Design of a single-arm clinical trial of regenerative therapy by periurethral injection of adipose-derived regenerative cells for male stress urinary incontinence in Japan: the ADRESU study protocol

Shinobu Shimizu, Tokunori Yamamoto, Shinobu Nakayama, Akihiro Hirakawa, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Yasuhito Funahashi, Yoshihisa Matsukawa, Keisuke Takanari, Kazuhiro Toriyama, Yuzuru Kamei, Kazutaka Narimoto, Tomonori Yamanishi, Osamu Ishizuka, Masaaki Mizuno, Momokazu Gotoh, Shinobu Shimizu, Tokunori Yamamoto, Shinobu Nakayama, Akihiro Hirakawa, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Yasuhito Funahashi, Yoshihisa Matsukawa, Keisuke Takanari, Kazuhiro Toriyama, Yuzuru Kamei, Kazutaka Narimoto, Tomonori Yamanishi, Osamu Ishizuka, Masaaki Mizuno, Momokazu Gotoh

Abstract

Background: Male stress urinary incontinence is a prevalent condition after radical prostatectomy. While the standard recommendation for the management of urine leakage is pelvic floor muscle training, its efficacy is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, we have focused on regenerative therapy, which consists of administering a periurethral injection of autologous regenerative cells from adipose tissue, separated using the Celution® system. Based on an interim data analysis of our exploratory study, we confirmed the efficacy and acceptable safety profile of this treatment. Accordingly, we began discussions with Japanese regulatory authorities regarding the development of this therapy in Japan. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare suggested that we implement a clinical trial of a new medical device based on the Pharmaceutical Affaires Act in Japan. Next, we discussed the design of this investigator-initiated clinical trial (the ADRESU study) aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of this therapy, in a consultation meeting with the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Device Agency.

Methods: The ADRESU study is an open-label, multi-center, single-arm study involving a total of 45 male stress urinary incontinence patients with mild-to-moderate urine leakage persisting more than 1 year after prostatectomy, in spite of behavioral and pharmacological therapies. The primary endpoint is the rate of patients at 52 weeks with improvement of urine leakage volume defined as a reduction from baseline greater than 50% by 24-h pad test. Our specific hypothesis is that the primary endpoint result will be higher than a pre-specified threshold of 10%.

Discussion: The ADRESU study is the first clinical trial of regenerative treatment for stress urinary incontinence by adipose-derived regenerative cells using the Celution® system based on the Japanese Pharmaceutical Affaires Act. We will evaluate the efficacy and safety in this trial to provide an adequate basis for marketing approval with the final objective of making this novel therapy widely available for Japanese patients.

Trial registration: This trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR Unique ID: UMIN000017901 ; Registered July 1, 2015) and at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02529865 ; Registered August 18, 2015).

Keywords: Adipose-derived regenerative cells; Cell therapy; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Prostatectomy; Regenerative medicine; Stress urinary incontinence.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

As regard to Ethics, we declared in the ‘Ethics approval and current status on this trial’ item of the ‘Discussion’ section that our study performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and have been approved by an appropriate ethics committee. We receive informed consent from all participant as described in the ‘Registration and informed consent’ item of the ‘Methods/Design’ section.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this manuscript or the work described herein.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Prabhu V, Sivarajan G, Taksler GB, Laze J, Lepor H. Long-term continence outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.006.
    1. Namiki S, Kaiho Y, Mitsuzuka K, Saito H, Yamada S, Nakagawa H, Ito A, Arai Y. Long-term quality of life after radical prostatectomy: 8-year longitudinal study in Japan. Int J Urol. 2014;21:1220–1226. doi: 10.1111/iju.12586.
    1. Parker WR, Wang R, He C, Wood DP., Jr Five year expanded prostate cancer index composite-based quality of life outcomes after prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2011;107:585–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09579.x.
    1. Namiki S, Kwan L, Kagawa-Singer M, Terai A, Arai Y, Litwin MS. Urinary quality of life after prostatectomy or radiation for localized prostate cancer: a prospective longitudinal cross-cultural study between Japanese and U.S. men. Urology 2008;71:1103–1108.
    1. Saranchuk JW, Kattan MW, Elkin E, Touijer AK, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4146–4151. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.922.
    1. Reek C, Noldus J, Huland H. Experiences with local collagen injection in male stress incontinence. Urologe A. 1997;36:40–43. doi: 10.1007/s001200050064.
    1. Faerber GJ, Richardson TD. Long-term results of transurethral collagen injection in men with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. J Endourol. 1997;11:273–277. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.273.
    1. Lucas MG, Bedretdinova D, Berghmans LC, Bosch JLHR, Burkhard FC, Druz F, Nambiar AK, Nilsson CG, Tubaro A, Pickard RS. Guidelines on Urinary Incontinence; European Association of Urology 2015. . Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
    1. Bettez M, Tu le M, Carlson K, Corcos J, Gajewski J, Jolivet M, Bailly G. 2012 update: guidelines for adult urinary incontinence collaborative consensus document for the canadian urological association. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;6:354–363. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.12248.
    1. Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG. Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol. 2009;55:322–333. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.10.029.
    1. Wu G, Song Y, Zheng X, Jiang Z. Adipose-derived stromal cell transplantation for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Tissue Cell. 2011;43:246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2011.04.003.
    1. Kim SO, Na HS, Kwon D, Joo SY, Kim HS, Ahn Y. Bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation enhances closing pressure and leak point pressure in a female urinary incontinence rat model. Urol Int. 2011;86:110–116. doi: 10.1159/000317322.
    1. Roche R, Festy F, Fritel X. Stem cells for stress urinary incontinence: the adipose promise. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:135–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00915.x.
    1. Smaldone MC, Chancellor MB. Muscle derived stem cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence. World J Urol. 2008;26:327–332. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0269-9.
    1. Praud C, Sebe P, Biérinx AS, Sebille A. Improvement of urethral sphincter deficiency in female rats following autologous skeletal muscle myoblasts grafting. Cell Transplant. 2007;16:741–749. doi: 10.3727/000000007783465118.
    1. Kwon D, Kim Y, Pruchnic R, Jankowski R, Usiene I, de Miguel F, Huard J, Chancellor MB. Periurethral cellular injection: comparison of muscle-derived progenitor cells and fibroblasts with regard to efficacy and tissue contractility in an animal model of stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2006;68:449–454. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.040.
    1. Watanabe T, Maruyama S, Yamamoto T, Kamo I, Yasuda K, Saka Y, Ozaki T, Yuzawa Y, Matsuo S, Gotoh M. Increased urethral resistance by periurethral injection of low serum cultured adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in rats. Int J Urol. 2011;18:659–666.
    1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Guidelines on Clinical Research using Human Stem Cells. July 3, 2016. . Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
    1. Gotoh M, Yamamoto T, Kato M, Majima T, Toriyama K, Kamei Y, Matsukawa Y, Hirakawa A, Funahashi Y. Regenerative treatment of male stress urinary incontinence by periurethral injection of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells: 1-year outcomes in 11 patients. Int J Urol. 2014;21:294–300. doi: 10.1111/iju.12266.
    1. Yamamoto T, Gotoh M, Kato M, Majima T, Toriyama K, Kamei Y, Iwaguro H, Matsukawa Y, Funahashi Y. Periurethral injection of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: Report of three initial cases. Int J Urol. 2012;19:652–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02999.x.
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation. Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials E9. . Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation. Choice of Control Group and Related Issues in Clinical Trials E10. . Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
    1. Lin K, Matsubara Y, Masuda Y, Togashi K, Ohno T, Tamura T, Toyoshima Y, Sugimachi K, Toyoda M, Marc H, Douglas A. Characterization of adipose tissue-derived cells isolated with the Celution system. Cytotherapy. 2008;10:417–426. doi: 10.1080/14653240801982979.
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation. General Considerations for Clinical Trials E8. . Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Clinical Investigation of Devices Indicated for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence. March 8, 2011. . Accessed 22 Sept 2017.
    1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. October 2013. . Accessed 22 Sept 2017.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever