Impact of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine on preventing subsequent infection and disease after excision treatment: post-hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial

Shuang Zhao, Shangying Hu, Xiaoqian Xu, Xun Zhang, Qinjing Pan, Feng Chen, Fanghui Zhao, Shuang Zhao, Shangying Hu, Xiaoqian Xu, Xun Zhang, Qinjing Pan, Feng Chen, Fanghui Zhao

Abstract

Background: It is widely acknowledged that HPV prophylactic vaccine could prevent new infections and their associated lesions among women who are predominantly HPV-naive at vaccination. Yet there still remains uncertainty about whether HPV vaccination could benefit to individuals who have undergone surgery for cervical disease.

Methods: This post-hoc analysis intends to focus on intent-to-treat participants who underwent excision treatment at baseline and the follow-up period in a phase II/III, double-blind, randomized trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00779766 ) conducted in Jiangsu province, China. We evaluate the impact of HPV vaccination on preventing women from subsequent infection and cervical lesions (LSIL+ and CIN2+) after excision treatment.

Results: One hundred sixty-eight (vaccine, n = 87; placebo, n = 81) performed excisional treatment in this clinical trial. We observed a significant effect of vaccination on acquiring 14 high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) infection after treatment (vaccine efficacy: 27.0%; 95% CI 4.9, 44.0%). The vaccine efficacy against new infections after treatment for 14 HR-HPV infection was estimated as 32.0% (95%CI 1.8, 52.8%), and was 41.2% (95%CI -162.7, 86.8%) for HPV16/18 infection. The accumulative clearance rates of the vaccine group and placebo group were 88.9 and 81.6% for HPV16/18 infection (P = 0.345), 63.4, 48.7% for 14 HR-HPV infection (P = 0.062), respectively. No significant difference was observed on the persistent rate of HPV16/18, 14 HR-HPV infection and occurrence rate of LSIL+ between the two groups.

Conclusions: No significant evidence from this study showed that HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine could lead to viral faster clearance or have any effect on the rates of persistent infection among women who had excision treatment. However, the vaccine may still benefit post-treatment women with "primary prophylactic" effect. Further research is required in clarifying the effect of using the prophylactic HPV vaccine as therapeutic agents.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00779766 . Date and status of trial registration: October 24, 2008. Completed; Has Results.

Keywords: Cervical Cancer; Clinical trial; Excision treatment; Human papillomavirus; Vaccine.

Conflict of interest statement

The institutions of FHZ received grants from the GSK group of companies for the conduct of the clinical trial. The GSK group of companies had no role in the analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant disposition. Abbreviations: LEEP: loop electrosurgical excision procedure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Impact of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine on accumulative clearance rate and persistent infection rate among the women after excision treatment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Impact of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine on occurrence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (LSIL+)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Biopsy type, histopathological diagnosis and HPV DNA result in lesion for women who had undergone surgical therapy for cervical disease. Case 1: the subject was HPV-16, 52 DNA positive, with ASCUS predicted by cytology at gynecological examination at visit 1. Case 2: occurred in a woman who, at baseline (visit1), was HPV-16 DNA positive, with HSIL predicted by cytology. Case 3: the woman was HPV-16, 59 DNA positive, with LSIL predicted by cytology at visit 1.And the subject was high-risk HPV DNA negative at month 18. HPV-39 was detected at month 30. Case 4: the subject was HPV-16, 31, 33 DNA positive, with HSIL predicted by cytology at gynecological examination at month 6. Case 5: the subject was HPV-58 DNA positive, with LSIL predicted by cytology at gynecological examination at month 66. Abbreviations: CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; VAIN: vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia; LEEP: loop electrosurgical excision procedure

References

    1. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189(1):12–19. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>;2-F.
    1. Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN, Glass AG, Cadell DM, Rush BB, et al. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(12):958–964. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.12.958.
    1. Paavonen J, Jenkins D, Bosch FX, Naud P, Salmerón J, Wheeler CM, et al. Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted bivalent L1virus-like-particle vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus types16and18 in young women: an interim analysis of a phase III double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9580):2161–2170. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60946-5.
    1. Paavonen J, Naud P, Salmeron J, Wheeler CM, Chow SN, Apter D, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomized study in young women. Lancet. 2009;374(9686):301–314. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61248-4.
    1. Soutter WP, Sasieni P, Panoskaltsis T. Long-term risk of invasive cervical cancer after treatment of squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(8):2048–2055. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21604.
    1. Strander B, Andersson-Ellstrom A, Milsom I, Sparén P. Long term risk of invasive cancer after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2007;335(7629):1077. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Melnikow J, McGahan C, Sawaya GF, Ehlen T, Coldman A. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment: long-term follow-up from the British Columbia cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(10):721–728. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp089.
    1. Rebolj M, Helmerhorst T, Habbema D, Looman C, Boer R, van Rosmalen J, et al. Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e6855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6855.
    1. Joura EA, Garland SM, Paavonen J, Ferris DG, Perez G, Ault KA, et al. Effect of the human papillomavirus (HPV) quadrivalent vaccine in a subgroup of women with cervical and vulvar disease: retrospective pooled analysis of trial data. BMJ. 2012;344:e1401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1401.
    1. Kang WD, Choi HS, Kim SM. Is vaccination with quadrivalent HPV vaccine after LEEP effective in preventing recurrence in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3)? Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(2):264–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.050.
    1. Swedish KA, Factor SH, Goldstone SE. Prevention of recurrent high-grade anal neoplasia with quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination of men who have sex with men: a nonconcurrent cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(7):891–898. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir1036.
    1. Ghelardi A, Parazzini F, Martella F, Pieralli A, Bay P, Tonetti A, et al. SPERANZA project: HPV vaccination after treatment for CIN2. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;151(2):229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.033.
    1. Zhu FC, Chen W, Hu YM, Hong Y, Li J, Zhang X, et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in healthy Chinese women aged 18-25 years: results from a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(11):2612–2622. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28897.
    1. Zhu FC, Hu SY, Hong Y, Hu YM, Zhang X, Zhang YJ, et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in Chinese women aged 18–25 years: event-triggered analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Med. 2017;6(1):12–25. doi: 10.1002/cam4.869.
    1. Zhao FH, Zhu FC, Chen W, Li J, Hu YM, Hong Y, et al. Baseline prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in healthy Chinese women aged 18-25 years enrolled in a clinical trial. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(11):2604–11. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28896.
    1. Kavanagh K, Pollock KG, Cuschieri K, Palmer T, Cameron RL, Watt C, et al. Changes in the prevalence of human papillomavirus following a national bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination programme in Scotland: a 7-year cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(12):1293–1302. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30468-1.
    1. Apgar BS, Zoschnick L, Wright TC., Jr The 2001 Bethesda system terminology. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(10):1992–1998.
    1. Abramson JH, Gahlinger PM. Computer programs for epidemiologists: PEPI. Version 4.0. Salt Lake City: UT: Sagebrush Press; 2001.
    1. Garland SM, Paavonen J, Jaisamrarn U, Naud P, Salmerón J, Chow SN, et al. Prior human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccination prevents recurrent high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after definitive surgical therapy: post-hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(12):2812–2826. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30391.
    1. Hildesheim A, Gonzalez P, Kreimer AR, Wacholder S, Schussler J, Rodriguez AC, et al. Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18 vaccination on prevalent infections and rates of cervical lesions after excisional treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):212.e1–212.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.021.
    1. Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, Meijer CJ, Poljak M, Ogilvie G, et al. Evidence regarding HPV testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine. 2012;30(Suppl 5):F88–F99. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095.
    1. Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, Kyrgiou M, Tzafetas M, Ghaem-Maghami S, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):1665–1679. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30700-3.
    1. Rositch AF, Soeters HM, Offutt-Powell TN, Wheeler BS, Taylor SM, Smith JS. The incidence of human papillomavirus infection following treatment for cervical neoplasia: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(3):767–779. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.040.
    1. Ruan YT, Liu M, Guo JH, Zhao JW, Niu SM, Li F. Evaluation of the accuracy of colposcopy in detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020. 10.1007/s00404-020-05740-x.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever