Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect

I Schindler, G Kerkhoff, H-O Karnath, I Keller, G Goldenberg, I Schindler, G Kerkhoff, H-O Karnath, I Keller, G Goldenberg

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether neck muscle vibration is an effective technique for neglect rehabilitation, with lasting beneficial effects.

Methods: The effects of differential treatment of visual exploration training alone or in combination with neck muscle vibration were evaluated in a crossover study of two matched groups of 10 patients suffering from left sided neglect. Each group received a sequence of 15 consecutive sessions of exploration training and combined treatment. The effects of treatment were assessed with respect to different aspects of the neglect disorder such as impaired perception of the egocentric midline, exploration deficits in visual and tactile modes, and visual size distortion. The transfer of treatment effects to activities of daily living was examined by a reading test and a questionnaire of neglect related everyday problems. All variables were measured six times: three baseline measurements, two post-treatment measurements, and one follow up after two months.

Results: The results showed superior effects of combination treatment. A specific and lasting reduction in the symptoms of neglect was achieved in the visual mode, which transferred to the tactile mode with a concomitant improvement in activities of daily living. The improvement was evident two months after the completion of treatment. In contrast, isolated exploration training resulted in only minor therapeutic benefits in visual exploration without any significant transfer effects to other tasks.

Conclusions: Neck muscle vibration is a decisive factor in the rehabilitation of spatial neglect and induces lasting recovery when given as a supplement to conventional exploration training.

References

    1. Neuron. 1998 Jan;20(1):15-24
    1. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000 Apr;10(2):242-9
    1. Exp Brain Res. 2002 Apr;143(3):350-8
    1. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Apr;35(4):435-44
    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 May;17(3):383-9
    1. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:303-30
    1. Brain. 1994 Oct;117 ( Pt 5):1001-12
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;55(9):799-805
    1. J Neurol. 1996 Apr;243(4):308-14
    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1992 Nov;14(6):901-23
    1. Brain. 1993 Apr;116 ( Pt 2):383-96
    1. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2000;16(1):1-4
    1. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(5):609-22
    1. Brain. 2002 Mar;125(Pt 3):608-23
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1995;105(2):321-4
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1977 Nov;58(11):479-86
    1. Nature. 1998 Sep 10;395(6698):169-72
    1. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(7):1073-86
    1. Neuroreport. 1999 Feb 5;10(2):319-23
    1. Brain. 1988 Dec;111 ( Pt 6):1405-24
    1. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
    1. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1998;12(1):27-40
    1. Cortex. 1990 Dec;26(4):541-54
    1. Curr Opin Neurol. 1999 Dec;12(6):703-8
    1. Neurology. 1980 May;30(5):509-17
    1. Stroke. 1997 Jul;28(7):1386-91
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1996 May;109(2):333-42
    1. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(4):390-6
    1. Neurology. 1985 Jul;35(7):1019-24
    1. Disabil Rehabil. 1992 Jan-Mar;14(1):51-60
    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Jul 29;354(1387):1325-46
    1. Nat Neurosci. 1998 May;1(1):17-22
    1. Cortex. 1995 Dec;31(4):669-83
    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 May;17(3):416-30
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Jun;55(6):431-6
    1. Curr Biol. 1995 Jan 1;5(1):85-9
    1. Nature. 1998 Sep 10;395(6698):166-9
    1. Neuroreport. 1994 Apr 14;5(8):869-72
    1. Nature. 1995 Feb 9;373(6514):521-3

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever