The Influence of Hand Preference on Grip Strength in Children and Adolescents; A Cross-Sectional Study of 2284 Children and Adolescents

Ann M Hepping, Joris J W Ploegmakers, Jan H B Geertzen, Sjoerd K Bulstra, Martin Stevens, Ann M Hepping, Joris J W Ploegmakers, Jan H B Geertzen, Sjoerd K Bulstra, Martin Stevens

Abstract

Introduction: In adults the preferred hand is often considered to be around 10% stronger than the non-preferred hand. Whether the same is true for children and adolescents remains unclear. The objective of this study is therefore to determine whether there is a difference in grip strength between the preferred and non-preferred hand in developing children, to establish whether this difference is similar for children of a different gender or hand preference, and whether there is a difference in grip strength of the preferred hand of left-preferent (LP) and right-preferent (RP) children.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Participants: Participants were recruited from schools in the northern provinces of the Netherlands. The study included healthy children and adolescents in the age range of 4-17 years.

Outcome measures: Each child was allowed a total of four attempts using the JAMAR hand dynamometer, two attempts with each hand. All individual attempts were scored. Hand preference was determined by asking which hand was used to write, or in the case of 4- and 5-year-olds, which hand was used to draw a shape.

Results: The study population comprised 2284 children and adolescents. RP boys and girls scored significantly higher with their preferred hand, the difference amounting to 9.5 and 10.1% respectively. LP girls scored significantly higher with their preferred hand, but this difference was only 3.0%. For LP boys no significant difference was found in favor of either hand. LP children score higher with the non-preferred hand and tie scores on both hands more often than RP children.

Conclusion: The 10% rule of hand preference is applicable to RP children ranging in age between 4 and 17 years, but not to LP children. In contrast to LP boys, LP girls are generally significantly stronger with their preferred hand.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Percentage of children that scored…
Fig 1. Percentage of children that scored higher, equal, or lower with their preferred hand compared with their non-preferred hand, according to hand preference and gender.

References

    1. American Society of Hand Therapists (1992) Clinical Assessment Recommendations (2nd ed.) Chicago
    1. American Medical Association (1993) Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (4th ed.) Chicago
    1. Clerke A, Clerke J. Literature Review of the Effect of Handedness on Isometric Grip Strength Differences of the Left and Right Hands. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2001; 55(2): 206–211.
    1. Bechtol CO. Grip Test: the Use of a Dynamometer with Adjustable Handle Spacings. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery America. 1954; 36: 820–832.
    1. Petersen P, Petrick M, Connor H, Conklin D. Grip Strength and Hand Dominance: challenging the 10% rule. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1989; 43: 444–447.
    1. Bohannon RW. Grip Strength: a Summary of Studies comparing Dominant and Nondominant Limb Measurements. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2003; 96: 728–730.
    1. Innes E. Handgrip Strength Testing: A review of the Literature. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 1999; 46: 120–140.
    1. Ager CL, Olivett BL, Johnson CL. Grasp and Pinch Strength in Children 5 to 12 years old. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1984; 38: 107–113.
    1. Mathiowetz V, Wiemer DM, Federman SM. Grip and Pinch Strength: Norms for 6- to 19-Year-Olds. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1986; 40: 705–711.
    1. Butterfield SA, Lehnhard RA, Loovis EM, Coladarci T, Saucier D. Grip Strength Performances by 5- to 19- year olds. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2009; 109: 362–370.
    1. Armstrong CA, Oldham JA. A Comparison of Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand Strengths. Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume). 1999; 24: 421–425.
    1. Crosby CA, Wehbé MA, Mawr B. Hand Strength: Normative values. The Journal of Hand Surgery America. 1994; 19: 665–670.
    1. De Smet L, Vercammen A. Grip Strength in Children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics part B. 2001; 10: 352–354.
    1. Incel NA, Ceceli E, Durukan PB, Erdem HR, Yorgancioglu ZR. Grip Strength: Effect of Hand Dominance. Singapore Medical Journal. 2002; 43: 234–237.
    1. Burmeister LF, Flatt AE, Weiss MW. Size and Strength Development of the Hand in Elementary School Children. Iowa State Services for Crippled Children, University of Iowa in Iowa City; 1974; ID nr: OL16447325M.
    1. Ploegmakers JJW, Hepping AM, Geertzen JHB, Bulstra SK, Stevens M. Grip Strength is strongly Associated with Height, Weight and Gender in Childhood: a Cross Sectional Study of 2241 Children and Adolescents providing Reference Values. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2013; 59: 255–261. 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70202-9
    1. Balogun JA, Akomolafe CT, Amusa LO. Grip Strength: Effects of Testing Posture and Elbow Position. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1991; 72: 280–283.
    1. Fess E. Grip Strength In Clinical Assessment Recommendations (2 edn). Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists, 1992; 41–45.
    1. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, et al. A review of the Measurement of Grip Strength in Clinical and Epidemiological Studies: Towards a Standardised Approach. Age and Ageing. 2011; 40: 423–429. 10.1093/ageing/afr051
    1. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis; An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. 2nd Edition ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012.
    1. Twisk JWR. Applied Multilevel Analysis: a Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
    1. Bear-Lehman J, Kafko M, Mah L, Mosquera L, Reilly B. An exploratory look at Hand Strength and Hand Size among Preschoolers. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2002; 15: 340–346.
    1. Newman DG, Pearn J, Barnes A, Young CM, Kehoe M, Newman J. Norms for Hand Grip Strength. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1984; 59: 453–459.
    1. Molenaar HM, Selles RW, Zuidam JM, Willemsen SP, Stam HJ, Hovius SE. Growth Diagrams for Grip Strength in Children. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2010; 468: 217–223. 10.1007/s11999-009-0881-z
    1. Annett M. The Binomial Distribution of Right, Mixed and Left Handedness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1967; 19: 327–333.
    1. Beukelaar LJ, Kroonenberg PM. Changes over Time in the Relationship between Hand Preference and Writing Hand among Left-handers. Neuropsychologia. 1986; 24: 301–303.
    1. Roszkowski MJ, Snelbecker GE, Sacks R. Young Children's Subjective Reports of Manual Preference: Internal Consistency and the Selection of the Most Representative Activity on the Basis of Item-Total Correlations. Clinical Neuropsychology. 1982; 4: 35–37.
    1. Roszkowski MJ, Snelbecker GE, Sacks R. Children's, Adolescents', and Adults' Reports of Hand Preference: Homogeneity and Discriminating Power of Selected Tasks. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology. 1981; 3: 199–213.
    1. Yahagi S, Kasai T. Motor Evoked Potentials Induced by Motor Imagery reveal a Functional Asymmetry of Cortical Motor Control in Left- and Right-Handed Human Subjects. Neuroscience Letters. 1999; 10: 185–188.
    1. Carlier M, Duyme M, Capron C, Dumont AM, Perez-Diaz F. Is a Dot-Filling Group Test a good Tool for assessing Manual Performance in Children? Neuropsychologica. 1993; 31: 233–240.
    1. Scharoun SM, Bryden PJ. Hand Preference, Performance Abilities, and Hand Selection in Children. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014; 5: 82 Published online, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00082
    1. Vingerhoets G, Acke F, Alderweireldt A, Nys J, Vandemaele P, Achten E. Cerebral Lateralization of Praxis in Right- and Left-handedness: same pattern, different strength. Human Brain Mapping. 2012; 33: 763–777. 10.1002/hbm.21247
    1. Dassonville P, Zhu X, Ugurbil K, Kim S, Ashe J. Functional Activation in Motor Cortex reflects the Direction and Degree of Handedness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997; 94 (25): 14015–14018.
    1. Van den Beld WA, van den Sanden GA, Sengers RC, Verbeek AL, Gabreëls FJ. Validity and Reproducibility of the Jamar Dynamometer in Children aged 4–11 years. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2006; 28: 1303–1309.
    1. Molenaar HM, Zuidam JM, Selles RW, Stam HJ, Hovius SER. Age-Specific Reliability of Two Grip-Strength Dynamometers when used by Children. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume. 2008; 90: 1053–1059. 10.2106/JBJS.G.00469
    1. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and Validity of Grip and Pinch Strength Evaluations. Journal of Hand Surgery, American Volume. 1984; 9: 222–226.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever