Non-structural misalignments of body posture in the sagittal plane

Dariusz Czaprowski, Łukasz Stoliński, Marcin Tyrakowski, Mateusz Kozinoga, Tomasz Kotwicki, Dariusz Czaprowski, Łukasz Stoliński, Marcin Tyrakowski, Mateusz Kozinoga, Tomasz Kotwicki

Abstract

Background: The physiological sagittal spinal curvature represents a typical feature of good body posture in the sagittal plane. The cervical and the lumbar spine are curved anteriorly (lordosis), while the thoracic segment is curved posteriorly (kyphosis). The pelvis is inclined anteriorly, and the lower limbs' joints remain in a neutral position. However, there are many deviations from the optimal body alignment.The aim of this paper is to present the most common types of non-structural misalignments of the body posture in the sagittal plane.

Main body of the abstract: The most common types of non-structural misalignments of body posture in the sagittal plane are as follows: (1) lordotic, (2) kyphotic, (3) flat-back, and (4) sway-back postures. Each one may influence both the skeletal and the muscular system leading to the functional disturbance and an increased strain of the supporting structures. Usually, the disturbances localized within the muscles are analyzed in respect to their shortening or lengthening. However, according to suggestions presented in the literature, when the muscles responsible for maintaining good body posture (the so-called stabilizers) are not being stimulated to resist against gravity for an extended period of time, e.g., during prolonged sitting, their stabilizing function is disturbed by the hypoactivity reaction resulting in muscular weakness. The deficit of the locomotor system stability triggers a compensatory mechanism-the stabilizing function is overtaken by the so-called mobilizing muscles. However, as a side effect, such compensation leads to the increased activity of mobilizers (hyperactivity) and decreased flexibility, which may finally lead to the pathological chain of reaction within the musculoskeletal system.

Conclusions: There exist four principal types of non-structural body posture misalignments in the sagittal plane: lordotic posture, kyphotic posture, flat-back posture, and sway-back posture. Each of them can disturb the physiological loading of the musculoskeletal system in a specific way, which may lead to a functional disorder.When planning postural corrective exercises, not only the analysis of muscles in respect to their shortening and lengthening but also their hypoactivity and hyperactivity should be considered.

Keywords: Body posture; Corrective exercises; Faults of body posture; Flat-back posture; Kyphotic posture; Lordotic posture; Sway-back posture.

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.Written informed consent for publication of clinical images was obtained from the parents of the patient.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Good body posture in a 8-year-old boy—the head line (a) and the base line (b) overlaps each other (c). Note: AM—external auditory meatus; A—acromion; GT—greater trochanter; HF—head of fibula; LM—lateral malleolus
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A 12-year-old boy with non-structural sagittal misalignment of body posture: postural thoracic hyperkyphosis. a Front view. b Back view. c Side view. d Forward bend view
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A 14-year-old boy with structural sagittal misalignment of body posture: structural thoracic hyperkyphosis. a Front view. b Back view. c Side view. d Forward bend view
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A 12-year-old boy with thoracic hyperkyphosis developing in habitual standing position. a Habitual standing position, lateral view. b Prone habitual lying position reveals thoracic hyperkyphosis. c Active trunk extension causes correction—flattening of thoracic hyperkyphosis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A 14-year-old boy with structural thoracic hyperkyphosis. a Habitual standing position, lateral view. b Lying prone position reveals maintaining thoracic hyperkyphosis. c Active trunk extension does not decrease the thoracic hyperkyphosis
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Lordotic posture in a 9-year-old girl. a Habitual standing, lateral view, note the hyperextension of the knees and plantar flexion of the feet. b Corresponding schematic representation of the shortened (red) and lengthened (blue) skeletal muscles. Note: AM—external auditory meatus; A—acromion; GT—greater trochanter; HF—head of fibula; LM—lateral malleolus
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Kyphotic posture in a 13-year-old boy. a Habitual standing, lateral view. b Corresponding schematic representation of the shortened (red) and lengthened (blue) skeletal muscles. Note: AM—external auditory meatus; A—acromion; GT—greater trochanter; HF—head of fibula; LM—lateral malleolus
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Kyphotic-lordotic posture in a 12-year-old boy. a Habitual standing, lateral view. b Corresponding schematic representation of the shortened (red) and lengthened (blue) skeletal muscles. Note: AM—external auditory meatus; A—acromion; GT—greater trochanter; HF—head of fibula; LM—lateral malleolus
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Flat-back posture in a 9-year-old boy. a Habitual standing, lateral view. b corresponding schematic representation of the shortened (red) and lengthened (blue) skeletal muscles. Note: AM—external auditory meatus; A—acromion; GT—greater trochanter; HF—head of fibula; LM—lateral malleolus
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Sway-back posture in a 11-year-old boy. a Habitual standing, lateral view. b Corresponding schematic representation of the shortened (red) and lengthened (blue) skeletal muscles. Note: AM—external auditory meatus; A—acromion; GT – greater Trochanter; HF—head of fibula; LM—lateral malleolus
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
The angle between chest and a head indicates improper head position - protraction. Note: AM—external auditory meatus; A—acromion; GT—greater trochanter; HF—head of fibula; LM—lateral malleolus
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
A 10-year-old boy presenting a lordotic posture. Note the following elements: increased lumbar lordosis, increased anterior pelvic tilt
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
The maximal active knee extension keeping the hip flexed 90°—decreased flexibility of left hamstrings
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Trunk forward bend test—decreased flexibility of hamstrings and trunk
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Normal trunk flexion in sitting position with knees flexed

References

    1. Claus A, Hides JA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW. Different ways to balance the spine: subtle changes in sagittal spinal curves affect regional muscle activity. Spine. 2009;34(6):208–214. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181908ead.
    1. O’Sullivan PB, Grahamslaw KM, Kendell M, et al. The effect of different standing and sitting postures on trunk muscle activity in a pain-free population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:1238–1244. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00019.
    1. Kendall F, McCreary E, Provance PG, Rodgers M, Romani WA. Muscle testing and function with posture and pain. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
    1. Janssen MM, Kouwenhoven JW, Schlösser TP, Viergever MA, Bartels LW, Castelein RM, Vincken KL. Analysis of preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal infantile, juvenile, and adolescent spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(7):486–491. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f468cc.
    1. Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis. F.A. Davis Company, 2005.
    1. McGill S. Low Back Disorders-3rd Edition with Web Resource: Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation. Human Kinetics; 3 edition, Champaign, USA; 2015.
    1. Sahrmann S. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002.
    1. Comerford M, Mottram S. Kinetic control—e-book: the management of uncontrolled movement. 2012.
    1. Bergmark A. Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in the mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;230:20–24.
    1. Richardson CA, Hodges PW, Hides J. Therapeutic exercise for lumbopelvic stabilization: a motor control approach for the treatment and prevention of low back pain. 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
    1. Richardson C. The muscle designation debate: the experts respond. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2000;4(4):235–236.
    1. Richardson C, Bullock MI. Changes in muscle activity during fast alternating flexion-extension movements of the knee. Scand J of Rehabil Med. 1986;18:51–58.
    1. Appell HJ. Muscular atrophy following immobilization: a review. Sports Med. 1990;10:42. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199010010-00005.
    1. Hides JA, Stokes MJ, Saide M, Jull GA, Cooper DH. Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with acute/subacute low back pain. Spine. 1994;19:165–172. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199401001-00009.
    1. Dilani Mendis M, Hides JA, Wilson SJ, Grimaldi A, Belavý DL, Stanton W, Felsenberg D, Rittweger J, Richardson C. Effect of prolonged bed rest on the anterior hip muscles. Gait Posture. 2009;30(4):533–537. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.002.
    1. Hides JA, Belavý DL, Stanton W, Wilson SJ, Rittweger J, Felsenberg D, Richardson CA. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of trunk muscles during prolonged bed rest. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32(15):1687–1692. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074c386.
    1. Hides JA, Lambrecht G, Stanton WR, Damann V. Changes in multifidus and abdominal muscle size in response to microgravity: possible implications for low back pain research. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(Suppl 1):175–182. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4311-5.
    1. Hides JA, Belavý DL, Cassar L, Williams M, Wilson SJ, Richardson CA. Altered response of the anterolateral abdominal muscles to simulated weight-bearing in subjects with low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(3):410–418. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0827-2.
    1. Reeve A, Dilley A. Effects of posture on the thickness of transversus abdominis in pain-free subjects. Man Ther. 2009;14(6):679–684. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.02.008.
    1. Bogduk N, Twomey LT. Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine. 2. London: Chruchill Livingstone; 1991.
    1. Hides JA, Lambrecht G, Richardson CA, Stanton WR, Armbrecht G, Pruett C, Damann V, Felsenberg D, Belavý DL. The effects of rehabilitation on the muscles of the trunk following prolonged bed rest. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(5):808–818. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1491-x.
    1. Belavý DL, Richardson CA, Wilson SJ, Rittweger J, Felsenberg D. Superficial lumbopelvic muscle overactivity and decreased cocontraction after 8 weeks of bed rest. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32(1):232–239. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250170.53746.27.
    1. Lee DG. The Pelvic Girdle: An integration of clinical expertise and research. Churchill Livingstone; 4 edition USA; 2010.
    1. Bullock-Saxton J, Murphy D, Norris C, Richardson C, Tunnel P. The muscle designation debate: the experts respond. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2000;4(4):225–257. doi: 10.1054/jbmt.2000.0180.
    1. Kędra A, Czaprowski D. Sedentary behaviours of 10-19-year-old students with and without spinal pain. Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2015;1(96):143–148.
    1. Czaprowski D, Stoliński Ł, Szczygieł A, Kędra A. Sedentary behaviours of girls and boys aged 7-15. Polish Journal of Public Health. 2011;121(3):248–252.
    1. Solberg G. Postural disorders & musculoskeletal dysfunction. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
    1. Gajdosik RL, Albert CR, Mitman JJ. Influence of hamstring length on the standing position and flexion range of motion of the pelvic angle, lumbar angle, and thoracic angle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;20(4):213–219. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.20.4.213.
    1. Fujitani R, Jiromaru T, Kida N, Nomura T. Effect of standing postural deviations on trunk and hip muscle activity. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(7):1212–1215. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1212.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever