Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Soo Downe, Kenneth Finlayson, Özge Tunçalp, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Soo Downe, Kenneth Finlayson, Özge Tunçalp, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Abstract
Background: Antenatal care (ANC) is a core component of maternity care. However, both quality of care provision and rates of attendance vary widely between and within countries. Qualitative research can assess factors underlying variation, including acceptability, feasibility, and the values and beliefs that frame provision and uptake of ANC programmes.This synthesis links to the Cochrane Reviews of the effectiveness of different antenatal models of care. It was designed to inform the World Health Organization guidelines for a positive pregnancy experience and to provide insights for the design and implementation of improved antenatal care in the future.
Objectives: To identify, appraise, and synthesise qualitative studies exploring:· Women's views and experiences of attending ANC; and factors influencing the uptake of ANC arising from women's accounts;· Healthcare providers' views and experiences of providing ANC; and factors influencing the provision of ANC arising from the accounts of healthcare providers.
Search methods: To find primary studies we searched MEDLINE, Ovid; Embase, Ovid; CINAHL, EbscoHost; PsycINFO, EbscoHost; AMED, EbscoHost; LILACS, VHL; and African Journals Online (AJOL) from January 2000 to February 2019. We handsearched reference lists of included papers and checked the contents pages of 50 relevant journals through Zetoc alerts received during the searching phase.
Selection criteria: We included studies that used qualitative methodology and that met our quality threshold; that explored the views and experiences of routine ANC among healthy, pregnant and postnatal women or among healthcare providers offering this care, including doctors, midwives, nurses, lay health workers and traditional birth attendants; and that took place in any setting where ANC was provided.We excluded studies of ANC programmes designed for women with specific complications. We also excluded studies of programmes that focused solely on antenatal education.
Data collection and analysis: Two authors undertook data extraction, logged study characteristics, and assessed study quality. We used meta-ethnographic and Framework techniques to code and categorise study data. We developed findings from the data and presented these in a 'Summary of Qualitative Findings' (SoQF) table. We assessed confidence in each finding using GRADE-CERQual. We used these findings to generate higher-level explanatory thematic domains. We then developed two lines of argument syntheses, one from service user data, and one from healthcare provider data. In addition, we mapped the findings to relevant Cochrane effectiveness reviews to assess how far review authors had taken account of behavioural and organisational factors in the design and implementation of the interventions they tested. We also translated the findings into logic models to explain full, partial and no uptake of ANC, using the theory of planned behaviour.
Main results: We include 85 studies in our synthesis. Forty-six studies explored the views and experiences of healthy pregnant or postnatal women, 17 studies explored the views and experiences of healthcare providers and 22 studies incorporated the views of both women and healthcare providers. The studies took place in 41 countries, including eight high-income countries, 18 middle-income countries and 15 low-income countries, in rural, urban and semi-urban locations. We developed 52 findings in total and organised these into three thematic domains: socio-cultural context (11 findings, five moderate- or high-confidence); service design and provision (24 findings, 15 moderate- or high-confidence); and what matters to women and staff (17 findings, 11 moderate- or high-confidence) The third domain was sub-divided into two conceptual areas; personalised supportive care, and information and safety. We also developed two lines of argument, using high- or moderate-confidence findings:For women, initial or continued use of ANC depends on a perception that doing so will be a positive experience. This is a result of the provision of good-quality local services that are not dependent on the payment of informal fees and that include continuity of care that is authentically personalised, kind, caring, supportive, culturally sensitive, flexible, and respectful of women's need for privacy, and that allow staff to take the time needed to provide relevant support, information and clinical safety for the woman and the baby, as and when they need it. Women's perceptions of the value of ANC depend on their general beliefs about pregnancy as a healthy or a risky state, and on their reaction to being pregnant, as well as on local socio-cultural norms relating to the advantages or otherwise of antenatal care for healthy pregnancies, and for those with complications. Whether they continue to use ANC or not depends on their experience of ANC design and provision when they access it for the first time.The capacity of healthcare providers to deliver the kind of high-quality, relationship-based, locally accessible ANC that is likely to facilitate access by women depends on the provision of sufficient resources and staffing as well as the time to provide flexible personalised, private appointments that are not overloaded with organisational tasks. Such provision also depends on organisational norms and values that overtly value kind, caring staff who make effective, culturally-appropriate links with local communities, who respect women's belief that pregnancy is usually a normal life event, but who can recognise and respond to complications when they arise. Healthcare providers also require sufficient training and education to do their job well, as well as an adequate salary, so that they do not need to demand extra informal funds from women and families, to supplement their income, or to fund essential supplies.
Authors' conclusions: This review has identified key barriers and facilitators to the uptake (or not) of ANC services by pregnant women, and in the provision (or not) of good-quality ANC by healthcare providers. It complements existing effectiveness reviews of models of ANC provision and adds essential insights into why a particular type of ANC provided in specific local contexts may or may not be acceptable, accessible, or valued by some pregnant women and their families/communities. Those providing and funding services should consider the three thematic domains identified by the review as a basis for service development and improvement. Such developments should include pregnant and postnatal women, community members and other relevant stakeholders.
Conflict of interest statement
Soo Downe is an editor with the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group.
Kenny Finlayson, Özge Tunçalp, and A Metin Gülmezoglu have no interests to report.
Figures
References
References to studies included in this review Abrahams 2001 {published data only}
- Abrahams N, Jewkes R, Mvo Z. Health care‐seeking practices of pregnant women and the role of the midwife in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health 2001;46(40):240‐7.
- Agus Y, Horiuchi S, Porter SE. Rural Indonesia women’s traditional beliefs about antenatal care. BMC Research Notes 2012;5:589. [.]
- Alderson P, Williams C, Farsides B. Pracitioners’ views about equity within prenatal services. Sociology 2004;38(1):61‐80.
- Andrew EV, Pell C, Angwin A, Auwun A, Daniels J, Mueller I, et al. Factors affecting attendance at and timing of formal antenatal care: results from a qualitative study in Madang, Papua New Guinea. PLOS One 2014;9(5):e93025. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093025]
- Armstrong TM, Pooley JA. Being pregnant: a qualitative study of women's lived experience of being pregnant. Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health 2005;20(1):4‐25.
- Ayala LS, Blumenthal PD, Sarnquist CC. Factors influencing women’s decision to seek antenatal care in the Andes of Peru. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2013;17(6):1112‐18. [DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1113-9]
- Ayiasi MR, Royen K, Verstraeten R, Atuyambe L, Criel B, Garimoi CO, et al. Exploring the focus of prenatal information offered to pregnant mothers regarding newborn care in rural Uganda. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2013;13:176. []
- Baffour‐Awuah A, Mwini‐Nyaledzigbor PP, Richter S. Enhancing focused antenatal care in Ghana: an exploration into perceptions of practicing midwives. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences 2015;2:59‐64.
- Bessett D. Negotiating normalization: the perils of producing pregnancy symptoms in prenatal care. Social Science & Medicine 2010;71(2):370‐7.
- Biondi HS, Pinho EC, Kirchhof AL, Rocha LP, Costa Kerber NP. Workloads and inter‐relationships with the program for the humanization of prenatal and childbirth care. Cogitare Enfermagem 2018;23(3):e52801. [DOI: ]
- Bradley EH, Byam P, Alpern R, Thompson JW, Zerihun A, Abeb Y, et al. A systems approach to improving rural care in Ethiopia. PLOS One 2012;7(4):e35042. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.00350422013]
- Cabral FB, Hirt LM, Sand IS. Prenatal care from puerperal women’s point of view: from medicalization to the fragmentation of care. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P 2013;47(2):281‐7.
- Cardelli AA, Marrero TL, Ferrari RA, Martins JT, Serafim D. Expectations and satisfaction of pregnant women: unveiling prenatal care in primary care. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería 2016;34(2):252‐60. [DOI: 10.17533/udea.lee.v34n2a04]
- Chapman RR. Endangering safe motherhood in Mozambique: prenatal care as pregnancy risk. Social Science and Medicine 2003;57(2):355‐74.
- Chimezie RO. A Case Study of Primary Healthcare Services in Isu, Nigeria [Dissertation]. Minneapolis: Walden University, 2013. [Available from ]
- Choudhury N, Ahmed SM. Maternal care practices among the ultra‐poor households in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2011;11:15. [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-15]
- Chowdhury AM, Mahbub A, Chowdhury AS. Skilled attendance at delivery in Bangladesh: an ethnographic study. Research Monograph Series 2003; Vol. 22. [ ]
- Conrad P, Allegri M, Moses A, Larsson EC, Neuhann F, Müller O, et al. Antenatal care services in rural Uganda: missed opportunities for good‐quality care. Qualitative Health Research 2012;22(5):619‐29.
- Coverston CR, Franklin CY, Davis JP. Seeking safe passage: Argentine women's experiences of prenatal care. Health Care for Women International 2004;25(7):620‐35.
- Dako‐Gyeke P, Aikins M, Aryeetey R, Mccough L, Adongo PB. The influence of socio‐cultural interpretations of pregnancy threats on health seeking behavior among pregnant women in urban Accra, Ghana. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2013;13:211. []
- Castro ME, Moura, MA, Silva LM. Quality of prenatal assistance: A perspective of the new puerpera’s. Revista da Rede de Enfermagem do Nordeste 2010;11:72‐81.
- Docherty A, Bugge C, Watterson A. Engagement: an indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care from pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Health Expectations 2011;15(2):126‐38.
- Duarte SJ. Reasons that pregnant women visit prenatal care: a social representation study. Ciencia y Enfermería 2012;18(2):75‐82.
- Earle S. Pregnancy and the maintenance of self‐identity: implications for antenatal care in the community. Health and Social Care in the Community 2000;8(4):235‐41.
- Family Care International. Care seeking during pregnancy, delivery and the post‐partum period: a study in Hombay and Migori districts, Kenya. 2003; Vol. (accessed 20 May 2019).
- Franngard C, Hansveden A, Lijestrand J. Compassion and severe challenges: an exploratory study of being a midwife in rural Uganda. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2006;16(4):461‐6.
- Ganle JK, Parker M, Fitzpatrick R, Otupiri E. A qualitative study of health system barriers to accessibility and utilization of maternal and newborn healthcare services in Ghana after user‐fee abolition. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014;14:425. [DOI: 10.1186/s12884-014-0425-8]
- Gheibizadeh M, Ali Abedi H, Mohammadi E, Abedi P. Iranian women and care providers' perceptions of equitable prenatal care: A qualitative study. Nursing Ethics 2016;23(4):465‐77.
- Graner S, Mogren I, Duong Le Q, Krantz G, Klingberg‐Allvin M. Maternal health care professionals’ perspectives on the provision and use of antenatal and delivery care: a qualitative descriptive study in rural Vietnam. BMC Public Health 2010;10:608. [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-608.; ]
- Graner S, Klingberg‐Allvin M, Duong LQ, Krantz G, Mogren I. Pregnant women’s perception on signs and symptoms during pregnancy and maternal health care in a rural low‐resource setting. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2013;92(9):1094‐100.
- Griffiths P, Stephenson R. Understanding users’ perspectives of barriers to maternal health care use in Maharashtra, India. Journal of Biosocial Science 2001;33(3):339‐59.
- Gross K, Schellenberg JA, Kessy F, Pfeiffer C, Obrist B. Antenatal care in practice: an exploratory study in antenatal care clinics in the Kilombero Valley, south eastern Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2011;11:36. [ ]
- Haddrill R, Jones GL, Mitchell CA, Anumba DO. Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014;14:207. [ ]
- Heaman MI, Sword W, Elliott L, Moffat M, Helewa ME, Morris H, et al. Perceptions of barriers, facilitators and motivators related to use of prenatal care: a qualitative descriptive study of inner‐city women in Winnipeg, Canada. SAGE Open Medicine 2015;3:2050312115621314. [DOI: ]
- Heberlein EC, Picklesimer AH, Billings DL, Covington‐Kolb S, Farber N, Frongillo EA. Qualitative comparison of womens perspectives on the functions and benefits of group and individual prenatal care. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2016;61(2):224‐34. [DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12379]
- Hunter A, Devane D, Houghton C, Grealish A, Tully A, Smith V. Woman‐centred care during pregnancy and birth in Ireland: thematic analysis of women's and clinicians' experiences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2017;17:322. [DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1521-3]
- Kabakian‐Khasholian T, Campbell O, Shediac‐Rizkallah M, Ghorayeb F. Women’s experiences of maternity care: satisfaction or passivity?. Social Science and Medicine 2000;51(1):103‐13.
- Khoso A, Khan AZ, Sayed SA, Rafique G. Perspectives regarding antenatal care, delivery and breastfeeding practices of women from Baluchistan, Pakistan. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad 2016;28(1):105‐9.
- Kraschnewski JL, Chuang CH, Poole ES, Peyton T, Blubaugh I, Pauli J, et al. Paging “Dr. Google”: does technology fill the gap created by the prenatal care visit structure? Qualitative Focus Group Study with pregnant women. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(6):e147. [DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3385]
- Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. What is the impact of the internet on decision making in pregnancy? a global study. Birth 2011;38(4):336‐45.
- Larsen GL, Lupiwa S, Kave HP, Gillieatt S, Alpers MP. Antenatal care in Goroka: issues and perceptions. Papua amd New Guinea Medical Journal 2004;47(3‐4):202‐14.
- Larsson A, Warna‐Furu C, Nasman Y. The meaning of caring in prenatal care from Swedish women’s perspectives. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2017;31(4):702‐9. [DOI: 10.1111/scs.12383]
- Lasso Toro P. Prenatal care: tensions or possible routes between culture and health system. Pensamiento Psicológico 2012;10(2):123‐133.
- Leal NJ, Barreiro MS, Mendes RB, Alves CK, Freitas C. Prenatal care: Nurses testimonial. Journal of Research: Fundamental Care Online 2018;10(1):113‐22. [DOI: ]
- LeMasters K, Wallis AB, Chereches R, Gichane M, Tehei C, Varga A, et al. Pregnancy experiences of women in rural Romania: understanding ethnic and socioeconomic disparities. Culture, Health & Sexuality 2018;21(3):249‐62. [DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1464208]
- Mahiti GR, Mkoka DA, Kiwara AD, Mbekenga CK, Hurtig AK, Goicolea I. Womens perceptions of antenatal delivery and postpartum services in rural Tanzania. Global Health Action 2015;8:28567. [DOI: ]
- Manithip C, Edin K, Sihavong A, Wahlstrom R, Wessel H. Poor quality of antenatal care services—Is lack of competence and support the reason? An observational and interview study in rural areas of Lao PDR. Midwifery 2013;29(3):195‐202.
- Maputle MS, Lebese RT, Khoza LB, Shilubane NH, Netshikweta LM. Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women towards antenatal care services at Tshino village, Vhembe district, South Africa. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance 2013;March(Supplement 1):126‐37.
- Mathole T, Linndmark G, Ahlberg BM. Dilemmas and paradoxes in providing and changing antenatal care: a study of nurses and midwives in rural Zimbabwe. Health Care Women International 2005;26(10):937‐56.
- Matsuoka S, Aiga H, Rasmey LC, Rathavy T, Okitsu A. Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia. Health Policy 2010;95(2‐3):255‐63.
- Mayca J, Palacios‐Flowers E, Medina A, Velasquez JE, Castañeda D. Perceptions of health personnel and the community in relation to the cultural appropriateness of maternal perinatal services in rural areas in the Andes and Amazon from Huanuco region. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica 2009;26(2):145‐160.
- McDonald SD, Sword W, Eryuzlu LE, Biringer AB. A qualitative descriptive study of the group prenatal care experience: perceptions of women with low‐risk pregnancies and their midwives. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014;14:334. [ ]
- McNeil DA, Vekved M, Dolan SM, Siever J, Horn S, Tough SC. Getting more than they realized they needed: a qualitative study of women's experience of group prenatal care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2012;12:17. [ ]
- Miteniece E, Pavlova M, Shengelia L, Rechel B, Groot W. Barriers to accessing adequate maternal care in Georgia: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18:631. [DOI: ]
- Molina G, Vargas G, Shaw A. Compromised quality of maternal healthcare in a market economy: Medellin, Colombia. Colombia Medica 2011;42(3):294‐302.
- Mrisho M, Obrist B, Schellenberg JA, Haws RA, Mushi AK, Mshinda H, et al. The use of antenatal and postnatal care: perspectives and experiences of women and health care providers in rural southern Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009;9:10. [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-10]
- Mugo NS, Dibley MJ, Damundu EY, Alam A. Barriers faced by the health workers to deliver maternal care services and their perceptions of the factors preventing their clients from receiving the services: a qualitative study in South Sudan. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2018;22:1598‐606. [DOI: ]
- Mumtaz Z, Salway SM. Gender, pregnancy and the uptake of antenatal care services in Pakistan. Sociology of Health and Illness 2007;29(1):1‐26. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00519.x]
- Munguambe K, Boene H, Vidler M, Bique C, Sawchuck D, Firoz T, et al. Barriers and facilitators to health care seeking behaviours in pregnancy in rural communities of southern Mozambique. Reproductive Health 2016;13(Suppl 1):31. [DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0141-0]
- Myer L, Harrison A. Why do women seek antenatal care late? Perspectives from rural South Africa. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2003;48(4):268‐72.
- Neves PR, Salim N, Soares GCF, Gualda DM. Experiences of women in a pregnant group: a descriptive study. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing [Internet] 2013;12(4):862‐71. [DOI: ; ]
- Novick G, Sadler LS, Kennedy HP, Cohen SS, Groce NE, Knafl KA. Women's experience of group prenatal care. Qualitative Health Research 2011;21(1):97‐116.
- Novick G, Sadler LS, Knafl KA, Groce NE, Kennedy HP. In a hard spot: Providing group prenatal care in two urban clinics. Midwifery 2013;29(6):690‐7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.013]
- Pretorius CF, Greeff M. Health‐service utilization by pregnant women in the greater Mafikeng‐Mmbatho district. Curationis 2004;27(1):72‐81.
- Rahmani Z, Brekke M. Antenatal and obstetric care in Afghanistan – a qualitative study among health care receivers and health care providers. BMC Health Services Research 2013;13:166. [ ]
- Rath S, Nair N, Tripathy PK, Barnett S, Rath S, Mahapatra R, et al. Explaining the impact of a women’s group led community mobilization intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation. BMC International Health and Human Rights 2010;10:25. []
- Saftner MA, Neerland C, Avery MD. Enhancing women's confidence for physiologic birth: Maternity care providers’ perspectives. Midwifery 2017;53:28‐34. []
- Santos AL, Radovanovic CA, Marcon SS. Prenatal care: satisfaction and expectations. Revista da Rede de Enfermagem do Nordeste 2010;11:61‐71.
- Shabila HP, Ahmed HM, Yasin MY. Women’s views and experiences of antenatal care in Iraq: a Q methodology study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014;14:43. []
- Simkhada B, Porter MA, Teijlingen ER. The role of mothers‐in‐law in antenatal care decision‐making in Nepal: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2010;10:34. [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-34]
- Spindola T, Progianti JM, Garcia Penna LH. Pregnant women’s experiences about the obstetrics nurse support during prenatal care at a university hospital. Ciencia y Enfermería 2012;18(2):65‐73.
- Stokes E, Dumbaya I, Owens S, Brabin L. The right to remain silent: a qualitative study of the medical and social ramifications of pregnancy disclosure for Gambian women. BJOG 2008;115(13):1641‐7. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01950.x]
- Sword W. Prenatal care use among women of low income: a matter of "taking care of self". Qualitative Health Research 2003;13(3):319. [DOI: 10.1177/0095399702250128]
- Sword W, Heaman MI, Brooks S, Tough S, Janssen PA, Young D, et al. Women’s and care providers’ perspectives of quality prenatal care: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2012;12:29. []
- Sychareun V, Somphet V, Chaleunvong K, Hansana V, Phengsavanh A, Xayavong S, et al. Perceptions and understandings of pregnancy, antenatal care and postpartum care among rural Lao women and their families. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2016;16:245. [DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1031-8]
- Teate A, Leap N, Rising SS, Homer CS. Women’s experiences of group antenatal care in Australia ‐ the Centering Pregnancy Pilot Study. Midwifery 2011;27(2):138‐45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.03.001]
- Teate A, Leap N, Homer CS. Midwives’ experiences of becoming Centering Pregnancy facilitators: a pilot study in Sydney, Australia. Women and Birth 2013;26:e31‐36.
- Thwala SB, Jones LK, Holroyd E. Swaziland rural maternal care: Ethnography of the interface of custom and biomedicine. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2011;17(1):93‐101. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2010.01911.x]
- Titaley CR, Hunter CL, Heywood P, Dibley MJ. Why don’t some women attend antenatal and postnatal care services?: a qualitative study of community members’ perspectives in Garu, Sukambi and Ciamis districts of West Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2010;10:61. [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-61.]
- Umeora OU, Ejikeme BN, Sunday‐Adeoye I, Ogu RN. Implementing the new WHO antenatal care model: voices from end‐users in a rural Nigerian community. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 2008;11(3):260‐4.
- Walburg V, Friederich F, Callahan S. Embarrassment and modesty feelings during pregnancy, childbirth and follow‐up care: A qualitative approach. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 2014;32(2):126‐36. [DOI: ]
- Wilmore M, Rodger D, Humphreys S, Clifton VL, Dalton J, Flabouris M, et al. How midwives tailor health information used in antenatal care. Midwifery 2015;31(1):74‐99. [DOI: ]
- Worley BL, Bullock LF, Geden E. The incubator model: is it effective prenatal care?. Clinical Excellence for Nurse Practitioners 2004;8(1):29‐34.
- Wright D, Pincombe J, McKellar L. Exploring routine hospital antenatal care consultations — An ethnographic study. Women and Birth 2018;31(3):e162‐e169. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.010]
- Østergaard LR. Maternal healthcare in context: A qualitative study of women's tactics to improve their experience of public healthcare in rural Burkina Faso. Social Science & Medicine 2015;147:98‐104. [DOI: ]
- Lohmann S, Mattern E, Ayerle GM. Midwives' perceptions of women's preferences related to midwifery care in Germany: A focus group study. Midwifery 2018;61:53‐62. []
- Murira N, Lutzen K, Lindmark G, Christensson K. Communication patterns between healthcare providers and their clients at an antenatal clinic in Zimbabwe. Health Care for Women International 2003;24(2):83‐92. [DOI: 10.1080/07399330390170060]
- Nigenda G, Langer A, Kuchaisit C, Romero M, Rojas G, Al‐Osimy M, et al. Womens' opinions on antenatal care in developing countries: results of a study in Cuba, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Argentina. BMC Public Health 2003;3:17. []
- Påfs J, Musafili A, Binder‐Finnema P, Klingberg‐Allvin M, Rulisa S, Essén B. ‘They would never receive you without a husband’: Paradoxical barriers to antenatal care scale‐up in Rwanda. Midwifery 2015;31(12):1149‐56. [DOI: ]
- Pell C, Menaca A, Were F, Afrah NA, Chatio S, Manda‐Taylor L, et al. Factors affecting antenatal care attendance: results from qualitative studies in Ghana, Kenya and Malawi. PLoS One 8;1:e53747. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053747]
- Tsawe M, Susuman AS. Determinants of access to and use of maternal health care services in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: a quantitative and qualitative investigation. BMC Research Notes 2014;7:723. []
- Aikawa Y. Positive support and negative support from medical staff which perinatal women experienced. Journal of the Japanese Academy of Midwives 2004;18(2):34‐43.
- Al‐Amer R, Ramjan L, Glew P, Darwish M, Salamonson Y. Translation of interviews from a source language to a target language: examining issues in cross‐cultural health care research. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2015;24(9‐10):1151‐62.
- Ames HM, Glenton C, Lewin S. Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2]
- Azjen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991;50(2):179‐211.
- Baig LA, Shaikh S, Polkowski M, Ali SK, Jamali S, Mazharullah L, et al. Violence against health care providers: a mixed‐methods study from Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of Emergency Medicine 2018;54(4):558‐66.
- Becker S, Mlay R, Schwandt HM, Lyamuya E. Comparing couples' and individual voluntary counseling and testing for HIV at antenatal clinics in Tanzania: a randomized trial. AIDS and Behavior 2010;14(3):558‐66.
- Benova L, Tunçalp Ö, Moran AC, Campbell OM. Not just a number: examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low‐income and middle‐income countries. BMJ Global Health 2018; Vol. 3, issue 2:000779. [e000779. doi:10.1136/ bmjgh‐2018‐000779]
- Birbili M. Translating from one language to another. Social Research Update 2000;31:1‐7.
- Biza A, Jille‐Traas I, Colomar M, Belizan M, Requejo Harris J, Crahay B, et al. Challenges and opportunities for implementing evidence‐based antenatal care in Mozambique: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015;15:200. [DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0625-x.]
- Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe‐Kaas HM, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Facilitators and barriers to facility‐based delivery in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reproductive Health 2014;11(1):71. [DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71; www.reproductive‐health‐]
- Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed‐methods systematic review. PLoS Medicine 2015;12(6):e1001847.
- Booth A. Chapter 3: Searching for studies. In: Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, Lewin S, et al, editor(s). Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group 2011.
- Booth A, Carroll C. How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety 2015;24(11):700‐8. [doi: 10.1136/bmjqs‐2014‐003642]
- Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Gerhardus A, Wahlster P, Wilt GJ, et al. Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions. Available from: www.integrate‐ 2016 (Accessed May 16th 2018).
- Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility‐based childbirth. (accessed prior to 17 September 2016).
- Brown HC, Smith HJ, Mori R, Noma H. Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002856.pub3]
- Carlson NS, Lowe NK. Centering Pregnancy: a new approach in prenatal care. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 2006;31(4):218‐23.
- Carolan M. Health literacy and the information needs and dilemmas of first‐time mothers over 35 years. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007;16(6):1162‐72.
- Carter EB, Temming LA, Akin J, Fowler S, Macones GA, Colditz GA. Group prenatal care compared with traditional prenatal care: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2016;128(3):551‐61.
- Catling CJ, Medley N, Foureur M, Ryan C, Leap N, Teate A, et al. Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007622.pub3]
- Clark L, Birkhead AS, Fernandez C, Egger MJ. A transcription and translation protocol for sensitive cross‐cultural team research. Qualitative Health Research 2017;27(12):1751‐64. [doi: 10.1177/1049732317726761]
- Downe S, Simpson L, Trafford K. Expert intrapartum maternity care: a meta‐synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2007;57(2):127‐40.
- Downe S, Finlayson K, Walsh D, Lavender T. 'Weighing up and balancing out': a meta‐synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high‐income countries. BJOG 2009;116(4):518‐29.
- Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ö, Gülmezoglu M. What matters to women: A scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women. BJOG 2016;123(4):529‐39.
- Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo O, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM. What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review. PLoS One 2018;13(4):e0194906. [e0194906.]
- Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan‐Neelofur D, et al. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub3]
- Elbarazi I, Loney T, Yousef S, Elias A. Prevalence of and factors associated with burnout among health care professionals in Arab countries: a systematic review. MC Health Services Research 2017;17(1):491‐501. [DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2319-8]
- Ezeonwu M. Policy strategies to improve maternal health services delivery and outcomes in Anambra State, Nigeria. Health Care for Women International 2014;35(7‐9):828‐44. [DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2014.925454]
- Finlayson K, Downe S. Why do women not use antenatal services in low‐ and middle‐income countries? A meta‐synthesis of qualitative studies. PLOS Medicine 2013;10(1):e1001373.
- Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2010.
- Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi‐disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013;13:117.
- Karlström A, Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2015;15:251. [DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0683-0]
- Khalil DD. Nurses' attitude towards ‘difficult’ and ‘good’ patients in eight public hospitals. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2009;15:437‐43.
- Lehmann U, Dieleman M, Martineau T. Staffing remote rural areas in middle‐ and low‐income countries: a literature review of attraction and retention. BMC Health Services Research 2008;23(8):19. [DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-19]
- Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe‐Kaas H, Carlsen B, Colvin CJ, Gülmezoglu M, et al. Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE‐CERQual). PLoS Medicine 2015;12(10):e1001895.
- Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publication, 1985.
- Magriples U, Boynton MH, Kershaw TS, Lewis J, Rising SS, Tobin JN, et al. The impact of group prenatal care on pregnancy and postpartum weight trajectories. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015;213(5):688.e1‐9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.066]
- Mbuagbaw L, Medley N, Darzi AJ, Richardson M, Habiba Garga K, Ongolo‐Zogo P. Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010994.pub2]
- Merriam S. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco (CA): Jossey‐Bass, 2009.
- Munabi‐Babigumira S, Glenton C, Lewin S, Fretheim A, Nabudere H. Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2]
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies. (accessed 7 September 2015).
- Nie JB. Non‐medical sex‐selective abortion in China: ethical and public policy issues in the context of 40 million missing females. British Medical Bulletin 2011;98:7‐20. [DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldr015]
- Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta‐Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Newbury Park (CA): Sage, 1988.
- Nyman V, Bondas T, Downe S, Berg M. Glancing beyond or being confined to routines: labour ward midwives' responses to change as a result of action research. Midwifery 2013;29(6):573‐8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.02.010]
- Olivier de Sardan OJ, Diarra A, Moha M. Travelling models and the challenge of pragmatic contexts and practical norms: the case of maternal health. Health Research Policy and Systems / BioMed Central 2017;12(15 (Suppl)):60. [DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0213-9]
- Pawson R, Tilley N. Caring communities, paradigm polemics, design debates. Evaluation 1998;4:73‐90.
- Phillippi JC. Women's perceptions of access to prenatal care in the United States: a literature review. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2009;54(3):219‐25.
- Potts H, Hunt P. Participation and the right to the highest attainable standard of health. (accessed prior to 17 September 2016).
- Regmi K, Naidoo J, Pilkington P. Understanding the processes of translation and transliteration in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2010;9(1):16‐26.
- Royal College of Midwives. State of Maternity Services Report. . 2015 accessed 16 May 2018).
- Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5]
- Seward N, Neuman M, Colbourn T, Osrin D, Lewycka S, Azad K, et al. Effects of women's groups practising participatory learning and action on preventive and care‐seeking behaviours to reduce neonatal mortality: A meta‐analysis of cluster‐randomised trials. PLoS One 2017;14:12. [e1002467]
- Smith A, Dixon A. Health care professionals’ views about safety in maternity services. Kings Fund, Maternity Services Inquiry. 2008 (accessed 29 May 2018).
- Stevelink SA, Brakel WH. The cross‐cultural equivalence of participation instruments: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation 2013;35(15):1256‐68.
- Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk? Maternal mortality in context. Social Science and Medicine 1994;38(8):1091‐110.
- Till SR, Everetts D, Haas DM. Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009916.pub2]
- United Nations. Millenium Development Goals Report 2014. . United Nations, (accessed prior to 17 September 2016).
- United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report. 2018 (accessed 20 May 2019).
- Villar J, Ba’aqeel H, Piaggio G, Lumbiganon P, Belizán JM, Farnot U, et al. WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group. WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet 2001;357(9268):1551‐64.
- Vogel JP, Habib NA, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Dowswell T, Carroli G, et al. Antenatal care packages with reduced visits and perinatal mortality: a secondary analysis of the WHO Antenatal Care Trial. Reproductive Health 2013;10:19.
- Walsh D, Downe S. Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery 2006;22(2):108‐19.
- World Health Organization. Provision of effective antenatal care ‐ Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth (IMPAC): Standards for maternal and neonatal care. . WHO, (accessed prior to 17 September 2016).
- World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. 2016 (accessed 16 May 2018).
- Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ö, Gülmezoglu AM. Factors that influence the uptake of routine antenatal services by pregnant women: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392]
- Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ö, Gülmezoglu AM. Factors that influence the provision of good‐quality routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis of the views and experiences of maternity care providers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012752.pub2]
Source: PubMed