.
    1. Andersson GB, Mekhail NA, Block JE. Treatment of intractable discogenic low back pain. A systematic review of spinal fusion and intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) Pain Physician. 2006;9:237–48.
    1. Saal JS, Saal JA. Management of chronic discogenic low back pain with a thermal intradiscal catheter: a preliminary report. Spine. 2000;25:382–8.
    1. Shah RV, Lutz GE, Lee J. et al.Intradiskal electrothermal therapy: a preliminary histological study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1230–7.
    1. Freeman BJ, Walters RM, Moore RJ. et al.Does Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy denervate and repair experimentally induced posterolateral annular tears in an animal model? Spine. 2003;28:2602–8.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever