Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions

Sara Gaur, Kristian Altern Øvrehus, Damini Dey, Jonathon Leipsic, Hans Erik Bøtker, Jesper Møller Jensen, Jagat Narula, Amir Ahmadi, Stephan Achenbach, Brian S Ko, Evald Høj Christiansen, Anne Kjer Kaltoft, Daniel S Berman, Hiram Bezerra, Jens Flensted Lassen, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Sara Gaur, Kristian Altern Øvrehus, Damini Dey, Jonathon Leipsic, Hans Erik Bøtker, Jesper Møller Jensen, Jagat Narula, Amir Ahmadi, Stephan Achenbach, Brian S Ko, Evald Høj Christiansen, Anne Kjer Kaltoft, Daniel S Berman, Hiram Bezerra, Jens Flensted Lassen, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard

Abstract

Aims: Coronary plaque characteristics are associated with ischaemia. Differences in plaque volumes and composition may explain the discordance between coronary stenosis severity and ischaemia. We evaluated the association between coronary stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT), and lesion-specific ischaemia identified by FFR in a substudy of the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).

Methods and results: Coronary CTA stenosis, plaque volumes, FFRCT, and FFR were assessed in 484 vessels from 254 patients. Stenosis >50% was considered obstructive. Plaque volumes (non-calcified plaque [NCP], low-density NCP [LD-NCP], and calcified plaque [CP]) were quantified using semi-automated software. Optimal thresholds of quantitative plaque variables were defined by area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) analysis. Ischaemia was defined by FFR or FFRCT ≤0.80. Plaque volumes were inversely related to FFR irrespective of stenosis severity. Relative risk (95% confidence interval) for prediction of ischaemia for stenosis >50%, NCP ≥185 mm(3), LD-NCP ≥30 mm(3), CP ≥9 mm(3), and FFRCT ≤0.80 were 5.0 (3.0-8.3), 3.7 (2.4-5.6), 4.6 (2.9-7.4), 1.4 (1.0-2.0), and 13.6 (8.4-21.9), respectively. Low-density NCP predicted ischaemia independent of other plaque characteristics. Low-density NCP and FFRCT yielded diagnostic improvement over stenosis assessment with AUCs increasing from 0.71 by stenosis >50% to 0.79 and 0.90 when adding LD-NCP ≥30 mm(3) and LD-NCP ≥30 mm(3) + FFRCT ≤0.80, respectively.

Conclusion: Stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, and FFRCT predict lesion-specific ischaemia. Plaque assessment and FFRCT provide improved discrimination of ischaemia compared with stenosis assessment alone.

Keywords: Computational fluid dynamics; Computed tomography angiography; Coronary plaque; Fractional flow reserve; Ischaemia.

© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case example. (A) Multiplanar reconstruction showing 50–70% stenosis (red arrow) in the left anterior descending artery. (B) Plaque analysis of the proximal portion of left anterior descending artery: non-calcified plaque 201 mm3 (red plus orange), low-density non-calcified plaque 35 mm3 (orange), and calcified plaque 41 mm3 (yellow). Total per-vessel plaque volumes: non-calcified plaque 454 mm3, low-density non-calcified plaque 85 mm3, and calcified plaque 50 mm3. (C) Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in the distal left anterior descending artery was 0.75. (D) Invasive coronary angiogram with a 60% stenosis in the proximal portion of left anterior descending artery (red arrow). Measured fractional flow reserve was 0.71.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of coronary stenosis severity in relation to fractional flow reserve.N = 484 vessels. Values shown are percentages within the fractional flow reserve groups, P < 0.001 for <30% stenosis, 51–70% stenosis, and >70% stenosis and P = 0.006 for the 30–50% stenosis category.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of coronary plaque volumes (A + C) and fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography values (B + D) in relation to fractional flow reserve.N = 484 vessels. Values shown are medians (interquartile range).
Figure 4
Figure 4
AUCs for discrimination of fractional flow reserve ≤0.80. AUC, area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve; CI, confidence interval; CTA, stenosis severity by coronary CTA; FFRCT, fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography; LD-NCP, low-density non-calcified plaque.

References

    1. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Boersma E, Regar E, van Geuns RJ, de Jaegere PJ, Serruys PW, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:636–643.
    1. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GB, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM, Weintraub WS, O'Rourke RA, Dada M, Spertus JA, Chaitman BR, Friedman J, Slomka P, Heller GV, Germano G, Gosselin G, Berger P, Kostuk WJ, Schwartz RG, Knudtson M, Veledar E, Bates ER, McCallister B, Teo KK, Boden WE, COURAGE Investigators. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008;117:1283–1291.
    1. Curzen N, Rana O, Nicholas Z, Golledge P, Zaman A, Oldroyd K, Hanratty C, Banning A, Wheatcroft S, Hobson A, Chitkara K, Hildick-Smith D, McKenzie D, Calver A, Dimitrov BD, Corbett S. Does routine pressure wire assessment influence management strategy at coronary angiography for diagnosis of chest pain? The RIPCORD study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:248–255.
    1. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, Stokkel MP, Dibbets-Schneider P, Decramer I, De Bondt P, van der Wall EE, Vanhoenacker PK, Bax JJ. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2508–2514.
    1. Park HB, Heo R, O Hartaigh B, Cho I, Gransar H, Nakazato R, Leipsic J, Mancini GB, Koo BK, Otake H, Budoff MJ, Berman DS, Erglis A, Chang HJ, Min JK. Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:1–10.
    1. Bauer RW, Thilo C, Chiaramida SA, Vogl TJ, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:410–418.
    1. Nakazato R, Shalev A, Doh JH, Koo BK, Gransar H, Gomez MJ, Leipsic J, Park HB, Berman DS, Min JK. Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:460–467.
    1. Shmilovich H, Cheng VY, Tamarappoo BK, Dey D, Nakazato R, Gransar H, Thomson LE, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Germano G, Slomka PJ, Berman DS. Vulnerable plaque features on coronary CT angiography as markers of inducible regional myocardial hypoperfusion from severe coronary artery stenoses. Atherosclerosis 2011;219:588–595.
    1. Nakazato R, Park HB, Gransar H, Leipsic JA, Budoff MJ, Mancini GB, Erglis A, Berman DS, Min JK. Additive diagnostic value of atherosclerotic plaque characteristics to non-invasive FFR for identification of lesions causing ischaemia: results from a prospective international multicentre trial. EuroIntervention 2015;11 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Sakurai S, Takashima H, Waseda K, Gosho M, Kurita A, Ando H, Maeda K, Suzuki A, Fujimoto M, Amano T. Influence of plaque characteristics on fractional flow reserve for coronary lesions with intermediate to obstructive stenosis: insights from integrated-backscatter intravascular ultrasound analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;31:1295–1301.
    1. Ahmadi A, Kini A, Narula J. Discordance between ischemia and stenosis, or PINSS and NIPSS: are we ready for new vocabulary? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:111–114.
    1. Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2233–2241.
    1. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS, Dunning A, DeFrance T, Lansky A, Leipsic J, Min JK. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1989–1997.
    1. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Apruzzese P, Budoff MJ, Cole JH, Jaffer FA, Leon MB, Malpeso J, Mancini GB, Park SJ, Schwartz RS, Shaw LJ, Mauri L. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 2012;308:1237–1245.
    1. Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, Jensen JM, Mauri L, De Bruyne B, Bezerra H, Osawa K, Marwan M, Naber C, Erglis A, Park SJ, Christiansen EH, Kaltoft A, Lassen JF, Botker HE, Achenbach S, NXT Trial Study Group. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1145–1155.
    1. Dey D, Schepis T, Marwan M, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Achenbach S. Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US. Radiology 2010;257:516–522.
    1. Gaur S, Achenbach S, Leipsic J, Mauri L, Bezerra HG, Jensen JM, Botker HE, Lassen JF, Norgaard BL. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013;7:279–288.
    1. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Boxt LM, Budoff MJ, Cheng V, DeFrance T, Hellinger JC, Karlsberg RP, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:122–136.
    1. Dey D, Achenbach S, Schuhbaeck A, Pflederer T, Nakazato R, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Marwan M. Comparison of quantitative atherosclerotic plaque burden from coronary CT angiography in patients with first acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014;8:368–374.
    1. Greiner M, Sohr D, Gobel P. A modified ROC analysis for the selection of cut-off values and the definition of intermediate results of serodiagnostic tests. J Immunol Methods 1995;185:123–132.
    1. Harrell FE., Jr Regression Modeling Strategies. 1st ed New York: Springer Series in Statistics; 2001.
    1. Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J 2014;35:1925–1931.
    1. Naya M, Murthy VL, Blankstein R, Sitek A, Hainer J, Foster C, Gaber M, Fantony JM, Dorbala S, Di Carli MF. Quantitative relationship between the extent and morphology of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and downstream myocardial perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1807–1816.
    1. Lavi S, Yang EH, Prasad A, Mathew V, Barsness GW, Rihal CS, Lerman LO, Lerman A. The interaction between coronary endothelial dysfunction, local oxidative stress, and endogenous nitric oxide in humans. Hypertension 2008;51:127–133.
    1. Ahmadi N, Ruiz-Garcia J, Hajsadeghi F, Azen S, Mack W, Hodis H, Lerman A. Impaired coronary artery distensibility is an endothelium-dependent process and is associated with vulnerable plaque composition. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2014. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Narula J, Nakano M, Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Petersen R, Newcomb R, Malik S, Fuster V, Finn AV. Histopathologic characteristics of atherosclerotic coronary disease and implications of the findings for the invasive and noninvasive detection of vulnerable plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1041–1051.
    1. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys PW, PROSPECT Investigators. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011;364:226–235.
    1. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K, Hara T, Naruse H, Ishii J, Hishida H, Wong ND, Virmani R, Kondo T, Ozaki Y, Narula J. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:49–57.
    1. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van't Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF, FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213–224.
    1. Patel MR. Detecting obstructive coronary disease with CT angiography and noninvasive fractional flow reserve. JAMA 2012;308:1269–1270.
    1. Gaur S, Bezerra HG, Lassen JF, Christiansen EH, Tanaka K, Jensen JM, Oldroyd KG, Leipsic J, Achenbach S, Kaltoft AK, Botker HE, Norgaard BL. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: variation of repeated analyses. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014;8:307–314.
    1. Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, Curzen N, Purcell I, Gutberlet M, Rioufol G, Hink U, Schuchlenz HW, Feuchtner G, Gilard M, Andreini D, Jensen JM, Hadamitzky M, Chiswell K, Cyr D, Wilk A, Wang F, Rogers C, De Bruyne B, PLATFORM Investigators. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFRCT: outcome and resource impacts study. Eur Heart J 2015;36:3359–3367.
    1. Leipsic J, Yang TH, Thompson A, Koo BK, Mancini GB, Taylor C, Budoff MJ, Park HB, Berman DS, Min JK. CT angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic CTA (DeFACTO) study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:989–994.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever