A prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the TAXUS Element paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions: design and statistical methods of the PERSEUS clinical program

Dominic J Allocco, Louis A Cannon, Amy Britt, John E Heil, Andrey Nersesov, Scott Wehrenberg, Keith D Dawkins, Dean J Kereiakes, Dominic J Allocco, Louis A Cannon, Amy Britt, John E Heil, Andrey Nersesov, Scott Wehrenberg, Keith D Dawkins, Dean J Kereiakes

Abstract

Background: Paclitaxel-eluting stents decrease angiographic and clinical restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention compared to bare metal stents. TAXUS Element is a third-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent which incorporates a novel, thinner-strut, platinum-enriched metal alloy platform. The stent is intended to have enhanced radiopacity and improved deliverability compared to other paclitaxel-eluting stents. The safety and efficacy of the TAXUS Element stent are being evaluated in the pivotal PERSEUS clinical trials.

Methods/design: The PERSEUS trials include two parallel studies of the TAXUS Element stent in single, de novo coronary atherosclerotic lesions. The PERSEUS Workhorse study is a prospective, randomized (3:1), single-blind, non-inferiority trial in subjects with lesion length < or = 28 mm and vessel diameter > or = 2.75 mm to < or = 4.0 mm which compares TAXUS Element to the TAXUS Express2 paclitaxel-eluting stent system. The Workhorse study employs a novel Bayesian statistical approach that uses prior information to limit the number of study subjects exposed to the investigational device and thus provide a safer and more efficient analysis of the TAXUS Element stent. PERSEUS Small Vessel is a prospective, single-arm, superiority trial in subjects with lesion length < or = 20 mm and vessel diameter > or = 2.25 mm to <2.75 mm that compares TAXUS Element with a matched historical bare metal Express stent control.

Discussion: The TAXUS PERSEUS clinical trial program uses a novel statistical approach to evaluate whether design and metal alloy iterations in the TAXUS Element stent platform provide comparable safety and improved procedural performance compared to the previous generation Express stent. PERSEUS trial enrollment is complete and primary endpoint data are expected in 2010. PERSEUS Workhorse and Small Vessel are registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identification numbers NCT00484315 and NCT00489541.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PERSEUS WH and PERSEUS SV Study Schematic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Strength and flexibility of the TAXUS Element stent compared to TAXUS Express and TAXUS Liberté stents. (A) Stent integrity, as measured by an accelerated life test of the bending fatigue of a stent in a simulated overlapped stent configuration, showing number of bend cycles before stent fracture. The test is conducted by mounting one end of a nominally deployed stent to a fixed mandrel while the other end is mounted to a mandrel suspended in a flexible membrane. The membrane mounted end of the stent is translated perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the stent to impart a repeatable bend in the stent. (B) Conformability - a measure of the torque required to bend the stent to a specific curvature, which is directly related to flexibility of the stent. Lower required bending moment indicates increased flexibility. N = 15 for each stent type. Bars represent ± 1 standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Express, Liberté, and Element stent architecture; (B) Radiographic comparison of Element and Express stents. Radiographic image was generated using a General Electric OEC 9800 Digital Imaging System at operating conditions of 51 kV and 11.66 mA. No anatomical simulating phantom was used during imaging.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fibrin deposition around stent struts following TAXUS stent implantation in porcine coronary arteries. Swine coronary arteries were implanted with overlapping bare metal or TAXUS Express, TAXUS Liberté, or TAXUS Element paclitaxel-eluting stents and examined at 30, 90, and 180 days using light microscopy. Peristrut fibrin deposition was evaluated by study pathologists and scored on a 0-3 scale where 0 = no visible fibrin, 1 = mild fibrin present, 2 = moderate fibrin present, 3 = extensive fibrin present. Trichrome stained sections, 200× plate magnification. See Seifert et al., 2007 for more detailed methods [29]. (A) Example specimens at 180 days showing peristrut fibrin deposition histology. Number of specimens in each category is shown as n/N. (B) Number of specimens with extensive fibrin deposition (score 3) at each timepoint. There were no significant differences among control bare metal stents in any of the studies.

References

    1. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ, Russell ME. TAXUS-IV Investigators. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:221–231. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032441.
    1. Turco MA, Ormiston JA, Popma JJ, Mandinov L, O'Shaughnessy CD, Mann T, McGarry TF, Wu CJ, Chan C, Webster MW, Hall JJ, Mishkel GJ, Cannon LA, Baim DS, Koglin J. Polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Liberte stent in de novo lesions: The Pivotal TAXUS ATLAS Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1676–1683. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.069.
    1. Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, Schofer J, Dawkins KD, Morice MC, Colombo A, Schampaert E, Grube E, Kirtane AJ, Cutlip DE, Fahy M, Pocock SJ, Mehran R, Leon MB. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:998–1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067193.
    1. Pache J, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schuhlen H, Dotzer F, Hausleiter J, Fleckenstein M, Neumann FJ, Sattelberger U, Schmitt C, Müller M, Dirschinger J, Schömig A. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO-2) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1283–1288. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00119-0.
    1. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, Dotzer F, Schuhlen H, Neumann FJ, Fleckenstein M, Pfafferott C, Seyfarth M, Schomig A. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial. Circulation. 2001;103:2816–2821.
    1. Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, Holmes DR, Jones RH, Sharma S, King SB III. Incomplete Revascularization in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents: Impact on Adverse Outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2009;2:17–25.
    1. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, Mann JT, Greenberg JD, Spriggs D, O'Shaughnessy CD, DeMaio S, Hall P, Popma JJ, Koglin J, Russell ME. TAXUS V Investigators. Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:1215–1223. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1215.
    1. Lasala JM, Cox DA, Lewis SJ, Tadros PN, Haas RC, Schweiger MJ, Chhabra A, Untereker WJ, Starzyk RM, Mascioli SR, Dawkins KD, Baim DS. Expanded Use of the TAXUS Express Stent: 2-Year Insights on Safety from the 7500 Patient ARRIVE Registry Programme. EuroIntervention. 2009;5:67–77.
    1. Ahmed W, Zambahari R, Al-Rashdan I, Al Naeemi A, Saeed FA, Mascioli S. One-Year Outcomes with the TAXUS Liberte Stent in the Real World: The TAXUS OLYMPIA Registry (Phase I) J Interv Cardiol. 2008;21:512–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00395.x.
    1. Ormiston JA, Mahmud E, Turco MA, Popma JJ, Weissman N, Cannon LA, Mann T, Lucca MJ, Lim S-T, Hall JJ, McClean D, Dobies D, Mandinov L, Baim DS. Direct Stenting With the TAXUS Liberte Drug-Eluting Stent: Results From the TAXUS ATLAS DIRECT STENT Study. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2008;1:150–160.
    1. Turco MA, Ormiston JA, Popma JJ, Hall JJ, Mann T, Cannon LA, Webster MWI, Mishkel GJ, O'Shaughnessy CD, McGarry TF, Mandinov L, Dawkins KD, Baim DS. Reduced Risk of Restenosis in Small Vessels and Reduced Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Long Lesions With the New Thin-Strut TAXUS Liberté Stent: 1-Year Results From the TAXUS ATLAS Program. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2008;1:699–709.
    1. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW. Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007;115:2344–2351. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.
    1. King SB, Smith SC Jr, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Morrison DA, Williams DO, Feldman TE, Kern MJ, O'Neill WW, Schaff HV, Whitlow PL, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee. Circulation. 2008;117:261–295. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188208.
    1. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Deligonul U, Topol EJ, Bulle TM. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation. 1990;82:1193–1202.
    1. Ellis SG, Popma JJ, Lasala JM, Koglin JJ, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Stone GW. Relationship between angiographic late loss and target lesion revascularization after coronary stent implantation: analysis from the TAXUS-IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1193–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.063.
    1. Berry DA. Bayesian clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:27–36. doi: 10.1038/nrd1927.
    1. Guidance for the Use of Bayesian Statistics in Medical Device Clinical Trials - Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. 2006.
    1. Pennello G, Thompson L. Experience with reviewing Bayesian medical device trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18:81–115. doi: 10.1080/10543400701668274.
    1. Turco M, Grube E. Taxus Clinical Update-Experts discuss the current role of the Taxus stent. Cardiac Intervent Today. 2008;September:34–39.
    1. Malec D. A closer look at combining data among a small number of binomial experiments. Stat Med. 2001;20:1811–1824. doi: 10.1002/sim.782.
    1. Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, Farhat N, Mahaffey KW, Cutlip DE, Fitzgerald PJ, Sood P, Su X, Lansky AJ. SPIRIT III Investigators. Comparison of an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1903–1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1903.
    1. Windecker S, Serruys PW, Wandel S, Buszman P, Trznadel S, Linke A, Lenk K, Ischinger T, Klauss V, Eberli F, Corti R, Wijns W, Morice MC, di Mario C, Davies S, van Geuns RJ, Eerdmans P, van Es GA, Meier B, Jüni P. Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2008;372:1163–1173. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61244-1.
    1. ASTM Standard F2079, Standard Test Method for Measuring Intrinsic Elastic Recoil of Balloon-Expandable Stents. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2002.
    1. Steiner R. ASM Handbook:: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys. 10. Vol. 1. Materials Park, OH: ASM International; 1990.
    1. Thompson C, Huibregtse B, Poff B, Wilson G. Time Dependent Vascular and Myocardial Responses of a Second Generation, Small Vessel, Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Platform. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:597–604. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21890.
    1. Virmani R, Farb A. Pathology of in-stent restenosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999;10:499–506. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199912000-00004.
    1. Wilson GJ, Polovick JE, Huibregtse BA, Poff BC. Overlapping paclitaxel-eluting stents: Long-term effects in a porcine coronary artery model. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;76:361–372. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.07.004.
    1. Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. A review of current devices and a look at new technology: drug-eluting stents. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6:33–42. doi: 10.1586/17434440.6.1.33.
    1. Seifert PS, Huibregtse BA, Polovick J, Poff B. Early vascular response to overlapped paclitaxel-eluting stents in swine coronary arteries. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2007;8:251–258. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2007.08.002.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever