Psychometric evaluation of the internalized stigma of mental illness scale for patients with mental illnesses: measurement invariance across time

Chih-Cheng Chang, Tsung-Hsien Wu, Chih-Yin Chen, Jung-Der Wang, Chung-Ying Lin, Chih-Cheng Chang, Tsung-Hsien Wu, Chih-Yin Chen, Jung-Der Wang, Chung-Ying Lin

Abstract

Background: The current investigation examined the psychometric properties of the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale in a sample of patients with mental illness. In addition to the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity that previous studies have tested for the ISMI, we extended the evaluation to its construct validity and measurement invariance using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Methods: Three hundred forty-seven participants completed two questionnaires (i.e., the ISMI and the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale [DSSS]), and 162 filled out the ISMI again after 50.23±31.18 days.

Results: The results of this study confirmed the frame structure of the ISMI; however, the Stigma Resistance subscale in the ISMI seemed weak. In addition, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were all satisfactory for all subscales and the total score of the ISMI, except for Stigma Resistance (α = 0.66; ICC = 0.52, and r = 0.02 to 0.06 with DSSS). Therefore, we hypothesize that Stigma Resistance is a new concept rather than a concept in internalized stigma. The acceptable fit indices supported the measurement invariance of the ISMI across time, and suggested that people with mental illness interpret the ISMI items the same at different times.

Conclusion: The clinical implication of our finding is that clinicians, when they design interventions, may want to use the valid and reliable ISMI without the Stigma Resistance subscale to evaluate the internalized stigma of people with mental illness.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Angermeyer MC, Dietrich S (2006) Public beliefs about and attitudes towards people with mental illness: A review of population studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 113: 163–179.
    1. Jacobasson L, Ghanea H, Törnkvist B (2013) Internalized stigma of mental illness in Sweden and Iran—A comparative study. Open J Psychiatr 3: 370–374.
    1. Link BG, Phelan JC (2001) Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 27: 363–385.
    1. Link BG, Mirotznik J, Cullen FT (1991) The effectiveness of stigma coping orientations: Can negative consequences of mental illness labeling be avoided? J Health Soc Behav 32: 302–320.
    1. Link BG, Struening EL, Neese-Todd S, Asmussen S, Phelan JC (2001) Stigma as a barrier to recovery: The consequences of stigma for the self-esteem of people with mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv 52: 1621–1626.
    1. Sibitz I, Amering M, Unger A, Seyringer ME, Bachmann A, et al. (2011) The impact of the social network, stigma and empowerment on the quality of life in patients with schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 26: 28–33.
    1. Ritsher (Boyd) J, Otilingam PG, Grajales M (2003) Internalized stigma of mental illness: Psychometric properties of a new measure. Psychiatry Res 121: 31–49.
    1. Brohan E, Slade M, Clement S, Thornicroft G (2010) Experiences of mental illness stigma, prejudice and discrimination: a review of measures. BMC Health Serv Res 10: : 80. Available: . Accessed 2014 Jan 4.
    1. Boyd JE, Emerald PA, Otilingam PG, Peters T (2014) Internalized stigma of mental illness (ISMI) scale: A multinational review. Compr Psychiatry 55: 221–231.
    1. Link BG, Struening EL, Rahav M, Phelan JC, Nuttbrock L (1997) On stigma and its consequences: Evidence from a longitudinal study of men with dual diagnoses of mental illness and substance abuse. J Health Soc Behav 38: 177–190.
    1. Ersoy MA, Varan A (2007) Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the internalized stigma of mental illness scale [in Turkish]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 18: 163–171.
    1. Hwang TY, Lee WK, Han ES, Kwon EJ (2006) A study on the reliability and validity of the Korean version of Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (K-ISMI) [in Korean]. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 45: 418–426.
    1. Sibitz I, Friedrich ME, Unger A, Bachmann A, Benesch T, et al. (2013) Internalized stigma of schizophrenia: Validation of the German version of the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness-Scale (ISMI) [in German]. Psychiatr Prax 40: 83–91.
    1. Rensen C, Bandyopadhyay S, Gopal PK, van Brakel WH (2010) Measuring leprosy-related stigma—A pilot study to validate a toolkit of instruments. Disabil Rehabil 33: 711–719.
    1. Sibitz I, Amering M, Unger A, Seyringer ME, Bachmann A, et al... (2006) Internalisiertes Stigma bei Personen mit einer Erkrangung aus dem schizophrenen Formenkreis: Validierung der ISMI (Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness) Skala. Forschungsbericht an den Medizinisch-Wissenschaftlichen Fonds des Burgermeisters der Bundeshauptstadt Wien. Projeckt Nr. 2396.
    1. Stevelink SA, Wu IC, Voorend CG, van Brakel WH (2012) The psychometric assessment of internalized stigma instruments: A systematic review. Stigma Res Action 2: 100–118.
    1. Medalia A, Revheim N (2002) Dealing with cognitive dysfunction associated with psychiatric disabilities: A handbook for families and friends of individuals with psychiatric disorders. New York State of Mental Health. Available: . Accessed 2014 Jan 4.
    1. Motl RW, Distefano C (2002) Longitudinal invariance of self-esteem and method effects associated with negatively worded items. Structural Equation Modeling 9: 562–578.
    1. Tang I-C, Chen H-Y, Wu H-C, Cheng S-R, Kao Y-R (2009) Perceptions of stigmatization and stigmatization experience—The example of people with spinal cord injuries and psychiatric disabilities [in Chinese]. Journal of Disability Research 7: 230–244.
    1. Hung C-I, Weng L-J, Su Y-J, Liu C-Y (2006) Depression and somatic symptoms scale: A new scale with both depression and somatic symptoms emphasized. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 60: 700–708.
    1. Lin C-Y, Luh W-M, Yang A-L, Su C-T, Wang J-D, et al. (2012) Psychometric properties and gender invariance of the Chinese version of the self-report Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0: Short form is acceptable. Qual Life Res 21: 177–182.
    1. Chan Y-H (2003) Biostatistics 104: Correlational analysis. Singapore Med J 44: 614–619.
    1. Hoyle RH, Panter AT (1995) Writing about structural equation modeling. In Hoyle RH, editor. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 158–176.
    1. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 3: 4–70.
    1. Schweizer K (2010) Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. Eur J Psychol Assess 26: 1–2.
    1. Chen F-F (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling 12: 471–492.
    1. Lin C-Y, Luh W-M, Cheng C-P, Yang A-L, Su C-T, et al. (2013) Measurement equivalence across child self-reports and parent-proxy reports in the Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 44: 583–590.
    1. Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST (2000) Reliability: What is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy 86: 94–99.
    1. Atkinson G, Nevill AM (1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26: 217–238.
    1. Brohan E, Elgie R, Satorius N, Thornicroft G (2010) Self-stigma, empowerment and perceived discrimination among people with schizophrenia in 14 European countries: The GAMIAN-Europe study. Schizophr Res 122: 232–238.
    1. Sibitz I, Unger A, Woppmann A, Zidek T, Amering M (2011) Stigma resistance in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 37: 316–323.
    1. Lin C-Y, Luh W-M, Cheng C-P, Yang A-L, Ma H-I (2014) Evaluating the wording effect and psychometric properties of the Kid-KINDL: using the multitrait-multimethod approach. Eur J Psychol Assess 30: 100–109.
    1. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88: 879–903.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever