Speaking up culture of medical students within an academic teaching hospital: Need of faculty working in patient safety

David Schwappach, Gerald Sendlhofer, Lars-Peter Kamolz, Wolfgang Köle, Gernot Brunner, David Schwappach, Gerald Sendlhofer, Lars-Peter Kamolz, Wolfgang Köle, Gernot Brunner

Abstract

Background: Speaking up behavior is a manifestation the culture of safety in an organization; however, withholding voice is commonly observed. Within one academic teaching hospital, it was the aim to assess students' speaking up behaviors and perceived culture in order to stimulation of the academic development in terms of patient safety.

Methods: Survey amongst medical students using a validated questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: 326 individuals completed the questionnaire (response rate 24%). 37% of responders were in their 5th- 6th clinical term, 32% were in their 7th-8th term and 31% were in the 9th-12th term. 69% of students had a specific safety concern in the past four weeks, 48% had observed an error and 68% noticed the violation of a patient safety rule. Though students perceived specific patient safety concerns, 56% did not speak up in a critical situation. All predefined barriers seemed to play an important role in inhibiting students' voicing concerns. The scores on the psychological safety scale were overall moderately favourable. Students felt little encouraged by colleagues and, in particular, by supervisors to speak up.

Conclusion: Speaking up behaviour of students was assessed for the first time in an Austrian academic teaching hospital. The higher the term the more frequent students reported perceived patient safety concerns or rule violations and withholding voice. These results suggest the need to adapt the curriculum concept of the faculty in order to address patient safety as a relevant topic.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Frequency of relevant barriers for…
Fig 1. Frequency of relevant barriers for bringing up patient safety concerns.
Fig 2. Mean ratings and 95% CI…
Fig 2. Mean ratings and 95% CI of the missed hand disinfection vignette by study term.
Reported p-values for differences in means between study terms (ANOVA).

References

    1. Schwappach D, Richard A. Speak up-related climate and its association with healthcare workers’ speaking up and withholding voice behaviours: a cross-sectional survey in Switzerland. BMJ Qual Saf [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Jul 23];0:1–9. Available from: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007388
    1. Lyndon A, Sexton JB, Simpson KR, Rosenstein A, Lee KA, Wachter RM. Predictors of likelihood of speaking up about safety concerns in labour and delivery. BMJ Qual Saf [Internet]. 2012. September [cited 2017 Nov 4];21(9):791–9. Available from: 10.1136/bmjqs-2010-050211
    1. Morrow KJ, Gustavson AM, Jones J. Speaking up behaviours (safety voices) of healthcare workers: A metasynthesis of qualitative research studies. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2016. December [cited 2017 Nov 4];64:42–51. Available from: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.014
    1. Beament T, Mercer SJ. Speak up! Barriers to challenging erroneous decisions of seniors in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2016. November [cited 2017 Nov 4];71(11):1332–40. Available from: 10.1111/anae.13546
    1. Schwappach DL, Gehring K. Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns. [cited 2017 Oct 29]; Available from:
    1. Okuyama A, Wagner C, Bijnen B. Speaking up for patient safety by hospital-based health care professionals: a literature review. [cited 2017. October 29]; Available from:
    1. Schwappach DLB, Gehring K. “Saying it without words”: a qualitative study of oncology staff’s experiences with speaking up about safety concerns. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2014. May 16 [cited 2017 Dec 2];4(5):e004740 Available from: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004740
    1. Schwappach D, Sendlhofer G, Häsler L, Gombotz V, Leitgeb K, Hoffmann M, et al. Speaking up behaviors and safety climate in an Austrian university hospital. Int J Qual Heal Care [Internet]. 2018. April 26 [cited 2018 Jul 23]; Available from:
    1. der Vossen MM, van Mook W, Croiset G, Kusurkar R. Simulated Patient’s Perspective on Speaking up about Unprofessional Behavior: Qual Prim Care [Internet]. 2018. February 15 [cited 2018 May 6];26(1). Available from:
    1. Samuel R, Shuen A, Dendle C, Kotsanas D, Scott C, Stuart RL. Hierarchy and Hand Hygiene: Would Medical Students Speak Up to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Infection? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 2012. August 2 [cited 2018 May 20];33(08):861–3. Available from:
    1. Schwappach DLB. Speaking up about hand hygiene failures: A vignette survey study among healthcare professionals. Am J Infect Control [Internet]. 2018. April 9 [cited 2018 Jul 23]; Available from:
    1. Martinez W, Lehmann LS, Thomas EJ, Etchegaray JM, Shelburne JT, Hickson GB, et al. Speaking up about traditional and professionalism-related patient safety threats: a national survey of interns and residents. BMJ Qual Saf [Internet]. 2017. November 1 [cited 2018 Sep 2];26(11):869–80. Available from: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006284
    1. Reeves SA, Denault D, Huntington JT, Ogrinc G, Southard DR, Vebell R. Learning to Overcome Hierarchical Pressures to Achieve Safer Patient Care. Nurse Educ [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2018 May 6];42:S27–31. Available from:
    1. Rees CE, Monrouxe LV., McDonald LA. ‘My mentor kicked a dying woman’s bed…’ Analysing UK nursing students’ ‘most memorable’ professionalism dilemmas. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2015. January [cited 2018 Jul 23];71(1):169–80. Available from: 10.1111/jan.12457
    1. Bickhoff L, Sinclair PM, Levett-Jones T. Moral courage in undergraduate nursing students: A literature review. Collegian [Internet]. 2017. February 1 [cited 2018 May 6];24(1):71–83. Available from:
    1. Doyle P, Vandenkerkhof EG, Edge DS, Ginsburg L, Goldstein DH. Self-reported patient safety competence among Canadian medical students and postgraduate trainees: a cross-sectional survey. [cited 2019 May 1]; Available from: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003142
    1. American Nurses Association., Kent State University. School of Nursing. Online journal of issues in nursing. [Internet]. Kent State University School of Nursing in partnership with the American Nurses’ Association; 1996 [cited 2018 Jul 23].
    1. Bradbury-Jones C, Sambrook S, Irvine F. The meaning of empowerment for nursing students: a critical incident study. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2007. August [cited 2018 Jul 23];59(4):342–51. Available from: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04331.x
    1. Human Medicine. cited 2019 Sep 4. Available from:
    1. Burns KEA, Duffett M, Kho ME, Meade MO, Adhikari NKJ, Sinuff T, et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. Can Med J 2008; 179(3): 245–252.
    1. Richard A, Pfeiffer Y, Schwappach DDL. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire. J Patient Saf [Internet]. 2017. August 28 [cited 2018 Sep 1];1 Available from:
    1. Cuzick J. 1985. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Statistics in Medicine 4: 87–90 10.1002/sim.4780040112
    1. Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ [Internet]. 2016. May 3 [cited 2017 Nov 4];353:i2139 Available from: 10.1136/bmj.i2139
    1. Walton M, Woodward H, Van Staalduinen S, Lemer C, Greaves F, Noble D, et al. The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools. BMJ Qual Saf [Internet]. 2010. December 1 [cited 2018 Sep 9];19(6):542–6. Available from:
    1. Coleman DL, Wardrop RM, Levinson WS, Zeidel ML, Parsons PE. Strategies for Developing and Recognizing Faculty Working in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety. Acad Med [Internet]. 2017. January [cited 2018 Sep 2];92(1):52–7. Available from: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001230
    1. Patient Safety Curriculum Guide Multi-professional Edition [Internet]. 2011. [cited 2018 Sep 2].
    1. Sandars J, Bax N, Mayer D, Wass V, Vickers R. Educating undergraduate medical students about patient safety: Priority areas for curriculum development. Med Teach [Internet]. 2007. January 3 [cited 2018 Sep 9];29(1):60–1. Available from: 10.1080/01421590601087546
    1. Anderson E, Thorpe L, Heney D, Petersen S. Medical students benefit from learning about patient safety in an interprofessional team. Med Educ [Internet]. 2009. June [cited 2018 Sep 9];43(6):542–52. Available from: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03328.x
    1. Dao DK, Goss AL, Hoekzema AS, Kelly LA, Logan AA, Mehta SD, et al. Integrating Theory, Content, and Method to Foster Critical Consciousness in Medical Students. Acad Med [Internet]. 2017. March [cited 2018 Sep 2];92(3):335–44. Available from:
    1. Escher C, Creutzfeldt J, Meurling L, Hedman L, Kjellin A, Felländer-Tsai L. Medical students’ situational motivation to participate in simulation based team training is predicted by attitudes to patient safety. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2017. December 10 [cited 2018 Sep 2];17(1):37 Available from: 10.1186/s12909-017-0876-5
    1. Ogunlayi F, Britton P. Achieving a "top-down" change agenda by driving and supporting a collaborative "bottom-up" process: case study of a large enhanced revovery programme. BMJ Open Quality 2017;6:e000008 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000008

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever