Pre-surgery evaluations by telephone decrease travel and cost for families of children with cerebral palsy

John D Robinson, John D Prochaska, David A Yngve, John D Robinson, John D Prochaska, David A Yngve

Abstract

Introduction: Children with cerebral palsy need highly specialized care. This can be very burdensome for families, particularly in large rural states, due to the need for long-distance travel to appointments. In this study, children undergoing the selective percutaneous myofascial lengthening surgery utilized a telephone-based telemedicine evaluation to assess for surgical eligibility. The goal was to avoid a separate preoperative clinic visit weeks before the surgery. If possible, eligibility was determined by telephone, and then, the patient could be scheduled for a clinic visit and possible surgery the next day, saving the family a trip. The purposes of the study were to calculate estimated reductions in miles traveled, in travel expenses, and in carbon emissions and to determine whether the telephone assessment was accurate and effective in determining eligibility for surgery.

Methods: From 2010 to 2012, 279 patients were retrospectively reviewed, and of those, 161 mailed four-page questionnaire and anteroposterior pelvis X-ray followed by a telephone conference. Geographic information system methods were used to geocode patients by location. Savings in mileage and travel costs were calculated. From 2014 to 2015, 195 patients were additionally studied to determine accuracy and effectiveness.

Results: The telephone prescreening method saved 106,070 miles in transportation over 3 years, a 38% reduction with US$55,326 in savings. Each family saved an average of 658 (standard deviation = 340) miles of travel and US$343.64 (standard deviation = US$178) in travel expenses. For each increase of 10 miles in distance from the health center, the odds of a patient utilizing telephone screening increased by 10% (odds ratio: 1.101, 95% confidence interval: 1.073-1.129, p < 0.001). After the telephone prescreening, 86% were determined to be likely candidates for the procedure. For 14%, a clinic visit only was scheduled, and they were not scheduled for surgery.

Conclusion: Families seeking specialized surgical care for their disabled children particularly benefited from this approach.

Keywords: Telemedicine; cerebral palsy; selective percutaneous myofascial lengthening; surgery; telehealth; telephone.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Those utilizing telephone screening were often from regions distant to the treating center.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Those not utilizing telephone screening were often from the region of the treating center.

References

    1. Mitsiokapa EA, Mavrogenis AF, Skouteli H, et al. Selective percutaneous myofascial lengthening of the lower extremities in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2010; 27: 335–343.
    1. Lee S, Broderick TJ, Haynes J, et al. The role of low-bandwidth telemedicine in surgical prescreening. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 1281–1283.
    1. Smith AC, Dowthwaite S, Agnew J, et al. Concordance between real-time telemedicine assessments and face-to-face consultations in paediatric otolaryngology. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 457–460.
    1. Rosser JC, Jr, Prosst RL, Rodas EB, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of portable low-bandwidth telemedical applications for postoperative followup: initial results. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191: 196–203.
    1. Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, et al. Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD002098.
    1. De la Torre-Diez I, Lopez-Coronado M, Vaca C, et al. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21: 81–85.
    1. Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, et al. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 427–447.
    1. Mistry H. Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 1–6.
    1. Miller EA. Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of the literature. J Telemed Telecare 2001; 7: 1–17.
    1. Wootton R, Bahaadinbeigy K, Hailey D. Estimating travel reduction associated with the use of telemedicine by patients and healthcare professionals: proposal for quantitative synthesis in a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 185.
    1. Russo JE, McCool RR, Davies L. VA telemedicine: an analysis of cost and time savings. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22: 209–215.
    1. Spaulding R, Belz N, DeLurgio S, et al. Cost savings of telemedicine utilization for child psychiatry in a rural Kansas community. Telemed J E Health 2010; 16: 867–871.
    1. Bidargaddi N, Bastiampillai T, Allison S, et al. Telephone-based low intensity therapy after crisis presentations to the emergency department is associated with improved outcomes. J Telemed Telecare 2015; 21: 385–391.
    1. Davis AM, Sampilo M, Gallagher KS, et al. Treating rural paediatric obesity through telemedicine vs. telephone: outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 22: 86–95.
    1. Raphael D, Waterworth S, Gott M. Telephone communication between practice nurses and older patients with long term conditions—a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 23: 142–148.
    1. Rowell PD, Pincus P, White M, et al. Telehealth in paediatric orthopaedic surgery in Queensland: a 10-year review. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84: 955–959.
    1. Edirippulige S, Reyno J, Armfield NR, et al. Availability, spatial accessibility, utilisation and the role of telehealth for multi-disciplinary paediatric cerebral palsy services in Queensland. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 22: 391–396.
    1. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). ArcGIS desktop: release 10.2. Redlands, CA: ESRI, (2013, accessed 15 January 2016).
    1. U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2014 American Community Survey 5-year estimates; using American FactFinder, (2014, accessed 15 January 2016).
    1. IRS announces 2010 standard mileage rates. IRS, 3 December, (2009, accessed 13 May 2016).
    1. IRS announces 2011 standard mileage rates. IRS, 3 December, (2010, accessed 13 May 2016).
    1. IRS announces 2012 standard mileage rates, most rates are the same as in July. IRS, 9 December, (2011, accessed 13 May 2016).
    1. EPA. Greenhouse gas emissions from a typical passenger vehicle. The United States Environment Protection Agency: Office of Transportation and Air Quality, (2014, accessed 13 May 2016).
    1. Hilty DM, Ingraham RL, Yang SP, et al. Multispecialty telephone and e-mail consultation for patients with developmental disabilities in rural California. Telemed J E Health 2004; 10: 413–421.
    1. Vo A, Shore J, Waugh M, et al. Meaningful use: a national framework for integrated telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21: 355–363.
    1. Holmner A, Ebi KL, Lazuardi L, et al. Carbon footprint of telemedicine solutions—unexplored opportunity for reducing carbon emissions in the health sector. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e105040.
    1. Lewis D, Tranter G, Axford AT. Use of videoconferencing in Wales to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, travel costs and time. J Telemed Telecare 2009; 15: 137–138.
    1. Yellowlees PM, Chorba K, Parish MB, et al. Telemedicine can make healthcare greener. Telemed J E Health 2010; 16: 230–233.
    1. Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Fossel AH, et al. The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire: report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Pediatric Outcomes Instrument Development Group. Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998; 18(5): 561–571.
    1. Hunt A, Goldman A, Seers K, et al. Clinical validation of the paediatric pain profile. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004; 46(1): 9–18.
    1. Novacheck TF, Stout JL, Tervo R. Reliability and validity of the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire as an outcome measure in children with walking disabilities. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000; 20(1): 75–81.
    1. Graham HK, Harvey A, Rodda J, et al. The Functional Mobility Scale (FMS). J Pediatr Orthop. 2004; 24(5): 514–520.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever