Safety of locating the tip of a medium-long catheter at the axillary front and clavicle midline: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Yali Zhao, Jie Geng, Xing Wu, Suiting Xiong, Liwei Wang, Juanxia Wang, Haijv Ma, Fengxian Wei, Zhihong Wei, Yali Zhao, Jie Geng, Xing Wu, Suiting Xiong, Liwei Wang, Juanxia Wang, Haijv Ma, Fengxian Wei, Zhihong Wei

Abstract

Background: Medium-long catheters are being used more and more widely in clinical practice, but we still do not know the impact of different placements, but this is an important clinical issue that cannot be ignored.

Objective: At present, the tip positioning of the mid-length catheter mainly includes the anterior part of the axilla and the midclavicular line. Different positioning may have different effects. Therefore, we did this research to confirm which positioning is more safety.

Methods: We systematically searched the Chinese and English databases: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network, China Biomedical Literature Database, VIP, Wan Fang. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation were carried out by 2 researchers, and finally, use Stata to carry out meta-analysis.

Results: This study is ongoing and the results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not applicable, since this is an overview based on published articles.

Protocol registration number: INPLASY2020110042.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of evidence search and selection.

References

    1. Oladapo OT, Okusanya BO, Abalos E, et al. Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;11:Cd009332.
    1. Okuya Y, Park JY, Garg A, et al. Coronary artery spasm during catheter ablation caused by the intravenous infusion of isoproterenol. Internal Med 2020.
    1. Xu D, Wu MR, Cao LJ. Application and nursing of medium and long catheter intravenous infusion method in critically ill patients in gastroenterology department. Electronic J Pract Clin Nurs 2020;5:30–1.
    1. Gu XL. Study on the related complications and nursing care of middle and long catheters. Electronic J Pract Clin Nurs 2019;4:81.
    1. Gorski LA. Infusion nursing standards of practice. J Infus Nurs 2007;30:151–2.
    1. Sharp R, Esterman A, McCutcheon H, et al. The safety and efficacy of midlines compared to peripherally inserted central catheters for adult cystic fibrosis patients: a retrospective, observational study. Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:694–702.
    1. Fu JQ. Clinical application of medium length catheter in peripheral vein. Chin Commun Phys 2011;13:272.
    1. Caparas JV, Hu JP. Safe administration of vancomycin through a novel midline catheter: a randomized, prospective clinical trial. J Vasc Access 2014;15:251–6.
    1. Catton JA, Davies J, Dobbins BM, et al. The effect of heparin in peripheral intravenous nutrition via a fine-bore midline: a randomised double-blind controlled trial. Clin Nutr 2006;25:394–9.
    1. Masters B, Hickish T, Cidon EU. A midline for oxaliplatin infusion: the myth of safety devices. BMJ Case Reports 20142014.
    1. Pathak R, Patel A, Enuh H, et al. The incidence of central line-associated bacteremia after the introduction of midline catheters in a ventilator unit population. Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md) 2015;23:131–4.
    1. Romesberg TL. Evaluating the evidence for midline catheter use in the newborn intensive care unit. J Infus Nurs 2015;38:420–9.
    1. Gao Y, Ge L, Ma X, et al. Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;113:214.e27.
    1. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:376–80.
    1. Higgins J, Gree.N.S E. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane collaboration (Eds). N-S Arch Pharmacol 2011;5:S38.
    1. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in Meta analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–5.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever