Protocol of a Multicenter International Randomized Controlled Manikin Study on Different Protocols of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for laypeople (MANI-CPR)

Enrico Baldi, Enrico Contri, Roman Burkart, Paola Borrelli, Ottavia Eleonora Ferraro, Michela Tonani, Amedeo Cutuli, Daniele Bertaia, Pasquale Iozzo, Caroline Tinguely, Daniel Lopez, Susi Boldarin, Claudio Deiuri, Sandrine Dénéréaz, Yves Dénéréaz, Michael Terrapon, Christian Tami, Cinzia Cereda, Alberto Somaschini, Stefano Cornara, Andrea Cortegiani, Enrico Baldi, Enrico Contri, Roman Burkart, Paola Borrelli, Ottavia Eleonora Ferraro, Michela Tonani, Amedeo Cutuli, Daniele Bertaia, Pasquale Iozzo, Caroline Tinguely, Daniel Lopez, Susi Boldarin, Claudio Deiuri, Sandrine Dénéréaz, Yves Dénéréaz, Michael Terrapon, Christian Tami, Cinzia Cereda, Alberto Somaschini, Stefano Cornara, Andrea Cortegiani

Abstract

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of death in industrialised countries. Survival depends on prompt identification of cardiac arrest and on the quality and timing of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation. For laypeople, there has been a growing interest on hands-only CPR, meaning continuous chest compression without interruption to perform ventilations. It has been demonstrated that intentional interruptions in hands-only CPR can increase its quality. The aim of this randomised trial is to compare three CPR protocols performed with different intentional interruptions with hands-only CPR.

Methods and analysis: This is a prospective randomised trial performed in eight training centres. Laypeople who passed a basic life support course will be randomised to one of the four CPR protocols in an 8 min simulated cardiac arrest scenario on a manikin: (1) 30 compressions and 2 s pause; (2) 50 compressions and 5 s pause; (3) 100 compressions and 10 s pause; (4) hands-only. The calculated sample size is 552 people. The primary outcome is the percentage of chest compression performed with correct depth evaluated by a computerised feedback system (Laerdal QCPR). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: . Due to the nature of the study, we obtained a waiver from the Ethics Committee (IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy). All participants will sign an informed consent form before randomisation. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journal. The data collected will also be made available in a public data repository.

Trial registration number: NCT02632500.

Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; feedback devices; training.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study. BLS/AED, Basic Life Support/Automatic External Defibrillation; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timeline of enrolment, interventions and assessments. CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; IPAQ, International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

References

    1. Priori SG, Aliot E, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. . Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2001;22:1374–450. 10.1053/euhj.2001.2824
    1. Kette F, Sbrojavacca R, Rellini G, et al. . Epidemiology and survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in north-east Italy: The F.A.C.S. study. Friuli Venezia Giulia Cardiac Arrest Cooperative Study. Resuscitation 1998;36:153–9.
    1. Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, et al. . Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:63–81. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576
    1. Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG, et al. . Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 2010;81:1479–87. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.006
    1. Cummins RO, Ornato JP, Thies WH, et al. . Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the "chain of survival" concept. A statement for health professionals from the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Subcommittee and the Emergency Cardiac Care Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 1991;83:1832–47. 10.1161/01.CIR.83.5.1832
    1. Daya MR, Schmicker RH, Zive DM, et al. . Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival improving over time: Results from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). Resuscitation 2015;91:108–15. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.003
    1. Baldi E, Bertaia D, Savastano S. Mouth-to-mouth: an obstacle to cardiopulmonary resuscitation for lay-rescuers. Resuscitation 2014;85:e195–e196. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.10.001
    1. Sayre MR, Berg RA, Cave DM, et al. . Hands-only (compression-only) cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a call to action for bystander response to adults who experience out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest: a science advisory for the public from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee. Circulation 2008;117:2162–7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.189380
    1. Japanese Circulation Society Resuscitation Science Study Group. Chest-compression-only bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio era. Nationwide observational study. Circ J 2013;77:2742–50.
    1. Iwami T, Kawamura T, Hiraide A, et al. . Effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2007;116:2900–7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.723411
    1. Kitamura T, Iwami T, Kawamura T, et al. . Time-dependent effectiveness of chest compression-only and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin. Resuscitation 2011;82:3–9. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.09.468
    1. Ong ME, Ng FS, Anushia P, et al. . Comparison of chest compression only and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore. Resuscitation 2008;78:119–26. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.03.012
    1. SOS-KANTO study group. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders with chest compression only (SOS-KANTO): an observational study. Lancet 2007;369:920–6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60451-6
    1. Bobrow BJ, Spaite DW, Berg RA, et al. . Chest compression-only CPR by lay rescuers and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2010;304:1447–54. 10.1001/jama.2010.1392
    1. Olasveengen TM, Wik L, Steen PA. Standard basic life support vs. continuous chest compressions only in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:914–9. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01723.x
    1. Bohm K, Rosenqvist M, Herlitz J, et al. . Survival is similar after standard treatment and chest compression only in out-of-hospital bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2007;116:2908–12. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.710194
    1. Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, et al. . European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015;95:81–99. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.015
    1. Nishiyama C, Iwami T, Kawamura T, et al. . Quality of chest compressions during continuous CPR; comparison between chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR. Resuscitation 2010;81:1152–5. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.008
    1. Sanson G, Verduno J, Zambon M, et al. . Emergency medical service treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Identification of weak links in the chain-of-survival through an epidemiological study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2016;15:328–36. 10.1177/1474515115573365
    1. Min MK, Yeom SR, Ryu JH, et al. . A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model. Resuscitation 2013;84:1279–84. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.01.035
    1. Laerdal.
    1. Cortegiani A, Russotto V, Montalto F, et al. . Use of a Real-Time Training Software (Laerdal QCPR®) Compared to Instructor-Based Feedback for High-Quality Chest Compressions Acquisition in Secondary School Students: A Randomized Trial. PLoS One 2017;12:e0169591 10.1371/journal.pone.0169591
    1. Baldi E, Cornara S, Contri E, et al. . Real-time visual feedback during training improves laypersons' CPR quality: a randomized controlled manikin study. CJEM 2017. 19:480–7. 10.1017/cem.2016.410
    1. Cortegiani A, Russotto V, Baldi E, et al. . Is it time to consider visual feedback systems the gold standard for chest compression skill acquisition? Crit Care 2017;21:166 10.1186/s13054-017-1740-z
    1. Pavo N, Goliasch G, Nierscher FJ, et al. . Short structured feedback training is equivalent to a mechanical feedback device in two-rescuer BLS: a randomised simulation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016;24:70 10.1186/s13049-016-0265-9
    1. González-Salvado V, Fernández-Méndez F, Barcala-Furelos R, et al. . Very brief training for laypeople in hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Effect of real-time feedback. Am J Emerg Med 2016;34:993–8. 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.047
    1. Krasteva V, Jekova I, Didon JP. An audiovisual feedback device for compression depth, rate and complete chest recoil can improve the CPR performance of lay persons during self-training on a manikin. Physiol Meas 2011;32:687–99. 10.1088/0967-3334/32/6/006
    1. Nishi T, Maeda T, Takase K, et al. . Does the number of rescuers affect the survival rate from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests? Two or more rescuers are not always better than one. Resuscitation 2013;84:154–61. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.05.026
    1. Gräsner JT, Lefering R, Koster RW, et al. . EuReCa ONE-27 Nations, ONE Europe, ONE Registry: A prospective one month analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in 27 countries in Europe. Resuscitation 2016;105:188–95. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.06.004
    1. Chow S, Shao J, Wang H. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. 100 2nd Ed: Chapman, 2008:31.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever